Irn Bru, all right...
Ruari
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Campbell" <scrubby64@...> To: <W650riders@...> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 10:16 AM Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson Here's a better shot....made in Scotland, from girders...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ruari McLennan" <r.mclennan@...> To: <W650riders@...> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 3:20 PM Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson
What's the flywheel thingy right in the front of it?
Ruari
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Campbell" <scrubby64@...> To: <W650riders@...> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 6:10 AM Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson
Yip, uses a Volvo engine...
----- Original Message ----- From: "James Franklin" <jimw650@...> To: <W650riders@...> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 11:20 AM Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson
That is a Brittish "Indian", I think, because of copy rights, it can be called an Indian in England, but if it were sold in the USA, it would be sold as a Dakota.
Anyway, it is a much better "Indian" than those S&S V-Twin powered California Motorcycle Company cookie cutter chopper things that won the rights in court, to use the Indian trademark in the USA.
James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211
808-225-0994 (cell)
From: "Mark Campbell" <scrubby64@...> Reply-To: W650riders@... To: <W650riders@...> Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:02:27 +0100
Ok, who knows what this is....
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonhaddock@..." <jonhaddock@...> To: <W650riders@...> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 10:43 AM Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson
Like a lot of things in that era, they assumed a reasonable understanding of machinery by the owner!
Neat - saves re-programming the throttle position sensor, eh?
Ruari
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonhaddock@..." <jonhaddock@...> To: <W650riders@...> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 1:03 AM Subject: Re: [W650riders] Henderson
The hand operated advance/retard lever was common on Brit bikes before the development of the spring loaded auto-advance mechanism. You set it retarded for starting, minimising kick-backs and ensuring a slow, lazy tick-over from cold, and advanced it for fast running. You could also retard the ignition to slog up hills, which was ideal if you were pulling a chair with the family on board!
Jon
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. :: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.4/898 - Release Date: 12/07/2007 16:08
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery.
:: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
<< emfindi1.jpg >>
_________________________________________________________________
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. :: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. :: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. :: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. :: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
|
Oh...? Now I get it...? Cougars
etc....
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: The new
Buell - NWC
Yeah.? The motorcycle
ones are pretty nice looking too... ;)
In a message dated 7/15/2007
1:40:45 PM Eastern Daylight Time, hazel@...
writes:
Panthers are GORGEOUS!!! ?
Rrrose. @>-->--
|
Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650
I lost my magazine collection in my divorce, so 10 to one was from my memory as my home references are pretty much gone.
James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211
808-225-0994 (cell)
From: "Dennis J. Guggemos" <djguggms@...> Reply-To: W650riders@... To: <W650riders@...> Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650 Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:23:58 -0700
James I believe the original 1970 XS1 had 9:1 compression, and all subsequent XS's had 8.4:1. Just FYI. Source and my challengeable memory.
Dennis
_________________________________________________________________
|
The Owner's manual unfortunately shows the fuel tap set pointing backward at "Reserve." The long end is the pointer. It should normally point forward, under "Fuel." To confirm, grab a magnifying glass and look closely at the edge of the tap handle. You should see a tiny almost invisible moulded arrow. I painted my arrow black to make it visible.
Ruari McLennan Victoria BC
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: "dvdberman" <dvdberman@...> To: <W650riders@...> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 6:03 PM Subject: [W650riders] Oil/ Oil Additives #1 Just joined W650riders a few days ago and really appreciate all the great tech advice.
#2 I've seen some mention about Shell Rotella 15W40 really smoothing out downshifts. True? Also, can the same be accomplished with an additive? I onced tried the Rotella in my Grand National because a buddy said it could handle the heat of the turbo better than 5W30. In the end, I went back to 5W30 because the slight increase in pressure from the Rotella gave me nothing in better performance.
#3 I saw an old thread about the annoying headlight rattle. I fixed mine without bending the flanges on the lamps ring, but instead, ran a couple wraps of teflon tape at the seal. It snugged up pretty good.
#4 What actually WAS the final word on the fuel tap? To be safe, I always top off the tank before heading out. My W is a 2000 and on page 35 of the OM it shows the "ON" position with the LONGER end of the flange covering the "RES" lettering.
#5 Any members in Oakland County, Michigan.
Kindest Regards,
DB
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. :: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
|
Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
The Victory has promise, their own engine and a parent company with a proven track record. Kawasaki's Drifter is still the best "Indian" ever made. Hendee would have liked it. bean counters and greed killed the Springfield Indian after Hendee died. Besides in magazines, I have never seen a EH, haven't seen a dealership either..not unusual in Hawaii I guess, but I used to spend one month a year riding around on the mainland..and never saw one. I am not a cruiser guy, so I don't mourn the loss of EH or Indian as much as I do Norton or Vincent. James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211 808-225-0994 (cell) From: john gary simpson <eustisgary@...> Reply-To: W650riders@... To: W650riders@... Subject: RE: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Unfortunately the state taxpayers spent the money on the building. The Hanlons did a LOT of promoting, and signed up many dealerships, but they stayed with their plan to have an in-house engine instead of using a Harley=clone engine. That delayed the product by nearly three years. When they finally put it into production, it was basically untested and unrefined, Every buyer was a beta tester! The good part is that fixes for the problems have been developed by the X community and the community support structure is fantastic. After bottoming out, used X prices are heading back up. Onceset up properly (about $2000), the X is one heck of a cruising motorcycle. Mine beat all comers at Phil Peterson's Miami Harley Davidson Anniversary Dyno Shootout, including the lone Hayabusa that came to embarass the American motorcycles. CMC/Indian imrpoved dramatically, but never got past being just another Harley clone with skirted fenders. It simply wasn't an Indian. But had Excelsior hit the market three years sooner with a 1200 Sporty motor, there may have been enough sales to build a following and a war chest by the time they finished developing that magnificent little engine that they had designed by those Engish racing guys! James Franklin <jimw650@...> wrote: But now that we have brought EH into it, never read a test where the journalists liked it, and what I did read about the company is, they spent way too much on an extravagant office building and perks for the brothers who started it, and should have spent more money on promotion and establishing dealerships. For the CMC Indian, for their last two years, they had a new CEO and build quality was way up..but they burned a lot of bridges with their initial bikes, mostly CDI and other component problems..but the bike was more of an assembled than a manufactured bike. James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211 808-225-0994 (cell) From: "James Franklin" <jimw650@...> Reply-To: W650riders@... To: W650riders@... Subject: RE: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:31:23 -1000 Actually, that quote attributed to me, was not from me, don't know where it came from, but was probably a reply to what I had written earlier about the CMC James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211 808-225-0994 (cell) From: "john gary simpson" <eustisgary@...> Reply-To: W650riders@... To: W650riders@... Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:42:43 -0000 Excelsior-Henderson bit the dust when the dotcoms took off. They needed money to ramp up production, and most of their investors pulled out and started putting their money in dotcoms instead. Too bad. My 11 second EH was one of the most satisfying bikes I ever owned!--- In W650riders@..., "James Franklin" <jimw650@...> wrote: The Excelsior/Henderson people screwed that up even though they
had huge backing money. Indian (California Motorcycle Company version, not the Springfield company original) sold really poor quality motorcycles in the beginning, some of it was bad suppliers...the bike was a composite, and some of it of course, was trying to build too many, too soon. In their last couple of years the product was better quality, but the bike had a limited market, and those really interested probably bought the original bikes and got burned.
James Franklin P.O. Box 289 Waimanalo, HI 96795-0289 USA 808-225-0994 (cell)
----Original Message Follows---- From: "kevin_cooklin" <kcooklin@...> Reply-To: W650riders@... To: W650riders@... Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:00:38 -0000
Hey, Den--
If I remember our goodly Gene had a GB? They are not cheap anymore. Distant memories tell me my own papa (I'm not Italian but am using this for literary effect only) bought one, then lost it in a poker game. The dog. He could have waited for me to take it for a spin. But it's a gorgeous bike. To. Be. Sure.
Ninja. I probably just need to hop on one sometime and go crazy. In all honesty, I've had this anti-crotch-rocket mentality all my life, and I don't know why. There's no reason for it. I graduated from high school in 1980. There's absolutely no sense to it. So I need to overcome the prejudice and give it a go. Come on out and let me take yours for a spin. I still would sell off my house for a 750 Norton Roadster, though. It be in the blood.
Don't completely rule out the new Norton, although all bets are most likely on failure. Huge undertaking, and underfunding is always the killer. [The attempt to bring back the Indian is an architypal model on the subject, and they had BIG funding]. Still, I like a guy or gal who is so passionate about what he does that he/she f____s up the funding, doesn't get it right, and yet..... had to do it. Artists, creative folk, so rarely get the accounting, but they get everything else. Let's hope he gets through it.
Did you sell the W because you were tired of it or because you wanted to gain a couple of other cool bikes?
kev
--- In W650riders@..., "Dennis J. Guggemos" <djguggms@> wrote:
Kev
The GB is buckets of fun, and a sure conversation starter just
like the W. The Ninja isn't a 114hp 600 four, just a lowly 65 hp twin. Tops out around 130 I hear but I'll never find out for myself. It does get to the ton in a hurry though. It has a pretty fair power band, kind of like a super W, useable low end, comes on the cam about 6k and pulls like a m-f- r. Red line at 11k but max power at around 8800. They cheaped out on the suspension, the only adjustment is rear spring preload. The forks are just beefier W forks. However that frame is super stiff, the racers love it.
Sold the W to a guy that walked into the local dealer where I
had left word. Seems like a nice kid, said that's they way he would have wanted to fix it up so I saved him a lot of trouble. He does a lot of 2-up with his gf and they like it. They're not really near here so not likely I'll see it again.
I read a bike tabloid a month or so ago that told of the demise
of the Norton. I suppose if they can find another bunch of money it could still be a go. I don't trust everything I read on their website now as the $ meltdown happened months ago but the website didn't say anything about it.
Dennis
----- Original Message ----- From: kevin_cooklin To: W650riders@... Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:29 AM Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all....
Dennis--
Wow, two other bikes.... and sold your W. Hey, the GB500 has
to be a blast, as does the
Ninja. I'm pretty sure I'd kill myself with a Ninja. Of course, now that you've sold the W,
you must resign your office! Kidding, of course. Did you sell the W to a pal, or on Ebay,
or.... just curious.
Did the new Norton just call it quits recently? I was checking them as recently as a month
ago; at that time they indicated they'd quit their factory and were in search for another.
They were also seeking more money, of course. But they had not formally thrown in the
towel. What a shame. But heck, that new Ducati Sport Classic, the GT, sure looks nice.
Haven't seen one for real yet.
Yes, need to get out there more on the bike. It's already feeling like fall here in PA.
Best,
kev Recent Activity a.. 16New Members b.. 1New Files Visit Your Group SPONSORED LINKS a.. Kawasaki motorcycles b.. Kawasaki vulcan c.. Kawasaki motorcycle accessory d.. Kawasaki motorcycle exhaust e.. Kawasaki motorcycle part Yahoo! News Space News
Get the latest
space related news
Y! Toolbar Get it Free!
easy 1-click access
to your groups.
Yahoo! Groups Start a group
in 3 easy steps.
Connect with others. .
__________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ --------------------------------- Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! _________________________________________________________________ Need a brain boost? Recharge with a stimulating game. Play now!
|
Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650
In my experience, changing an 883 into a 1200 is an afternoon's work and three hundred bucks. That makes the 883 comparison moot. James Franklin wrote: A stock 1200 Sportster is doing the 1/4 in 13.02...half a second quicker than the fastest W 650 I have ever seen a test on. At 100 MPH (the HDs terminal speed), 1/2 second would be about 75 feet ahead, the W rider would know he lost, but the Sportster rider would know he was close.
The 1200 makes 64.4 HP, 20 more than a stock W.
It's stock torque is 72.7 lb-ft at 3700 RPM, which would be around 70 MPH, or twice what the W has at that speed in 5th.
A W, not even a 50 HP W, is not much of a roll-on challenge for a 1200 Sportster.
But an 883, which costs (supposedly) closer to the W, really isn't in the same performance
class.
The 883 makes 43.1 HP, about two less than the average W, yet weighs 50 lbs more.
the 883 makes 43 ft lbs torque at 4550 RPM, the W 37.5 5100 RPM (that is around 80 MPH for the W)
The best 1/4 mile I have seen for an 883..15.16 sec at 88.33 MPH (that puts it right there with a good Honda CB 350 or a Suzuki X6 Hustler). The slowest W test I have is 14.33 @ 92.34
The W, when compared to the Sportster, is a revver. When you compare it to a stock 883, you get a lot more performance for your money. The 883 needs pipes, and a cam, with a little chip manipulation to match a stock W. Not much after market hi-perf stuff is available for the W, but the W is a retro, and it is quicker than a 60s Bonneville or Lightning. And the W is pretty low key, it has a compression ratio of only 8.4 to 1, whereas the Yamaha XS 650 was 10 to 1. Has anyone shaved the heads on a W to see what kind of power is available
there? Jon, you just did pipes and jets and got 50 HP.
Jon, you probably beat the rider, not the machine, if what you rolled away from was a 1200 and you did it in 5th gear, but there is no dishonor in downshifting if the other bike has a 500cc advantage. I have ridden a lot of Sportsters (883s/1000s/1200s)..none of the rubber mounted engine ones yet..but I never rode a Sportster as comfortable as the W, or as confidant at parking lot speeds. And I bet Lucy was much more comfortable on the back of your W than she would have been on that skinny slab HD provides for a passenger on the Sportster.
James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211
808-225-0994 (cell)
From: "Jonhaddock@..." Reply-To: W650riders@... To: Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650 Date:
Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:56:42 +0100
Well a stock one isn't as quick as a W650 which is about as slow as modern motorcycles get....which makes the Sporty pretty slow. Certainly my warmed up W will beat a loud piped 1200 Sporty from 60 to 100 plus....two up.....And Lucy was on the back when we did it...
>A 1200 Sporty is by no means slow. It's about as fast a Harley > platform as there is. /--- In W650riders@..., "Alexander > Ward" wrote: >> >> I've been lurking on this list for years, but now I have to chime > in >> on this topic. >> >> I think the Sportster is a great partner to the W650. I have both > a >> 2000 W650 and a 1996 Sportster XL1200S Sport. The Sport has >> adjustable Showa forks and dual front discs. If you add rearsets > and >> clipons and a decent seat, then it becomes a really fun scoot.
' >> >> No, it is not particularly fast, but the wide flat powerband >> and more than ample torque combine with decent handling and > braking >> to make it easy to ride without requiring a lot of work. If you >> switch to 17" wheels and sticky tires it gets even better. Don't >> worry about the vibration if you buy an older one with a solid- > mount >> engine, just install BalanceMasters active vibration dampers and >> fiddle with the final drive ratios (or even switch to chain drive) >> and once it is dialed in, then just enjoy it. >> >> Although any Japanese 600 can run rings around it, that is > balanced >> out by the double-takes from all of the head-to-toe leather-clad >> dumplings on their cool Harleys who are cruising along at 30mph > when >> you pass them on the outside of a curve. >> >> You do have
to think about it though. One of the classic > disparaging >> comments about Harleys is that they vibrate so much that parts > fall >> off. It is true, too. the first time I rode the Sporty any >> distance, both mirrors, the taillight, and one turn signal fell > off. >> I felt like I had finally gained admittance to a long and proud >> tradition! >> >> At any rate, keep the W650, get a Sportster too. >> >> Alex >> >> --- In W650riders@..., "Larry Botheras" >> wrote: >> > >> > Think long and hard. unless it's tricked up the 1200 sporty > will >> feel >> > slower than the W IMHO, it's not that much more powerful (HD > never >> quote) >> > but it is a lot heavier >> > >> > >> > >> > From:
W650riders@... >> [mailto:W650riders@...] On >> > Behalf Of John >> > Sent: 11 July 2007 06:39 >> > To: W650riders@... >> > Subject: [W650riders] Thinking about getting rid of my w650 >> > >> > >> > >> > I found a sportster 1200r that's tempting me to get rid of the > w. >> What >> > are your thoughts on the 2006 sportster 1200 roadster? >> > >> > > > > > Go to temporary photos site - http://tinyurl.com/yuade :: > Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. > :: > Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email > delivery. > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free
Edition. > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.6/900 - Release Date: 14/07/2007 > 15:36 > >
_________________________________________________________________ Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary!? http://club.live.com/chicktionary.aspx?icid=chick_hotmailtextlink2
Go to temporary photos site - http://tinyurl.com/yuade :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. :: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/W650riders/
<*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/W650riders/join (Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email: mailto:W650riders-digest@...
mailto:W650riders-fullfeatured@...
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: W650riders-unsubscribe@...
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Looking for earth-friendly autos? at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
|
Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650
How much does the Halrey weigh, James?
Ruari
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: "James Franklin" <jimw650@...> To: <W650riders@...> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 6:57 PM Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650 A stock 1200 Sportster is doing the 1/4 in 13.02...half a second quicker than the fastest W 650 I have ever seen a test on. At 100 MPH (the HDs terminal speed), 1/2 second would be about 75 feet ahead, the W rider would know he lost, but the Sportster rider would know he was close.
The 1200 makes 64.4 HP, 20 more than a stock W.
It's stock torque is 72.7 lb-ft at 3700 RPM, which would be around 70 MPH, or twice what the W has at that speed in 5th.
A W, not even a 50 HP W, is not much of a roll-on challenge for a 1200 Sportster.
But an 883, which costs (supposedly) closer to the W, really isn't in the same performance class.
The 883 makes 43.1 HP, about two less than the average W, yet weighs 50 lbs more.
the 883 makes 43 ft lbs torque at 4550 RPM, the W 37.5 5100 RPM (that is around 80 MPH for the W)
The best 1/4 mile I have seen for an 883..15.16 sec at 88.33 MPH (that puts it right there with a good Honda CB 350 or a Suzuki X6 Hustler). The slowest W test I have is 14.33 @ 92.34
The W, when compared to the Sportster, is a revver. When you compare it to a stock 883, you get a lot more performance for your money. The 883 needs pipes, and a cam, with a little chip manipulation to match a stock W. Not much after market hi-perf stuff is available for the W, but the W is a retro, and it is quicker than a 60s Bonneville or Lightning. And the W is pretty low key, it has a compression ratio of only 8.4 to 1, whereas the Yamaha XS 650 was 10 to 1. Has anyone shaved the heads on a W to see what kind of power is available there? Jon, you just did pipes and jets and got 50 HP.
Jon, you probably beat the rider, not the machine, if what you rolled away from was a 1200 and you did it in 5th gear, but there is no dishonor in downshifting if the other bike has a 500cc advantage. I have ridden a lot of Sportsters (883s/1000s/1200s)..none of the rubber mounted engine ones yet..but I never rode a Sportster as comfortable as the W, or as confidant at parking lot speeds. And I bet Lucy was much more comfortable on the back of your W than she would have been on that skinny slab HD provides for a passenger on the Sportster.
James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211
808-225-0994 (cell)
From: "Jonhaddock@..." <jonhaddock@...> Reply-To: W650riders@... To: <W650riders@...> Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:56:42 +0100
Well a stock one isn't as quick as a W650 which is about as slow as modern motorcycles get....which makes the Sporty pretty slow. Certainly my warmed up W will beat a loud piped 1200 Sporty from 60 to 100 plus....two up.....And Lucy was on the back when we did it...
A 1200 Sporty is by no means slow. It's about as fast a Harley platform as there is. /--- In W650riders@..., "Alexander Ward" <award@...> wrote:
I've been lurking on this list for years, but now I have to chime in
on this topic.
I think the Sportster is a great partner to the W650. I have both a
2000 W650 and a 1996 Sportster XL1200S Sport. The Sport has adjustable Showa forks and dual front discs. If you add rearsets and
clipons and a decent seat, then it becomes a really fun scoot. '
No, it is not particularly fast, but the wide flat powerband and more than ample torque combine with decent handling and braking
to make it easy to ride without requiring a lot of work. If you switch to 17" wheels and sticky tires it gets even better. Don't worry about the vibration if you buy an older one with a solid- mount
engine, just install BalanceMasters active vibration dampers and fiddle with the final drive ratios (or even switch to chain drive) and once it is dialed in, then just enjoy it.
Although any Japanese 600 can run rings around it, that is balanced
out by the double-takes from all of the head-to-toe leather-clad dumplings on their cool Harleys who are cruising along at 30mph when
you pass them on the outside of a curve.
You do have to think about it though. One of the classic disparaging
comments about Harleys is that they vibrate so much that parts fall
off. It is true, too. the first time I rode the Sporty any distance, both mirrors, the taillight, and one turn signal fell off.
I felt like I had finally gained admittance to a long and proud tradition!
At any rate, keep the W650, get a Sportster too.
Alex
--- In W650riders@..., "Larry Botheras" <larry.botheras@> wrote:
Think long and hard. unless it's tricked up the 1200 sporty
will
feel
slower than the W IMHO, it's not that much more powerful (HD never
quote)
but it is a lot heavier
From: W650riders@... [mailto:W650riders@...] On
Behalf Of John Sent: 11 July 2007 06:39 To: W650riders@... Subject: [W650riders] Thinking about getting rid of my w650
I found a sportster 1200r that's tempting me to get rid of the w.
What
are your thoughts on the 2006 sportster 1200 roadster?
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery.
:: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.6/900 - Release Date: 14/07/2007
15:36
_________________________________________________________________ Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary!
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. :: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
|
#4 - The manual is wrong. :)
Jake
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: "dvdberman" <dvdberman@...>
#1 Just joined W650riders a few days ago and really appreciate all the great tech advice.
#2 I've seen some mention about Shell Rotella 15W40 really smoothing out downshifts. True? Also, can the same be accomplished with an additive? I onced tried the Rotella in my Grand National because a buddy said it could handle the heat of the turbo better than 5W30. In the end, I went back to 5W30 because the slight increase in pressure from the Rotella gave me nothing in better performance.
#3 I saw an old thread about the annoying headlight rattle. I fixed mine without bending the flanges on the lamps ring, but instead, ran a couple wraps of teflon tape at the seal. It snugged up pretty good.
#4 What actually WAS the final word on the fuel tap? To be safe, I always top off the tank before heading out. My W is a 2000 and on page 35 of the OM it shows the "ON" position with the LONGER end of the flange covering the "RES" lettering.
#5 Any members in Oakland County, Michigan.
Kindest Regards,
DB
|
Re: Need Help w/ Petition
Thanks, Kirk, I will sign now!
Ruari
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: "John" <schnozejt@...> To: <W650riders@...> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 2:53 PM Subject: [W650riders] Re: Need Help w/ Petition I appreciate it much Kirk
--- In W650riders@..., Kirk Johnson <johnsonkirk@...> wrote:
I signed his petition and some time ago and have had absolutly no problems. Kirk
--- Ruari McLennan <r.mclennan@...> wrote:
John, my MacAfee Site Advisor program has a big red flag against your site, indicating it is "very spammy," and advising against going there. That's why I haven't signed, I don't want spam and pop-ups afterwards.
Ruari McLennan Victoria BC
----- Original Message ----- Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 7:52 PM Subject: [W650riders] Need Help w/ Petition Hello,
I need help with getting more people sign my petition to bring back
the W650 to the US. Any suggestions?
www.petitionspot.com/petitions/bringw6502usa
Thanks -John
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. :: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
|
Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650
James I believe the original 1970 XS1 had 9:1 compression, and all subsequent XS's had 8.4:1. Just FYI. Source and my challengeable memory.
Dennis
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: "James Franklin" <jimw650@...> To: <W650riders@...> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 6:57 PM Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650 And the W is pretty low key, it has a compression ratio of only 8.4 to 1, whereas the Yamaha XS 650 was 10 to 1.
|
Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650
A stock 1200 Sportster is doing the 1/4 in 13.02...half a second quicker than the fastest W 650 I have ever seen a test on. At 100 MPH (the HDs terminal speed), 1/2 second would be about 75 feet ahead, the W rider would know he lost, but the Sportster rider would know he was close. The 1200 makes 64.4 HP, 20 more than a stock W. It's stock torque is 72.7 lb-ft at 3700 RPM, which would be around 70 MPH, or twice what the W has at that speed in 5th. A W, not even a 50 HP W, is not much of a roll-on challenge for a 1200 Sportster. But an 883, which costs (supposedly) closer to the W, really isn't in the same performance class. The 883 makes 43.1 HP, about two less than the average W, yet weighs 50 lbs more. the 883 makes 43 ft lbs torque at 4550 RPM, the W 37.5 5100 RPM (that is around 80 MPH for the W) The best 1/4 mile I have seen for an 883..15.16 sec at 88.33 MPH (that puts it right there with a good Honda CB 350 or a Suzuki X6 Hustler). The slowest W test I have is 14.33 @ 92.34 The W, when compared to the Sportster, is a revver. When you compare it to a stock 883, you get a lot more performance for your money. The 883 needs pipes, and a cam, with a little chip manipulation to match a stock W. Not much after market hi-perf stuff is available for the W, but the W is a retro, and it is quicker than a 60s Bonneville or Lightning. And the W is pretty low key, it has a compression ratio of only 8.4 to 1, whereas the Yamaha XS 650 was 10 to 1. Has anyone shaved the heads on a W to see what kind of power is available there? Jon, you just did pipes and jets and got 50 HP. Jon, you probably beat the rider, not the machine, if what you rolled away from was a 1200 and you did it in 5th gear, but there is no dishonor in downshifting if the other bike has a 500cc advantage. I have ridden a lot of Sportsters (883s/1000s/1200s)..none of the rubber mounted engine ones yet..but I never rode a Sportster as comfortable as the W, or as confidant at parking lot speeds. And I bet Lucy was much more comfortable on the back of your W than she would have been on that skinny slab HD provides for a passenger on the Sportster. James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211 808-225-0994 (cell) From: "Jonhaddock@..." <jonhaddock@...> Reply-To: W650riders@... To: <W650riders@...> Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:56:42 +0100 Well a stock one isn't as quick as a W650 which is about as slow as modern motorcycles get....which makes the Sporty pretty slow. Certainly my warmed up W will beat a loud piped 1200 Sporty from 60 to 100 plus....two up.....And Lucy was on the back when we did it... A 1200 Sporty is by no means slow. It's about as fast a Harley platform as there is. /--- In W650riders@..., "Alexander Ward" <award@...> wrote:
I've been lurking on this list for years, but now I have to chime in
on this topic.
I think the Sportster is a great partner to the W650. I have both a
2000 W650 and a 1996 Sportster XL1200S Sport. The Sport has adjustable Showa forks and dual front discs. If you add rearsets and
clipons and a decent seat, then it becomes a really fun scoot. '
No, it is not particularly fast, but the wide flat powerband and more than ample torque combine with decent handling and braking
to make it easy to ride without requiring a lot of work. If you switch to 17" wheels and sticky tires it gets even better. Don't worry about the vibration if you buy an older one with a solid- mount
engine, just install BalanceMasters active vibration dampers and fiddle with the final drive ratios (or even switch to chain drive) and once it is dialed in, then just enjoy it.
Although any Japanese 600 can run rings around it, that is balanced
out by the double-takes from all of the head-to-toe leather-clad dumplings on their cool Harleys who are cruising along at 30mph when
you pass them on the outside of a curve.
You do have to think about it though. One of the classic disparaging
comments about Harleys is that they vibrate so much that parts fall
off. It is true, too. the first time I rode the Sporty any distance, both mirrors, the taillight, and one turn signal fell off.
I felt like I had finally gained admittance to a long and proud tradition!
At any rate, keep the W650, get a Sportster too.
Alex
--- In W650riders@..., "Larry Botheras" <larry.botheras@> wrote:
Think long and hard. unless it's tricked up the 1200 sporty
will
feel
slower than the W IMHO, it's not that much more powerful (HD never
quote)
but it is a lot heavier
From: W650riders@... [mailto:W650riders@...] On
Behalf Of John Sent: 11 July 2007 06:39 To: W650riders@... Subject: [W650riders] Thinking about getting rid of my w650
I found a sportster 1200r that's tempting me to get rid of the w.
What
are your thoughts on the 2006 sportster 1200 roadster?
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. :: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.6/900 - Release Date: 14/07/2007 15:36
_________________________________________________________________ Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary!
|
#1 Just joined W650riders a few days ago and really appreciate all the great tech advice.
#2 I've seen some mention about Shell Rotella 15W40 really smoothing out downshifts. True? Also, can the same be accomplished with an additive? I onced tried the Rotella in my Grand National because a buddy said it could handle the heat of the turbo better than 5W30. In the end, I went back to 5W30 because the slight increase in pressure from the Rotella gave me nothing in better performance.
#3 I saw an old thread about the annoying headlight rattle. I fixed mine without bending the flanges on the lamps ring, but instead, ran a couple wraps of teflon tape at the seal. It snugged up pretty good.
#4 What actually WAS the final word on the fuel tap? To be safe, I always top off the tank before heading out. My W is a 2000 and on page 35 of the OM it shows the "ON" position with the LONGER end of the flange covering the "RES" lettering.
#5 Any members in Oakland County, Michigan.
Kindest Regards,
DB
|
Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
Unfortunately the state taxpayers spent the money on the building.? The Hanlons did a LOT of promoting, and signed up many dealerships, but they stayed with their plan to have an in-house engine instead of using a Harley=clone engine.? That delayed the product by nearly three years.? When they finally put it into production, it was basically untested and unrefined,? Every buyer was a beta tester!? The good part is that fixes for the problems have been developed by the X community and the community support structure is fantastic.? After bottoming out, used X prices are heading back up.? Onceset up properly (about $2000), the X is one heck of a cruising motorcycle.? Mine beat all comers at Phil Peterson's Miami Harley Davidson Anniversary Dyno Shootout, including the lone Hayabusa that came to?embarass the American motorcycles. CMC/Indian imrpoved dramatically, but never got?past being just another Harley
clone with skirted fenders. It simply wasn't an Indian. But had Excelsior hit the market three years sooner with a 1200 Sporty motor, there may have been enough sales to build a following and a war chest by the time they finished developing that magnificent little engine that they had designed by those Engish racing guys!
James Franklin wrote: But now that we have brought EH into it, never read a test where the journalists liked it, and what I did read about the company is, they spent
way too much on an extravagant office building and perks for the brothers who started it, and should have spent more money on promotion and establishing dealerships. For the CMC Indian, for their last two years, they had a new CEO and build quality was way up..but they burned a lot of bridges with their initial bikes, mostly CDI and other component problems..but the bike was more of an assembled than a manufactured bike. James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211 808-225-0994 (cell) From: "James Franklin" < jimw650@hotmail.com> Reply-To: W650riders@yahoogroups.comTo: W650riders@yahoogroups.comSubject: RE: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:31:23 -1000 Actually, that
quote attributed to me, was not from me, don't know where it came from, but was probably a reply to what I had written earlier about the CMC James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211 808-225-0994 (cell) From: "john gary simpson" < eustisgary@yahoo.com> Reply-To: W650riders@yahoogroups.comTo: W650riders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:42:43 -0000 Excelsior-Henderson bit the dust when the dotcoms took off. They needed money to ramp up production, and most of their investors pulled out and started putting their money in dotcoms instead. Too bad. My 11 second EH was one of the most satisfying bikes I ever owned!--- In W650riders@yahoogroups.com, "James Franklin" > wrote: > > The Excelsior/Henderson people screwed that up even though they had huge > backing money. Indian (California Motorcycle Company version, not the > Springfield company original) sold really poor quality motorcycles in the > beginning, some of it was bad suppliers... the bike was a composite, and some > of it of course, was trying to build too many, too soon. In their last > couple of years the product was better quality, but the bike had a limited > market, and those really interested probably bought the original bikes and > got burned. > > > > James Franklin > P.O. Box 289 > Waimanalo, HI 96795-0289 > USA > 808-225-0994 (cell) > > > > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From:
"kevin_cooklin" .> > Reply-To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com> To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com> Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc > Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:00:38 -0000 > > Hey, Den-- > > If I remember our goodly Gene had a GB? They are not cheap anymore. > Distant memories > tell me my own papa (I'm not Italian but am using this for literary effect > only) bought one, > then lost it in a poker game. The dog. He could have waited for me to take > it for a spin. > But it's a gorgeous bike. To. Be. Sure. > > Ninja. I probably just need to hop on one sometime and go crazy. In all > honesty, I've had > this anti-crotch- rocket mentality all my life, and I don't know why. > There's no reason
for > it. I graduated from high school in 1980. There's absolutely no sense to > it. So I need to > overcome the prejudice and give it a go. Come on out and let me take yours > for a spin. I > still would sell off my house for a 750 Norton Roadster, though. It be in > the blood. > > Don't completely rule out the new Norton, although all bets are most likely > on failure. > Huge undertaking, and underfunding is always the killer. [The attempt to > bring back the > Indian is an architypal model on the subject, and they had BIG funding]. > Still, I like a guy > or gal who is so passionate about what he does that he/she f____s up the > funding, doesn't > get it right, and yet..... had to do it. Artists, creative folk, so rarely > get the accounting, but > they get everything else. Let's hope he gets through it. > > Did you sell the W
because you were tired of it or because you wanted to > gain a couple of > other cool bikes? > > kev > > > > > --- In W650riders@yahoogroups.com, "Dennis J. Guggemos" > wrote: > > > > Kev > > > > The GB is buckets of fun, and a sure conversation starter just like the > W. The Ninja isn't > a 114hp 600 four, just a lowly 65 hp twin. Tops out around 130 I hear but > I'll never find > out for myself. It does get to the ton in a hurry though. It has a pretty > fair power band, > kind of like a super W, useable low end, comes on the cam about 6k and pulls > like a m-f- > r. Red line at 11k but max power at around 8800. They cheaped out on the > suspension, > the only adjustment is rear spring preload. The forks are just beefier
W > forks. However > that frame is super stiff, the racers love it. > > > > Sold the W to a guy that walked into the local dealer where I had left > word. Seems like a > nice kid, said that's they way he would have wanted to fix it up so I saved > him a lot of > trouble. He does a lot of 2-up with his gf and they like it. They're not > really near here so > not likely I'll see it again. > > > > I read a bike tabloid a month or so ago that told of the demise of the > Norton. I suppose > if they can find another bunch of money it could still be a go. I don't > trust everything I read > on their website now as the $ meltdown happened months ago but the website > didn't say > anything about it. > > > > Dennis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message
----- > > From: kevin_cooklin > > To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:29 AM > > Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... > > > > > > Dennis-- > > > > Wow, two other bikes.... and sold your W. Hey, the GB500 has to be a > blast, as does the > > Ninja. I'm pretty sure I'd kill myself with a Ninja. Of course, now > that you've sold the W, > > you must resign your office! Kidding, of course. Did you sell the W to > a pal, or on Ebay, > > or.... just curious. > > > > Did the new Norton just call it quits recently? I was checking them as > recently as a > month > > ago; at that time they indicated they'd quit their factory and were in > search for another. > > They were also seeking
more money, of course. But they had not formally > thrown in > the > > towel. What a shame. But heck, that new Ducati Sport Classic, the GT, > sure looks nice. > > Haven't seen one for real yet. > > > > Yes, need to get out there more on the bike. It's already feeling like > fall here in PA. > > > > Best, > > > > kev > > Recent Activity > > a.. 16New Members > > b.. 1New Files > > Visit Your Group > > SPONSORED LINKS > > a.. Kawasaki motorcycles > > b.. Kawasaki vulcan > > c.. Kawasaki motorcycle accessory > > d.. Kawasaki motorcycle exhaust > > e.. Kawasaki motorcycle part > > Yahoo! News > > Space News > > > > Get the latest > > > > space related news > > > > Y! Toolbar > > Get it Free! >
> > > easy 1-click access > > > > to your groups. > > > > Yahoo! Groups > > Start a group > > > > in 3 easy steps. > > > > Connect with others. > > . > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _ ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
Shape Yahoo! in your own image.
|
Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650
Well a stock one isn't as quick as a W650 which is about as slow as modern motorcycles get....which makes the Sporty pretty slow. Certainly my warmed up W will beat a loud piped 1200 Sporty from 60 to 100 plus....two up.....And Lucy was on the back when we did it...
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
A 1200 Sporty is by no means slow. It's about as fast a Harley platform as there is. /--- In W650riders@..., "Alexander Ward" <award@...> wrote:
I've been lurking on this list for years, but now I have to chime in
on this topic.
I think the Sportster is a great partner to the W650. I have both a
2000 W650 and a 1996 Sportster XL1200S Sport. The Sport has adjustable Showa forks and dual front discs. If you add rearsets and
clipons and a decent seat, then it becomes a really fun scoot. '
No, it is not particularly fast, but the wide flat powerband and more than ample torque combine with decent handling and braking
to make it easy to ride without requiring a lot of work. If you switch to 17" wheels and sticky tires it gets even better. Don't worry about the vibration if you buy an older one with a solid- mount
engine, just install BalanceMasters active vibration dampers and fiddle with the final drive ratios (or even switch to chain drive) and once it is dialed in, then just enjoy it.
Although any Japanese 600 can run rings around it, that is balanced
out by the double-takes from all of the head-to-toe leather-clad dumplings on their cool Harleys who are cruising along at 30mph when
you pass them on the outside of a curve.
You do have to think about it though. One of the classic disparaging
comments about Harleys is that they vibrate so much that parts fall
off. It is true, too. the first time I rode the Sporty any distance, both mirrors, the taillight, and one turn signal fell off.
I felt like I had finally gained admittance to a long and proud tradition!
At any rate, keep the W650, get a Sportster too.
Alex
--- In W650riders@..., "Larry Botheras" <larry.botheras@> wrote:
Think long and hard. unless it's tricked up the 1200 sporty
will
feel
slower than the W IMHO, it's not that much more powerful (HD never
quote)
but it is a lot heavier
From: W650riders@... [mailto:W650riders@...] On
Behalf Of John Sent: 11 July 2007 06:39 To: W650riders@... Subject: [W650riders] Thinking about getting rid of my w650
I found a sportster 1200r that's tempting me to get rid of the w.
What
are your thoughts on the 2006 sportster 1200 roadster?
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. :: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.6/900 - Release Date: 14/07/2007 15:36
|
Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
I always considered the CMC/Indian to be something P.T. Barnum would have been proud to have sold. James Franklin wrote: Actually, that quote attributed to me, was not from me, don't know where it came from, but was probably a reply to what I had written earlier about the CMC James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211 808-225-0994 (cell) From: "john gary simpson" < eustisgary@yahoo.com> Reply-To: W650riders@yahoogroups.comTo: W650riders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:42:43 -0000 Excelsior-Henderson bit the dust when the dotcoms took off. They needed money to ramp up production, and most of their investors pulled out and started putting their money in dotcoms instead. Too bad. My 11 second EH was one of the most satisfying bikes I ever owned!--- In W650riders@yahoogroups.com, "James Franklin" > wrote: > > The Excelsior/Henderson people screwed that up even though they had huge > backing money. Indian (California Motorcycle Company version, not the > Springfield
company original) sold really poor quality motorcycles in the > beginning, some of it was bad suppliers... the bike was a composite, and some > of it of course, was trying to build too many, too soon. In their last > couple of years the product was better quality, but the bike had a limited > market, and those really interested probably bought the original bikes and > got burned. > > > > James Franklin > P.O. Box 289 > Waimanalo, HI 96795-0289 > USA > 808-225-0994 (cell) > > > > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: "kevin_cooklin" .> > Reply-To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com> To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com> Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc > Date: Fri, 15
Sep 2006 02:00:38 -0000 > > Hey, Den-- > > If I remember our goodly Gene had a GB? They are not cheap anymore. > Distant memories > tell me my own papa (I'm not Italian but am using this for literary effect > only) bought one, > then lost it in a poker game. The dog. He could have waited for me to take > it for a spin. > But it's a gorgeous bike. To. Be. Sure. > > Ninja. I probably just need to hop on one sometime and go crazy. In all > honesty, I've had > this anti-crotch- rocket mentality all my life, and I don't know why. > There's no reason for > it. I graduated from high school in 1980. There's absolutely no sense to > it. So I need to > overcome the prejudice and give it a go. Come on out and let me take yours > for a spin. I > still would sell off my house for a 750 Norton Roadster, though. It be in > the
blood. > > Don't completely rule out the new Norton, although all bets are most likely > on failure. > Huge undertaking, and underfunding is always the killer. [The attempt to > bring back the > Indian is an architypal model on the subject, and they had BIG funding]. > Still, I like a guy > or gal who is so passionate about what he does that he/she f____s up the > funding, doesn't > get it right, and yet..... had to do it. Artists, creative folk, so rarely > get the accounting, but > they get everything else. Let's hope he gets through it. > > Did you sell the W because you were tired of it or because you wanted to > gain a couple of > other cool bikes? > > kev > > > > > --- In W650riders@yahoogroups.com, "Dennis J. Guggemos" >
wrote: > > > > Kev > > > > The GB is buckets of fun, and a sure conversation starter just like the > W. The Ninja isn't > a 114hp 600 four, just a lowly 65 hp twin. Tops out around 130 I hear but > I'll never find > out for myself. It does get to the ton in a hurry though. It has a pretty > fair power band, > kind of like a super W, useable low end, comes on the cam about 6k and pulls > like a m-f- > r. Red line at 11k but max power at around 8800. They cheaped out on the > suspension, > the only adjustment is rear spring preload. The forks are just beefier W > forks. However > that frame is super stiff, the racers love it. > > > > Sold the W to a guy that walked into the local dealer where I had left > word. Seems like a > nice kid, said that's they way he would have wanted to fix it up so I saved > him a
lot of > trouble. He does a lot of 2-up with his gf and they like it. They're not > really near here so > not likely I'll see it again. > > > > I read a bike tabloid a month or so ago that told of the demise of the > Norton. I suppose > if they can find another bunch of money it could still be a go. I don't > trust everything I read > on their website now as the $ meltdown happened months ago but the website > didn't say > anything about it. > > > > Dennis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: kevin_cooklin > > To: W650riders@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:29 AM > > Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... > > > > > >
Dennis-- > > > > Wow, two other bikes.... and sold your W. Hey, the GB500 has to be a > blast, as does the > > Ninja. I'm pretty sure I'd kill myself with a Ninja. Of course, now > that you've sold the W, > > you must resign your office! Kidding, of course. Did you sell the W to > a pal, or on Ebay, > > or.... just curious. > > > > Did the new Norton just call it quits recently? I was checking them as > recently as a > month > > ago; at that time they indicated they'd quit their factory and were in > search for another. > > They were also seeking more money, of course. But they had not formally > thrown in > the > > towel. What a shame. But heck, that new Ducati Sport Classic, the GT, > sure looks nice. > > Haven't seen one for real yet. > > > > Yes, need to get out there more on the
bike. It's already feeling like > fall here in PA. > > > > Best, > > > > kev > > Recent Activity > > a.. 16New Members > > b.. 1New Files > > Visit Your Group > > SPONSORED LINKS > > a.. Kawasaki motorcycles > > b.. Kawasaki vulcan > > c.. Kawasaki motorcycle accessory > > d.. Kawasaki motorcycle exhaust > > e.. Kawasaki motorcycle part > > Yahoo! News > > Space News > > > > Get the latest > > > > space related news > > > > Y! Toolbar > > Get it Free! > > > > easy 1-click access > > > > to your groups. > > > > Yahoo! Groups > > Start a group > > > > in 3 easy steps. > > > > Connect with others. > > . >
> > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
No need to miss a message. with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile.
|
Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
But now that we have brought EH into it, never read a test where the journalists liked it, and what I did read about the company is, they spent way too much on an extravagant office building and perks for the brothers who started it, and should have spent more money on promotion and establishing dealerships.
For the CMC Indian, for their last two years, they had a new CEO and build quality was way up..but they burned a lot of bridges with their initial bikes, mostly CDI and other component problems..but the bike was more of an assembled than a manufactured bike.
James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211
808-225-0994 (cell)
From: "James Franklin" <jimw650@...> Reply-To: W650riders@... To: W650riders@... Subject: RE: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:31:23 -1000
Actually, that quote attributed to me, was not from me, don't know where it came from, but was probably a reply to what I had written earlier about the CMC
James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211
808-225-0994 (cell)
From: "john gary simpson" <eustisgary@...> Reply-To: W650riders@... To: W650riders@... Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:42:43 -0000
Excelsior-Henderson bit the dust when the dotcoms took off. They needed money to ramp up production, and most of their investors pulled out and started putting their money in dotcoms instead. Too bad. My 11 second EH was one of the most satisfying bikes I ever owned!--- In W650riders@..., "James Franklin" <jimw650@...> wrote: > > The Excelsior/Henderson people screwed that up even though they had huge > backing money. Indian (California Motorcycle Company version, not the > Springfield company original) sold really poor quality motorcycles in the > beginning, some of it was bad suppliers...the bike was a composite, and some > of it of course, was trying to build too many, too soon. In their last > couple of years the product was better quality, but the bike had a limited > market, and those really interested probably bought the original bikes and > got burned. > > > > James Franklin > P.O. Box 289 > Waimanalo, HI 96795-0289 > USA > 808-225-0994 (cell) > > > > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: "kevin_cooklin" <kcooklin@...> > Reply-To: W650riders@... > To: W650riders@... > Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc > Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:00:38 -0000 > > Hey, Den-- > > If I remember our goodly Gene had a GB? They are not cheap anymore. > Distant memories > tell me my own papa (I'm not Italian but am using this for literary effect > only) bought one, > then lost it in a poker game. The dog. He could have waited for me to take > it for a spin. > But it's a gorgeous bike. To. Be. Sure. > > Ninja. I probably just need to hop on one sometime and go crazy. In all > honesty, I've had > this anti-crotch-rocket mentality all my life, and I don't know why. > There's no reason for > it. I graduated from high school in 1980. There's absolutely no sense to > it. So I need to > overcome the prejudice and give it a go. Come on out and let me take yours > for a spin. I > still would sell off my house for a 750 Norton Roadster, though. It be in > the blood. > > Don't completely rule out the new Norton, although all bets are most likely > on failure. > Huge undertaking, and underfunding is always the killer. [The attempt to > bring back the > Indian is an architypal model on the subject, and they had BIG funding]. > Still, I like a guy > or gal who is so passionate about what he does that he/she f____s up the > funding, doesn't > get it right, and yet..... had to do it. Artists, creative folk, so rarely > get the accounting, but > they get everything else. Let's hope he gets through it. > > Did you sell the W because you were tired of it or because you wanted to > gain a couple of > other cool bikes? > > kev > > > > > --- In W650riders@..., "Dennis J. Guggemos" <djguggms@> > wrote: > > > > Kev > > > > The GB is buckets of fun, and a sure conversation starter just like the > W. The Ninja isn't > a 114hp 600 four, just a lowly 65 hp twin. Tops out around 130 I hear but > I'll never find > out for myself. It does get to the ton in a hurry though. It has a pretty > fair power band, > kind of like a super W, useable low end, comes on the cam about 6k and pulls > like a m-f- > r. Red line at 11k but max power at around 8800. They cheaped out on the > suspension, > the only adjustment is rear spring preload. The forks are just beefier W > forks. However > that frame is super stiff, the racers love it. > > > > Sold the W to a guy that walked into the local dealer where I had left > word. Seems like a > nice kid, said that's they way he would have wanted to fix it up so I saved > him a lot of > trouble. He does a lot of 2-up with his gf and they like it. They're not > really near here so > not likely I'll see it again. > > > > I read a bike tabloid a month or so ago that told of the demise of the > Norton. I suppose > if they can find another bunch of money it could still be a go. I don't > trust everything I read > on their website now as the $ meltdown happened months ago but the website > didn't say > anything about it. > > > > Dennis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: kevin_cooklin > > To: W650riders@... > > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:29 AM > > Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... > > > > > > Dennis-- > > > > Wow, two other bikes.... and sold your W. Hey, the GB500 has to be a > blast, as does the > > Ninja. I'm pretty sure I'd kill myself with a Ninja. Of course, now > that you've sold the W, > > you must resign your office! Kidding, of course. Did you sell the W to > a pal, or on Ebay, > > or.... just curious. > > > > Did the new Norton just call it quits recently? I was checking them as > recently as a > month > > ago; at that time they indicated they'd quit their factory and were in > search for another. > > They were also seeking more money, of course. But they had not formally > thrown in > the > > towel. What a shame. But heck, that new Ducati Sport Classic, the GT, > sure looks nice. > > Haven't seen one for real yet. > > > > Yes, need to get out there more on the bike. It's already feeling like > fall here in PA. > > > > Best, > > > > kev > > Recent Activity > > a.. 16New Members > > b.. 1New Files > > Visit Your Group > > SPONSORED LINKS > > a.. Kawasaki motorcycles > > b.. Kawasaki vulcan > > c.. Kawasaki motorcycle accessory > > d.. Kawasaki motorcycle exhaust > > e.. Kawasaki motorcycle part > > Yahoo! News > > Space News > > > > Get the latest > > > > space related news > > > > Y! Toolbar > > Get it Free! > > > > easy 1-click access > > > > to your groups. > > > > Yahoo! Groups > > Start a group > > > > in 3 easy steps. > > > > Connect with others. > > . > > >
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
|
Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650
Have you actually ridden a 1200 Sporty?--- In W650riders@..., "Larry Botheras" <larry.botheras@...> wrote: Think long and hard. unless it's tricked up the 1200 sporty will
feel slower than the W IMHO, it's not that much more powerful (HD never quote) but it is a lot heavier
From: W650riders@... [mailto:W650riders@...] On Behalf Of John Sent: 11 July 2007 06:39 To: W650riders@... Subject: [W650riders] Thinking about getting rid of my w650
I found a sportster 1200r that's tempting me to get rid of the w. What are your thoughts on the 2006 sportster 1200 roadster?
|
Re: Thinking about getting rid of my w650
A 1200 Sporty is by no means slow. It's about as fast a Harley platform as there is. /--- In W650riders@..., "Alexander Ward" <award@...> wrote: I've been lurking on this list for years, but now I have to chime
in on this topic.
I think the Sportster is a great partner to the W650. I have both a 2000 W650 and a 1996 Sportster XL1200S Sport. The Sport has adjustable Showa forks and dual front discs. If you add rearsets and clipons and a decent seat, then it becomes a really fun scoot. '
No, it is not particularly fast, but the wide flat powerband and more than ample torque combine with decent handling and braking to make it easy to ride without requiring a lot of work. If you switch to 17" wheels and sticky tires it gets even better. Don't worry about the vibration if you buy an older one with a solid- mount engine, just install BalanceMasters active vibration dampers and fiddle with the final drive ratios (or even switch to chain drive) and once it is dialed in, then just enjoy it.
Although any Japanese 600 can run rings around it, that is balanced out by the double-takes from all of the head-to-toe leather-clad dumplings on their cool Harleys who are cruising along at 30mph when you pass them on the outside of a curve.
You do have to think about it though. One of the classic disparaging comments about Harleys is that they vibrate so much that parts fall off. It is true, too. the first time I rode the Sporty any distance, both mirrors, the taillight, and one turn signal fell off. I felt like I had finally gained admittance to a long and proud tradition!
At any rate, keep the W650, get a Sportster too.
Alex
--- In W650riders@..., "Larry Botheras" <larry.botheras@> wrote:
Think long and hard. unless it's tricked up the 1200 sporty
will feel
slower than the W IMHO, it's not that much more powerful (HD never quote)
but it is a lot heavier
From: W650riders@... [mailto:W650riders@...] On
Behalf Of John Sent: 11 July 2007 06:39 To: W650riders@... Subject: [W650riders] Thinking about getting rid of my w650
I found a sportster 1200r that's tempting me to get rid of the w. What
are your thoughts on the 2006 sportster 1200 roadster?
|
Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc
Actually, that quote attributed to me, was not from me, don't know where it came from, but was probably a reply to what I had written earlier about the CMC James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211 808-225-0994 (cell) From: "john gary simpson" <eustisgary@...> Reply-To: W650riders@... To: W650riders@... Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:42:43 -0000 Excelsior-Henderson bit the dust when the dotcoms took off. They needed money to ramp up production, and most of their investors pulled out and started putting their money in dotcoms instead. Too bad. My 11 second EH was one of the most satisfying bikes I ever owned!--- In W650riders@..., "James Franklin" <jimw650@...> wrote: The Excelsior/Henderson people screwed that up even though they
had huge backing money. Indian (California Motorcycle Company version, not the Springfield company original) sold really poor quality motorcycles in the beginning, some of it was bad suppliers...the bike was a composite, and some of it of course, was trying to build too many, too soon. In their last couple of years the product was better quality, but the bike had a limited market, and those really interested probably bought the original bikes and got burned.
James Franklin P.O. Box 289 Waimanalo, HI 96795-0289 USA 808-225-0994 (cell)
----Original Message Follows---- From: "kevin_cooklin" <kcooklin@...> Reply-To: W650riders@... To: W650riders@... Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... nwc Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:00:38 -0000
Hey, Den--
If I remember our goodly Gene had a GB? They are not cheap anymore. Distant memories tell me my own papa (I'm not Italian but am using this for literary effect only) bought one, then lost it in a poker game. The dog. He could have waited for me to take it for a spin. But it's a gorgeous bike. To. Be. Sure.
Ninja. I probably just need to hop on one sometime and go crazy. In all honesty, I've had this anti-crotch-rocket mentality all my life, and I don't know why. There's no reason for it. I graduated from high school in 1980. There's absolutely no sense to it. So I need to overcome the prejudice and give it a go. Come on out and let me take yours for a spin. I still would sell off my house for a 750 Norton Roadster, though. It be in the blood.
Don't completely rule out the new Norton, although all bets are most likely on failure. Huge undertaking, and underfunding is always the killer. [The attempt to bring back the Indian is an architypal model on the subject, and they had BIG funding]. Still, I like a guy or gal who is so passionate about what he does that he/she f____s up the funding, doesn't get it right, and yet..... had to do it. Artists, creative folk, so rarely get the accounting, but they get everything else. Let's hope he gets through it.
Did you sell the W because you were tired of it or because you wanted to gain a couple of other cool bikes?
kev
--- In W650riders@..., "Dennis J. Guggemos" <djguggms@> wrote: > > Kev > > The GB is buckets of fun, and a sure conversation starter just like the W. The Ninja isn't a 114hp 600 four, just a lowly 65 hp twin. Tops out around 130 I hear but I'll never find out for myself. It does get to the ton in a hurry though. It has a pretty fair power band, kind of like a super W, useable low end, comes on the cam about 6k and pulls like a m-f- r. Red line at 11k but max power at around 8800. They cheaped out on the suspension, the only adjustment is rear spring preload. The forks are just beefier W forks. However that frame is super stiff, the racers love it. > > Sold the W to a guy that walked into the local dealer where I had left word. Seems like a nice kid, said that's they way he would have wanted to fix it up so I saved him a lot of trouble. He does a lot of 2-up with his gf and they like it. They're not really near here so not likely I'll see it again. > > I read a bike tabloid a month or so ago that told of the demise of the Norton. I suppose if they can find another bunch of money it could still be a go. I don't trust everything I read on their website now as the $ meltdown happened months ago but the website didn't say anything about it. > > Dennis > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: kevin_cooklin > To: W650riders@... > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:29 AM > Subject: [W650riders] Re: 95, 295, 495 Highways, all.... > > > Dennis-- > > Wow, two other bikes.... and sold your W. Hey, the GB500 has to be a blast, as does the > Ninja. I'm pretty sure I'd kill myself with a Ninja. Of course, now that you've sold the W, > you must resign your office! Kidding, of course. Did you sell the W to a pal, or on Ebay, > or.... just curious. > > Did the new Norton just call it quits recently? I was checking them as recently as a month > ago; at that time they indicated they'd quit their factory and were in search for another. > They were also seeking more money, of course. But they had not formally thrown in the > towel. What a shame. But heck, that new Ducati Sport Classic, the GT, sure looks nice. > Haven't seen one for real yet. > > Yes, need to get out there more on the bike. It's already feeling like fall here in PA. > > Best, > > kev > Recent Activity > a.. 16New Members > b.. 1New Files > Visit Your Group > SPONSORED LINKS > a.. Kawasaki motorcycles > b.. Kawasaki vulcan > c.. Kawasaki motorcycle accessory > d.. Kawasaki motorcycle exhaust > e.. Kawasaki motorcycle part > Yahoo! News > Space News > > Get the latest > > space related news > > Y! Toolbar > Get it Free! > > easy 1-click access > > to your groups. > > Yahoo! Groups > Start a group > > in 3 easy steps. > > Connect with others. > . >
_________________________________________________________________
|
Is Al Gore in it?
?
Dennis
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 8:53 AM
Subject: [W650riders] NWC: Brits in
hacks
Back in the 50s, during summer vacation, us kids
were allowed to stay up till all hours watching TV.
Back then, for some reason, most of the late
night movies were British imports. At least that was true in the San Francisco
area.
?
One movie that I'll never forget was about a man,
driving a motorcycle with a sidecar, who kidnaps a young girl so he can get
money to help his wife who had some medical problem.
?
Anyone ever see this movie?
?
?
gene in OR
.
|