¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

TG501 2ns & 1ns operation


 

Hi all,

I've been working on rehabbing a TG501. After replacing the shorted Tantalum filter caps on the 15v supply the device has operated pretty well. I've been learning the operation, circuits, and tuning of it without too much difficulty. I've gotten the timing marks synced with a Leo Bodnar GPSDO and, despite not having the OPT1 1MHz oscillator, can achieve a very stable output. That is, almost no drift relative to the GPSDO at 1MHz over long periods of time. Nice output levels too.

A remaining issue I'm having leads me to wonder how the 1ns and 2ns circuits are intended to work. First, I understand 1ns is pretty fast for the equipment I have on hand, but I do have a 7934 with 7B92A time base, and 7A29 vertical amplifiers. It's all in less than ideal condition, but functioning well enough for me to observe the 1ns sine wave. Albeit at a weak level. Is this the 7934 BW limit, or the TG501? Undetermined yet.

But the 2ns output is plenty strong - up to 1.5v p2p. Adjustment of C515 between 1ns and 2ns levels has me turning it down to about 800mv p2p. But still I cannot get anything more than about 40mv p2p on the 1ns output (see above - is it the BW limit of the 7934, or the TG501?).

In working on these outputs I've had them both on the 7934 through both the left and right vertical slots, both going through 7A29s. Switching between the 1ns and 2ns push buttons results in both outputs present (2ns on MARKER OUT, 1ns on 1NS ONLY), but when in 1ns mode the 2ns output drops from 800mv p2p (or whatever I've set it to) to about 40mv p2p. The 1ns sine wave output remains fairly consistent at about 40mv p2p. It looks pretty good - a good sine wave, and the level does change a few mV between 1ns and 2ns settings. The 2ns waveform however, goes from looking beautiful in 2ns mode to ugly (not a clean sine waveform) in 1ns mode.

I'm trying to understand how this is happening. Studying the A2 Multiplier Board schematic <4>, I don't see what the 1ns/2ns push buttons even do to affect the 1ns/2ns circuit operation. It looks like these push buttons are tied together at the input of NOR gate U450C. That having either pushed in enables this gate to pass the 100MHz oscillator into the 10ns Amplifier of Q484/Q486. And it also looks like these push buttons both operate/enable K450, and should result in both 2ns and 1ns outputs to be at their respective output BNCs: MARKER OUT and 1NS ONLY. How is selecting 1ns causing the MARKER OUT output to drop?

I'm suspicious of CR515, but given I don't even see how the 10ns Amplifier output should change at all, that seems to be ignorant grasping. Is there something about the input to U450C I'm not understanding? It seems the 1ns and 2ns outputs should always be present, and the 1ns and 2ns push buttons seem redundant - there should just be one button and both outputs?

I'm perfectly comfortable recognizing the 1ns output level to be BW limited by my setup. It makes tuning C515 guesswork, but I can live with that. If I can't even discern the 1ns output reliably with the equipment I have, I don't actually have much (any?) need for it. But it bothers me that that 2ns is so adversely affected. And that I can't understand why the circuit behaves this way. So any insights are greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Dave


 

Hi Dave,
It looks like the 7932 is a 500 Mhz scope so you be well past 3db down at 1ns time marks. To tune these in the lab I have to scale up to a DSA602A with a 11A72. This gets me right to 1Ghz. The fact that 7932 can trigger is impressive and that trace is viewable is also impressive as the frame is being pushed to double its bandwidth. With this setup wave shape can be inferred but amplitude can not. I would not trust anything "calibration" related out this far. But this also depends on your needs.

Zen

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dave Peterson via groups.io
Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 12:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TekScopes] TG501 2ns & 1ns operation

Hi all,

I've been working on rehabbing a TG501. After replacing the shorted Tantalum filter caps on the 15v supply the device has operated pretty well. I've been learning the operation, circuits, and tuning of it without too much difficulty. I've gotten the timing marks synced with a Leo Bodnar GPSDO and, despite not having the OPT1 1MHz oscillator, can achieve a very stable output. That is, almost no drift relative to the GPSDO at 1MHz over long periods of time. Nice output levels too.

A remaining issue I'm having leads me to wonder how the 1ns and 2ns circuits are intended to work. First, I understand 1ns is pretty fast for the equipment I have on hand, but I do have a 7934 with 7B92A time base, and 7A29 vertical amplifiers. It's all in less than ideal condition, but functioning well enough for me to observe the 1ns sine wave. Albeit at a weak level. Is this the 7934 BW limit, or the TG501? Undetermined yet.

But the 2ns output is plenty strong - up to 1.5v p2p. Adjustment of C515 between 1ns and 2ns levels has me turning it down to about 800mv p2p. But still I cannot get anything more than about 40mv p2p on the 1ns output (see above - is it the BW limit of the 7934, or the TG501?).

In working on these outputs I've had them both on the 7934 through both the left and right vertical slots, both going through 7A29s. Switching between the 1ns and 2ns push buttons results in both outputs present (2ns on MARKER OUT, 1ns on 1NS ONLY), but when in 1ns mode the 2ns output drops from 800mv p2p (or whatever I've set it to) to about 40mv p2p. The 1ns sine wave output remains fairly consistent at about 40mv p2p. It looks pretty good - a good sine wave, and the level does change a few mV between 1ns and 2ns settings. The 2ns waveform however, goes from looking beautiful in 2ns mode to ugly (not a clean sine waveform) in 1ns mode.

I'm trying to understand how this is happening. Studying the A2 Multiplier Board schematic <4>, I don't see what the 1ns/2ns push buttons even do to affect the 1ns/2ns circuit operation. It looks like these push buttons are tied together at the input of NOR gate U450C. That having either pushed in enables this gate to pass the 100MHz oscillator into the 10ns Amplifier of Q484/Q486. And it also looks like these push buttons both operate/enable K450, and should result in both 2ns and 1ns outputs to be at their respective output BNCs: MARKER OUT and 1NS ONLY. How is selecting 1ns causing the MARKER OUT output to drop?

I'm suspicious of CR515, but given I don't even see how the 10ns Amplifier output should change at all, that seems to be ignorant grasping. Is there something about the input to U450C I'm not understanding? It seems the 1ns and 2ns outputs should always be present, and the 1ns and 2ns push buttons seem redundant - there should just be one button and both outputs?

I'm perfectly comfortable recognizing the 1ns output level to be BW limited by my setup. It makes tuning C515 guesswork, but I can live with that. If I can't even discern the 1ns output reliably with the equipment I have, I don't actually have much (any?) need for it. But it bothers me that that 2ns is so adversely affected. And that I can't understand why the circuit behaves this way. So any insights are greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Dave


 

On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 06:17 PM, Dave Peterson wrote:


A remaining issue I'm having leads me to wonder how the 1ns and 2ns circuits
are intended to work. First, I understand 1ns is pretty fast for the equipment
I have on hand, but I do have a 7934 with 7B92A time base, and 7A29 vertical
amplifiers. It's all in less than ideal condition, but functioning well enough
for me to observe the 1ns sine wave. Albeit at a weak level. Is this the 7934
BW limit, or the TG501? Undetermined yet.

The 1ns sine wave output remains fairly consistent at about 40mv p2p.
FYI:

Both my TG501's show the following at 1ns, using ordinary RG58C/U cable:
In 7854/7S11/7T11A/S-4 (BW ca. 14GHz): 320mVpp
in 7904 with 7A29: 200mVpp

Spec for the TG501 is >= 200 mVpp @ 1ns


It looks pretty good - a good sine wave
Because the "pulse" @ 1ns is fast for the equipment (including the 1ns "source" itself!), you can't really expect to see
anything else than a sinewave-like shape, because that would indicate the presence of harmonics, which of course
are outside the equipment's BW limits.
Even using the 14GHz 'scope, the 1ns signal looks like a pretty good sinewave, because of the properties of the TG501.

Raymond


 

I just did a few experiments using a 7103 (1 Ghz) scope, in which I had a 7A29 (1Ghz) and a 7A19 (500 Mhz).

Using a TG501, and having calibrated each with a PG506, you get (roughly) the following observations.? These are observations only, though.

With the 2 ns marker, going between the 7A29 (say 800 mv p/p) shows you 700 mv p/p on a 7A19.

The 1 ns timing waveform is less than the 2 ns waveform on the 7A29.? Call the 1 ns timing waveform about 300 mv p/p.

with the 1 ns output observed, turning on the 2 ns output drops the 1 ns output by about 50% or so.? It doesn't stop it.? Turning on the 5 ns output will kill the 1 ns output.

I've found no difference in waveshape between the 1 ns and 2 ns outputs regardless of pushbutton, when both are present.

I'm going to guess that the bandwidth of a 7A19 and a 7103 is the same as a 7934 and a 7A29, so this should be meaningful for you.

I'd say that while your 1 ns output is a bit low (perhaps), remember that is wasn't really intended to be anything but a source of timing markers.

I'd also suggest that the 1 ns output is possibly visible on your equipment, but at a very reduced amplitude.

Harvey

On 12/2/2021 12:17 PM, Dave Peterson via groups.io wrote:
Hi all,

I've been working on rehabbing a TG501. After replacing the shorted Tantalum filter caps on the 15v supply the device has operated pretty well. I've been learning the operation, circuits, and tuning of it without too much difficulty. I've gotten the timing marks synced with a Leo Bodnar GPSDO and, despite not having the OPT1 1MHz oscillator, can achieve a very stable output. That is, almost no drift relative to the GPSDO at 1MHz over long periods of time. Nice output levels too.

A remaining issue I'm having leads me to wonder how the 1ns and 2ns circuits are intended to work. First, I understand 1ns is pretty fast for the equipment I have on hand, but I do have a 7934 with 7B92A time base, and 7A29 vertical amplifiers. It's all in less than ideal condition, but functioning well enough for me to observe the 1ns sine wave. Albeit at a weak level. Is this the 7934 BW limit, or the TG501? Undetermined yet.

But the 2ns output is plenty strong - up to 1.5v p2p. Adjustment of C515 between 1ns and 2ns levels has me turning it down to about 800mv p2p. But still I cannot get anything more than about 40mv p2p on the 1ns output (see above - is it the BW limit of the 7934, or the TG501?).

In working on these outputs I've had them both on the 7934 through both the left and right vertical slots, both going through 7A29s. Switching between the 1ns and 2ns push buttons results in both outputs present (2ns on MARKER OUT, 1ns on 1NS ONLY), but when in 1ns mode the 2ns output drops from 800mv p2p (or whatever I've set it to) to about 40mv p2p. The 1ns sine wave output remains fairly consistent at about 40mv p2p. It looks pretty good - a good sine wave, and the level does change a few mV between 1ns and 2ns settings. The 2ns waveform however, goes from looking beautiful in 2ns mode to ugly (not a clean sine waveform) in 1ns mode.

I'm trying to understand how this is happening. Studying the A2 Multiplier Board schematic <4>, I don't see what the 1ns/2ns push buttons even do to affect the 1ns/2ns circuit operation. It looks like these push buttons are tied together at the input of NOR gate U450C. That having either pushed in enables this gate to pass the 100MHz oscillator into the 10ns Amplifier of Q484/Q486. And it also looks like these push buttons both operate/enable K450, and should result in both 2ns and 1ns outputs to be at their respective output BNCs: MARKER OUT and 1NS ONLY. How is selecting 1ns causing the MARKER OUT output to drop?

I'm suspicious of CR515, but given I don't even see how the 10ns Amplifier output should change at all, that seems to be ignorant grasping. Is there something about the input to U450C I'm not understanding? It seems the 1ns and 2ns outputs should always be present, and the 1ns and 2ns push buttons seem redundant - there should just be one button and both outputs?

I'm perfectly comfortable recognizing the 1ns output level to be BW limited by my setup. It makes tuning C515 guesswork, but I can live with that. If I can't even discern the 1ns output reliably with the equipment I have, I don't actually have much (any?) need for it. But it bothers me that that 2ns is so adversely affected. And that I can't understand why the circuit behaves this way. So any insights are greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Dave





 

I've added the photo album "TG501 2ns 1ns waveforms" showing what I'm seeing switching between 2ns and 1ns modes:

/g/TekScopes/album?id=270466

I suspect this is _not_ expected behavior.

Given the completely uncalibrated nature of the entire 7934 setup, let's say the 1ns level is a BW limit.

Why does switching 2ns/1ns push buttons change the 2ns output at all!? Given the schematic for the 10ns Amplifier input U450C.


 

On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 08:52 PM, Dave Peterson wrote:


Why does switching 2ns/1ns push buttons change the 2ns output at all!? Given
the schematic for the 10ns Amplifier input U450C.
S350-1 and S350-2 are closed in the 1-2-5 ns position.
With collector of Q270 low (Out of Lock filter), S450B (2ns) connects Marker Out to C515 (2ns signal) via K450-S1 K450.
With 1 ns button depressed, K450-S1 opens that link, reducing and changing load on 2ns filter output and 2ns filter is coupled only to 1ns filter.

Raymond


 

When I fixed mine, I found the best tool for adjusting and looking at the two fastest outputs was a spectrum analyser.

Dan


 

Ah! Thank you Raymond.

I was not clear on how the 1ns/2ns switches were operating K450. I did not get that 1ns switches K450 back off. Now that I go back and reread the Circuit Description it plainly says as much. And now I see (and understand) that this mode also keeps U450B off, so the 5ns output is also disabled.


I asymptotically approach understanding.
Dave

On Thursday, December 2, 2021, 12:25:40 PM PST, Raymond Domp Frank <hewpatek@...> wrote:

On Thu, Dec? 2, 2021 at 08:52 PM, Dave Peterson wrote:


Why does switching 2ns/1ns push buttons change the 2ns output at all!? Given
the schematic for the 10ns Amplifier input U450C.
S350-1 and S350-2 are closed in the 1-2-5 ns position.
With collector of Q270 low (Out of Lock filter), S450B (2ns) connects Marker Out to C515 (2ns signal) via K450-S1 K450.
With 1 ns button depressed, K450-S1 opens that link, reducing and changing load on 2ns filter output and 2ns filter is coupled only to 1ns filter.

Raymond


 

I guess my next question would be: is that horrible 40mV p2p signal coming out of the MARKER OUT "normal" in 1ns mode? Yuck.

I can see how mitigating coupling through the contacts of K450 could be challenging. But does this indicate any issues with Q460, CR468, or any other associated components and wiring? It seems that Q460 should be pulling MARKER OUT up.


 

IIRC, the marker is labeled 2ns to (whatever), which makes me suspect that there was never intended to be a marker out at 1 ns.? Haven't looked at the output, though.

Harvey

On 12/2/2021 5:51 PM, Dave Peterson via groups.io wrote:
I guess my next question would be: is that horrible 40mV p2p signal coming out of the MARKER OUT "normal" in 1ns mode? Yuck.

I can see how mitigating coupling through the contacts of K450 could be challenging. But does this indicate any issues with Q460, CR468, or any other associated components and wiring? It seems that Q460 should be pulling MARKER OUT up.





 

Nope, not intended nor expected. But I don't expect to see the MARKER OUT output to be putting out anything while in 1ns mode. The 1ns output on the 1ns ONLY BNC is otherwise fine - as good as my equipment can make out.
The MARKER OUT should be pulled up by Q460, and I'm seeing a crappy 40mV ~2ns (500MHz) sine wave. I've taken a look at Q460. It's not socketed, so I'm not going to pull it at this point to check on a curve tracer. Not yet anyway. I would like to know what is expected. Am I right that it should be near +5v (minus a diode drop?)?

On Thursday, December 2, 2021, 03:31:39 PM PST, Harvey White <madyn@...> wrote:

IIRC, the marker is labeled 2ns to (whatever), which makes me suspect
that there was never intended to be a marker out at 1 ns.? Haven't
looked at the output, though.

Harvey


On 12/2/2021 5:51 PM, Dave Peterson via groups.io wrote:
I guess my next question would be: is that horrible 40mV p2p signal coming out of the MARKER OUT "normal" in 1ns mode? Yuck.

I can see how mitigating coupling through the contacts of K450 could be challenging. But does this indicate any issues with Q460, CR468, or any other associated components and wiring? It seems that Q460 should be pulling MARKER OUT up.






 

Well, surprise, surprise.? I actually looked at the plugin and I was definitely wrong on the trigger output.

Trigger output valid from 0.1 us to 5 sec.

In mine, you get a + spike at the appropriate time interval up to 0.1 us.

At 0.1 us you get somewhat of a broader trigger, still at the correct spacing (100 ns).

From 0.1 us to 1 ns you get a narrow spike at 100 ns intervals.

Harvey

On 12/2/2021 6:41 PM, Dave Peterson via groups.io wrote:
Nope, not intended nor expected. But I don't expect to see the MARKER OUT output to be putting out anything while in 1ns mode. The 1ns output on the 1ns ONLY BNC is otherwise fine - as good as my equipment can make out.
The MARKER OUT should be pulled up by Q460, and I'm seeing a crappy 40mV ~2ns (500MHz) sine wave. I've taken a look at Q460. It's not socketed, so I'm not going to pull it at this point to check on a curve tracer. Not yet anyway. I would like to know what is expected. Am I right that it should be near +5v (minus a diode drop?)?

On Thursday, December 2, 2021, 03:31:39 PM PST, Harvey White <madyn@...> wrote:
IIRC, the marker is labeled 2ns to (whatever), which makes me suspect
that there was never intended to be a marker out at 1 ns.? Haven't
looked at the output, though.

Harvey


On 12/2/2021 5:51 PM, Dave Peterson via groups.io wrote:
I guess my next question would be: is that horrible 40mV p2p signal coming out of the MARKER OUT "normal" in 1ns mode? Yuck.

I can see how mitigating coupling through the contacts of K450 could be challenging. But does this indicate any issues with Q460, CR468, or any other associated components and wiring? It seems that Q460 should be pulling MARKER OUT up.













 

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 12:41 AM, Dave Peterson wrote:


Nope, not intended nor expected. But I don't expect to see the MARKER OUT
output to be putting out anything while in 1ns mode. The 1ns output on the 1ns
ONLY BNC is otherwise fine - as good as my equipment can make out.
The MARKER OUT should be pulled up by Q460, and I'm seeing a crappy 40mV ~2ns
(500MHz) sine wave. I've taken a look at Q460. It's not socketed, so I'm not
going to pull it at this point to check on a curve tracer. Not yet anyway. I
would like to know what is expected. Am I right that it should be near +5v
(minus a diode drop?)?
I'm not sure if you realize that 2ns and 1ns aren't generated by the 5ns+ circuits; they are separated by K450-S1, which selects either all 5ns+ signals or both the 1ns and 2ns signals. The fact that you can see 1,2 ns and 5ns+ signals indicates that K450-S1 does its selection job. For 1ns and 2ns, everything "above" K450-S1, i.e. from P468, doesn't count.

The 2ns signal is the bandwidth-filtered result of a dirty signal going into the 2ns filter (CL510, C/L511, C/L512, CL513).
CR515 "sharpens" that signal, creating harmonics, which are then bandwidth-filtered out by C/L517, C/L518, C/L519 and C/L5120. the result is a "soft" signal with a frequency of 1GHz, presented at the "1ns only" BNC socket.

The irregular 2ns signal in your picture looks like the result of mixing, caused by leakage: Bad screening by the aluminium cage covering the 1ns and 2ns etc. circuits may cause this. It should be a pretty tight and complete fit. Just the screws holding it in place and making contact isn't enough.
If you can make a setup where you can put pressure on the cage with power on, I wouldn't be surprised if the signal shape of 1ns and 2ns signals visibly varies, depending on pressure exerted on the cage cover.
If that is so, you may want to remove the cage lid and bend its sides together, even to a slightly smaller than 90 degree angle. Use some tool to fit the lid on and put in the screws.
Next, perform the adjustment for the 2ns and 1ns signals (C/L510 ...C/L520), unless everything looks perfect already. Preferably use a ceramic screwdriver, definitely not one with a metal tip. Simple peaking of the signal and watching for a regular signal on your scope will do the job; first 2ns, then 1ns, and repeat until no more changes. This usually is enough to achieve excellent results. The BW of your 'scope is only important in so far as it is able to show and trigger on the signal. Correct amplitude is not important.

Raymond


 

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 01:18 AM, Raymond Domp Frank wrote:


I'm not sure if you realize that 2ns and 1ns aren't generated by the 5ns+
circuits;
Of course, all signals have a common frequency source (variable timing out is a special case).

Raymond


 

The schematic depiction of switches in Tek schematics isn't always clear to me.

Yes, I was clear on the 5, 2, and 1 ns circuits - really the 5ns and 1/2ns circuits, and that K450 switches between them. Thus my confusion regarding K450 DE-activating in 1ns mode. I further missed that in NOT 5ns mode the base of Q460 is pulled up by the disconnection of the 5ns pushbutton (S450A) and R451. And checking the 2ns and 5ns output I now understand why the 5ns mode jumps up in DC offset compared to the 2ns output. Incremental understanding.

So the 2ns Filter output is disconnected from MARKER OUT, Q460 is off, anode of CR468 is pulled down by R465, and MARKER OUT is floating. That explains is susceptibility to noise. Recall I'm the guy who has Sutro Tower looming over my house blasting me with 100MHz broadcast frequencies. Still, the proximity of the 500MHz/2ns signal out of the 2ns Filter is plenty to appear on the MARKER OUT.

I had (in the pictures) the 2ns level C515 set for a large output. Adjusting it to a minimum 2ns level results in a significantly smaller "noise" level on MARKER OUT in 1ns mode. No surprise. There also seems to be a balance between maximum 2ns level and maximum 1ns level. As this is all a tuned resonant type circuit, I'm not surprised. I'm working on rebuilding my small signal analysis chops. And again, I'll say I'm closer to full understanding. But it's always a closer approximation - never quite fully there.

As an aside, since you brought it up: I've been looking for a suitable non-capacitive trimming screwdriver. I just tried making one out of hard plastic, but these aged devices tend to be kind of sticky. It can't stand up to the torque needed to turn some of the caps. So I have to resort to a metal trimmer to get the caps turned. I can do incremental adjustments and get the effects I need.

I've been wary of buying plastic non-capacitive trimmers online. I suspect they'll be no better than I've been able to make myself. You mentioned ceramic. Do you have a particular brand or source for such? An Amazon link perhaps?

Thanks.Dave

On Thursday, December 2, 2021, 04:18:29 PM PST, Raymond Domp Frank <hewpatek@...> wrote:

On Fri, Dec? 3, 2021 at 12:41 AM, Dave Peterson wrote:


Nope, not intended nor expected. But I don't expect to see the MARKER OUT
output to be putting out anything while in 1ns mode. The 1ns output on the 1ns
ONLY BNC is otherwise fine - as good as my equipment can make out.
The MARKER OUT should be pulled up by Q460, and I'm seeing a crappy 40mV ~2ns
(500MHz) sine wave. I've taken a look at Q460. It's not socketed, so I'm not
going to pull it at this point to check on a curve tracer. Not yet anyway. I
would like to know what is expected. Am I right that it should be near +5v
(minus a diode drop?)?
I'm not sure if you realize that 2ns and 1ns aren't generated by the 5ns+ circuits; they are separated by K450-S1, which selects either all 5ns+ signals or both the 1ns and 2ns signals. The fact that you can see 1,2 ns and 5ns+ signals indicates that K450-S1 does its selection job. For 1ns and 2ns, everything "above" K450-S1, i.e. from P468, doesn't count.

The 2ns signal is the bandwidth-filtered result of a dirty signal going into the 2ns filter (CL510, C/L511, C/L512, CL513).
CR515 "sharpens" that signal, creating harmonics, which are then bandwidth-filtered out by C/L517, C/L518, C/L519 and C/L5120. the result is a "soft" signal with a frequency of 1GHz, presented at the "1ns only" BNC socket.

The irregular 2ns signal in your picture looks like the result of mixing, caused by leakage: Bad screening by the aluminium cage covering the 1ns and 2ns etc. circuits may cause this. It should be a pretty tight and complete fit. Just the screws holding it in place and making contact isn't enough.
If you can make a setup where you can put pressure on the cage with power on, I wouldn't be surprised if the signal shape of 1ns and 2ns signals visibly varies, depending on pressure exerted on the cage cover.
If that is so, you may want to remove the cage lid and bend its sides together, even to a slightly smaller than 90 degree angle. Use some tool to fit the lid on and put in the screws.
Next, perform the adjustment for the 2ns and 1ns signals (C/L510 ...C/L520), unless everything looks perfect already. Preferably use a ceramic screwdriver, definitely not one with a metal tip. Simple peaking of the signal and watching for a regular signal on your scope will do the job; first 2ns, then 1ns, and repeat until no more changes. This usually is enough to achieve excellent results. The BW of your 'scope is only important in so far as it is able to show and trigger on the signal. Correct amplitude is not important.

Raymond


 

Re: non-conductive tools

I often make my own from cast-off bits of FR4. A little filing action, and you've got your tool. Works great.

--Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070

On 12/2/2021 17:47, Dave Peterson via groups.io wrote:
The schematic depiction of switches in Tek schematics isn't always clear to me.

Yes, I was clear on the 5, 2, and 1 ns circuits - really the 5ns and 1/2ns circuits, and that K450 switches between them. Thus my confusion regarding K450 DE-activating in 1ns mode. I further missed that in NOT 5ns mode the base of Q460 is pulled up by the disconnection of the 5ns pushbutton (S450A) and R451. And checking the 2ns and 5ns output I now understand why the 5ns mode jumps up in DC offset compared to the 2ns output. Incremental understanding.

So the 2ns Filter output is disconnected from MARKER OUT, Q460 is off, anode of CR468 is pulled down by R465, and MARKER OUT is floating. That explains is susceptibility to noise. Recall I'm the guy who has Sutro Tower looming over my house blasting me with 100MHz broadcast frequencies. Still, the proximity of the 500MHz/2ns signal out of the 2ns Filter is plenty to appear on the MARKER OUT.

I had (in the pictures) the 2ns level C515 set for a large output. Adjusting it to a minimum 2ns level results in a significantly smaller "noise" level on MARKER OUT in 1ns mode. No surprise. There also seems to be a balance between maximum 2ns level and maximum 1ns level. As this is all a tuned resonant type circuit, I'm not surprised. I'm working on rebuilding my small signal analysis chops. And again, I'll say I'm closer to full understanding. But it's always a closer approximation - never quite fully there.

As an aside, since you brought it up: I've been looking for a suitable non-capacitive trimming screwdriver. I just tried making one out of hard plastic, but these aged devices tend to be kind of sticky. It can't stand up to the torque needed to turn some of the caps. So I have to resort to a metal trimmer to get the caps turned. I can do incremental adjustments and get the effects I need.

I've been wary of buying plastic non-capacitive trimmers online. I suspect they'll be no better than I've been able to make myself. You mentioned ceramic. Do you have a particular brand or source for such? An Amazon link perhaps?

Thanks.Dave


On Thursday, December 2, 2021, 04:18:29 PM PST, Raymond Domp Frank <hewpatek@...> wrote:
On Fri, Dec? 3, 2021 at 12:41 AM, Dave Peterson wrote:

Nope, not intended nor expected. But I don't expect to see the MARKER OUT
output to be putting out anything while in 1ns mode. The 1ns output on the 1ns
ONLY BNC is otherwise fine - as good as my equipment can make out.
The MARKER OUT should be pulled up by Q460, and I'm seeing a crappy 40mV ~2ns
(500MHz) sine wave. I've taken a look at Q460. It's not socketed, so I'm not
going to pull it at this point to check on a curve tracer. Not yet anyway. I
would like to know what is expected. Am I right that it should be near +5v
(minus a diode drop?)?
I'm not sure if you realize that 2ns and 1ns aren't generated by the 5ns+ circuits; they are separated by K450-S1, which selects either all 5ns+ signals or both the 1ns and 2ns signals. The fact that you can see 1,2 ns and 5ns+ signals indicates that K450-S1 does its selection job. For 1ns and 2ns, everything "above" K450-S1, i.e. from P468, doesn't count.

The 2ns signal is the bandwidth-filtered result of a dirty signal going into the 2ns filter (CL510, C/L511, C/L512, CL513).
CR515 "sharpens" that signal, creating harmonics, which are then bandwidth-filtered out by C/L517, C/L518, C/L519 and C/L5120. the result is a "soft" signal with a frequency of 1GHz, presented at the "1ns only" BNC socket.

The irregular 2ns signal in your picture looks like the result of mixing, caused by leakage: Bad screening by the aluminium cage covering the 1ns and 2ns etc. circuits may cause this. It should be a pretty tight and complete fit. Just the screws holding it in place and making contact isn't enough.
If you can make a setup where you can put pressure on the cage with power on, I wouldn't be surprised if the signal shape of 1ns and 2ns signals visibly varies, depending on pressure exerted on the cage cover.
If that is so, you may want to remove the cage lid and bend its sides together, even to a slightly smaller than 90 degree angle. Use some tool to fit the lid on and put in the screws.
Next, perform the adjustment for the 2ns and 1ns signals (C/L510 ...C/L520), unless everything looks perfect already. Preferably use a ceramic screwdriver, definitely not one with a metal tip. Simple peaking of the signal and watching for a regular signal on your scope will do the job; first 2ns, then 1ns, and repeat until no more changes. This usually is enough to achieve excellent results. The BW of your 'scope is only important in so far as it is able to show and trigger on the signal. Correct amplitude is not important.

Raymond









 

Dave,

I bought a set of ceramic screwdrivers about a year ago, from Amazon. The best thing I can say about them is that they were inexpensive. They are also very cheap. They do, however, get the job done, and I don't worry about breaking or losing them (as I said: inexpensive).

Somewhere, in my mess of a lab, I should have some ceramic screwdrivers that I bought back in the early 90s, and those were, if my memory is not betraying me, much better made than the ones I bought recently.

I also have a couple of sets of TV trimmer tools, some old, some new. They are all quite cheaply made, but they also do the job for which they were intended.

I like Tom's suggestion to construct your own from bits of FR4. I think I even have a couple of old non-conductive screwdrivers that are basically that; the shafts are made from fiberglass rod. Making your own is probably a good plan, as the ones I have seem to have aged poorly (maybe I need to reshape the tips, which appear to have lost their corners with use).

-- Jeff Dutky


 

Or Vessel ceramic screwdrivers from Japan.? I used them in the early 2000's to adjust inductors in an oscillator.? Way easier than using a regular metal screwdriver; the oscillator drifted off frequency when I pulled it away.? Really annoying!? ? ? ? ?Jim Ford?Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

-------- Original message --------From: Tom Lee <tomlee@...> Date: 12/2/21 6:02 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TekScopes] TG501 2ns & 1ns operation Re: non-conductive toolsI often make my own from cast-off bits of FR4. A little filing action, and you've got your tool. Works great.--Tom-- Prof. Thomas H. LeeAllen Ctr., Rm. 205350 Jane Stanford WayStanford UniversityStanford, CA 94305-4070 12/2/2021 17:47, Dave Peterson via groups.io wrote:>?? The schematic depiction of switches in Tek schematics isn't always clear to me.>> Yes, I was clear on the 5, 2, and 1 ns circuits - really the 5ns and 1/2ns circuits, and that K450 switches between them. Thus my confusion regarding K450 DE-activating in 1ns mode. I further missed that in NOT 5ns mode the base of Q460 is pulled up by the disconnection of the 5ns pushbutton (S450A) and R451. And checking the 2ns and 5ns output I now understand why the 5ns mode jumps up in DC offset compared to the 2ns output. Incremental understanding.>> So the 2ns Filter output is disconnected from MARKER OUT, Q460 is off, anode of CR468 is pulled down by R465, and MARKER OUT is floating. That explains is susceptibility to noise. Recall I'm the guy who has Sutro Tower looming over my house blasting me with 100MHz broadcast frequencies. Still, the proximity of the 500MHz/2ns signal out of the 2ns Filter is plenty to appear on the MARKER OUT.>> I had (in the pictures) the 2ns level C515 set for a large output. Adjusting it to a minimum 2ns level results in a significantly smaller "noise" level on MARKER OUT in 1ns mode. No surprise. There also seems to be a balance between maximum 2ns level and maximum 1ns level. As this is all a tuned resonant type circuit, I'm not surprised. I'm working on rebuilding my small signal analysis chops. And again, I'll say I'm closer to full understanding. But it's always a closer approximation - never quite fully there.>> As an aside, since you brought it up: I've been looking for a suitable non-capacitive trimming screwdriver. I just tried making one out of hard plastic, but these aged devices tend to be kind of sticky. It can't stand up to the torque needed to turn some of the caps. So I have to resort to a metal trimmer to get the caps turned. I can do incremental adjustments and get the effects I need.>> I've been wary of buying plastic non-capacitive trimmers online. I suspect they'll be no better than I've been able to make myself. You mentioned ceramic. Do you have a particular brand or source for such? An Amazon link perhaps?>> Thanks.Dave>>>????? On Thursday, December 2, 2021, 04:18:29 PM PST, Raymond Domp Frank <hewpatek@...> wrote:>?? >?? On Fri, Dec? 3, 2021 at 12:41 AM, Dave Peterson wrote:>>> Nope, not intended nor expected. But I don't expect to see the MARKER OUT>> output to be putting out anything while in 1ns mode. The 1ns output on the 1ns>> ONLY BNC is otherwise fine - as good as my equipment can make out.>> The MARKER OUT should be pulled up by Q460, and I'm seeing a crappy 40mV ~2ns>> (500MHz) sine wave. I've taken a look at Q460. It's not socketed, so I'm not>> going to pull it at this point to check on a curve tracer. Not yet anyway. I>> would like to know what is expected. Am I right that it should be near +5v>> (minus a diode drop?)?>>> I'm not sure if you realize that 2ns and 1ns aren't generated by the 5ns+ circuits; they are separated by K450-S1, which selects either all 5ns+ signals or both the 1ns and 2ns signals. The fact that you can see 1,2 ns and 5ns+ signals indicates that K450-S1 does its selection job. For 1ns and 2ns, everything "above" K450-S1, i.e. from P468, doesn't count.>> The 2ns signal is the bandwidth-filtered result of a dirty signal going into the 2ns filter (CL510, C/L511, C/L512, CL513).> CR515 "sharpens" that signal, creating harmonics, which are then bandwidth-filtered out by C/L517, C/L518, C/L519 and C/L5120. the result is a "soft" signal with a frequency of 1GHz, presented at the "1ns only" BNC socket.>> The irregular 2ns signal in your picture looks like the result of mixing, caused by leakage: Bad screening by the aluminium cage covering the 1ns and 2ns etc. circuits may cause this. It should be a pretty tight and complete fit. Just the screws holding it in place and making contact isn't enough.> If you can make a setup where you can put pressure on the cage with power on, I wouldn't be surprised if the signal shape of 1ns and 2ns signals visibly varies, depending on pressure exerted on the cage cover.> If that is so, you may want to remove the cage lid and bend its sides together, even to a slightly smaller than 90 degree angle. Use some tool to fit the lid on and put in the screws.> Next, perform the adjustment for the 2ns and 1ns signals (C/L510 ...C/L520), unless everything looks perfect already. Preferably use a ceramic screwdriver, definitely not one with a metal tip. Simple peaking of the signal and watching for a regular signal on your scope will do the job; first 2ns, then 1ns, and repeat until no more changes. This usually is enough to achieve excellent results. The BW of your 'scope is only important in so far as it is able to show and trigger on the signal. Correct amplitude is not important.>> Raymond>>>>>>??? >>> >>


 

Both Vessel and Engineer brands are very good Japanese brands I have a bunch of tools from both brands. You can find them everywhere here in Japan, not sure about other countries though..

For reference, here is the output on my somewhat adjusted TG501A measured on my 1GHz TDS784C scope.

1ns -
2ns -
5ns -
Marker Output @ 0.1us -
+Trig Output @ 0.1us -

I found that my usual plastic adjustment screwdriver with the little metal tip would affect the adjustments for the 2ns and 1ns trimmer capacitors, making accurate adjustment almost impossible.
I guess the little metal tip was changing the capacitance just enough to alter the rather touchy adjustments. Switching to a ceramic screwdriver made it a breeze (I also have cheap ebay ceramic screwdrivers that work great).
Also, I found that putting the side cover on made a small impact to the output amplitude, probably due to the close proximity of the grounded cover plate to the trimmer capacitors.
Luckily the cover plate on the TG501A is a perforated style, so I could juuussstt squeeze the screwdriver in through the holes (sometimes at an angle) with the cover plate in place to tweak the trimmer pots for the best output.


 

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 08:15 AM, Jared Cabot wrote:


Both Vessel and Engineer brands are very good Japanese brands I have a bunch
of tools from both brands. You can find them everywhere here in Japan, not
sure about other countries though..
Jared,

I was able to find these two brands on AMAZON. Vessel makes a great set of JIS Screwdrivers as well, invaluable when working on Japanese equipment. I also found some very high quality, German made Pozi-Drive screwdrivers there. As a professional motorcycle mechanic, I was exposed early on to high quality Japanese tools. HONDA used many KOWA SEIKI brand tools. I have owned and used these for 40+ years.

There is definitely a difference in the quality of the Japanese tools.

--
Michael Lynch
Dardanelle, AR