My version is 3.0, 1999 I find it easier to use.
We're talking about Pu-239 correct?:
Photon Emission Products: Pu-239
Fraction? ? Energy(MeV)
0.000476? ? 0.112910
0.044141? ? 0.013600
----- Original Message -----
From: Dude <dfemer@...>
To:
[email protected]Sent: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 19:34:02 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [XRF] Trinitite
What
version?
±á²¹³¦°ì±ð°ù¡¯²õ
Rad Decay Ver 4 shows these yields much lower 238 = La 3.79, 239 La 1.57. Other
references also support the lower yields.
Dud
?
?
Using
"Prof. C. Hacker's DECAY program",
same one as always since day 1. If you see it elsewhere, please reference the
source.
-----
Original Message -----
From: Dude <dfemer@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 16:37:34 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [XRF] Trinitite
margin: 0.0in;
font-size: 12.0pt;
font-family: "Times New Roman" , serif;
}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {
color: blue;
text-decoration: underline;
}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
color: purple;
text-decoration: underline;
}
p {
margin-right: 0.0in;
margin-left: 0.0in;
font-size: 12.0pt;
font-family: "Times New Roman" , serif;
}
span.EmailStyle18 {
font-family: Arial , sans-serif;
color: black;
}
*.MsoChpDefault {
}
div.Section1 {
page: Section1;
}
/*]]>*/
Geo,
Double
check those yields. They look to be about 3x too high. Which program were you
using?
Dud
?
From Prof. C. Hacker's DECAY
program,?
the likelihood of Pu-238 decay producing a Ka1 X-Ray from
it's progeny U-234 is 11.57%
Photon Emission Products: Pu-238
Fraction? ?Energy(MeV)
0.000473 0.055303
0.115750 0.013600
the likelihood of Pu-239 decay
producing a Ka1 X-Ray from it's progeny U-235 is 4.414% per decay:
Photon Emission Products: Pu-239??
the likelihood of Pu-240 decay producing a Ka1 X-Ray from
it's progeny U-236 is 11%
Photon Emission Products: Pu-240
Fraction Energy(MeV)
0.000525 0.054327
0.110120 0.013600
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ??
There are other paths to U daughters but their decay chain longevity is pretty
long so not included
on this list but will be considered after discussion.
