Re: R7103 backplane repair
You could be right about that. I had gotten it in a lot of scopes I got from a Govliquidation auction and it was the one I figured was going to be parted out. It had a lot missing like knobs, both
By
Peter Gottlieb <hpnpilot@...>
·
#86333
·
|
Re: 2445 CPU Address line failed
I think it has been discussed here before but I do not have a link to where. Maybe there two different versions of U800? wrote:
By
David Hess
·
#86332
·
|
Re: 2445 CPU Address line failed
I see I need to explain that a bit more, I did not want to add too much non-scope stuff in my first entry in the forum. So to expand, Neighbor relations prohibit lethal ideas I got my kids a Ryobi
By
ykochcal
·
#86331
·
|
Re: R7103 backplane repair
The first 7834 I bought which has the bad CRT geometry, maybe it was dropped during shipping, does that occasionally and my 7904 does it as well although less often so far. I suspect the power
By
David Hess
·
#86330
·
|
Re: R7103 backplane repair
Perfect then. The less I have to deal with Yahoo the better. I consider Yahoo to be a company which could have become something great but never strove for excellence or really truly caring, and thus
By
Peter Gottlieb <hpnpilot@...>
·
#86329
·
|
Re: Tektronix DMM-4020 Opinions?
Hi David: That is good information to know. I have been looking for good overall bench DMM for some time, and stumbled upon this one. When compared to my Fluke 867B this seems like a real bargain! Are
By
Rich Miller
·
#86328
·
|
Re: Tektronix DMM-4020 Opinions?
It's not a Keithley, it's a Fluke 8808A. At that price you might as well try it, you would have no trouble reselling it.
By
David DiGiacomo
·
#86327
·
|
Re: 2445 CPU Address line failed
Actually, my neighbor has an aggressive pit bull -- it gets close enough to us that no 'scope is needed, but a laser sight might be useful for when it hops over the fence. My take on this -- most of
By
Jim <n6otq@...>
·
#86326
·
|
Re: 2445 CPU Address line failed
I agree. I had so many comebacks for this but the rest of the story explained it. Joe From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of victor_j_silva Sent: Saturday,
By
J. L. Trantham
·
#86325
·
|
Re: 2445 CPU Address line failed
When you break your funny bone, it's real bad. Don Black.
By
Don Black <donald_black@...>
·
#86324
·
|
Re: 2445 CPU Address line failed
I know I was going to ask if it was a rifle scope.. but refrained... now I cannot resist. Sorry as always for when my funny bone kicks in and thanks as always for the bandwidth. Rob From:
By
Rob <rgwood@...>
·
#86323
·
|
Re: 2445 CPU Address line failed
A rifle scope? Don Black.
By
Don Black <donald_black@...>
·
#86322
·
|
Possible P6042 part...
261114631650 FYI.
By
Alex <alexeisenhut@...>
·
#86321
·
|
Re: scanned: 1958 Tek Personnel
Maybe not. On page 58 of the 1958 photo album, we find the same photo of Ms. Lusk, with the same calendar. Perhaps the photo was taken in 1953? Also, I got one of the possible years wrong; it would be
By
Tony Jacobson
·
#86320
·
|
Re: 2445 CPU Address line failed
Interesting story, I find this statement a little humerous: "In late 2012 a dog next door bit my wife and I needed a scope"
By
victor.silva
·
#86319
·
|
Tektronix DMM-4020 Opinions?
Hello: I have the opportunity to buy one of these far below the list price. I wonder if anyone has used this DMM, and what were your impressions of it> While I know it is not a Keithly, it seems like
By
Rich Miller
·
#86318
·
|
Re: scanned: 1958 Tek Personnel
Nicely spotted. Pretty good if it's 1943, thats before the company existed. Don Black.
By
Don Black <donald_black@...>
·
#86317
·
|
Re: Bench Built Isolation Transformer
Ah, Dave, But the electrical system in the US is grounded. What you are referring to is the ability for the GFCI to work without the presence of a ground conductor attached to the GFCI. The electrical
By
Frank DuVal
·
#86316
·
|
Re: scanned: 1958 Tek Personnel
Thanks. Seems right. -Kurt
By
sipespresso <sipespresso@...>
·
#86315
·
|
Anybody know the difference between a 475M and 475?
Looking at picking up a Tek 475M oscilloscope locally.? Anybody know how it differs from a regular 475?? Is it just the military model?? Are the specifications the same as the plain 475?? Any
By
Matt Jodz <matt.inchina@...>
·
#86314
·
|