¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: "Electric field strength" measurements?


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Everett,
Thank you. I have it.
Ray, W4BYG

On 8/10/2022 20:11, Everett N4CY via groups.io wrote:
If you buy a SDRPlay, there is free SA software on SDRPlays website.

Everett N4CY


On Aug 10, 2022, at 6:59 PM, Paul via groups.io <w8aef@...> wrote:

?

Take a look at the RTLSDR dongle.? Cheap and lots of software available.

?

Paul, W8AEF

?


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray, W4BYG
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 4:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] "Electric field strength" measurements?

?

Harvey,
Thanks for your inputs. I have an RspDuo and an Airspy+ . I've not tried them for a application such as this. I tend to think one would not be able to resolve enough detail accuracy with an SDR, but I have not tried it.

As for less costly commercial SA's, (all but the TinySA ($100 or so, with 2.8" screen)), costs near $1,000, as best I can see.? Also the specs on what I have seen reveal questionable + and - amplitude accuracy. Absolute accuracy is not necessary to reveal any differences between antenna signal levels, but repeatability is important.

While I have much retirement time on my hands and a some dollars to play with for parts, the commercial alternative is still a bit more than I want to spend. I love building and experimenting.
Ray, W4BYG

On 8/10/2022 19:26, Harvey White wrote:

If you had a software defined Radio, could you dig the data out of it?? No idea about bandwidth or sensitivity, but it might be sufficiently sensitive depending on the frequency you're interested in.? As an alternate thought, aren't there some very inexpensive SA's out there?? Would they be sufficient?

Harvey

?

On 8/10/2022 6:46 PM, Ray, W4BYG wrote:

Brooke,
Thank you for your comment. I agree using a SA is probably the best way to measure EMF's. Been there done that.

But it seems that with some of the new chips today. a reasonable arbitrary log characterization could be established (in dbm or dbV) with a reference dipole and then switch the feed to the antenna with supposed gain (or loss) and use a calibrated attenuator to match the level of the reference antenna, then read the delta between them on the attenuator as gain or loss.

I suspect this has already been done by those that are much smarter than I. Just trying to find out if it's so...
Ray, W4BYG

On 8/10/2022 17:24, Brooke Clarke via groups.io wrote:

Hi Ray:

I looked into Measuring EMFs and the best result was based on using a spectrum analyzer that has calibrated amplitudes based on a 50 Ohm input.

?

?

Virus-free.

?


-- 
"If you want to build a strong house, I'll give you my engineer's number. 
If you want to build a strong life, I'll introduce you to my carpenter."
  Lebron and Heather Lackey

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.