Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Re: Chain of Command rules question
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýOk that all seems to make sense - they will just have to make the best of it - I think it is a mute point anyway as another 15cm shell will be on its way soon!
Sent from my Galaxy
-------- Original message --------
From: Penguin Koen <kgpm.desmedt@...>
Date: 08/02/2021 10:01 (GMT+00:00)
Subject: Re: [TooFatLardies] Chain of Command rules question
Ah, I see what you mean, now, after checking the rules...
"If four or more 6¡¯s are rolled when rolling to hit?the target, the structure will begin to collapse. Troops in a collapsing building will roll 1D6 for?each man inside the structure, losing one man to falling rubble for every 5 or 6 rolled. Any?survivors
will then be placed immediately outside any door of the building of their opponent¡¯s choosing."
Obviously he chose an exposed door :D
I'd say that it could be cheesy if they run back through the building, otoh if the are really really exposed, they may take their chances with that. But in that case, I'd say they would have to roll for casualties due to falling rubble, once for every
phase they are inside or immediately adjacent to it. And add a chance of the building actually collapsing and all becoming casualties.
But to be honest, the?rules clearly suggest they can't go back in - you MUST evacuate already once the building becomes unstable, and even if not stated in the same words, it is at least implied in the rules on collapsing buildings.?
/K
Op ma 8 feb. 2021 om 10:43 schreef James Catchpole via
<jlcatchpole=[email protected]>:
---
|
to navigate to use esc to dismiss