Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
Re: Phosphorescent Calcite
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThanks Dud.? I¡¯ll have to take some time to digest this.? Hitting the road now for New Hamster. ? 73 --? Ken ? From: Dude
Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2020 02:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [XRF] Phosphorescent Calcite ? Ken, Attached are some spectra from a cheap 405nm laser pointer and a 532 green. The 405nm ?lasers are direct lasers using a Gallium Nitride media and aren¡¯t frequency doubled. The 532 nm laser pointers uses a 808 nm IR pump into a Nd:YAG crystal to get 1064nm IR output which then goes into a KTP crystal that produces the 532nm green output. Some people can get confused when looking at raw spectra and don¡¯t take into account second order grading effects and report other IR peaks. Note in the 405nm 2d order picture the peak at 817.51 nm which is a 2d order ?effect where the grating allows leakage from the primary signal at a twice the wavelength (408.75 *2 = 817.50nm). I am not running a 2d order blocking filter on these spectra so you see bleed through but at a much reduced intensity. The 532 spectra show the 808nm pump but not the 1064nm due to the limited range of the spectrometer. Both 1064 and 808nm IR are making it through at a reduced power but some pointers don¡¯t have IR blocking filters on the output and have hazardous levels of IR that you can¡¯t see. Dud ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Sejkora ? Thanks Geo.? Yes, Dud offered to run an analysis, so I¡¯ll be dropping a sample in the mail to him so he can run an analysis.? He also mentioned checking the sample with a 405 nm laser pointer.? I did that last year when I first collected the samples, and did indeed see a similar response of both fluorescence and phosphorescence.? I¡¯d be interested to see a spectrogram of a typical 405 nm laser diode to see where its UV peaks come in.? I know many laser diodes actually produce their primary output in the infrared region, and they use a frequency-doubling ¡®filter¡¯ to ¡°boost¡± the response into the visible range.? Therefore, I can understand that a 405 nm laser diode is probably producing its primary emission at 810 nm, which would be in the infrared region and ?¡®invisible¡¯ to the naked eye.? I don¡¯t know if there is frequency tripling going on to produce a 270 nm peak, or if perhaps the ¡°blue¡± 405 nm laser diode is producing another longer wavelength peak that is being frequency-shifted into the UV region. ? Nope, never did venture into the ¡°flame speaker¡± realm.? Sounds very interesting.? What was the ¡®fuel¡¯ for the flame? Was it something like methane or propane, spiked with an aerosol of metal salts?? Or was the flame actually a plasma of ionized air or some other inert gas?? Yeah, the old days of ham radio with big iron, kilovolts, and vacuum tubes like the 807.? The noobs don¡¯t know what they were/are missing. ? Thanks for the comments, Geo.? Another member of the group, Charles Young, also offered to run an XRF analysis.? Perhaps when all is said and done, both will share their results with the group. ? 73 Geo. ? Ken, WB0OCV ? ? From: GEOelectronics@... ? Interesting Ken. Probably Dud's setup is the best for the light elements- but strontium is easy to do on an amateur rig, so I'll ask Nick what chemicals make red colors in fireworks. ? Which reminds me Ken, did you ever build a flame speaker? I set one up once and it was amazing. Shoot a flame between two metal screens, are biased with HV, and modulate that HV. The flame itself is spiked with a chemical salt that ionizes and is modulated in the air to create the sound. The Germans invented it, and claim almost unlimited high notes. This was long ago when ham radio was mostly still AM and every ham had HV and modulators galore. ? Geo>K0FF ? ? |