¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: OT: microwave oven blows fuse
Hello everyone, I have been reading on this board and not knowing the answers till I got to this post. I have been repairing commercial food equipment for 20 plus years and microwaves are part of
By benwetzel · #188802 ·
Re: Internal Drive Mechanism for 7B53N (et., al.) Sweep Speed Cam
I will have to try removing that retaining ring and go from there. I'm afraid that even if I can do that and release the tubing so that it comes out the front, I still may not be able to get the disk
By n4buq · #188801 ·
Re: Type 106
"BAV17" (typo). Thanks, Barry - N4BUQ
By n4buq · #188800 ·
Re: Type 106
On second look, the DAV17 comes in a DO-35 package. I think I can solder some small-diameter tubing to the leads right up against the diode's body and clip it in to the existing
By n4buq · #188799 ·
Re: Type 106
Thanks, Tom. The existing diodes are tiny glass(?) cylinders with metal ends that clip into small holders (much like the old fashioned clip-in fuses). I suppose I'll be doing some plumbing for
By n4buq · #188798 ·
Re: 465M parts
Interesting! Unlike the 465M, the 455 has no fuse in the HV Oscillator supply. In fact it shows as a jumper in place of the fuse. That could blow up a few things easily.
By Ananda · #188797 ·
Re: Type 106
Based on the fast-rise circuitry of the 106 and PG506 being similar and having similar specs, you would seem to have several good Si-Schottky candidates. A few that come to mind
By Tom Lee · #188796 ·
Re: Type 106
Speaking of a 106, anyone know anything about the GaAs diodes in the Fast Rise outputs? I think one or two of mine are bad. The +OUTPUT works but not the -OUTPUT. Input to the two diodes on the
By n4buq · #188795 ·
Re: Recommended ventilation clearance around a 2465 scope
Nothing better than a fan AND a heat sink for the Horizontal Chip. Digikey has one but you have to drill your own holes in it. Part Number HS273-ND
By W2TCM435@... · #188794 ·
Re: Type 106
Yes, but no. Everything is fine. As you understood, I was not probing at the right place. I was misled by the +/- 9.1V beneath the capacitors, so I probed there because it was an easy access.
By Stephen · #188793 ·
Re: Type 106
Ah, so your earlier "my bad" message meant to say that nothing is actually wrong with the +/-10 rails. Got it. However, regarding: "Instead of checking voltages between chassis ground and directly at
By saipan59 (Pete) · #188792 ·
Re: Type 106
Yes, you¡¯re right. But weirdly enough the +/- 9.1 are also mentioned at the capacitors. Which is misleading. That¡¯s why I expected that when I checked there, but nope¡­
By Stephen · #188791 ·
Re: Type 106
The voltages taken directly at the emitters read + and - 9.7V. All within specs.
By Stephen · #188790 ·
Re: Type 106
One other note: Even though the two rails are named "+10" and "-10", note that the schematic shows that the REAL values are +9.1 and -9.1. Pete
By saipan59 (Pete) · #188789 ·
Re: Type 106
What about D213 and D216? You can simply measure the voltage at the cathode of D213, and the anode of D216 (or at the Base of the associated transistor, if that's easier to get to). Should be around
By saipan59 (Pete) · #188788 ·
Re: Internal Drive Mechanism for 7B53N (et., al.) Sweep Speed Cam
Yes, it's clearly been a long time since I've had to work on one of these. I was thinking that pulling the drive dog forward would disengage the drive dogs from the rear drum, but that bothered me, as
By Jim Adney · #188787 ·
Re: Wanted: Feet for TDS6xx scope..
Hello Lyle. If you can't locate a replacement set, have you considered 3D printing a set? https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4168123 J
By 12ax7 · #188786 ·
Re: Recommended ventilation clearance around a 2465 scope
Thanks everyone for your valuable feedback. Thank you for the heat sink suggestion avtek2. Reading through the various threads about "horizontal output IC" cooling, there seems to be an even split
By 12ax7 · #188785 ·
Re: Type 106
Hi Pete. They are not shorted. I have checked all the transistors in the power supply with a dedicated transistor checker. They are fine and within specs.
By Stephen · #188784 ·
Re: Type 106
My bad. I wasn¡¯t probing the right places. Instead of checking voltages between chassis ground and directly at both emitters, I probed between ground and + C215/ C218. According to the schematic,
By Stephen · #188783 ·