On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 at 00:40, John Kolb <jlkolb@...> wrote:
Agreed
That requires making and calibrating an RF volt meter. I don¡¯t know the what sort of accuracy one could achieve with that, but I don¡¯t have any obvious ways of checking that. If that resistor was 10 m ohm, which was the sort of value I was hoping to use, a 50 ohm power meter would cause negligible loading. But RF lower measurements are tricky, and achieving a 2% uncertainty is tricky. Neither my RF power meter no the 10 MHz to 18 GHz sensors are calibrated. At least a thermal method can be calibrated with DC substitution. I suspect that my uncertainty of a thermal method would be lower than I achieve with an RF volt meter.? I am interested in making the overall uncertainty of Q measurements as low as possible - not because I have a need for a low uncertainty, but because it would be interesting to do the best job possible.
Dave? Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd, drkirkby@... Telephone 01621-680100./ +44 1621 680100 Registered in England & Wales, company number 08914892. Registered office: Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Althorne, Chelmsford, Essex, CM3 6DT, United Kingdom |