开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

[Abraham-Hicks] A poem with morning tea


Connee Chandler
 

Thanks for reminding us what we share makes a difference, Cary!

I am reminded today that every single thought is a higher frequency than some
thoughts, a lower frequency than other thoughts. Every thought will resonate
differently with the guidance system of different people.

Wow! Life is so interesting!

Love and hugs,

Connee


evelyn wray
 

Connee Chandler wrote:

"I am reminded today that every single thought is a higher frequency than some
thoughts"


The Science of Deliberate Creation question:

Is there a body of hard science that embraces the thought as vibration point of view?

Can thought frequency be measured in Hz frequency?

If the thought is direct correlation with the emotion, then can emotional measurements be indicative of thought frequency?

Ia mud pie. vbg...Evie












---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more
faith.yahoo.com


Connee Chandler
 

Hi, Evie,

I don't know the answer to your questions...yet. I look forward
to reading what others say.

If the thought is direct correlation with the emotion, then can
emotional measurements be indicative of thought frequency?
And, I do have thoughts that might be somewhat related.

Some doctor said on a cymatics video I saw that particular
healthy organs have a vibrational frequency that can be
measured. A healthy liver is one frequency, a diseased liver has
another frequency. And they found that if they could introduce a
sound that matches the frequency of the healthy liver, that
healing takes place faster.

The other thing that occurs to me is that everything is
relative. Someone feels a thought to be a lower, slower
thought. Another person feels the same thought to be a higher
faster thought. It seems like that would indicate that one of
the people is at a higher faster place than the thought, and the
other at a lower, slower place than the thought.

But in my observation, it isn't that simple. Different people,
with what seem like very high fast frequencies, got there on
different paths. They have entirely different belief systems
that have supported their moving toward bliss or peace. Thoughts
from other belief systems seem to tend to feel lower and slower
to them, even if they are the highest fastest thoughts of that
other belief system.

For example, I spent some time with some LDS missionary boys.
What brilliantly illuminated young men they were, they invited me
to call them Elder! They loved Jesus with their whole hearts,
and were devoting a couple of years of their lives to carrying
this beautiful message to others. They brought me a highly
graphic video of the Good Friday experience. I felt assaulted by
it. But when it was over, they were glowing even brighter. I
said, "Obviously you see something in there that is different
from what I see in there. Tell me what you see." This simple,
beautiful young man sitting next to me said, "I see love. He did
it for me!"

He could see love, vividly, obviously, where I could see no
love. He was absolutely radiating gratitude and appreciation. I
felt sick. Who had the higher faster frequency? That movie made
him soar. It made me cringe. I think the message is that he
should watch the movie, it amplifies his connection. And I
should find other movies to watch that leave me feeling like that
movie left him!

Therefore, I've come to think of it as residing on different
mountains. I have a sense of the higher and more appealing
thoughts on my mountain. But someone else's mountain has a whole
different set of thoughts. And some others prefer to reside in
the valley and fish by the river, and the lower slower thoughts
of Old Man River keep rolling along and feel incredibly good to
them as they bliss out by the river.

In other words, for today, I give up on measuring the relative
frequencies of other people's thoughts! I'll pay attention to my
own, and use my discernment to see if I'd like to take on
thinking thoughts I hear, or I'd rather let them slide for now.

I very intrigued right now about this idea of hearing other
people describe the beauty they can see, the harmony they can
hear, the delicious motion of energy they can appreciate.
Whatever the mode, I want to know more about the flavors of
connection!

Love and hugs,

Connee


Ashley Long
 

HI Connee,

I've been thinking about this a lot lately. My
thoughts have come from a shift with me in re-focusing
the old 'right and wrong' beliefs.
I'm really feeling how beautiful it is that we all get
to decide for ourselves what we love and don't love
and what we find that inspires us.
I've really had a craving to get back to writing and I
pulled out some of my old manuscripts and was reading
them. I got all excited about the characters
again...but found myself struggling with the thought
of "should I change the direction of this story"?
I use to write paranormal erotica. Now, my perceptions
of the paranormal have really changed...but the
subject still really thrills me. And I
realized...therein lies the point....its something
that 'thrills' me...irregardless of what I think about
certain subjects within that realm...I love mysteries,
the unknown and things that go to those 'unknown dark
places'.
Now.....my thoughts then went to this: That subject is
not typically thought as a 'high' vibration...because
it is usually connected to the emotion of fear....but
'my' vibration while enjoying those subjects is high
due to the enjoyment experienced.
Just like my daughter loves being reckless and riding
really scary rides at amusement parks, but for me they
are HORRIBLE and I can't stand them!
More and more I see the beauty of our freedom to find
joy in whatever we deem as joy.
And....that led to this thought....I wonder....and
this is a whole new can of worms....the question of
"Why do bad things always seem to happen to good
people"? Why is it that there have been some really
'bad' people who got away with some really 'bad'
things and seem to have it all 'their' way? I
wonder...if in doing what they did, were they so in
bliss over it, that they were able to 'get away with
it'...and were so many of those 'good' people not
living in joy due to believing they always had to be
'so good'?
OK, I'll put an end to my rambling for this
evening....lol.

Ash



__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More


maija ruman
 

I have always assumed that emotion resulted from the DIFFERENCE between the thought we think and the belief we have about it. A new thought would feel unfamiliar, and thus uncomfortable. An angry thought would separate us from our innate beliefs altogether. But once we align the two, there's nothing but wind and bright sunshine underneath our wings. I can't imagine how a thought in itself could have 'frequency'. Like - is it 'higher' to think about a castle instead of a button? I believe that Abraham refers to a 'low' frequency as being out of alignment, because very little energy is available under such circumstances. LOve, Maija

Connee Chandler <connee@...> wrote:<Hi, Evie,

I don't know the answer to your questions...yet. I look forward
to reading what others say.>

If the thought is direct correlation with the emotion, then can>>
emotional measurements be indicative of thought frequency?>>
<. . . for today, I give up on measuring the relative
frequencies of other people's thoughts! I'll pay attention to my
own, and use my discernment to see if I'd like to take on
thinking thoughts I hear, or I'd rather let them slide for now.>




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more
faith.yahoo.com


evelyn wray
 

Maija, I had supposed it may be a higher frequency to 'think' of bliss in contrast to shame. Evelyn
maija ruman <maijaruman@...> wrote:
I have always assumed that emotion resulted from the DIFFERENCE between the thought we think and the belief we have about it. A new thought would feel unfamiliar, and thus uncomfortable. An angry thought would separate us from our innate beliefs altogether. But once we align the two, there's nothing but wind and bright sunshine underneath our wings. I can't imagine how a thought in itself could have 'frequency'. Like - is it 'higher' to think about a castle instead of a button? I believe that Abraham refers to a 'low' frequency as being out of alignment, because very little energy is available under such circumstances. LOve, Maija

Connee Chandler wrote:
I don't know the answer to your questions...yet. I look forward
to reading what others say.>

If the thought is direct correlation with the emotion, then can>>
emotional measurements be indicative of thought frequency?>>
<. . . for today, I give up on measuring the relative
frequencies of other people's thoughts! I'll pay attention to my
own, and use my discernment to see if I'd like to take on
thinking thoughts I hear, or I'd rather let them slide for now.>






---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more
faith.yahoo.com


maija ruman
 

And exactly under which circumstances would shame be in alignment with your innate beliefs? When you are born knowing you are good, and powerful, and magnificent? LOve, Maija

evelyn wray <wrayevelyn@...> wrote:
Maija, I had supposed it may be a higher frequency to 'think' of bliss in contrast to shame. Evelyn
maija ruman <maijaruman@...> wrote:
I have always assumed that emotion resulted from the DIFFERENCE between the thought we think and the belief we have about it. A new thought would feel unfamiliar, and thus uncomfortable. An angry thought would separate us from our innate beliefs altogether. But once we align the two, there's nothing but wind and bright sunshine underneath our wings. I can't imagine how a thought in itself could have 'frequency'. Like - is it 'higher' to think about a castle instead of a button? I believe that Abraham refers to a 'low' frequency as being out of alignment, because very little energy is available under such circumstances. LOve, Maija



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more
faith.yahoo.com


Stephanie Yamout
 

You wrote:I can't imagine how a thought in itself could have 'frequency'.
Like - is it 'higher' to think about a castle instead of a button?


Since everything is frequency also a thought falls into this law. A castle
is a castle, a button is a button. It is YOU who gives the castle a meaning
and the button another meaning. Per se, everything is without meaning; only
we humans attach emotion to each "thing" and thus have different vibrations.
If you feel better about a castle, well, that's you. If you feel better
about a button, well, that's you again. We have mass-beliefs and thus make
ourselves believe that certain things are better and others are less good.
It's all in our heads. Try it out.

Love, Stephanie


Joan
 

{I have always assumed that emotion resulted from the DIFFERENCE between the
thought we think and the belief we have about it. A new thought would feel
unfamiliar, and thus uncomfortable. An angry thought would separate us from
our innate beliefs altogether. But once we align the two, there's nothing
but wind and bright sunshine underneath our wings. I can't imagine how a
thought in itself could have 'frequency'. Like - is it 'higher' to think
about a castle instead of a button? I believe that Abraham refers to a 'low'
frequency as being out of alignment, because very little energy is available
under such circumstances. LOve, Maija }

My immediate reaction was it's the amount of joy you feel that establishes
the frequency....whether it's the "right button" or the "right castle"? If
you feel joy then you're aligned?
Hugs and smiles,
Joan