开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Re: X-Air Ultralight Aircraft Fabric protection

Xair Ontario
 

Over here there is a product called Aerothane 100 by Polyfiber
(www.polyfiber.com) which is a UV clearcoat. A lot of manufacturers in the
US now offer this as an option, mostly for cenonite coverings but it works
just as well on Dacron. Aparently Dupont makes something similar but I don't
have the exact name of it. Guy De France at Speedwing uses it (Dupont stuff)
and has very good results.

Aerothane works very well but if you regularly play with the fabric (ie:
open the fastback) it cracks and you run the chance of the cracks acting
like a knife on the rest of the fabric. I was going to cover mine but since
I keep it in an excellent hangar there is no need for the UV. Keeping stains
off on the other hand is another topic altogether. My leading edge is grey
and while is has some stains from fuel and such its not too obvious so I'm
not very worried.

Hope this helps
--
Trevor Page
X-Air Ontario Dealer
tpage@...


From: xairirl@...
Reply-To: X-Air_Ultralight_Aircraft@...
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 22:35:14 -0000
To: X-Air_Ultralight_Aircraft@...
Subject: X-Air Ultralight Aircraft Fabric protection

My new Xair is Green & yellow, and before I take it out I would like
to add sort of protection to the leading edge fabric, (yellow) to
prevent the dirt and grime getting into the weave.

I have seen alot of Xair's to date with yellow leading edges, and
once dirtied they are very hard to clean. Does anybody know of a
product I could paint on NOW to seal the weave, I know in the US they
paint the whole wing with some form of UV protection paint.

Seamus O'Donnell
Xair Ireland








---------------------------------------------------
Faster, better web-based customer support from BN3!


____________________________
Free Email/SMTP/POP, , Hosting yourname@...


Welcome

 

Welcome to X-Air Central

In this eGroup we can freely exchange ideas, building comments and
tips between builders, owners and others interested in the X-Air
Ultralight Aircraft. The group will rely on your input to make it
successful, we need your ideas, pictures and comments.

The group is unmoderated and there is no membership criteria, just
enjoy the information we can exchange.

Please take the time to check out all the options available, add a
link send a picture to the files section.

Any questions please let me know.

Thanks Michael


Up and running

 

Thanks Joe for your kind words, i have added a link to your X-Air web
site in the 'links' section.

Others can veiw your web page by following the link, i have also
uploaded some of your pictures to the 'files' section on the main
menu, when submitting photographs please send them to me to run
through Photoshop and freshen them up and compress them for faster
download, this way we can access the pictures without waiting for
several minutes for the download, it will also allow us to keep more
photographs on the web site.

thanks Michael


Amphibian Photos

 

Gday again,

I have just posted some rare photographs of both the Amphibian and the Hydro versions of the X-Air, both are available ex France.

To check them out, go to the 'files' section, select the folder 'Amphibian X-Air's and then click on each image to view.

I have attached a sample to this Email to wet your appetite (pardon the pun)

Thanks Michael


flyabout

 

G'day everyone,
Just to let everyone know what we're going to be doing:
On July 17, 2000, the Musarra Family will embark on a 6 month journey
around Australia. Our goal: to circumnavigate the continent of
Australia in an ultralight aircraft. Larry and Aren Musarra will fly
the ultralight, while the rest of the family, Lenne', Sungie, and
Tim, take the low road, following the route in a motor home.
There's a link to our web page on the egroups link area, or you can
link to it at


Rudder Pedal Extensions

 

Australian's seem to be a fairly big lot of people, a lot of our
customers, my-self included are well over 180cm (6 feet) tall. The
legroom in the X-Air is ample for most people but some need the extra
room and we have been sucessfully 'stretching' the X-Air for several
people.

Firstly, using the standard floor as a template we make the floor 100mm
longer towards the front of the aircraft, all the holes etc are drilled
as normal and the wood (12mm marine ply) is sealed and painted. I make
another two holes directly in line with the existing bolt holes for the
pedals exactly 75mm forward of their excisting positions. You cannot go
any further forward without the rudder pedals contacting the pod at full
lock. The bolts which would go through the normal pedal position are now
too long, so disgard them and purchase the correct length and grade, you
will also need two more new bolts to hold the pedals in the new
position.

The adjustable arms which attach from the normal rudder pedal position
to the front steering yoke for the front wheel will also need to be
shortened by exactly 75mm and the rudder cables will need to be
lengthened 75mm, i have attached a picture of the extensions which we
use for the rudder cables, they are stainless steel and are rated at
over 2.5 tonnes (so they are strong enough).

If your adding carpet to your floor use a good quality marine carpet as
they wont rot, they are close weave and therefore resist dirt etc, they
are easy to vacumn and designed to be washed down with water when it
gets dirty. Attach the carpet with contact adhesive to the floor and use
a soldering iron to burn the bolt holes through the carpet, this seals
each hole and will make it much easier to pass all the bolts through,
mount all the controls etc over the top of the carpet and this will help
the glue hold everything in place as the different parts are bolted to
the floor.

Hope this helps

Best Wishes, Michael Coates
Sydney, Australia. Home of the 2000 Olympics

Email mcoates@...

X-Air Web Site:


"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth
with your eyes turned skyward,
for there you have been, and there you long to return."


Tips and tricks - How to stop the fuel vents from crimping

 

Some owners have mentioned the fuel vent tubes are able to bend over and
crimp, possibly stopping the fuel supply because it can cause a vacumn
in the tanks. We have 'discovered' another idea which works really well
and it involves putting a piece of heavy duty fuel tube inside the
existing clear tubing, this
way the tube will make the bend without crimping, we also have tried a
couple of plastic 90 degree bends from water irrigation systems but they
are a lot more mucking around.

The Brit's have just started using a coiled wire, wrap some stiff wire
around a small tube several times, remove the breather and insert the
wire on the bend, so far it works but i worry about the chances of rust
etc... a couple of years down the track.


Best Wishes, Michael CoatesX-Air

Web Site:


"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth
with your eyes turned skyward,
for there you have been, and there you long to return."


Link page Up and Running

 

The link section of this group now has links to 17 X-Air sites
including the factory in France and the manufacturer of the aircraft
in India.

It will take a few hours to make your way through this bounty of
information.

To access; click on the 'Links' button on the left and choose the web
sites from there.

Enjoy

Michael Coates X-Air Australia


X-Air with Floats

 

I have just been forwarded a business card from an X-Air Customer? - Stéphane in Saint Martin , which is a French Caribbean Island, the aircraft has been fitted with hard floats and is being used in a tourist environment for joy flights etc.

Stéphane can be contacted on Email???? theostef@...

?
Best Wishes,??? Michael Coates
Sydney, Australia.? Home of the 2000 Olympics

Email mcoates@...

X-Air Web Site:?
?


Rotax 912 Powered X-Air

 

We have just posted some pictures of a Rotax 912 powered X-Air in the
'Files' section of this site.

There are plenty of close-ups of the modified engine mounts and i am
told she flies really well.

Look for the photographs in the Rotax 912 folder

Thanks Michael


Engine comparisons.

 

Anyone got true performance figures to compare the 618, 912 and the Jabiru 2.2?
We had a Thruster T500 at our airfield that had a 912 mounted. It seemed to work
OK (I flew in it), however I couldn\'t help think the advantages of the bigger
motor/prop may have been negated somewhat by the drag/weight increase.

Ofcourse, no one can dispute the 912 reliability though, which is a big bonus.


Another new member

 

Hi I am Darrel Peatey the Xair dealer for Tasmania I would like to
hear from other people with similar interests.


Re: Another new member

 

---
Hi Darrel,
I spoke to you shortly after you wrote the article re your
Xair you had just finised building in the Pacific Ultralight Mag.
You mentioned to me on the phone how much you loved the Rotax 618
with
its power. Especially on take off.
Have you flown to Cradle Mountain or down to Hobart or the east coast
as yet.

I guess you would be rugged up this time of the year for
flying...even
on the Gold Coast its been pretty cold at night lately.

Have you got doors fitted to yours...if not I bet you will be getting
them.

Cheers ...a few ports would not go astray, another cold night.

Peter




In X-Air_Ultralight_Aircraft@..., dnpeaty@b... wrote:

Hi I am Darrel Peatey the Xair dealer for Tasmania I would like to
hear from other people with similar interests.


Re: Engine comparisons.

 

--- In X-Air_Ultralight_Aircraft@..., Gordon Bailey
<gordon.bailey@j...> wrote:
Anyone got true performance figures to compare the 618, 912 and the
Jabiru 2.2?
We had a Thruster T500 at our airfield that had a 912 mounted. It
seemed to work
OK (I flew in it), however I couldn&#92;'t help think the advantages of
the bigger
motor/prop may have been negated somewhat by the drag/weight
increase.

Ofcourse, no one can dispute the 912 reliability though, which is a
big bonus.

My experience shows that the 618 and Jabiru are very similar in
performance - although the benifits of near silence in cruise is
appreciated over sensitive areas.

Our Jabiru performes very well except for climb and this directly
relates to the engine mount which makes the thrust line to high (the
propeller sits too high) if the standard engine mount was replaced
with a new one to specificcaly suit the Jabiru engine then i am sure
it would perform better in climb.

The 912 i expect would perform very well but no-one has done that
instalation in Australia, both the 912 and the Jabiru are heavier
than
the 618.

Fuel consumption is nearly identical between the Jabiru and my 618
although some of our customers are using up to 18 liters per hour on
there 618's ?? - (they probably need to be set up a bit better).

I am sure if someone could come up with some sort of engine fairing
for these engines that better consumption figures could be acheived.
If you look at the size of say the Jabiru hanging out the front and
imagine the wind resistance..... it must have a big effect


Hello all

 

Hi,

I'm Bill Magrini -- Xair Dealer in the US fort Virginia and Maryland.
I just completed my Xair F and have flown it twice. I Didn't set the
prop thrust line up properly, so it wouldn't climb so hot with two
people. I'm still tweaking the bird. I hope to have it all correct
this weekend.

Regards,

Bill


Re: X-AIR CENTRAL Re: Engine comparisons.

 

开云体育

?
----- Original Message -----
From: xair@...
.

Fuel consumption is nearly identical between the Jabiru and my 618
although some of our customers are using up to 18 liters per hour on
there 618's ?? - (they probably need to be set up a bit better).
?
Better in which way? I get about 16.5 L/h at 60Kts, 18 at 65Kts and over 20 at 70Kts, but that should be normal??
I can also stay aloft on 8.5L/Hr too!

I am sure if someone could come up with some sort of engine fairing
for these engines that better consumption figures could be acheived.
If you look at the size of say the Jabiru hanging out the front and
imagine the wind resistance..... it must have a big effect
Fairing for the 618 would be lovely too!
?
Peter







Re: X-Air F not climbing

Michael Coates
 

I'm Bill Magrini -- Xair Dealer in the US fort Virginia and
Maryland.
I just completed my Xair F and have flown it twice. I Didn't set the
prop thrust line up properly, so it wouldn't climb so hot with two
people. I'm still tweaking the bird. I hope to have it all correct
this weekend.

Regards, Bill

What do you mean by not set the thrust line up properly ??, did you
have the gearbox upside down, what engine ??

I have about 25 hours in "F" models and they should climb a little
bit
better than the standard plane on the first stage of flap, i have
found full flap on takeoff is just like throwing out an anchor, but
having said that if you commence ground roll with no flap and then at
about 35 knots pull full flap she leaps off the ground real quick.
Someone wiser and more sensible than me told me it increases your
chance of stalling dramaticaly, so he did not recommend it as part of
normal flight practices.

Overall we find the "F" model a little bit faster (about 5-8 knots)
the roll rate is also about double, other than that they are very
similar.

Please let us know what your playing with and make sure to post a
picture of your aircraft in the Files section in the folder "Aircraft
Colours".... i am trying to build a library of different colour
schemes for customers who are always asking what does a pink and
purple look like etc...

Thanks Michael


Re: Engine comparisons.

Michael Coates
 

"Peter Stuy" <pstuy@x>
wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: xair@m...
To: X-Air_Ultralight_Aircraft@...


Fuel consumption is nearly identical between the Jabiru and my 618
although some of our customers are using up to 18 liters per hour
on there 618's ?? - (they probably need to be set up a bit better).

Better in which way? I get about 16.5 L/h at 60Kts, 18 at 65Kts
and over 20 at 70Kts, but that should be normal??
I can also stay aloft on 8.5L/Hr too!

I am sure if someone could come up with some sort of engine
fairing for these engines that better consumption figures could be
acheived.

If you look at the size of say the Jabiru hanging out the front
and imagine the wind resistance..... it must have a big effect
Fairing for the 618 would be lovely too!



Reply;

The X-Air has a definate 'step' in it's performance... for about the
first month i floated around at about 50 to 55knots on the 618 at
5200
to 5300 rpm, i found when desending at this rpm the aircraft picked
up
speed to about 60 to 65 knots and the altimeter stayed the same... i
was not loosing height. With a bit of practice it's easy to get the
plane on the 'step' sometimes without even thinking about it.

You can 'drag' the plane around the sky with high rpm which means
high
fuel burn or you can learn to use the step as part of normal flight
operations.

The easy way to pick the step is to line up the wing tips with the
horizon. If the leading edge is higher than the trailing edge then
your just poking around having fun.... push the stick forward slowly
or give it a touch of trim and she will pick up speed; the increased
speed creates extra lift which keeps you flying fast without loosing
height. Look to the wing tip on the step and the leading edge is
lower
than the trailing edge when lined up with the horizon.

This technique will take about an hour to master - learn it in still
weather otherwise the thermals etc will make it hard to learn.

The other reason my economy is down is my aircraft is geared to only
run to 6200 rpm instead of the max 6750 rpm, this gives me higher
gearing which equates to faster cruise speed for a lower rpm. If your
prop allows for advustment give it a go.

Thanks Michael


Re: X-AIR CENTRAL Re: Engine comparisons.

Tony Stiller
 

Hi Gordon
I have a 2.2 Jabiru on my Xair and suffers on climb due to the thrust line, however Bert Flood has manufactured a replacement bracket for the Xiar to take the 912 and I am trying to get hold of one of these brackets to fit to my Xair so I can lower the thrust line and improve the climb rate.
The engine bracket made by Jabiru for the 2.2 bolts directly into the provided holes on the plate for the rotax engine, so I see no need for Jabiru to make up another bracket if one has already been constructed by Bert Flood.
My Xair with the 2.2 Jabiru cruises at 65 knots on 2800 rpm making the 4 stroke engine very quiet, safe and reliable to fly.
cheers
Tony

At 12:14 AM 6/17/00 +0000, you wrote:
--- In X-Air_Ultralight_Aircraft@..., Gordon Bailey
<gordon.bailey@j...> wrote:
Anyone got true performance figures to compare the 618, 912 and the
Jabiru 2.2?
We had a Thruster T500 at our airfield that had a 912 mounted. It
seemed to work
OK (I flew in it), however I couldn&#92;'t help think the advantages of
the bigger
motor/prop may have been negated somewhat by the drag/weight
increase.

Ofcourse, no one can dispute the 912 reliability though, which is a
big bonus.

My experience shows that the 618 and Jabiru are very similar in
performance - although the benifits of near silence in cruise is
appreciated over sensitive areas.

Our Jabiru performes very well except for climb and this directly
relates to the engine mount which makes the thrust line to high (the
propeller sits too high) if the standard engine mount was replaced
with a new one to specificcaly suit the Jabiru engine then i am sure
it would perform better in climb.

The 912 i expect would perform very well but no-one has done that
instalation in Australia, both the 912 and the Jabiru are heavier
than
the 618.

Fuel consumption is nearly identical between the Jabiru and my 618
although some of our customers are using up to 18 liters per hour on
there 618's ?? - (they probably need to be set up a bit better).

I am sure if someone could come up with some sort of engine fairing
for these engines that better consumption figures could be acheived.
If you look at the size of say the Jabiru hanging out the front and
imagine the wind resistance..... it must have a big effect


Re: X-AIR CENTRAL Re: Engine comparisons.

 

开云体育

Hello Tony,
?
Saw your message re 912 bracket. Do yo know how much Flood wants for it?
Appreciate your advice.
?
Cheers,
?
Peter Stuy