Maija, I had supposed it may be a higher frequency to 'think' of bliss in contrast to shame. Evelyn
maija ruman <maijaruman@...> wrote:
I have always assumed that emotion resulted from the DIFFERENCE between the thought we think and the belief we have about it. A new thought would feel unfamiliar, and thus uncomfortable. An angry thought would separate us from our innate beliefs altogether. But once we align the two, there's nothing but wind and bright sunshine underneath our wings. I can't imagine how a thought in itself could have 'frequency'. Like - is it 'higher' to think about a castle instead of a button? I believe that Abraham refers to a 'low' frequency as being out of alignment, because very little energy is available under such circumstances. LOve, Maija
Connee Chandler wrote:
I don't know the answer to your questions...yet. I look forward
to reading what others say.>
If the thought is direct correlation with the emotion, then can>>
emotional measurements be indicative of thought frequency?>>
<. . . for today, I give up on measuring the relative
frequencies of other people's thoughts! I'll pay attention to my
own, and use my discernment to see if I'd like to take on
thinking thoughts I hear, or I'd rather let them slide for now.>
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more
faith.yahoo.com
