Re: sorry to bother you all with that last posting...
Sorry that my email reply meant for Andrew in Sydney went out to the group.
I didn't check the reply address before I hit the send button (and I also
didn't correct the subject title). It's kinda
By
donlcramer@...
·
#363
·
|
Re: Looking for 465B parts
Hello Andrew,
Thank you for the reply from early May providing me with the TAS 465 service
manual part number.
I'm still trying to locate one (though it turns out my next door neighbor
designed
By
donlcramer@...
·
#362
·
|
Re: Audio foo foo & 3A6 question
--- Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...> wrote:
By
Steve B.
·
#360
·
|
Re: Audio foo foo & 3A6 question
--- Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...>
wrote:
By
Steve B.
·
#359
·
|
Re: Audio foo foo & 3A6 question
Steve B. wrote:
By
Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...>
·
#358
·
|
Audio foo foo & 3A6 question
something
(sorry
a true
I do have quite a sense of humor, but on this topic it has been long
exhausted elsewhere, thanx to the persistently reoccuring pointed
derision therein of those who have
By
Steve B.
·
#357
·
|
Re: Telequipment scopes
Hi Fernando,
Check the power supplies in the D43. It sounds like
something common to both the deflection circuits and beam voltages. It seems
the horizontal circuits are working
By
Don Black <jeans@...>
·
#361
·
|
Telequipment scopes
Hi there,
This might be a bit offtopic since I'm bringing
Telequipment scopes to
discussion. But then again Telequipment was bought by
Tektronix in the late
60's I think, so I hope all is well
By
Red Tomato <feolfo@...>
·
#356
·
|
Ex-"audio consultant" just has to put in 2?
Interesting range of opinions thus far.. and *yes* there's a
relationship to scopes in all of this, IMhO. At least re test
equipment operation, there are physics-laws + state of the
'mensuration art'
By
ashtonb@...
·
#355
·
|
time-mark generators
Hello,
I'd agree with both Stan and Dean. If you want to meet the specs spelled
out in
the manual, then you should go by the manual. But I and many others the
ballpark estimate is good enough.
By
Windsor <mongteen@...>
·
#354
·
|
About the 465B with thick trace going up and down
Hello,
Perhaps a change in subject is would be good right now.
I caught up on the topics because I recently signed up.
Anyway did you check the horizontal plates for jitter ?
Because I had a
By
Windsor <mongteen@...>
·
#353
·
|
Re: Valuable 12AX7 and all this audio foo foo.
"guitar amps sound different with different sets of tubes from different manufacturers. Damned if I know why, but they do. Sometimes radically different. I almost feel that I have a split personality
By
James & Kandy Nunn <jnunn@...>
·
#352
·
|
Re: Valuable 12AX7 and all this audio foo foo.
After looking at my 535A this a.m., you are correct. There are tube lineups just as you say in my scope AND CA plugin. However, I don't recall seeing many 6AK5, 6AU6, or 12AU7 tubes from the
By
europachris@...
·
#351
·
|
Re: Valuable 12AX7 and all this audio foo foo.
Right on. Same for the Japanese paying mega bucks for the old Western Electric theatre amps. Audio is rife with "the emperor's new clothes" syndrome, and the brain plays a lot of tricks on
By
europachris@...
·
#350
·
|
Re: Valuable 12AX7 and all this audio foo foo.
europachris@... wrote:
I'm not really sure what you mean by "small signal positions" . . . do you mean the first stage of a sensitive amplifier? For letter series tube amplifiers, the first
By
Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...>
·
#349
·
|
Re: Valuable 12AX7 and all this audio foo foo.
It isn't human dynamic range or bandwidth that creates this demand for
certain devices/brands Dean; it's a tone; a certain character of sound
quality. There is no technical definition for this
By
Phil (VA3UX) <phil@...>
·
#348
·
|
Re: Valuable 12AX7 and all this audio foo foo.
Well hang on guys. I'm with you to a point. My original response was mainly ridiculing the hype and component pricing that is the consequence of that hype, within the audio community. I am not an
By
Phil (VA3UX) <phil@...>
·
#347
·
|
Re: Valuable 12AX7 and all this audio foo foo.
Relax Steve. A bit of humor, venting and off-topic chat is something fairly foreign to a group of mostly serious stodgy engineer/techies (sorry guys) that are interested in oscilloscopes. This sort
By
Phil (VA3UX) <phil@...>
·
#346
·
|
Re: Valuable 12AX7 and all this audio foo foo.
Ah yes, audio mumbo-jumbo. Before everyone jumps on my case, I do a fair amount of audio design and I DO know what i am talking about.
Most people forget there is a way to get very close to 'what
By
ilimzn
·
#345
·
|
Re: Valuable 12AX7 and all this audio foo foo.
be
I would respectfully suggest we return to our respective fields of
expertise and experience and the central topic of this forum,
Tek 'scopes and related items. Enough misinformation has already
By
Steve B.
·
#344
·
|