¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Making a Q-meter / References etc


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks, but I already noted that explicitly in the first paragraph of my post. My question is not about the symbols, but about the units when spelled out. David asserted that the BIPM says that even in that case, one does not add an s. I cannot find any reference to such a rule in my search of BIPM docs.

--Tom
--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070
On 8/29/2022 20:15, Brian wrote:

The Style Manual, the Australian Government Publishing Service document, states quite categorically that SI unit symbols never take a plural s (Wiley Australia, 2002:184). This is based on ISO:31:1992.

Cheers, Brian

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Lee
Sent: Tuesday, 30 August 2022 8:26 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] Making a Q-meter / References etc

?

Thanks for that, David. I do have a question about plurals, however. IEEE journal editorial practice explicitly disagrees with your rule about plurals when the unit is spelled out. The IEEE says to add an s, so ¡°2 watts¡± is correct, according to them. That also conforms with standard English grammar rules.

?

Since my style guide is decades old, I took a look at the most recent BIPM SI summary. I could not find any reference to a pluralization rule anywhere in its 102 pages (other than a prohibition against adding an s to unit abbreviations) but I was only skimming. If you could point me to a specific page in that or done other document, I¡¯d appreciate it greatly.

Cheers,

Tom


Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.