Re: 7D20 with unknown options or mods
Ok, But there was an option on the 7D20 that made it work with the 7854 digital storage scope. Perhaps that is the option you seek? -Chuck Harris Clark Foley wrote:
By
Chuck Harris <cfharris@...>
·
#171401
·
|
Re: Help troubleshooting a 2710 SA
From my experience with these, certain PCB revisions have an issue in the EHT section; on one I've repaired, there had been creepage and flashover in the high resistance potential divider chain which
By
Martin Whybrow
·
#171400
·
|
Re: P6249 Oscillation
Maybe he's of the KISS lobby :)
By
David C. Partridge
·
#171399
·
|
Re: P6249 Oscillation
'Osculation' ???? (Sorry, couldn't resist it !!!) Tim [email protected]> wrote:
By
Tim Phillips
·
#171398
·
|
Re: 7D20 with unknown options or mods
Chuck, The 7D20T did not require anything extra from the 7D20. Any production 7D20 will function in the T package without modification. You could add the rear access cable for the GPIB that had a
By
Clark Foley
·
#171397
·
|
Re: Strange Tek2440 issue
Ok, here's where I'm at. ALL of the electrolytics, except the two big ones in the back, have been replaced. I tested them and they were all good with very low ESR so I'll toss them in a box for now.
By
Vince Vielhaber
·
#171396
·
|
2445 ¡°A¡± sweep Issue
I am having issues with a 2445 Oscilloscope that is not showing the A horizontal sweep. The ¡°B¡± sweep appears when the B delayed time base is used. The readout shows some dots on the bottom line
By
christopherbath@...
·
#171395
·
|
Re: P6249 Oscillation
I believe I've narrowed the issue to the probe tip, as you've suggested. Seems hitting it with a shot of cold air will calm the oscillation for a short period of time. The probe tip seems to be an
By
fauffing <fauffing@...>
·
#171394
·
|
Re: Tek TDS694C advice pls
You're of course absolutely correct about the numbers in my example, Bruce. My approximation is only valid if R >> 1/(2 * pi * f * C), in which case R as a parallel R may be ignored. In my example it
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#171393
·
|
Re: Tek TDS694C advice pls
Wrong, when calculating the impedance of a parallel R +C the 90 degree phase shift should be taken into account. The input impedance is actually closer to 550 ohms. Bruce
By
Bruce Griffiths
·
#171392
·
|
Re: Tek TDS694C advice pls
By
Ray
·
#171391
·
|
Re: Tek TDS694C advice pls
At higher frequencies the P6249 is a lighter load than the P6158, not because of its 20 kOhm parallel resistance vs. the P6158's 1 kOhm, but because its input capacity is significantly lower (< 1 pF)
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#171390
·
|
Re: Tek TDS694C advice pls
By
Ray
·
#171389
·
|
Re: Help Troubleshooting 466, No +15VDC
There are a number of tricks.? One is to put a current limited supply on the +15.? Adjust the supply to +15 volts and the current limit to roughly between 50 ma to 100 ma.? Look for the lowest
By
Harvey White
·
#171388
·
|
Re: Tek TDS694C advice pls
Frank, Ray, I recently needed to measure some 600 MHz clock signals and the folks I was working with were not convinced that probe and scope bandwidth was so important, so I came up with this data.
By
Tom Bowers
·
#171387
·
|
Re: Tektronix TDS3PRT Printer
To reply to my own message again , the TDS3PRT printer I purchased from an overseas seller arrived yesterday, but without instructions or accessories. Upon examination I found the platen knob to be
By
ebrucehunter
·
#171386
·
|
Re: 1S1 sampling unit; (also 7B53AN & 7A18 plugins)
The only non-Tektronix scope that can accept Tektronix letter- and 1-series plugins is the Lavoie clone AFAIK. http://w140.com/tekwiki/wiki/Lavoie_LA-265A
By
Snappy
·
#171385
·
|
Re: Tek TDS694C advice pls
By
Ray
·
#171384
·
|
Re: WTD - P6201 Probe tips (Tek P/N 206-0200-00)
Hi Phil, I have (found) two of the tiny screw-in probe tips, NOS, that I can part with. How about a (free) NOS witch hat (015-0135-00) for your P6201 or do you have one? When I purchased components
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#171383
·
|
Re: Lot of 10 scopes (400s & 2400s) with 5 scopemobiles
I asked the gentleman in question to plug in the 2465B, 2465, and the second 2445 to take a picture and see if there were a visible screen. He said no. I again wrote back to say it would take 5
By
Lawrance A. Schneider
·
#171382
·
|