¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Q9070 Mounting in a 2220 - all voltages checked out OK - scope is very good


briankvedaras
 

Hi Tom,

Thanks for your mail. I popped the case off and probed the points and found the voltages were all in tolerance. Excellent.

I'll use it to assist in fault finding / audio design.

Many thanks,
Brian.

--- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Jobe" <tomjobe@...> wrote:

Hi Brian,
Do yourself a favor and at least check the various low voltages and the ripple on each one.
I think you have access to the low voltages by just taking the outer cover off of the scope. I think there is a window in the metal frame on the right side where the voltage test points are. You can also get to them on the bottom side of the mainboard without removing anything else.
The scope depends on the accuracy of the various voltages to perform properly, and all of the low voltages are regulated from the -8.6 volt supply in some way.
tom jobe...



----- Original Message -----
From: briankvedaras
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 AM
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Q9070 Mounting in a 2220 - the news - the good news .....




I have put in the IRF830, properly mounted to the heatsink for Q9070. I put the scope back together with all covers in place, believing and hoping that nothing else was blown and with my fingers crossed, replaced the fuse......and switched on.....and it worked, fan on, no signs of warm case, and it has now been on for 30 minutes plus.


Thanks to help from Tom Miller, Tom Jobe and Ed Miller, who replied to my posts re how to mount the FET.


The question is - as all appears to be working and stable, and cool, do I just leave it, or would you recommend case-off and probing around to check for anything that might be 'on the edge'....what do you learned gentlemen recommend????


I am of the 'if it ain't broke don't touch it' school (learned after some disappointing experiences), if you know what I mean.


I have now got to read the instruction manual as to how to use the storage scope element (just to see if it works - it does appear to be doing some capture.


Thanks in advance for your replies to date, and I await with bated breath for your pearls of wisdom.


regards,
Brian.
--- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Jobe" <tomjobe@> wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
> My guess is that the IRF830 will work just fine.
> Q9070 is so easy to change that you could replace it later if you were so inclined.
> As for your need for an isolation transformer, I doubt that you will need one.
> If the inverter works, there is nothing else that really needs to be tested unless you are just interested in the details, and a DMM will give you much of that.
> tom jobe...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: briankvedaras
> To: TekScopes@...
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 12:47 PM
> Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Q9070 Mounting in a 2220 - help please (EASY ONE - I HOPE)
>
>
>
> Tom,
>
> Excellent pics, thanks and very helpful.
>
> I have the IRF830 (two spares were given to me with the scope), will they do OK?
>
> --- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Jobe" tomjobe@ wrote:
> >
> > Hi Brian,
> > Attached are some pictures showing how Q9070 is mounted.
> > On the original scopes there is no mica washer, just ordinary white thermal paste on both sides of the ceramic piece.
> > I think your added mica piece might upset the clamping action of Q9070 to the aluminum heat sink plate, but that is just a guess.
> > One common replacement for Q9070 seems to be the IRF840 (8 amp, 500 volt), they have worked perfectly for me.
> > tom jobe...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: briankvedaras
> > To: TekScopes@...
> > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 7:49 AM
> > Subject: [TekScopes] Q9070 Mounting in a 2220 - help please (EASY ONE - I HOPE)
> >
> >
> >
> > Hopefully this will be easy for you experts out there.
> >
> > I recently bought a faulty 2220. It had been repaired with some difficulty by the previous owner, he replaced some of the bridge rectifier diodes (at least one was S/C, he also rings Q9070 and Q908 as items that he replaced. The scope is in good condition, and the repairs look good quality.
> >
> > After he repaired it, it ran stably for several days with the case off. He then put the case on, and within/after 1 hour the main fuse on the back panel blew big time (metallic vapour on inside of the glass tube)
> >
> > A quick look inside shows Q9070 short circuit, I checked the bits that had blown before and they seem ok. The molex or similar plug to the pins of Q9070 look light brown (has previously cooked).
> >
> > So it looks like the PSU was working pretty much OK to have survived for that long, and it was heat that pushed it over the edge. I found that the FET itself was clamped between a brown plastic box and white ceramic type block, with a small mica washer in for good measure. Q9070 is an IRF830. I tool the fet out to have a look at it without paying too much attention to how it was mounted, but I do know that I only needed to slacken the screw slightly for it to come out (the body of the FET was not 'inside' the box).
> >
> > I believe that the FET may have been clamped ONLY on the tab, and that the rest of the body of the FET was not in contact with the heatsink or bracket. If that is the case, it may have run hot, but not too hot with the case off, but with the case in place it overheated and blew.
> >
> > Can one of you learned guys please tell me how the fet should mount please, particularly including orientation of the brown plastic box, the ceramic block, and the mica washer.
> >
> > The brown box looks like it could take the transistor in a couple of ways:
> > 1+ one with the mounting screw going through the hole in the tab but then the ceramic block doesn't seem to work, and the tab would not be insulated from the metal heat sink.
> > 2+ with the FET inside the box with the metal side facing the heatsink, with the ceramic block sitting also inside the plastic block but being sandwiched between the FET back and the heatsink.
> >
> > Option 2 seems favourite, but I can't verify from the service manual. What do you guys think of the right way to do it, and would it in fact need a mica washer? My thoughts are not needed, just some heat transfer compound on either side of the ceramic block.
> >
> > Any help appreciated.
> >
> > Finally, re the scope testing, I have a DVM and another working scope, so intend to make some measurements, hopefully once I've replaced and remounted Q9070 and it works. I don't have an isolation transformer, however, and remember from my younger days of using a scope with 2 channels in add mode, and no 'gnd' connection being made to the scope. Just channel 2 being put to the negative rail, and channel 1 going to the point being measured, would effectively give me an isolated scope. Does that make sense, and is there something to watch out for?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Brian.
> >
> > As a new scope owner I am
> >
>


Tom Jobe
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi Brian,
Thanks for the update, it sounds like you are all set for now.
The way most of us use a scope they are not left on for a very long time, so their life expectancy?should be fairly good.
Even if it does fail, the Tekscopes?group understands a lot about how to fix it.
tom jobe...
?
?
?

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 2:53 PM
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Q9070 Mounting in a 2220 - all voltages checked out OK - scope is very good

?

Hi Tom,

Thanks for your mail. I popped the case off and probed the points and found the voltages were all in tolerance. Excellent.

I'll use it to assist in fault finding / audio design.

Many thanks,
Brian.

--- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Jobe" wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
> Do yourself a favor and at least check the various low voltages and the ripple on each one.
> I think you have access to the low voltages by just taking the outer cover off of the scope. I think there is a window in the metal frame on the right side where the voltage test points are. You can also get to them on the bottom side of the mainboard without removing anything else.
> The scope depends on the accuracy of the various voltages to perform properly, and all of the low voltages are regulated from the -8.6 volt supply in some way.
> tom jobe...
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: briankvedaras
> To: TekScopes@...
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 AM
> Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Q9070 Mounting in a 2220 - the news - the good news .....
>
>
>
>
> I have put in the IRF830, properly mounted to the heatsink for Q9070. I put the scope back together with all covers in place, believing and hoping that nothing else was blown and with my fingers crossed, replaced the fuse......and switched on.....and it worked, fan on, no signs of warm case, and it has now been on for 30 minutes plus.
>
>
> Thanks to help from Tom Miller, Tom Jobe and Ed Miller, who replied to my posts re how to mount the FET.
>
>
> The question is - as all appears to be working and stable, and cool, do I just leave it, or would you recommend case-off and probing around to check for anything that might be 'on the edge'....what do you learned gentlemen recommend????
>
>
> I am of the 'if it ain't broke don't touch it' school (learned after some disappointing experiences), if you know what I mean.
>
>
> I have now got to read the instruction manual as to how to use the storage scope element (just to see if it works - it does appear to be doing some capture.
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your replies to date, and I await with bated breath for your pearls of wisdom.
>
>
> regards,
> Brian.
> --- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Jobe" wrote:
> >
> > Hi Brian,
> > My guess is that the IRF830 will work just fine.
> > Q9070 is so easy to change that you could replace it later if you were so inclined.
> > As for your need for an isolation transformer, I doubt that you will need one.
> > If the inverter works, there is nothing else that really needs to be tested unless you are just interested in the details, and a DMM will give you much of that.
> > tom jobe...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: briankvedaras
> > To: TekScopes@...
> > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 12:47 PM
> > Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Q9070 Mounting in a 2220 - help please (EASY ONE - I HOPE)
> >
> >
> >
> > Tom,
> >
> > Excellent pics, thanks and very helpful.
> >
> > I have the IRF830 (two spares were given to me with the scope), will they do OK?
> >
> > --- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Jobe" tomjobe@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Brian,
> > > Attached are some pictures showing how Q9070 is mounted.
> > > On the original scopes there is no mica washer, just ordinary white thermal paste on both sides of the ceramic piece.
> > > I think your added mica piece might upset the clamping action of Q9070 to the aluminum heat sink plate, but that is just a guess.
> > > One common replacement for Q9070 seems to be the IRF840 (8 amp, 500 volt), they have worked perfectly for me.
> > > tom jobe...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: briankvedaras
> > > To: TekScopes@...
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 7:49 AM
> > > Subject: [TekScopes] Q9070 Mounting in a 2220 - help please (EASY ONE - I HOPE)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hopefully this will be easy for you experts out there.
> > >
> > > I recently bought a faulty 2220. It had been repaired with some difficulty by the previous owner, he replaced some of the bridge rectifier diodes (at least one was S/C, he also rings Q9070 and Q908 as items that he replaced. The scope is in good condition, and the repairs look good quality.
> > >
> > > After he repaired it, it ran stably for several days with the case off. He then put the case on, and within/after 1 hour the main fuse on the back panel blew big time (metallic vapour on inside of the glass tube)
> > >
> > > A quick look inside shows Q9070 short circuit, I checked the bits that had blown before and they seem ok. The molex or similar plug to the pins of Q9070 look light brown (has previously cooked).
> > >
> > > So it looks like the PSU was working pretty much OK to have survived for that long, and it was heat that pushed it over the edge. I found that the FET itself was clamped between a brown plastic box and white ceramic type block, with a small mica washer in for good measure. Q9070 is an IRF830. I tool the fet out to have a look at it without paying too much attention to how it was mounted, but I do know that I only needed to slacken the screw slightly for it to come out (the body of the FET was not 'inside' the box).
> > >
> > > I believe that the FET may have been clamped ONLY on the tab, and that the rest of the body of the FET was not in contact with the heatsink or bracket. If that is the case, it may have run hot, but not too hot with the case off, but with the case in place it overheated and blew.
> > >
> > > Can one of you learned guys please tell me how the fet should mount please, particularly including orientation of the brown plastic box, the ceramic block, and the mica washer.
> > >
> > > The brown box looks like it could take the transistor in a couple of ways:
> > > 1+ one with the mounting screw going through the hole in the tab but then the ceramic block doesn't seem to work, and the tab would not be insulated from the metal heat sink.
> > > 2+ with the FET inside the box with the metal side facing the heatsink, with the ceramic block sitting also inside the plastic block but being sandwiched between the FET back and the heatsink.
> > >
> > > Option 2 seems favourite, but I can't verify from the service manual. What do you guys think of the right way to do it, and would it in fact need a mica washer? My thoughts are not needed, just some heat transfer compound on either side of the ceramic block.
> > >
> > > Any help appreciated.
> > >
> > > Finally, re the scope testing, I have a DVM and another working scope, so intend to make some measurements, hopefully once I've replaced and remounted Q9070 and it works. I don't have an isolation transformer, however, and remember from my younger days of using a scope with 2 channels in add mode, and no 'gnd' connection being made to the scope. Just channel 2 being put to the negative rail, and channel 1 going to the point being measured, would effectively give me an isolated scope. Does that make sense, and is there something to watch out for?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Brian.
> > >
> > > As a new scope owner I am
> > >
> >
>