¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Henderson

Ruari McLennan
 

Irn Bru, all right...

Ruari

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Campbell" <scrubby64@...>
To: <W650riders@...>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson


Here's a better shot....made in Scotland, from girders...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ruari McLennan" <r.mclennan@...>
To: <W650riders@...>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson


What's the flywheel thingy right in the front of it?

Ruari

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Campbell" <scrubby64@...>
To: <W650riders@...>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 6:10 AM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson


Yip, uses a Volvo engine...


----- Original Message -----
From: "James Franklin" <jimw650@...>
To: <W650riders@...>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson


That is a Brittish "Indian", I think, because of copy rights, it can be
called an Indian in England, but if it were sold in the USA, it would be
sold as a Dakota.

Anyway, it is a much better "Indian" than those S&S V-Twin powered
California Motorcycle Company cookie cutter chopper things that won the
rights in court, to use the Indian trademark in the USA.



James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)





From: "Mark Campbell" <scrubby64@...>
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To: <W650riders@...>
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:02:27 +0100

Ok, who knows what this is....

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonhaddock@..." <jonhaddock@...>
To: <W650riders@...>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson


Like a lot of things in that era, they assumed a reasonable
understanding
of
machinery by the owner!


Neat - saves re-programming the throttle position sensor, eh?

Ruari

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonhaddock@..." <jonhaddock@...>
To: <W650riders@...>
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson



The hand operated advance/retard lever was common on Brit bikes
before
the
development of the spring loaded auto-advance mechanism. You set it
retarded
for starting, minimising kick-backs and ensuring a slow, lazy
tick-over
from
cold, and advanced it for fast running. You could also retard the
ignition
to slog up hills, which was ideal if you were pulling a chair with
the
family on board!

Jon


Go to temporary photos site - ::
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email
delivery.
::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email
delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.4/898 - Release Date:
12/07/2007
16:08



Go to temporary photos site - ::
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email
delivery.
::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email
delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links


<< emfindi1.jpg >>

_________________________________________________________________




Go to temporary photos site - ::
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email
delivery.
::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email
delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links




Go to temporary photos site - ::
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email
delivery.
::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email
delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links




Go to temporary photos site - ::
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery.
::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email
delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links



Go to temporary photos site - ::
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. ::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links




Re: The new Buell - NWC

Ruari McLennan
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Oh...? Now I get it...? Cougars etc....

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: The new Buell - NWC

Yeah.? The motorcycle ones are pretty nice looking too... ;)

In a message dated 7/15/2007 1:40:45 PM Eastern Daylight Time, hazel@... writes:



Panthers are GORGEOUS!!!

?



Rrrose.
@>-->--


Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650

 

I lost my magazine collection in my divorce, so 10 to one was from my memory as my home references are pretty much gone.



James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)





From: "Dennis J. Guggemos" <djguggms@...>
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To: <W650riders@...>
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:23:58 -0700

James
I believe the original 1970 XS1 had 9:1 compression, and all subsequent XS's
had 8.4:1.
Just FYI. Source and my challengeable memory.

Dennis

_________________________________________________________________


Re: Oil/ Oil Additives

Ruari McLennan
 

The Owner's manual unfortunately shows the fuel tap set pointing backward at "Reserve." The long end is the pointer. It should normally point forward, under "Fuel." To confirm, grab a magnifying glass and look closely at the edge of the tap handle. You should see a tiny almost invisible moulded arrow. I painted my arrow black to make it visible.

Ruari McLennan
Victoria BC

----- Original Message -----
From: "dvdberman" <dvdberman@...>
To: <W650riders@...>
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 6:03 PM
Subject: [W650riders] Oil/ Oil Additives


#1 Just joined W650riders a few days ago and really appreciate all
the
great tech advice.

#2 I've seen some mention about Shell Rotella 15W40
really smoothing out downshifts. True? Also, can the same be
accomplished with an additive? I onced tried the Rotella in my Grand
National because a buddy said it could handle the heat of the turbo
better than 5W30. In the end, I went back to 5W30 because the slight
increase in pressure from the Rotella gave me nothing in better
performance.

#3 I saw an old thread about the annoying headlight rattle. I
fixed mine without bending the flanges on the lamps ring, but
instead, ran a couple wraps of teflon tape at the seal. It snugged up
pretty good.

#4 What actually WAS the final word on the fuel tap? To be safe, I
always top off the tank before heading out. My W is a 2000 and on
page 35 of the OM it shows the "ON" position with the LONGER end of
the flange covering the "RES" lettering.

#5 Any members in Oakland County, Michigan.

Kindest Regards,

DB





Go to temporary photos site - ::
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. ::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links



Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc

 

The Victory has promise, their own engine and a parent company with a proven track record.

Kawasaki's Drifter is still the best "Indian" ever made. Hendee would have liked it. bean counters and greed killed the Springfield Indian after Hendee died.

Besides in magazines, I have never seen a EH, haven't seen a dealership either..not unusual in Hawaii I guess, but I used to spend one month a year riding around on the mainland..and never saw one.

I am not a cruiser guy, so I don't mourn the loss of EH or Indian as much as I do Norton or Vincent.



James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)





From: john gary simpson <eustisgary@...>
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To: W650riders@...
Subject: RE: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:59:52 -0700 (PDT)

Unfortunately the state taxpayers spent the money on the building. The Hanlons did a LOT of promoting, and signed up many dealerships, but they stayed with their plan to have an in-house engine instead of using a Harley=clone engine. That delayed the product by nearly three years. When they finally put it into production, it was basically untested and unrefined, Every buyer was a beta tester! The good part is that fixes for the problems have been developed by the X community and the community support structure is fantastic. After bottoming out, used X prices are heading back up. Onceset up properly (about $2000), the X is one heck of a cruising motorcycle. Mine beat all comers at Phil Peterson's Miami Harley Davidson Anniversary Dyno Shootout, including the lone Hayabusa that came to embarass the American motorcycles.
CMC/Indian imrpoved dramatically, but never got past being just another Harley clone with skirted fenders. It simply wasn't an Indian.
But had Excelsior hit the market three years sooner with a 1200 Sporty motor, there may have been enough sales to build a following and a war chest by the time they finished developing that magnificent little engine that they had designed by those Engish racing guys!

James Franklin <jimw650@...> wrote:
But now that we have brought EH into it, never read a test where the
journalists liked it, and what I did read about the company is, they spent
way too much on an extravagant office building and perks for the brothers
who started it, and should have spent more money on promotion and
establishing dealerships.

For the CMC Indian, for their last two years, they had a new CEO and build
quality was way up..but they burned a lot of bridges with their initial
bikes, mostly CDI and other component problems..but the bike was more of an
assembled than a manufactured bike.

James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)

From: "James Franklin" <jimw650@...>
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To: W650riders@...
Subject: RE: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:31:23 -1000

Actually, that quote attributed to me, was not from me, don't know where it
came from, but was probably a reply to what I had written earlier about the
CMC

James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)

From: "john gary simpson" <eustisgary@...>
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To: W650riders@...
Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:42:43 -0000

Excelsior-Henderson bit the dust when the dotcoms took off. They
needed money to ramp up production, and most of their investors
pulled out and started putting their money in dotcoms instead. Too
bad. My 11 second EH was one of the most satisfying bikes I ever
owned!--- In W650riders@..., "James Franklin"
<jimw650@...> wrote:

The Excelsior/Henderson people screwed that up even though they
had huge
backing money. Indian (California Motorcycle Company version, not
the
Springfield company original) sold really poor quality motorcycles
in the
beginning, some of it was bad suppliers...the bike was a
composite, and some
of it of course, was trying to build too many, too soon. In their
last
couple of years the product was better quality, but the bike had a
limited
market, and those really interested probably bought the original
bikes and
got burned.



James Franklin
P.O. Box 289
Waimanalo, HI 96795-0289
USA
808-225-0994 (cell)




----Original Message Follows----
From: "kevin_cooklin" <kcooklin@...>
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To: W650riders@...
Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:00:38 -0000

Hey, Den--

If I remember our goodly Gene had a GB? They are not cheap
anymore.
Distant memories
tell me my own papa (I'm not Italian but am using this for
literary effect
only) bought one,
then lost it in a poker game. The dog. He could have waited for
me to take
it for a spin.
But it's a gorgeous bike. To. Be. Sure.

Ninja. I probably just need to hop on one sometime and go crazy.
In all
honesty, I've had
this anti-crotch-rocket mentality all my life, and I don't know
why.
There's no reason for
it. I graduated from high school in 1980. There's absolutely no
sense to
it. So I need to
overcome the prejudice and give it a go. Come on out and let me
take yours
for a spin. I
still would sell off my house for a 750 Norton Roadster, though.
It be in
the blood.

Don't completely rule out the new Norton, although all bets are
most likely
on failure.
Huge undertaking, and underfunding is always the killer. [The
attempt to
bring back the
Indian is an architypal model on the subject, and they had BIG
funding].
Still, I like a guy
or gal who is so passionate about what he does that he/she f____s
up the
funding, doesn't
get it right, and yet..... had to do it. Artists, creative folk,
so rarely
get the accounting, but
they get everything else. Let's hope he gets through it.

Did you sell the W because you were tired of it or because you
wanted to
gain a couple of
other cool bikes?

kev




--- In W650riders@..., "Dennis J. Guggemos"
<djguggms@>
wrote:

Kev

The GB is buckets of fun, and a sure conversation starter just
like the
W. The Ninja isn't
a 114hp 600 four, just a lowly 65 hp twin. Tops out around 130 I
hear but
I'll never find
out for myself. It does get to the ton in a hurry though. It has a
pretty
fair power band,
kind of like a super W, useable low end, comes on the cam about 6k
and pulls
like a m-f-
r. Red line at 11k but max power at around 8800. They cheaped out
on the
suspension,
the only adjustment is rear spring preload. The forks are just
beefier W
forks. However
that frame is super stiff, the racers love it.

Sold the W to a guy that walked into the local dealer where I
had left
word. Seems like a
nice kid, said that's they way he would have wanted to fix it up
so I saved
him a lot of
trouble. He does a lot of 2-up with his gf and they like it.
They're not
really near here so
not likely I'll see it again.

I read a bike tabloid a month or so ago that told of the demise
of the
Norton. I suppose
if they can find another bunch of money it could still be a go. I
don't
trust everything I read
on their website now as the $ meltdown happened months ago but the
website
didn't say
anything about it.

Dennis






----- Original Message -----
From: kevin_cooklin
To: W650riders@...
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:29 AM
Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all....


Dennis--

Wow, two other bikes.... and sold your W. Hey, the GB500 has
to be a
blast, as does the
Ninja. I'm pretty sure I'd kill myself with a Ninja. Of
course, now
that you've sold the W,
you must resign your office! Kidding, of course. Did you sell
the W to
a pal, or on Ebay,
or.... just curious.

Did the new Norton just call it quits recently? I was
checking them as
recently as a
month
ago; at that time they indicated they'd quit their factory
and were in
search for another.
They were also seeking more money, of course. But they had
not formally
thrown in
the
towel. What a shame. But heck, that new Ducati Sport Classic,
the GT,
sure looks nice.
Haven't seen one for real yet.

Yes, need to get out there more on the bike. It's already
feeling like
fall here in PA.

Best,

kev
Recent Activity
a.. 16New Members
b.. 1New Files
Visit Your Group
SPONSORED LINKS
a.. Kawasaki motorcycles
b.. Kawasaki vulcan
c.. Kawasaki motorcycle accessory
d.. Kawasaki motorcycle exhaust
e.. Kawasaki motorcycle part
Yahoo! News
Space News

Get the latest

space related news

Y! Toolbar
Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups
Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.
.
__________________________________________________________


__________________________________________________________







---------------------------------
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!

_________________________________________________________________
Need a brain boost? Recharge with a stimulating game. Play now!


Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650

john gary simpson
 

In my experience, changing an 883 into a 1200 is an afternoon's work and three hundred bucks. That makes the 883 comparison moot.

James Franklin wrote:
A stock 1200 Sportster is doing the 1/4 in 13.02...half a second quicker
than the fastest W 650 I have ever seen a test on. At 100 MPH (the HDs
terminal speed), 1/2 second would be about 75 feet ahead, the W rider would
know he lost, but the Sportster rider would know he was close.

The 1200 makes 64.4 HP, 20 more than a stock W.

It's stock torque is 72.7 lb-ft at 3700 RPM, which would be around 70 MPH,
or twice what the W has at that speed in 5th.

A W, not even a 50 HP W, is not much of a roll-on challenge for a 1200
Sportster.

But an 883, which costs (supposedly) closer to the W, really isn't in the
same performance class.

The 883 makes 43.1 HP, about two less than the average W, yet weighs 50 lbs
more.

the 883 makes 43 ft lbs torque at 4550 RPM, the W 37.5 5100 RPM (that is
around 80 MPH for the W)

The best 1/4 mile I have seen for an 883..15.16 sec at 88.33 MPH (that puts
it right there with a good Honda CB 350 or a Suzuki X6 Hustler). The
slowest W test I have is 14.33 @ 92.34

The W, when compared to the Sportster, is a revver. When you compare it to
a stock 883, you get a lot more performance for your money. The 883 needs
pipes, and a cam, with a little chip manipulation to match a stock W. Not
much after market hi-perf stuff is available for the W, but the W is a
retro, and it is quicker than a 60s Bonneville or Lightning. And the W is
pretty low key, it has a compression ratio of only 8.4 to 1, whereas the
Yamaha XS 650 was 10 to 1. Has anyone shaved the heads on a W to see what
kind of power is available there? Jon, you just did pipes and jets and got
50 HP.

Jon, you probably beat the rider, not the machine, if what you rolled away
from was a 1200 and you did it in 5th gear, but there is no dishonor in
downshifting if the other bike has a 500cc advantage. I have ridden a lot of
Sportsters (883s/1000s/1200s)..none of the rubber mounted engine ones
yet..but I never rode a Sportster as comfortable as the W, or as confidant
at parking lot speeds. And I bet Lucy was much more comfortable on the back
of your W than she would have been on that skinny slab HD provides for a
passenger on the Sportster.



James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)





From: "Jonhaddock@..."
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To:
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:56:42 +0100


Well a stock one isn't as quick as a W650 which is about as slow as modern
motorcycles get....which makes the Sporty pretty slow. Certainly my warmed
up W will beat a loud piped 1200 Sporty from 60 to 100 plus....two
up.....And Lucy was on the back when we did it...


>A 1200 Sporty is by no means slow. It's about as fast a Harley
> platform as there is. /--- In W650riders@..., "Alexander
> Ward" wrote:
>>
>> I've been lurking on this list for years, but now I have to chime
> in
>> on this topic.
>>
>> I think the Sportster is a great partner to the W650. I have both
> a
>> 2000 W650 and a 1996 Sportster XL1200S Sport. The Sport has
>> adjustable Showa forks and dual front discs. If you add rearsets
> and
>> clipons and a decent seat, then it becomes a really fun scoot. '
>>
>> No, it is not particularly fast, but the wide flat powerband
>> and more than ample torque combine with decent handling and
> braking
>> to make it easy to ride without requiring a lot of work. If you
>> switch to 17" wheels and sticky tires it gets even better. Don't
>> worry about the vibration if you buy an older one with a solid-
> mount
>> engine, just install BalanceMasters active vibration dampers and
>> fiddle with the final drive ratios (or even switch to chain drive)
>> and once it is dialed in, then just enjoy it.
>>
>> Although any Japanese 600 can run rings around it, that is
> balanced
>> out by the double-takes from all of the head-to-toe leather-clad
>> dumplings on their cool Harleys who are cruising along at 30mph
> when
>> you pass them on the outside of a curve.
>>
>> You do have to think about it though. One of the classic
> disparaging
>> comments about Harleys is that they vibrate so much that parts
> fall
>> off. It is true, too. the first time I rode the Sporty any
>> distance, both mirrors, the taillight, and one turn signal fell
> off.
>> I felt like I had finally gained admittance to a long and proud
>> tradition!
>>
>> At any rate, keep the W650, get a Sportster too.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> --- In W650riders@..., "Larry Botheras"
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Think long and hard. unless it's tricked up the 1200 sporty
> will
>> feel
>> > slower than the W IMHO, it's not that much more powerful (HD
> never
>> quote)
>> > but it is a lot heavier
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: W650riders@...
>> [mailto:W650riders@...] On
>> > Behalf Of John
>> > Sent: 11 July 2007 06:39
>> > To: W650riders@...
>> > Subject: [W650riders] Thinking about getting rid of my w650
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I found a sportster 1200r that's tempting me to get rid of the
> w.
>> What
>> > are your thoughts on the 2006 sportster 1200 roadster?
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
> Go to temporary photos site - http://tinyurl.com/yuade ::
> Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email
delivery.
> ::
> Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email
> delivery.
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.6/900 - Release Date:
14/07/2007
> 15:36
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary!?
http://club.live.com/chicktionary.aspx?icid=chick_hotmailtextlink2



Go to temporary photos site - http://tinyurl.com/yuade ::
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. ::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/W650riders/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/W650riders/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:W650riders-digest@...
mailto:W650riders-fullfeatured@...

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
W650riders-unsubscribe@...

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Looking for earth-friendly autos?
at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.


Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650

Ruari McLennan
 

How much does the Halrey weigh, James?

Ruari

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Franklin" <jimw650@...>
To: <W650riders@...>
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650


A stock 1200 Sportster is doing the 1/4 in 13.02...half a second quicker
than the fastest W 650 I have ever seen a test on. At 100 MPH (the HDs
terminal speed), 1/2 second would be about 75 feet ahead, the W rider would
know he lost, but the Sportster rider would know he was close.

The 1200 makes 64.4 HP, 20 more than a stock W.

It's stock torque is 72.7 lb-ft at 3700 RPM, which would be around 70 MPH,
or twice what the W has at that speed in 5th.

A W, not even a 50 HP W, is not much of a roll-on challenge for a 1200
Sportster.

But an 883, which costs (supposedly) closer to the W, really isn't in the
same performance class.

The 883 makes 43.1 HP, about two less than the average W, yet weighs 50 lbs
more.

the 883 makes 43 ft lbs torque at 4550 RPM, the W 37.5 5100 RPM (that is
around 80 MPH for the W)

The best 1/4 mile I have seen for an 883..15.16 sec at 88.33 MPH (that puts
it right there with a good Honda CB 350 or a Suzuki X6 Hustler). The
slowest W test I have is 14.33 @ 92.34

The W, when compared to the Sportster, is a revver. When you compare it to
a stock 883, you get a lot more performance for your money. The 883 needs
pipes, and a cam, with a little chip manipulation to match a stock W. Not
much after market hi-perf stuff is available for the W, but the W is a
retro, and it is quicker than a 60s Bonneville or Lightning. And the W is
pretty low key, it has a compression ratio of only 8.4 to 1, whereas the
Yamaha XS 650 was 10 to 1. Has anyone shaved the heads on a W to see what
kind of power is available there? Jon, you just did pipes and jets and got
50 HP.

Jon, you probably beat the rider, not the machine, if what you rolled away
from was a 1200 and you did it in 5th gear, but there is no dishonor in
downshifting if the other bike has a 500cc advantage. I have ridden a lot of
Sportsters (883s/1000s/1200s)..none of the rubber mounted engine ones
yet..but I never rode a Sportster as comfortable as the W, or as confidant
at parking lot speeds. And I bet Lucy was much more comfortable on the back
of your W than she would have been on that skinny slab HD provides for a
passenger on the Sportster.



James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)





From: "Jonhaddock@..." <jonhaddock@...>
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To: <W650riders@...>
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:56:42 +0100


Well a stock one isn't as quick as a W650 which is about as slow as modern
motorcycles get....which makes the Sporty pretty slow. Certainly my warmed
up W will beat a loud piped 1200 Sporty from 60 to 100 plus....two
up.....And Lucy was on the back when we did it...


A 1200 Sporty is by no means slow. It's about as fast a Harley
platform as there is. /--- In W650riders@..., "Alexander
Ward" <award@...> wrote:

I've been lurking on this list for years, but now I have to chime
in
on this topic.

I think the Sportster is a great partner to the W650. I have both
a
2000 W650 and a 1996 Sportster XL1200S Sport. The Sport has
adjustable Showa forks and dual front discs. If you add rearsets
and
clipons and a decent seat, then it becomes a really fun scoot. '

No, it is not particularly fast, but the wide flat powerband
and more than ample torque combine with decent handling and
braking
to make it easy to ride without requiring a lot of work. If you
switch to 17" wheels and sticky tires it gets even better. Don't
worry about the vibration if you buy an older one with a solid-
mount
engine, just install BalanceMasters active vibration dampers and
fiddle with the final drive ratios (or even switch to chain drive)
and once it is dialed in, then just enjoy it.

Although any Japanese 600 can run rings around it, that is
balanced
out by the double-takes from all of the head-to-toe leather-clad
dumplings on their cool Harleys who are cruising along at 30mph
when
you pass them on the outside of a curve.

You do have to think about it though. One of the classic
disparaging
comments about Harleys is that they vibrate so much that parts
fall
off. It is true, too. the first time I rode the Sporty any
distance, both mirrors, the taillight, and one turn signal fell
off.
I felt like I had finally gained admittance to a long and proud
tradition!

At any rate, keep the W650, get a Sportster too.

Alex

--- In W650riders@..., "Larry Botheras"
<larry.botheras@> wrote:

Think long and hard. unless it's tricked up the 1200 sporty
will
feel
slower than the W IMHO, it's not that much more powerful (HD
never
quote)
but it is a lot heavier



From: W650riders@...
[mailto:W650riders@...] On
Behalf Of John
Sent: 11 July 2007 06:39
To: W650riders@...
Subject: [W650riders] Thinking about getting rid of my w650



I found a sportster 1200r that's tempting me to get rid of the
w.
What
are your thoughts on the 2006 sportster 1200 roadster?



Go to temporary photos site - ::
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email
delivery.
::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email
delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.6/900 - Release Date:
14/07/2007
15:36

_________________________________________________________________
Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary!




Go to temporary photos site - ::
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. ::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links




Re: Oil/ Oil Additives

 

#4 - The manual is wrong. :)

Jake

----- Original Message -----
From: "dvdberman" <dvdberman@...>


#1 Just joined W650riders a few days ago and really appreciate all
the
great tech advice.

#2 I've seen some mention about Shell Rotella 15W40
really smoothing out downshifts. True? Also, can the same be
accomplished with an additive? I onced tried the Rotella in my Grand
National because a buddy said it could handle the heat of the turbo
better than 5W30. In the end, I went back to 5W30 because the slight
increase in pressure from the Rotella gave me nothing in better
performance.

#3 I saw an old thread about the annoying headlight rattle. I
fixed mine without bending the flanges on the lamps ring, but
instead, ran a couple wraps of teflon tape at the seal. It snugged up
pretty good.

#4 What actually WAS the final word on the fuel tap? To be safe, I
always top off the tank before heading out. My W is a 2000 and on
page 35 of the OM it shows the "ON" position with the LONGER end of
the flange covering the "RES" lettering.

#5 Any members in Oakland County, Michigan.

Kindest Regards,

DB


Re: Need Help w/ Petition

Ruari McLennan
 

Thanks, Kirk, I will sign now!

Ruari

----- Original Message -----
From: "John" <schnozejt@...>
To: <W650riders@...>
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 2:53 PM
Subject: [W650riders] Re: Need Help w/ Petition


I appreciate it much Kirk

--- In W650riders@..., Kirk Johnson <johnsonkirk@...> wrote:

I signed his petition and some time ago and have had
absolutly no problems.
Kirk

--- Ruari McLennan <r.mclennan@...> wrote:

John, my MacAfee Site Advisor program has a big red
flag against your site,
indicating it is "very spammy," and advising
against going there. That's
why I haven't signed, I don't want spam and pop-ups
afterwards.

Ruari McLennan
Victoria BC

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 7:52 PM
Subject: [W650riders] Need Help w/ Petition
Hello,

I need help with getting more people sign my
petition to bring back
the W650 to the US. Any suggestions?

www.petitionspot.com/petitions/bringw6502usa

Thanks
-John



Go to temporary photos site - ::
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. ::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links



Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650

 

James
I believe the original 1970 XS1 had 9:1 compression, and all subsequent XS's had 8.4:1.
Just FYI. Source and my challengeable memory.

Dennis

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Franklin" <jimw650@...>
To: <W650riders@...>
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650


And the W is
pretty low key, it has a compression ratio of only 8.4 to 1, whereas the
Yamaha XS 650 was 10 to 1.


Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650

 

A stock 1200 Sportster is doing the 1/4 in 13.02...half a second quicker than the fastest W 650 I have ever seen a test on. At 100 MPH (the HDs terminal speed), 1/2 second would be about 75 feet ahead, the W rider would know he lost, but the Sportster rider would know he was close.

The 1200 makes 64.4 HP, 20 more than a stock W.

It's stock torque is 72.7 lb-ft at 3700 RPM, which would be around 70 MPH, or twice what the W has at that speed in 5th.

A W, not even a 50 HP W, is not much of a roll-on challenge for a 1200 Sportster.

But an 883, which costs (supposedly) closer to the W, really isn't in the same performance class.

The 883 makes 43.1 HP, about two less than the average W, yet weighs 50 lbs more.

the 883 makes 43 ft lbs torque at 4550 RPM, the W 37.5 5100 RPM (that is around 80 MPH for the W)

The best 1/4 mile I have seen for an 883..15.16 sec at 88.33 MPH (that puts it right there with a good Honda CB 350 or a Suzuki X6 Hustler). The slowest W test I have is 14.33 @ 92.34

The W, when compared to the Sportster, is a revver. When you compare it to a stock 883, you get a lot more performance for your money. The 883 needs pipes, and a cam, with a little chip manipulation to match a stock W. Not much after market hi-perf stuff is available for the W, but the W is a retro, and it is quicker than a 60s Bonneville or Lightning. And the W is pretty low key, it has a compression ratio of only 8.4 to 1, whereas the Yamaha XS 650 was 10 to 1. Has anyone shaved the heads on a W to see what kind of power is available there? Jon, you just did pipes and jets and got 50 HP.

Jon, you probably beat the rider, not the machine, if what you rolled away from was a 1200 and you did it in 5th gear, but there is no dishonor in downshifting if the other bike has a 500cc advantage. I have ridden a lot of Sportsters (883s/1000s/1200s)..none of the rubber mounted engine ones yet..but I never rode a Sportster as comfortable as the W, or as confidant at parking lot speeds. And I bet Lucy was much more comfortable on the back of your W than she would have been on that skinny slab HD provides for a passenger on the Sportster.



James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)





From: "Jonhaddock@..." <jonhaddock@...>
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To: <W650riders@...>
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:56:42 +0100


Well a stock one isn't as quick as a W650 which is about as slow as modern
motorcycles get....which makes the Sporty pretty slow. Certainly my warmed
up W will beat a loud piped 1200 Sporty from 60 to 100 plus....two
up.....And Lucy was on the back when we did it...


A 1200 Sporty is by no means slow. It's about as fast a Harley
platform as there is. /--- In W650riders@..., "Alexander
Ward" <award@...> wrote:

I've been lurking on this list for years, but now I have to chime
in
on this topic.

I think the Sportster is a great partner to the W650. I have both
a
2000 W650 and a 1996 Sportster XL1200S Sport. The Sport has
adjustable Showa forks and dual front discs. If you add rearsets
and
clipons and a decent seat, then it becomes a really fun scoot. '

No, it is not particularly fast, but the wide flat powerband
and more than ample torque combine with decent handling and
braking
to make it easy to ride without requiring a lot of work. If you
switch to 17" wheels and sticky tires it gets even better. Don't
worry about the vibration if you buy an older one with a solid-
mount
engine, just install BalanceMasters active vibration dampers and
fiddle with the final drive ratios (or even switch to chain drive)
and once it is dialed in, then just enjoy it.

Although any Japanese 600 can run rings around it, that is
balanced
out by the double-takes from all of the head-to-toe leather-clad
dumplings on their cool Harleys who are cruising along at 30mph
when
you pass them on the outside of a curve.

You do have to think about it though. One of the classic
disparaging
comments about Harleys is that they vibrate so much that parts
fall
off. It is true, too. the first time I rode the Sporty any
distance, both mirrors, the taillight, and one turn signal fell
off.
I felt like I had finally gained admittance to a long and proud
tradition!

At any rate, keep the W650, get a Sportster too.

Alex

--- In W650riders@..., "Larry Botheras"
<larry.botheras@> wrote:

Think long and hard. unless it's tricked up the 1200 sporty
will
feel
slower than the W IMHO, it's not that much more powerful (HD
never
quote)
but it is a lot heavier



From: W650riders@...
[mailto:W650riders@...] On
Behalf Of John
Sent: 11 July 2007 06:39
To: W650riders@...
Subject: [W650riders] Thinking about getting rid of my w650



I found a sportster 1200r that's tempting me to get rid of the
w.
What
are your thoughts on the 2006 sportster 1200 roadster?



Go to temporary photos site - ::
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email
delivery.
::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email
delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.6/900 - Release Date:
14/07/2007
15:36

_________________________________________________________________
Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary!


Oil/ Oil Additives

 

#1 Just joined W650riders a few days ago and really appreciate all
the
great tech advice.

#2 I've seen some mention about Shell Rotella 15W40
really smoothing out downshifts. True? Also, can the same be
accomplished with an additive? I onced tried the Rotella in my Grand
National because a buddy said it could handle the heat of the turbo
better than 5W30. In the end, I went back to 5W30 because the slight
increase in pressure from the Rotella gave me nothing in better
performance.

#3 I saw an old thread about the annoying headlight rattle. I
fixed mine without bending the flanges on the lamps ring, but
instead, ran a couple wraps of teflon tape at the seal. It snugged up
pretty good.

#4 What actually WAS the final word on the fuel tap? To be safe, I
always top off the tank before heading out. My W is a 2000 and on
page 35 of the OM it shows the "ON" position with the LONGER end of
the flange covering the "RES" lettering.

#5 Any members in Oakland County, Michigan.

Kindest Regards,

DB


Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc

john gary simpson
 

Unfortunately the state taxpayers spent the money on the building.? The Hanlons did a LOT of promoting, and signed up many dealerships, but they stayed with their plan to have an in-house engine instead of using a Harley=clone engine.? That delayed the product by nearly three years.? When they finally put it into production, it was basically untested and unrefined,? Every buyer was a beta tester!? The good part is that fixes for the problems have been developed by the X community and the community support structure is fantastic.? After bottoming out, used X prices are heading back up.? Onceset up properly (about $2000), the X is one heck of a cruising motorcycle.? Mine beat all comers at Phil Peterson's Miami Harley Davidson Anniversary Dyno Shootout, including the lone Hayabusa that came to?embarass the American motorcycles.
CMC/Indian imrpoved dramatically, but never got?past being just another Harley clone with skirted fenders. It simply wasn't an Indian.
But had Excelsior hit the market three years sooner with a 1200 Sporty motor, there may have been enough sales to build a following and a war chest by the time they finished developing that magnificent little engine that they had designed by those Engish racing guys!

James Franklin wrote:
But now that we have brought EH into it, never read a test where the
journalists liked it, and what I did read about the company is, they spent
way too much on an extravagant office building and perks for the brothers
who started it, and should have spent more money on promotion and
establishing dealerships.

For the CMC Indian, for their last two years, they had a new CEO and build
quality was way up..but they burned a lot of bridges with their initial
bikes, mostly CDI and other component problems..but the bike was more of an
assembled than a manufactured bike.

James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)

From: "James Franklin" <jimw650@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com
To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:31:23 -1000

Actually, that quote attributed to me, was not from me, don't know where it
came from, but was probably a reply to what I had written earlier about the
CMC

James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)

From: "john gary simpson" <eustisgary@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com
To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:42:43 -0000

Excelsior-Henderson bit the dust when the dotcoms took off. They
needed money to ramp up production, and most of their investors
pulled out and started putting their money in dotcoms instead. Too
bad. My 11 second EH was one of the most satisfying bikes I ever
owned!--- In W650riders@yahoogroups.com, "James Franklin"
> wrote:
>
> The Excelsior/Henderson people screwed that up even though they
had huge
> backing money. Indian (California Motorcycle Company version, not
the
> Springfield company original) sold really poor quality motorcycles
in the
> beginning, some of it was bad suppliers...the bike was a
composite, and some
> of it of course, was trying to build too many, too soon. In their
last
> couple of years the product was better quality, but the bike had a
limited
> market, and those really interested probably bought the original
bikes and
> got burned.
>
>
>
> James Franklin
> P.O. Box 289
> Waimanalo, HI 96795-0289
> USA
> 808-225-0994 (cell)
>
>
>
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "kevin_cooklin" .>
> Reply-To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com
> To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:00:38 -0000
>
> Hey, Den--
>
> If I remember our goodly Gene had a GB? They are not cheap
anymore.
> Distant memories
> tell me my own papa (I'm not Italian but am using this for
literary effect
> only) bought one,
> then lost it in a poker game. The dog. He could have waited for
me to take
> it for a spin.
> But it's a gorgeous bike. To. Be. Sure.
>
> Ninja. I probably just need to hop on one sometime and go crazy.
In all
> honesty, I've had
> this anti-crotch-rocket mentality all my life, and I don't know
why.
> There's no reason for
> it. I graduated from high school in 1980. There's absolutely no
sense to
> it. So I need to
> overcome the prejudice and give it a go. Come on out and let me
take yours
> for a spin. I
> still would sell off my house for a 750 Norton Roadster, though.
It be in
> the blood.
>
> Don't completely rule out the new Norton, although all bets are
most likely
> on failure.
> Huge undertaking, and underfunding is always the killer. [The
attempt to
> bring back the
> Indian is an architypal model on the subject, and they had BIG
funding].
> Still, I like a guy
> or gal who is so passionate about what he does that he/she f____s
up the
> funding, doesn't
> get it right, and yet..... had to do it. Artists, creative folk,
so rarely
> get the accounting, but
> they get everything else. Let's hope he gets through it.
>
> Did you sell the W because you were tired of it or because you
wanted to
> gain a couple of
> other cool bikes?
>
> kev
>
>
>
>
> --- In W650riders@yahoogroups.com, "Dennis J. Guggemos"

> wrote:
> >
> > Kev
> >
> > The GB is buckets of fun, and a sure conversation starter just
like the
> W. The Ninja isn't
> a 114hp 600 four, just a lowly 65 hp twin. Tops out around 130 I
hear but
> I'll never find
> out for myself. It does get to the ton in a hurry though. It has a
pretty
> fair power band,
> kind of like a super W, useable low end, comes on the cam about 6k
and pulls
> like a m-f-
> r. Red line at 11k but max power at around 8800. They cheaped out
on the
> suspension,
> the only adjustment is rear spring preload. The forks are just
beefier W
> forks. However
> that frame is super stiff, the racers love it.
> >
> > Sold the W to a guy that walked into the local dealer where I
had left
> word. Seems like a
> nice kid, said that's they way he would have wanted to fix it up
so I saved
> him a lot of
> trouble. He does a lot of 2-up with his gf and they like it.
They're not
> really near here so
> not likely I'll see it again.
> >
> > I read a bike tabloid a month or so ago that told of the demise
of the
> Norton. I suppose
> if they can find another bunch of money it could still be a go. I
don't
> trust everything I read
> on their website now as the $ meltdown happened months ago but the
website
> didn't say
> anything about it.
> >
> > Dennis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: kevin_cooklin
> > To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:29 AM
> > Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all....
> >
> >
> > Dennis--
> >
> > Wow, two other bikes.... and sold your W. Hey, the GB500 has
to be a
> blast, as does the
> > Ninja. I'm pretty sure I'd kill myself with a Ninja. Of
course, now
> that you've sold the W,
> > you must resign your office! Kidding, of course. Did you sell
the W to
> a pal, or on Ebay,
> > or.... just curious.
> >
> > Did the new Norton just call it quits recently? I was
checking them as
> recently as a
> month
> > ago; at that time they indicated they'd quit their factory
and were in
> search for another.
> > They were also seeking more money, of course. But they had
not formally
> thrown in
> the
> > towel. What a shame. But heck, that new Ducati Sport Classic,
the GT,
> sure looks nice.
> > Haven't seen one for real yet.
> >
> > Yes, need to get out there more on the bike. It's already
feeling like
> fall here in PA.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > kev
> > Recent Activity
> > a.. 16New Members
> > b.. 1New Files
> > Visit Your Group
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > a.. Kawasaki motorcycles
> > b.. Kawasaki vulcan
> > c.. Kawasaki motorcycle accessory
> > d.. Kawasaki motorcycle exhaust
> > e.. Kawasaki motorcycle part
> > Yahoo! News
> > Space News
> >
> > Get the latest
> >
> > space related news
> >
> > Y! Toolbar
> > Get it Free!
> >
> > easy 1-click access
> >
> > to your groups.
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups
> > Start a group
> >
> > in 3 easy steps.
> >
> > Connect with others.
> > .
> >
>

__________________________________________________________


__________________________________________________________




Shape Yahoo! in your own image.


Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650

 

Well a stock one isn't as quick as a W650 which is about as slow as modern motorcycles get....which makes the Sporty pretty slow. Certainly my warmed up W will beat a loud piped 1200 Sporty from 60 to 100 plus....two up.....And Lucy was on the back when we did it...

A 1200 Sporty is by no means slow. It's about as fast a Harley
platform as there is. /--- In W650riders@..., "Alexander
Ward" <award@...> wrote:

I've been lurking on this list for years, but now I have to chime
in
on this topic.

I think the Sportster is a great partner to the W650. I have both
a
2000 W650 and a 1996 Sportster XL1200S Sport. The Sport has
adjustable Showa forks and dual front discs. If you add rearsets
and
clipons and a decent seat, then it becomes a really fun scoot. '

No, it is not particularly fast, but the wide flat powerband
and more than ample torque combine with decent handling and
braking
to make it easy to ride without requiring a lot of work. If you
switch to 17" wheels and sticky tires it gets even better. Don't
worry about the vibration if you buy an older one with a solid-
mount
engine, just install BalanceMasters active vibration dampers and
fiddle with the final drive ratios (or even switch to chain drive)
and once it is dialed in, then just enjoy it.

Although any Japanese 600 can run rings around it, that is
balanced
out by the double-takes from all of the head-to-toe leather-clad
dumplings on their cool Harleys who are cruising along at 30mph
when
you pass them on the outside of a curve.

You do have to think about it though. One of the classic
disparaging
comments about Harleys is that they vibrate so much that parts
fall
off. It is true, too. the first time I rode the Sporty any
distance, both mirrors, the taillight, and one turn signal fell
off.
I felt like I had finally gained admittance to a long and proud
tradition!

At any rate, keep the W650, get a Sportster too.

Alex

--- In W650riders@..., "Larry Botheras"
<larry.botheras@> wrote:

Think long and hard. unless it's tricked up the 1200 sporty
will
feel
slower than the W IMHO, it's not that much more powerful (HD
never
quote)
but it is a lot heavier



From: W650riders@...
[mailto:W650riders@...] On
Behalf Of John
Sent: 11 July 2007 06:39
To: W650riders@...
Subject: [W650riders] Thinking about getting rid of my w650



I found a sportster 1200r that's tempting me to get rid of the
w.
What
are your thoughts on the 2006 sportster 1200 roadster?



Go to temporary photos site - ::
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. ::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.6/900 - Release Date: 14/07/2007 15:36


Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc

john gary simpson
 

I always considered the CMC/Indian to be something P.T. Barnum would have been proud to have sold.

James Franklin wrote:
Actually, that quote attributed to me, was not from me, don't know where it
came from, but was probably a reply to what I had written earlier about the
CMC

James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)

From: "john gary simpson" <eustisgary@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com
To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:42:43 -0000

Excelsior-Henderson bit the dust when the dotcoms took off. They
needed money to ramp up production, and most of their investors
pulled out and started putting their money in dotcoms instead. Too
bad. My 11 second EH was one of the most satisfying bikes I ever
owned!--- In W650riders@yahoogroups.com, "James Franklin"
> wrote:
>
> The Excelsior/Henderson people screwed that up even though they
had huge
> backing money. Indian (California Motorcycle Company version, not
the
> Springfield company original) sold really poor quality motorcycles
in the
> beginning, some of it was bad suppliers...the bike was a
composite, and some
> of it of course, was trying to build too many, too soon. In their
last
> couple of years the product was better quality, but the bike had a
limited
> market, and those really interested probably bought the original
bikes and
> got burned.
>
>
>
> James Franklin
> P.O. Box 289
> Waimanalo, HI 96795-0289
> USA
> 808-225-0994 (cell)
>
>
>
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "kevin_cooklin" .>
> Reply-To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com
> To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:00:38 -0000
>
> Hey, Den--
>
> If I remember our goodly Gene had a GB? They are not cheap
anymore.
> Distant memories
> tell me my own papa (I'm not Italian but am using this for
literary effect
> only) bought one,
> then lost it in a poker game. The dog. He could have waited for
me to take
> it for a spin.
> But it's a gorgeous bike. To. Be. Sure.
>
> Ninja. I probably just need to hop on one sometime and go crazy.
In all
> honesty, I've had
> this anti-crotch-rocket mentality all my life, and I don't know
why.
> There's no reason for
> it. I graduated from high school in 1980. There's absolutely no
sense to
> it. So I need to
> overcome the prejudice and give it a go. Come on out and let me
take yours
> for a spin. I
> still would sell off my house for a 750 Norton Roadster, though.
It be in
> the blood.
>
> Don't completely rule out the new Norton, although all bets are
most likely
> on failure.
> Huge undertaking, and underfunding is always the killer. [The
attempt to
> bring back the
> Indian is an architypal model on the subject, and they had BIG
funding].
> Still, I like a guy
> or gal who is so passionate about what he does that he/she f____s
up the
> funding, doesn't
> get it right, and yet..... had to do it. Artists, creative folk,
so rarely
> get the accounting, but
> they get everything else. Let's hope he gets through it.
>
> Did you sell the W because you were tired of it or because you
wanted to
> gain a couple of
> other cool bikes?
>
> kev
>
>
>
>
> --- In W650riders@yahoogroups.com, "Dennis J. Guggemos"

> wrote:
> >
> > Kev
> >
> > The GB is buckets of fun, and a sure conversation starter just
like the
> W. The Ninja isn't
> a 114hp 600 four, just a lowly 65 hp twin. Tops out around 130 I
hear but
> I'll never find
> out for myself. It does get to the ton in a hurry though. It has a
pretty
> fair power band,
> kind of like a super W, useable low end, comes on the cam about 6k
and pulls
> like a m-f-
> r. Red line at 11k but max power at around 8800. They cheaped out
on the
> suspension,
> the only adjustment is rear spring preload. The forks are just
beefier W
> forks. However
> that frame is super stiff, the racers love it.
> >
> > Sold the W to a guy that walked into the local dealer where I
had left
> word. Seems like a
> nice kid, said that's they way he would have wanted to fix it up
so I saved
> him a lot of
> trouble. He does a lot of 2-up with his gf and they like it.
They're not
> really near here so
> not likely I'll see it again.
> >
> > I read a bike tabloid a month or so ago that told of the demise
of the
> Norton. I suppose
> if they can find another bunch of money it could still be a go. I
don't
> trust everything I read
> on their website now as the $ meltdown happened months ago but the
website
> didn't say
> anything about it.
> >
> > Dennis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: kevin_cooklin
> > To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:29 AM
> > Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all....
> >
> >
> > Dennis--
> >
> > Wow, two other bikes.... and sold your W. Hey, the GB500 has
to be a
> blast, as does the
> > Ninja. I'm pretty sure I'd kill myself with a Ninja. Of
course, now
> that you've sold the W,
> > you must resign your office! Kidding, of course. Did you sell
the W to
> a pal, or on Ebay,
> > or.... just curious.
> >
> > Did the new Norton just call it quits recently? I was
checking them as
> recently as a
> month
> > ago; at that time they indicated they'd quit their factory
and were in
> search for another.
> > They were also seeking more money, of course. But they had
not formally
> thrown in
> the
> > towel. What a shame. But heck, that new Ducati Sport Classic,
the GT,
> sure looks nice.
> > Haven't seen one for real yet.
> >
> > Yes, need to get out there more on the bike. It's already
feeling like
> fall here in PA.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > kev
> > Recent Activity
> > a.. 16New Members
> > b.. 1New Files
> > Visit Your Group
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > a.. Kawasaki motorcycles
> > b.. Kawasaki vulcan
> > c.. Kawasaki motorcycle accessory
> > d.. Kawasaki motorcycle exhaust
> > e.. Kawasaki motorcycle part
> > Yahoo! News
> > Space News
> >
> > Get the latest
> >
> > space related news
> >
> > Y! Toolbar
> > Get it Free!
> >
> > easy 1-click access
> >
> > to your groups.
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups
> > Start a group
> >
> > in 3 easy steps.
> >
> > Connect with others.
> > .
> >
>

__________________________________________________________




No need to miss a message.
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile.


Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc

 

But now that we have brought EH into it, never read a test where the journalists liked it, and what I did read about the company is, they spent way too much on an extravagant office building and perks for the brothers who started it, and should have spent more money on promotion and establishing dealerships.

For the CMC Indian, for their last two years, they had a new CEO and build quality was way up..but they burned a lot of bridges with their initial bikes, mostly CDI and other component problems..but the bike was more of an assembled than a manufactured bike.



James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)





From: "James Franklin" <jimw650@...>
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To: W650riders@...
Subject: RE: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:31:23 -1000

Actually, that quote attributed to me, was not from me, don't know where it
came from, but was probably a reply to what I had written earlier about the
CMC



James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)





From: "john gary simpson" <eustisgary@...>
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To: W650riders@...
Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:42:43 -0000

Excelsior-Henderson bit the dust when the dotcoms took off. They
needed money to ramp up production, and most of their investors
pulled out and started putting their money in dotcoms instead. Too
bad. My 11 second EH was one of the most satisfying bikes I ever
owned!--- In W650riders@..., "James Franklin"
<jimw650@...> wrote:
>
> The Excelsior/Henderson people screwed that up even though they
had huge
> backing money. Indian (California Motorcycle Company version, not
the
> Springfield company original) sold really poor quality motorcycles
in the
> beginning, some of it was bad suppliers...the bike was a
composite, and some
> of it of course, was trying to build too many, too soon. In their
last
> couple of years the product was better quality, but the bike had a
limited
> market, and those really interested probably bought the original
bikes and
> got burned.
>
>
>
> James Franklin
> P.O. Box 289
> Waimanalo, HI 96795-0289
> USA
> 808-225-0994 (cell)
>
>
>
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "kevin_cooklin" <kcooklin@...>
> Reply-To: W650riders@...
> To: W650riders@...
> Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:00:38 -0000
>
> Hey, Den--
>
> If I remember our goodly Gene had a GB? They are not cheap
anymore.
> Distant memories
> tell me my own papa (I'm not Italian but am using this for
literary effect
> only) bought one,
> then lost it in a poker game. The dog. He could have waited for
me to take
> it for a spin.
> But it's a gorgeous bike. To. Be. Sure.
>
> Ninja. I probably just need to hop on one sometime and go crazy.
In all
> honesty, I've had
> this anti-crotch-rocket mentality all my life, and I don't know
why.
> There's no reason for
> it. I graduated from high school in 1980. There's absolutely no
sense to
> it. So I need to
> overcome the prejudice and give it a go. Come on out and let me
take yours
> for a spin. I
> still would sell off my house for a 750 Norton Roadster, though.
It be in
> the blood.
>
> Don't completely rule out the new Norton, although all bets are
most likely
> on failure.
> Huge undertaking, and underfunding is always the killer. [The
attempt to
> bring back the
> Indian is an architypal model on the subject, and they had BIG
funding].
> Still, I like a guy
> or gal who is so passionate about what he does that he/she f____s
up the
> funding, doesn't
> get it right, and yet..... had to do it. Artists, creative folk,
so rarely
> get the accounting, but
> they get everything else. Let's hope he gets through it.
>
> Did you sell the W because you were tired of it or because you
wanted to
> gain a couple of
> other cool bikes?
>
> kev
>
>
>
>
> --- In W650riders@..., "Dennis J. Guggemos"
<djguggms@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Kev
> >
> > The GB is buckets of fun, and a sure conversation starter just
like the
> W. The Ninja isn't
> a 114hp 600 four, just a lowly 65 hp twin. Tops out around 130 I
hear but
> I'll never find
> out for myself. It does get to the ton in a hurry though. It has a
pretty
> fair power band,
> kind of like a super W, useable low end, comes on the cam about 6k
and pulls
> like a m-f-
> r. Red line at 11k but max power at around 8800. They cheaped out
on the
> suspension,
> the only adjustment is rear spring preload. The forks are just
beefier W
> forks. However
> that frame is super stiff, the racers love it.
> >
> > Sold the W to a guy that walked into the local dealer where I
had left
> word. Seems like a
> nice kid, said that's they way he would have wanted to fix it up
so I saved
> him a lot of
> trouble. He does a lot of 2-up with his gf and they like it.
They're not
> really near here so
> not likely I'll see it again.
> >
> > I read a bike tabloid a month or so ago that told of the demise
of the
> Norton. I suppose
> if they can find another bunch of money it could still be a go. I
don't
> trust everything I read
> on their website now as the $ meltdown happened months ago but the
website
> didn't say
> anything about it.
> >
> > Dennis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: kevin_cooklin
> > To: W650riders@...
> > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:29 AM
> > Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all....
> >
> >
> > Dennis--
> >
> > Wow, two other bikes.... and sold your W. Hey, the GB500 has
to be a
> blast, as does the
> > Ninja. I'm pretty sure I'd kill myself with a Ninja. Of
course, now
> that you've sold the W,
> > you must resign your office! Kidding, of course. Did you sell
the W to
> a pal, or on Ebay,
> > or.... just curious.
> >
> > Did the new Norton just call it quits recently? I was
checking them as
> recently as a
> month
> > ago; at that time they indicated they'd quit their factory
and were in
> search for another.
> > They were also seeking more money, of course. But they had
not formally
> thrown in
> the
> > towel. What a shame. But heck, that new Ducati Sport Classic,
the GT,
> sure looks nice.
> > Haven't seen one for real yet.
> >
> > Yes, need to get out there more on the bike. It's already
feeling like
> fall here in PA.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > kev
> > Recent Activity
> > a.. 16New Members
> > b.. 1New Files
> > Visit Your Group
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > a.. Kawasaki motorcycles
> > b.. Kawasaki vulcan
> > c.. Kawasaki motorcycle accessory
> > d.. Kawasaki motorcycle exhaust
> > e.. Kawasaki motorcycle part
> > Yahoo! News
> > Space News
> >
> > Get the latest
> >
> > space related news
> >
> > Y! Toolbar
> > Get it Free!
> >
> > easy 1-click access
> >
> > to your groups.
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups
> > Start a group
> >
> > in 3 easy steps.
> >
> > Connect with others.
> > .
> >
>

_________________________________________________________________


_________________________________________________________________


Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650

john gary simpson
 

Have you actually ridden a 1200 Sporty?--- In
W650riders@..., "Larry Botheras" <larry.botheras@...>
wrote:

Think long and hard. unless it's tricked up the 1200 sporty will
feel
slower than the W IMHO, it's not that much more powerful (HD never
quote)
but it is a lot heavier



From: W650riders@...
[mailto:W650riders@...] On
Behalf Of John
Sent: 11 July 2007 06:39
To: W650riders@...
Subject: [W650riders] Thinking about getting rid of my w650



I found a sportster 1200r that's tempting me to get rid of the w.
What
are your thoughts on the 2006 sportster 1200 roadster?


Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650

john gary simpson
 

A 1200 Sporty is by no means slow. It's about as fast a Harley
platform as there is. /--- In W650riders@..., "Alexander
Ward" <award@...> wrote:

I've been lurking on this list for years, but now I have to chime
in
on this topic.

I think the Sportster is a great partner to the W650. I have both
a
2000 W650 and a 1996 Sportster XL1200S Sport. The Sport has
adjustable Showa forks and dual front discs. If you add rearsets
and
clipons and a decent seat, then it becomes a really fun scoot. '

No, it is not particularly fast, but the wide flat powerband
and more than ample torque combine with decent handling and
braking
to make it easy to ride without requiring a lot of work. If you
switch to 17" wheels and sticky tires it gets even better. Don't
worry about the vibration if you buy an older one with a solid-
mount
engine, just install BalanceMasters active vibration dampers and
fiddle with the final drive ratios (or even switch to chain drive)
and once it is dialed in, then just enjoy it.

Although any Japanese 600 can run rings around it, that is
balanced
out by the double-takes from all of the head-to-toe leather-clad
dumplings on their cool Harleys who are cruising along at 30mph
when
you pass them on the outside of a curve.

You do have to think about it though. One of the classic
disparaging
comments about Harleys is that they vibrate so much that parts
fall
off. It is true, too. the first time I rode the Sporty any
distance, both mirrors, the taillight, and one turn signal fell
off.
I felt like I had finally gained admittance to a long and proud
tradition!

At any rate, keep the W650, get a Sportster too.

Alex

--- In W650riders@..., "Larry Botheras"
<larry.botheras@> wrote:

Think long and hard. unless it's tricked up the 1200 sporty
will
feel
slower than the W IMHO, it's not that much more powerful (HD
never
quote)
but it is a lot heavier



From: W650riders@...
[mailto:W650riders@...] On
Behalf Of John
Sent: 11 July 2007 06:39
To: W650riders@...
Subject: [W650riders] Thinking about getting rid of my w650



I found a sportster 1200r that's tempting me to get rid of the
w.
What
are your thoughts on the 2006 sportster 1200 roadster?


Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc

 

Actually, that quote attributed to me, was not from me, don't know where it came from, but was probably a reply to what I had written earlier about the CMC



James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)





From: "john gary simpson" <eustisgary@...>
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To: W650riders@...
Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:42:43 -0000

Excelsior-Henderson bit the dust when the dotcoms took off. They
needed money to ramp up production, and most of their investors
pulled out and started putting their money in dotcoms instead. Too
bad. My 11 second EH was one of the most satisfying bikes I ever
owned!--- In W650riders@..., "James Franklin"
<jimw650@...> wrote:

The Excelsior/Henderson people screwed that up even though they
had huge
backing money. Indian (California Motorcycle Company version, not
the
Springfield company original) sold really poor quality motorcycles
in the
beginning, some of it was bad suppliers...the bike was a
composite, and some
of it of course, was trying to build too many, too soon. In their
last
couple of years the product was better quality, but the bike had a
limited
market, and those really interested probably bought the original
bikes and
got burned.



James Franklin
P.O. Box 289
Waimanalo, HI 96795-0289
USA
808-225-0994 (cell)




----Original Message Follows----
From: "kevin_cooklin" <kcooklin@...>
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To: W650riders@...
Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:00:38 -0000

Hey, Den--

If I remember our goodly Gene had a GB? They are not cheap
anymore.
Distant memories
tell me my own papa (I'm not Italian but am using this for
literary effect
only) bought one,
then lost it in a poker game. The dog. He could have waited for
me to take
it for a spin.
But it's a gorgeous bike. To. Be. Sure.

Ninja. I probably just need to hop on one sometime and go crazy.
In all
honesty, I've had
this anti-crotch-rocket mentality all my life, and I don't know
why.
There's no reason for
it. I graduated from high school in 1980. There's absolutely no
sense to
it. So I need to
overcome the prejudice and give it a go. Come on out and let me
take yours
for a spin. I
still would sell off my house for a 750 Norton Roadster, though.
It be in
the blood.

Don't completely rule out the new Norton, although all bets are
most likely
on failure.
Huge undertaking, and underfunding is always the killer. [The
attempt to
bring back the
Indian is an architypal model on the subject, and they had BIG
funding].
Still, I like a guy
or gal who is so passionate about what he does that he/she f____s
up the
funding, doesn't
get it right, and yet..... had to do it. Artists, creative folk,
so rarely
get the accounting, but
they get everything else. Let's hope he gets through it.

Did you sell the W because you were tired of it or because you
wanted to
gain a couple of
other cool bikes?

kev




--- In W650riders@..., "Dennis J. Guggemos"
<djguggms@>
wrote:
>
> Kev
>
> The GB is buckets of fun, and a sure conversation starter just
like the
W. The Ninja isn't
a 114hp 600 four, just a lowly 65 hp twin. Tops out around 130 I
hear but
I'll never find
out for myself. It does get to the ton in a hurry though. It has a
pretty
fair power band,
kind of like a super W, useable low end, comes on the cam about 6k
and pulls
like a m-f-
r. Red line at 11k but max power at around 8800. They cheaped out
on the
suspension,
the only adjustment is rear spring preload. The forks are just
beefier W
forks. However
that frame is super stiff, the racers love it.
>
> Sold the W to a guy that walked into the local dealer where I
had left
word. Seems like a
nice kid, said that's they way he would have wanted to fix it up
so I saved
him a lot of
trouble. He does a lot of 2-up with his gf and they like it.
They're not
really near here so
not likely I'll see it again.
>
> I read a bike tabloid a month or so ago that told of the demise
of the
Norton. I suppose
if they can find another bunch of money it could still be a go. I
don't
trust everything I read
on their website now as the $ meltdown happened months ago but the
website
didn't say
anything about it.
>
> Dennis
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: kevin_cooklin
> To: W650riders@...
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:29 AM
> Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all....
>
>
> Dennis--
>
> Wow, two other bikes.... and sold your W. Hey, the GB500 has
to be a
blast, as does the
> Ninja. I'm pretty sure I'd kill myself with a Ninja. Of
course, now
that you've sold the W,
> you must resign your office! Kidding, of course. Did you sell
the W to
a pal, or on Ebay,
> or.... just curious.
>
> Did the new Norton just call it quits recently? I was
checking them as
recently as a
month
> ago; at that time they indicated they'd quit their factory
and were in
search for another.
> They were also seeking more money, of course. But they had
not formally
thrown in
the
> towel. What a shame. But heck, that new Ducati Sport Classic,
the GT,
sure looks nice.
> Haven't seen one for real yet.
>
> Yes, need to get out there more on the bike. It's already
feeling like
fall here in PA.
>
> Best,
>
> kev
> Recent Activity
> a.. 16New Members
> b.. 1New Files
> Visit Your Group
> SPONSORED LINKS
> a.. Kawasaki motorcycles
> b.. Kawasaki vulcan
> c.. Kawasaki motorcycle accessory
> d.. Kawasaki motorcycle exhaust
> e.. Kawasaki motorcycle part
> Yahoo! News
> Space News
>
> Get the latest
>
> space related news
>
> Y! Toolbar
> Get it Free!
>
> easy 1-click access
>
> to your groups.
>
> Yahoo! Groups
> Start a group
>
> in 3 easy steps.
>
> Connect with others.
> .
>
_________________________________________________________________


Re: NWC: Brits in hacks

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Is Al Gore in it?
?
Dennis
?

----- Original Message -----
From: Gene Fitch
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 8:53 AM
Subject: [W650riders] NWC: Brits in hacks

Back in the 50s, during summer vacation, us kids were allowed to stay up till all hours watching TV.
Back then, for some reason, most of the late night movies were British imports. At least that was true in the San Francisco area.
?
One movie that I'll never forget was about a man, driving a motorcycle with a sidecar, who kidnaps a young girl so he can get money to help his wife who had some medical problem.
?
Anyone ever see this movie?
?
?
gene in OR
.