Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
7L14 - no 1st LO output
开云体育Hi
Guys
Information please.
I have a 7L14, where the 1st LO has just died.
It seems the main
YIG driver transistor, an NPN Darlington, has already been replaced
The Tek part number
is 151-0454-00, but this bears a Motorola number SJ6796 and a date code of
8018.
?
Despite searching
all the usual places (net/databooks)?I cannot find any reference to the
Motorola part.
Anyone got any
information about it they are willing to share?
thanks
Chris
HJ |
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Christopher Hilton-Johnson
<chj@...> wrote: You could buy a replacement Tek part: |
raymonddompfrank
Hi Chris,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
My very difficult to read copy of the "Semiconductors Common Design Parts Catalog 1982 identifies this (bottom of page 6-20) as a DTS1010, High(er) voltage NPN in TO-3 case. Specs are here: Could this be correct? Raymond --- In TekScopes@..., "Christopher Hilton-Johnson" wrote:
|
开云体育?
?>?You could buy a replacement Tek part: Got some already?- but thanks for the
tip!
Really more about trying to find information about what
appears to be an installed?replacement
?
Chris HJ |
开云体育>My
very difficult to read copy of the "Semiconductors Common Design Parts Catalog
1982 identifies this (bottom of page 6-20) as a DTS1010, High(er) voltage NPN in
TO-3 case. Specs are here:
> >Could this be correct? >Raymond Raymond Absolutely correct - the original is a DTS1010, but again,
thanks for the pointer to the datasheet for that part.
My interest is in trying to get information about the part
actually installed as the YIG main coil driver in my (failed)
7L14.
I just want to know if it is supposed to be
better/different/was a factory installed replacement etc.
during the 7L14 lifetime (according to my Manual) this board
(YIG driver) went theough three iterations (suffix -01 through -03) yet mine is
a suffix -00, confusing or what?
Really my interest is in trying to get some data on this
Motorola part, to add perspective to this issue, but?I have a correct
replacement, which I will use & see what happens!
?
Chris HJ
? |
raymonddompfrank
Chris,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Your question was clear, both David DG and I didn't read it well. This is one ref. to a Freescale (-Motorola) part with just a few specs: Here you can see that the mil-designated Freescale part is considered at least in some way compatible with Tek's part and DST1010 (and some others). I guess you've seen it already. --- In TekScopes@..., "Christopher Hilton-Johnson" wrote:
|
开云体育Raymond
The good news is that replacing the Motorola part with the Tek
specified item produces a cure & all is good again.
?Probably not relevant but the Motorola part was
aluminium, and featherweight, the original part is steel and of
substance.?I think the problem was junction heat related, in that there was a
direct relationship between length of 'off' time, in days, and 'on' time in
minutes, with a minimum of 1 day 'off' to get any 'on' time at
all.
?
Thanks for all
responses
regards
Chris
HJ ? |
raymonddompfrank
AFAIK, the specific heat capacity of aluminium is much larger than that of steel, but this seems somewhat extreme...
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Glad your issue is resolved. Raymond --- In TekScopes@..., "Christopher Hilton-Johnson" wrote:
|
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Christopher Hilton-Johnson
<chj@...> wrote: RaymondI don't think there's a significant thermal performance difference between steel and aluminum TO3s. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss