Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Re: Possible designs for a Ultra low noise 1 Hz to 100kHz amplifier for Phase Noise Analyzer?
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýOn 21/08/2022 00:30, F1EKU wrote:This is not true. The S/N and hence noise figure may decrease with addition of more parallel transistors, but it doesn't improve by 3dB for every doubling of the number. Paralleling transistors only reduces the noise contributed by the transistors, the source noise remains the same. It is really only useful if the noise figure of the transistor is significant to start with. If a transistor stage has a noise figure of 3dB, for example, it means that half the noise is contributed by the transistor. If you add another identical transistor in parallel (all other things being unchanged), the transistors' contribution will reduce by half, but the total noise is still ? of what it was. The noise figure will now be 1.75dB - an improvement of 1.25dB. If you double again to 4 transistors, the resulting noise figure will now be 0.96dB - incremental improvement of 0.79dB. The benefit of each doubling of the number of transistors rapidly diminishes. Here's a table with more cases: <------------------------------------------------------- Noise Figure of n transistors in parallel -----------------------------------------------------> ?1??? ? 2??? ???? 3? ?? ??? 4??? ? ?? 5??? ? ?? 6? ?? ??? 7?? ? ? ? 8???????? 9?? ? ? ? 10?? ? ?? 11?? ? ?? 12? ? ??? 13?? ? ?? 14 ? ?? ? 15? ? ? ? 16 1dB??? 0.53dB??? 0.36dB??? 0.27dB??? 0.22dB??? 0.18dB??? 0.16dB??? 0.14dB??? 0.12dB??? 0.11dB??? 0.10dB??? 0.09dB??? 0.09dB??? 0.08dB??? 0.07dB??? 0.07dB 2dB??? 1.11dB??? 0.77dB??? 0.59dB??? 0.48dB??? 0.40dB??? 0.35dB??? 0.31dB??? 0.27dB??? 0.25dB??? 0.22dB??? 0.21dB??? 0.19dB??? 0.18dB??? 0.17dB??? 0.16dB 3dB??? 1.75dB??? 1.24dB??? 0.96dB??? 0.79dB??? 0.67dB??? 0.58dB??? 0.51dB??? 0.46dB??? 0.41dB??? 0.38dB??? 0.35dB??? 0.32dB??? 0.30dB??? 0.28dB??? 0.26dB 4dB??? 2.45dB??? 1.77dB??? 1.39dB??? 1.15dB??? 0.98dB??? 0.85dB??? 0.75dB??? 0.67dB??? 0.61dB??? 0.56dB??? 0.52dB??? 0.48dB??? 0.45dB??? 0.42dB??? 0.39dB 5dB??? 3.18dB??? 2.36dB??? 1.88dB??? 1.56dB??? 1.34dB??? 1.17dB??? 1.04dB??? 0.94dB??? 0.85dB??? 0.78dB??? 0.72dB??? 0.67dB??? 0.62dB??? 0.58dB??? 0.55dB 6dB??? 3.96dB??? 3.00dB??? 2.42dB??? 2.03dB??? 1.75dB??? 1.54dB??? 1.38dB??? 1.24dB??? 1.13dB??? 1.04dB??? 0.96dB??? 0.90dB??? 0.84dB??? 0.79dB??? 0.74dB 7dB??? 4.78dB??? 3.69dB??? 3.02dB??? 2.56dB??? 2.22dB??? 1.97dB??? 1.77dB??? 1.60dB??? 1.46dB??? 1.35dB??? 1.25dB??? 1.17dB??? 1.09dB??? 1.03dB??? 0.97dB 8dB??? 5.63dB??? 4.42dB??? 3.67dB??? 3.14dB??? 2.75dB??? 2.45dB??? 2.21dB??? 2.01dB??? 1.85dB??? 1.71dB??? 1.59dB??? 1.49dB??? 1.40dB??? 1.32dB??? 1.24dB 9dB??? 6.50dB??? 5.20dB??? 4.37dB??? 3.78dB??? 3.34dB??? 2.99dB??? 2.71dB??? 2.48dB??? 2.29dB??? 2.13dB??? 1.98dB??? 1.86dB??? 1.75dB??? 1.65dB??? 1.57dB 10dB?? 7.40dB??? 6.02dB??? 5.12dB??? 4.47dB??? 3.98dB??? 3.59dB??? 3.27dB??? 3.01dB??? 2.79dB??? 2.60dB??? 2.43dB??? 2.28dB??? 2.16dB??? 2.04dB??? 1.94dB 11dB?? 8.32dB??? 6.87dB??? 5.91dB??? 5.21dB??? 4.67dB??? 4.24dB??? 3.89dB??? 3.59dB??? 3.34dB??? 3.13dB??? 2.94dB??? 2.77dB??? 2.62dB??? 2.49dB??? 2.37dB 12dB?? 9.26dB??? 7.74dB??? 6.73dB??? 5.99dB??? 5.41dB??? 4.94dB??? 4.56dB??? 4.23dB??? 3.95dB??? 3.71dB??? 3.50dB??? 3.31dB??? 3.14dB??? 2.99dB??? 2.85dB 13dB?? 10.20dB?? 8.64dB??? 7.59dB??? 6.80dB??? 6.19dB??? 5.69dB??? 5.28dB??? 4.92dB??? 4.62dB??? 4.35dB??? 4.12dB??? 3.91dB??? 3.72dB??? 3.55dB??? 3.39dB 14dB?? 11.16dB?? 9.56dB??? 8.47dB??? 7.65dB??? 7.01dB??? 6.48dB??? 6.04dB??? 5.66dB??? 5.33dB??? 5.04dB??? 4.79dB??? 4.56dB??? 4.35dB??? 4.16dB??? 3.99dB 15dB?? 12.12dB?? 10.50dB?? 9.37dB??? 8.53dB??? 7.86dB??? 7.30dB??? 6.84dB??? 6.44dB??? 6.09dB??? 5.78dB??? 5.50dB??? 5.26dB??? 5.03dB??? 4.83dB??? 4.64dB ? In practice, it is difficult to see these improvements. --
Regards, Tony |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss