¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: RF Current meters


 

On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 at 00:40, John Kolb <jlkolb@...> wrote:

Even if you could get accurate measurements with the limited contact
area, you would still be faced with the slow response time of a glass
thermometer.? Makes adjustments difficult.
Agreed


I like the idea of a fixed gain amplifier and diode detector directly
measuring the voltage across the 0.02 or whatever ohm resistor.

That requires making and calibrating an RF volt meter. I don¡¯t know the what sort of accuracy one could achieve with that, but I don¡¯t have any obvious ways of checking that. If that resistor was 10 m ohm, which was the sort of value I was hoping to use, a 50 ohm power meter would cause negligible loading. But RF lower measurements are tricky, and achieving a 2% uncertainty is tricky. Neither my RF power meter no the 10 MHz to 18 GHz sensors are calibrated. At least a thermal method can be calibrated with DC substitution. I suspect that my uncertainty of a thermal method would be lower than I achieve with an RF volt meter.?

I am interested in making the overall uncertainty of Q measurements as low as possible - not because I have a need for a low uncertainty, but because it would be interesting to do the best job possible.

John

Dave?
--
Dr. David Kirkby,
Kirkby Microwave Ltd,
drkirkby@...

Telephone 01621-680100./ +44 1621 680100

Registered in England & Wales, company number 08914892.
Registered office:
Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Althorne, Chelmsford, Essex, CM3 6DT, United Kingdom

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.