The Heathkit
102 QM-1 Q-meter is clearly nowhere near as accurate as a
Boonton, but it a great beginners tool.
?
I¡¯ve found a
better assembly and use manual:
?
And this is
some additional information:
?
An EE friend
talked me through restoring the QM-1. I replaced all the
electrolytic capacitors, measured each resistor and changed
all of them for newer metal film resistors. Most of the the
carbon composition resistors had increased in value, putting
them well out of tolerance, I removed the solder from some
questionable connections, tested all the tubes, then put the
voltage regular and applied power to the unit through a series
120 100W incandescent light bulb.
?
The logic
being any short would cause the bulb to glow brightly. My EE
friend has a special test rig with an Edison light bulb
socket, an AC input power switch, light bulb bypass switch,
and a NEMA 15-5R power socket. He uses different wattage bulbs
for different tests.
?
I¡¯m guessing
all the calibration coils are 250uH with a Q of 110.
?
On the VNA
my calibration coil read 251.4 and the q was 108. Pretty good
for a product older then I.
?
At least I
now have a nice variable RF oscillator that covers 150kHz to
18MHz, or 150kc to 18mc.
?
The case was
actually in much better shape then it initially looked. A lot
of TLC by my artistic inclined wife and the unit looks pretty
snazzy. She used home made soap, warm water, a soft brush,
sponge, and a lot of care. I¡¯m guessing here, but I suspect
she spent 5 hours cleaning the case.
?
The OD3
voltage regulator produced 153 volts, well within tolerance.
All of the tubes (Valves to our British cousins) checked near
perfect for emission.
We replaced the 2 conductor power cord and 2 prong power
connector with a 3 conductor and a NEMA 15-5P 3 prong power
connector and added an internal fuse for safety.
?
It has been
educational to wind coils using various winding schemes.
?
My unit was
compared to a VNA in the EE Instrumentation and measurement
practical lab and, within its limits, it is within 10 to 20%.
?
This is an
overview of using a VNA.
?
Note, I did
not do the measurement! The TA in charge of the lab did that.
They aren¡¯t silly enough to let ¡°sort of freshmen dilatants¡±
touch the expensive test equipment.
?
My next goal
is to get matching knobs for the controls.
?
We replaced
the missing rubber feet with stick on plastic feet.
All in all
this has been a great practical learning experience.
I think I've covered all the major points.
If I might ask a question, "Why the fascination and
determination to make precision measurements of Q?"
Are y'all into radio?
?
?