开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

trigger problem with 7B70


 

Hi all,

I just acquired a 7704A with plugins (7A26, 7CT1N, and two 7B70s). Everything more-or-less works, although I'll have some mainframe questions eventually.

For the moment, I'm trying to figure out why one of the 7B70s won't trigger on anything other than a square wave/pulse. Note that I've cleaned the cam switch contacts with alcohol/paper, reseated all transistors on the trigger board, relays check good, and the trigger amplifier transistors aren't shorted or open (using a DMM diode test).

Using FG502 as input source:

With 7A26 on 0.5V/div, EXT trigger displays a stable waveform with a 1.25 Vpp square wave. INT trigger displays a stable waveform with 2Vpp from the FG502.

With lower output voltage from the FG502 on either trigger, the TRIG light is on, but no waveform is displayed, so I assume it's triggering on noise? If I adjust the trigger pot until the TRIG light goes off, I can see the envelope of the waveform, so it's not like the signal vanished.

With the 7A26 on 1V/div, EXT works with 1.25Vpp, but INT requires 4Vpp to display the waveform. I do not understand this interaction with the vertical amplifier, but the INT trigger only gives a stable waveform if the signal is 4x the vertical V/div setting. EXT only requires 1.25 Vpp.

The other oddity is that it will not trigger on a sine or triangle wave, although it will display them if I use the external trigger output from the FG502. I'd assumed it was a dead transistor in the trigger amplifier until I realized this, and now I'm wondering about a bad tunnel diode? No extender, so I'm kind of limited on tracing for the moment.

thanks,
Adam


 

Adam,

You may have bad tunnel diodes. Check the ESR of the condensers. They may need to be replaced.

Mark


 

A couple of years ago, I had triggering issues with my 7B70. It turned out to be a bad tunnel diode (VR304). At that time, I was finding suitable tunnel diode replacements on eBay (1S2199); however, I'm not seeing those at the moment. Hopefully yours will turn out to be something else but, if not, then the 1S2199 diodes may resurface.

Good luck with it,
Barry - N4BUQ

Hi all,

I just acquired a 7704A with plugins (7A26, 7CT1N, and two 7B70s). Everything
more-or-less works, although I'll have some mainframe questions eventually.

For the moment, I'm trying to figure out why one of the 7B70s won't trigger on
anything other than a square wave/pulse. Note that I've cleaned the cam switch
contacts with alcohol/paper, reseated all transistors on the trigger board,
relays check good, and the trigger amplifier transistors aren't shorted or open
(using a DMM diode test).

Using FG502 as input source:

With 7A26 on 0.5V/div, EXT trigger displays a stable waveform with a 1.25 Vpp
square wave. INT trigger displays a stable waveform with 2Vpp from the FG502.

With lower output voltage from the FG502 on either trigger, the TRIG light is
on, but no waveform is displayed, so I assume it's triggering on noise? If I
adjust the trigger pot until the TRIG light goes off, I can see the envelope of
the waveform, so it's not like the signal vanished.

With the 7A26 on 1V/div, EXT works with 1.25Vpp, but INT requires 4Vpp to
display the waveform. I do not understand this interaction with the vertical
amplifier, but the INT trigger only gives a stable waveform if the signal is 4x
the vertical V/div setting. EXT only requires 1.25 Vpp.

The other oddity is that it will not trigger on a sine or triangle wave,
although it will display them if I use the external trigger output from the
FG502. I'd assumed it was a dead transistor in the trigger amplifier until I
realized this, and now I'm wondering about a bad tunnel diode? No extender, so
I'm kind of limited on tracing for the moment.

thanks,
Adam




 

On Mar 30, 2024, at 20:30 , n4buq via groups.io <n4buq@...> wrote:

A couple of years ago, I had triggering issues with my 7B70. It turned out to be a bad tunnel diode (VR304). At that time, I was finding suitable tunnel diode replacements on eBay (1S2199); however, I'm not seeing those at the moment. Hopefully yours will turn out to be something else but, if not, then the 1S2199 diodes may resurface.
VR304 is the one I was wondering about, so I figured I may as well test it on my new 7CT1N. It looked okay on the curve tracer, and since it's socketed I swapped it in to my working 7B70. The good 7B70 continued to work fine, so I guess I can cross that TD off the list for now.

Maybe I can pull a side panel off the 7704A and probe the trigger board through the side.

thanks,
Adam


 

Glad it isn't the TD. Yes, I've pulled side panel to get to the right-hand side of the time-bases. Getting to the left-hand side is a bit more of a challenge.

Did you also look at the other TD?

Barry - N4BUQ

A couple of years ago, I had triggering issues with my 7B70. It turned out to
be a bad tunnel diode (VR304). At that time, I was finding suitable tunnel
diode replacements on eBay (1S2199); however, I'm not seeing those at the
moment. Hopefully yours will turn out to be something else but, if not, then
the 1S2199 diodes may resurface.
VR304 is the one I was wondering about, so I figured I may as well test it on my
new 7CT1N. It looked okay on the curve tracer, and since it's socketed I
swapped it in to my working 7B70. The good 7B70 continued to work fine, so I
guess I can cross that TD off the list for now.

Maybe I can pull a side panel off the 7704A and probe the trigger board through
the side.

thanks,
Adam




 

On Mar 31, 2024, at 16:52 , n4buq via groups.io <n4buq@...> wrote:

Glad it isn't the TD. Yes, I've pulled side panel to get to the right-hand side of the time-bases. Getting to the left-hand side is a bit more of a challenge.

Did you also look at the other TD?
VR322 and VR358 both look OK on the curve tracer, or at least what I think a 4.7 mA TD should look like. I started tracing things out with the side panel off, and things looked reasonable until the Trigger Generator <4> of the manual from tekwiki.

A waveform was present at Q309 and Q317, but not at the base of Q326, so I'll look at that area more closely and take better notes. The triggered holdoff stage description in the manual is over my head, as usual.

thanks,
Adam


 

Sorry that I haven't been following this thread too closely, so I apologize if you've already gone through and checked the various adjustments in the TD circuits. If not, do that first. TDs tend to exhibit long-term drift, which you can compensate to a degree by tweaking the adjustments.

Good luck!

-- Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
420 Via Palou Mall
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070

On 3/31/2024 10:11 PM, Adam R. Maxwell via groups.io wrote:
VR322 and VR358 both look OK on the curve tracer, or at least what I think a 4.7 mA TD should look like. I started tracing things out with the side panel off, and things looked reasonable until the Trigger Generator <4> of the manual from tekwiki.

A waveform was present at Q309 and Q317, but not at the base of Q326, so I'll look at that area more closely and take better notes. The triggered holdoff stage description in the manual is over my head, as usual.

thanks,
Adam


 

Base of Q326 will only show a signal if sweeps are running.

If you set 7B70 as described in test conditions, and with a 1V/1kHz sine wave at External input:
- Do you see any sweeps?
- Do you see sharp pulses (not a sine wave) at base of Q309? What amplitude?

If signal at Q309 base doesn't have sharp edges, and because you ruled out a bad VR304, bias point of VR304 could be wrong.
- Is +15V correct?
- What voltages do you see at the bases of Q309 and Q317?
- What voltages do you see left sides of R300 and R306?

Ozan

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:11 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:

A waveform was present at Q309 and Q317, but not at the base of Q326, so I'll
look at that area more closely and take better notes. The triggered holdoff
stage description in the manual is over my head, as usual.

thanks,
Adam


 

On Apr 1, 2024, at 00:14 , Ozan via groups.io <ozan_g@...> wrote:

Base of Q326 will only show a signal if sweeps are running.

If you set 7B70 as described in test conditions, and with a 1V/1kHz sine wave at External input:
Yes, and I verified 1Vpp 1kHz sine on my 2465A.

- Do you see any sweeps?
No. My assumption has been that it's sweeping too fast to see.

- Do you see sharp pulses (not a sine wave) at base of Q309? What amplitude?
I think the shape is correct, and amplitude is a bit over 200 mVpp. Photos here; GND reference set at centerline.





The manual shows ~10x lower, I think due to the note about 10x probe? All waveforms I measured through the trigger amplifier were 10x larger than shown on the schematic. The PDF scan is missing some of the detail, though.

If signal at Q309 base doesn't have sharp edges, and because you ruled out a bad VR304, bias point of VR304 could be wrong.
- Is +15V correct?
- What voltages do you see at the bases of Q309 and Q317?
- What voltages do you see left sides of R300 and R306?
+15 is 15.01 at the test point.

Base of Q309 and Q317 is the same, +3.8 from chassis ground.
Emitter of Q317 is 4.46, collector is 0.

Left side of R300 is 3.54; other is 3.96.

R306 I measure 3.49 at one end (physically the top), and 3.54 at the other end. I can't see the foil trace, so not sure which is left vs. right in schematic.

thanks,
Adam


 

Waveform in the schematics look like with a 10x probe based on waveform picture at EXT TRIG IN port.

Manual shows at base of Q309 signal has 10x50mV=500mV peaks as far as I can tell. Scope shot "07 19 38" shows ~200mV peaks and it is not clear if tunnel diode action is happening (could you DC couple for future scope shots?). I think you mentioned sweep works with a sharp edge but not with sine wave. A sharp edge doesn't need tunnel diode action as much as sine wave.

The circuit biases VR304 very close to 10mA (trip point) with no signal. If VR304 is in a socket you can use an ammeter instead of it and measure DC current with no input. Perhaps one of the components shifted or left sides of R300 and R306 are at wrong DC potential and stealing current. It may be as simple as adjusting the blocks prior to R300/R306.

When it is operating, signal coming from trigger amp pushes the tunnel diode VR304 to its high voltage region, and creates a fast spike at bases of Q309 and Q317. Q317 collector produces a pulse, and triggers VR358 through CR319. VR358 waits at the edge of trigger (current through R357+R356) until this time, and Q328 is off. When anode of VR358 jumps to high voltage region (~ 0.5-0.6V? depends on the tunnel diode) sweep is running. Q360 collector signal disables Q526 and sweep starts. When sweep hits ~ 10V Q408/Q409 and the network of devices in hold-off circuit send signal back to CR320/VR322, Q328 turns off and puts VR358 back to low voltage region for next trigger.

If you don't see ~ 0.5-0.6V at anode of VR358 at sweep rate (~10ms in test condition) it could be because it didn't get triggered, or Q328 is pulling it low. If Q328 is in a socket you can remove it to test if something in Q328 path is the problem.

However, most likely issue is wrong DC operating point of VR304 since you already verified VR304 is good and with a large enough signal you can get sweeps.

Does single sweep work?

Ozan

=====

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 08:00 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:



On Apr 1, 2024, at 00:14 , Ozan via groups.io <ozan_g@...>
wrote:

Base of Q326 will only show a signal if sweeps are running.

If you set 7B70 as described in test conditions, and with a 1V/1kHz sine
wave at External input:

Yes, and I verified 1Vpp 1kHz sine on my 2465A.

- Do you see any sweeps?
No. My assumption has been that it's sweeping too fast to see.

- Do you see sharp pulses (not a sine wave) at base of Q309? What amplitude?
I think the shape is correct, and amplitude is a bit over 200 mVpp. Photos
here; GND reference set at centerline.





The manual shows ~10x lower, I think due to the note about 10x probe? All
waveforms I measured through the trigger amplifier were 10x larger than shown
on the schematic. The PDF scan is missing some of the detail, though.

If signal at Q309 base doesn't have sharp edges, and because you ruled out a
bad VR304, bias point of VR304 could be wrong.
- Is +15V correct?
- What voltages do you see at the bases of Q309 and Q317?
- What voltages do you see left sides of R300 and R306?
+15 is 15.01 at the test point.

Base of Q309 and Q317 is the same, +3.8 from chassis ground.
Emitter of Q317 is 4.46, collector is 0.

Left side of R300 is 3.54; other is 3.96.

R306 I measure 3.49 at one end (physically the top), and 3.54 at the other
end. I can't see the foil trace, so not sure which is left vs. right in
schematic.

thanks,
Adam




 

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 04:09 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:


With 7A26 on 0.5V/div, EXT trigger displays a stable waveform with a 1.25 Vpp
square wave. INT trigger displays a stable waveform with 2Vpp from the FG502.

With the 7A26 on 1V/div, EXT works with 1.25Vpp, but INT requires 4Vpp to
display the waveform. I do not understand this interaction with the vertical
amplifier, but the INT trigger only gives a stable waveform if the signal is
4x the vertical V/div setting. EXT only requires 1.25 Vpp.
Adam,
In the 7A26 all attenuation is done is by the input attenuators. Hence after that the same signal is sent to the Vertical amp chain and the trigger amp chain. This means that the signal amplitude at the CRT is important for triggering. In both cases you mentioned here the amplitudes at the CRT are the same.

Albert


 

Thanks to Ozan for helping off-list with some additional measurement advice and insight on expected values. I continue to be amazed at what some of you can understand from a schematic.

He suggested replacing Q309/Q317 in the trigger pulse generator with the pair from my working 7B70, and that did the trick: stable waveform with sine/triangle/square, and controls work as expected.

I had previously tried replacing them individually with a 2N3906 (one of the few PNP transistors I have on hand), with no luck. Replacing both Q309 and Q317 with 2N3906s actually shows a waveform instead of a blank screen, but it stutters so I've ordered some 151-0220-00 replacements.

Adam


 

I'll second Ozan's helpfulness with this sort of thing. He has helped me a few times isolate a problem like that whcih I'm pretty sure I would not have found on my own. Glad you have something going and hope the correct transistors will fix the rest of the issues with this.

Barry - N4BUQ

Thanks to Ozan for helping off-list with some additional measurement advice and
insight on expected values. I continue to be amazed at what some of you can
understand from a schematic.

He suggested replacing Q309/Q317 in the trigger pulse generator with the pair
from my working 7B70, and that did the trick: stable waveform with
sine/triangle/square, and controls work as expected.

I had previously tried replacing them individually with a 2N3906 (one of the few
PNP transistors I have on hand), with no luck. Replacing both Q309 and Q317
with 2N3906s actually shows a waveform instead of a blank screen, but it
stutters so I've ordered some 151-0220-00 replacements.

Adam




 

Hi Barry, Adam,
Thank you for the nice words. Your detailed data taking and coming up with good questions were key to fixing the issues and it was fun to spend time on these puzzles.
Ozan

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 06:43 AM, n4buq wrote:

I'll second Ozan's helpfulness with this sort of thing. He has helped me a
few times isolate a problem like that whcih I'm pretty sure I would not have
found on my own. Glad you have something going and hope the correct
transistors will fix the rest of the issues with this.

Barry - N4BUQ

Thanks to Ozan for helping off-list with some additional measurement advice
and
insight on expected values. I continue to be amazed at what some of you can
understand from a schematic.

He suggested replacing Q309/Q317 in the trigger pulse generator with the
pair
from my working 7B70, and that did the trick: stable waveform with
sine/triangle/square, and controls work as expected.

I had previously tried replacing them individually with a 2N3906 (one of the
few
PNP transistors I have on hand), with no luck. Replacing both Q309 and Q317
with 2N3906s actually shows a waveform instead of a blank screen, but it
stutters so I've ordered some 151-0220-00 replacements.

Adam




 

On Apr 3, 2024, at 22:05 , Adam R. Maxwell via groups.io <amaxwell@...> wrote:

He suggested replacing Q309/Q317 in the trigger pulse generator with the pair from my working 7B70, and that did the trick: stable waveform with sine/triangle/square, and controls work as expected.

I had previously tried replacing them individually with a 2N3906 (one of the few PNP transistors I have on hand), with no luck. Replacing both Q309 and Q317 with 2N3906s actually shows a waveform instead of a blank screen, but it stutters so I've ordered some 151-0220-00 replacements.
Messing around with this a bit more tonight, I tested both of the 151-0220-00 transistors from the bad 7B70 in my cheapo tester (BSIDE ESR02 Pro). It recognizes both as PNP transistors, one with B=187, Uf=682 mV and the other with B=150, Uf=676 mV.

The 7B70 manual (S/N <205000) specifies 151-0220-00 for Q309/Q317, and the Common Design catalog says a 2N3906 is close (fT is 400 MHz for the 151-0220-00, 2N3906 is 250 MHz). I tried stealing a pair of 151-0220-00 transistors from elsewhere on the trigger board (assuming they were fine) for the Q309/Q317 sockets (replacing the donors with 2N3906s), and the bad 7B70 still did not work.

I finally realized my good 7B70 has a >205000 serial number, and the manual for that specifies a 151-0271-00 (which explains why the ones that work in both plugins are marked 151271). That transistor has a minimum fT of 2 GHz, and is an AST4261 or 2N4261 in a TO-92 case, so I might be SOL if the bad 7B70 needs those.

I assume the (much!) slower transistor worked at some point in the low serial number unit, but Tek must have had a reason for that change. I've grown a bit less optimistic that NOS 151-0220-00 transistors will be the silver bullet, though.

Further bulletins as events warrant, etc.

Adam


 

Adam,

The high speed transistors could be replaced with KSP10BU. The pinout is BEC. The voltage ratings are a bit higher. It is a TO-92 case. I have, as well as others here, have used these as replacements. If you find 0367s that are leaky, the replacement is what I used to replace the original leaky one. The 0367 transistor is used in many plug-ins and some scopes. Only the 7D15 has a different p/n yet is the same transistor. From my experience, the KSP type fixed problems the leaky 0367s had in the pieces I have.

Mark


 

On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 11:14 AM, Mark Vincent wrote:

The high speed transistors could be replaced with KSP10BU. The pinout is BEC.
I need a PNP transistor, though. Pretty sure KSP10BU is NPN, as I have some and
checked everything in my limited stash as a potential replacement. Finding a PNP
over 500 MHz looks unlikely, especially in the 2 GHz range of the 151-0271.

thanks,
Adam


 

The 2N5771 is an 850MHz ft, 15V PNP. Pretty cheap, too.

-- Cheers,
Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
420 Via Palou Mall
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070

On 4/5/2024 2:24 PM, Adam R. Maxwell via groups.io wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 11:14 AM, Mark Vincent wrote:

The high speed transistors could be replaced with KSP10BU. The pinout is BEC.
I need a PNP transistor, though. Pretty sure KSP10BU is NPN, as I have some and
checked everything in my limited stash as a potential replacement. Finding a PNP
over 500 MHz looks unlikely, especially in the 2 GHz range of the 151-0271.


 

On Apr 5, 2024, at 21:53 , Tom Lee via groups.io <tomlee@...> wrote:

The 2N5771 is an 850MHz ft, 15V PNP.
Ordered. I was hoping you'd be able to correct me off the top of your head :).

Pretty cheap, too.
The language of my people.

Thanks!
Adam


 

On Apr 4, 2024, at 22:18 , Adam R. Maxwell via groups.io <amaxwell@...> wrote:

I assume the (much!) slower transistor worked at some point in the low serial number unit, but Tek must have had a reason for that change. I've grown a bit less optimistic that NOS 151-0220-00 transistors will be the silver bullet, though.
Indeed, a pair of NOS 151-0220-00 transistors in Q309/Q317 did not fix the problem. I'm curious to see if the faster transistors I've ordered will do the trick, although if so I suspect it would just be papering over problems with some other marginal component(s).

thanks,
Adam