Re: 7934 Service Manual
Just as a sidebar, my manual in section 7, last page is 7-74.
Karin
By
Karin Johnson
·
#208969
·
|
Re: Decomposing Cam Switch Drum
I had problems with broken individual cams and bushings in the attenuator of a 7A29, which I think are the same gray plastic. I had to do some tricky repairs to put them all back together. The story
By
ed breya
·
#208968
·
|
Re: 7934 Service Manual
I have an original Tektronix service manual for the 7934, dated First printing May 1986, I also have two, count them two, 7934.
Is there any question I may answer for you?????
Karin Anne Johnson
By
Karin Johnson
·
#208967
·
|
Re: Decomposing Cam Switch Drum
https://www.3erp.com/blog/injection-molding-defects/
Look under "Surface Delamination."
Greg
By
Greg Muir
·
#208966
·
|
Re: Succesfully upgraded TDS620 to TDS640.
Hi Wamor,
Would this work on a TDS620A?
Rafael
By
raffo.he@...
·
#208965
·
|
Re: Decomposing Cam Switch Drum
To me, that appears like someone has used an incompatible contact cleaner or such on it.
Russ
By
Russ Whale WA7MLW
·
#208964
·
|
Re: 7934 Service Manual
I would very much appreciate those scans
Mark
W7HPW
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
By
W7HPW Radio
·
#208963
·
|
Re: 7934 Service Manual
Where and who is "Mark, the OP"? Could you consider uploading just those 3 pages, 3-1, 6-22 and 6-23 to TEKSCOPES files area? That would help anyone, including me, update the old manual until such
By
Bill
·
#208962
·
|
Re: Decomposing Cam Switch Drum
I have some (PG506 for one, IIRC) cam switches that are cracked on the ends, and I expect they're on borrowed time. Nothing as bad as in Clark's photos, though.
I've had the same thought, more
By
Adam R. Maxwell
·
#208961
·
|
Re: Decomposing Cam Switch Drum
I was fortunate to find an NOS replacement for one drum , 105-0509-00. That allows me to experiment with the bad unit; however, I am not sure where to start. One thought is to find a compatible resin,
By
Clark Foley
·
#208960
·
|
Re: GPIB workflow
Last time I did serious IEEE programming was writing a driver using PLM-86 for one of the competitors in the MATE program.? That was a LONG time ago.? TMS9914 I think was the chip.
Harvey.
By
Harvey White
·
#208959
·
|
Re: Decomposing Cam Switch Drum
Hey Clark,
I've never seen such a thing (/g/TekScopes/album?id=301415),
how strange. I wonder if anyone here knows what sort of plastic Tek used
for these?
I've never looked closely
By
Sigur?ur ?sgeirsson
·
#208958
·
|
Re: 492 has no 110 MHz IF
I ran the 492 long enough for it it wake up again, and tried swapping a cold VR module in…and it kept working with a full scale peak, which ruled out the VR (and calls into question my notes on
By
Adam R. Maxwell
·
#208957
·
|
Re: Unusual s/n 2465B
Have you checked its functions, or are you too scared ?????
;-)
By
M Yachad
·
#208956
·
|
Re: GPIB workflow
Almost. Valid addresses are 0 thru 30, with 31 reserved for Untalk or Unlisten.
Steve Hendrix
By
Steve Hendrix
·
#208955
·
|
Re: GPIB workflow
If your incorrect address of 4 instead of 14 was written in hex or octal rather than decimal, I'd suspect a bad DIP switch. But IEEE-488 addresses are usually stated in decimal, and context in the
By
Steve Hendrix
·
#208954
·
|
Re: 492 has no 110 MHz IF
Hi Mark,
At this point, anything could be bad as far as I'm concerned, including my reasoning to get to the VR as a potential problem. Without extenders, I don't think there's enough room to spray
By
Adam R. Maxwell
·
#208953
·
|
Re: TDS 5xx debug port
[email protected]> wrote:
It looks like archive.org captured at least some of the threads
By
Sigur?ur ?sgeirsson
·
#208952
·
|
Re: 492 has no 110 MHz IF
Adam,
Could the transistors be bad? The 2N5179 replaces ones on this board of the p/n, 151-0282-00. If you have component cooler, use that to briefly spray on the transistors to see if cooling them
By
Mark Vincent
·
#208951
·
|
Added photo album Tektronix TDS754D - acquisition board issues
#photo-notice
Radu Bogdan Dicher <vondicher@...> added the photo album Tektronix TDS754D - acquisition board issues ( /g/TekScopes/album?id=301426 )
By
Group Notification <noreply@...>
·
#208950
·
|