Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
494 and 2756 Spectrum Analyzer questions...
1st question.
I have brought a 494 analyzer back to life. Except for the Xtal filter box on top of the CRT, the instrument performs OK. The filter box does not show any temperaturerise when in operation with cover off. Looking in KE5FX service notes, the box must be opened in order to replace the transistor. Any suggestions about the best way to open it in a non-destructive way? Put it on a hot boiler plate and remove the cover when the tin melts or use brute force making the cover unuseable? 2nd question. I have also repaired a 2756P with various problems and the instrument does now work. I am just a bit puzzled by the fact that there is only a very small vent intake on the left side of the cabinet. After some time, the rear end with the integratedheat sink gets to hot to touch. The Bueler fan runs at highest speed. Other 49x analyzers that I have used over the years does not even get close to this high temperature. Easy fix would be to add extra vent intake(s). Did Tek ever made any modifications to the cabinet? Cheers Ulf KylenfallSM6GXV |
Any suggestions about the best way to open it inI usually use a Dremel tool with a cutting wheel. The filter takes a lot of vibration, unfortunately, and a respirator is needed unless you want to breathe a lot of lead particles. But it does get the job done. Some have used propane torches successfully, but transferring just the right amount of heat to melt the solder is harder than it sounds. I've done more than my share of damage with propane torches, operating under the usual rationale ("I know what I'm doing, this'll only take a few seconds.") After some time, the rear end with the integratedheat sink gets to hot toGood question, not that I know of. At least some departments at Tektronix used a straightforward watts-per-cubic-inch metric to determine whether something was going to get too hot. Fans were recommended for instruments consuming more than 50 mW/in^3, and the documentation I've seen (Common Design Parts Catalog volume 2 from 1983) indicates that the surface area of the enclosure is also supposed to be taken into consideration. So the thinking may have been that the large surface area of the 275x rack mount enclosure was enough to avoid the need for additional ventilation or a bigger fan, when in reality the instrument might have ended up hotter than the benchtop version. Much of the box is empty, so they would have needed to consider how the heat was supposed to reach the enclosure boundary in the first place. Perhaps that process needed some more work. Maybe someone on the list remembers more about how these decisions were made back in the day? -- john, KE5FX |
I have no knowledge of the particular component, I use a chemistry hot
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
plate that I have roughly calibrated for pre heating, just dandy for certain surface boards where one leg of the component is tied to a big ground plane. 125 - 175 C is the recommendation usually, your mileage and experience may be different..... On Tuesday, August 20, 2019, John Miles <john@...> wrote:
Any suggestions about the best way to open it inI usually use a Dremel tool with a cutting wheel. The filter takes a lot |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss