Re: SG504 fault
I'm embarrassed to say that the apparent problem with the SG504 seems to have more to do with operator error than any real fault. The Lecroy DSO being used to look at the SG504 output has only
By
Kerry Burns
·
#152136
·
|
Re: how high would you stack them?
I'm blown away by this. I had seen these, but thought they were equipment specific.? Many must be, but what a great idea.? And if cosmetics aren't critical they seem available? (used) on Ebay for
By
John Ferguson
·
#152135
·
|
Re: how high would you stack them?
I use Hardigg military rack cases each set of specialized instruments lives in its ¡®own¡¯ waterproof and air and dust tight hardigg case with its own power strip. My ¡®basic¡¯ instruments like
By
Scott McGrath
·
#152134
·
|
How to make a 92SX109 from a 92S16 and a 92SX118 from a 92S32 Pattern Generator Module Card?
Hi to All, This to create a 100 MHz Pattern Generator out of "standard" 50MHz (92S16/92S32) Pattern Generator Modules. Out of the 92SX109/92SX118 Product Note (57W-7122) the 92SX109/92SX118 Modules
By
Egge Siert
·
#152133
·
|
Re: 468 still trouble shooting Horizontal jitter
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 05:25 PM, lop pol wrote: > > I have cleaned up the power supplies with new caps all around. Still have a > horizontal jitter. Its almost unnoticeable during A sweep. Its most
By
Brendan
·
#152132
·
|
Re: Tek 465 "B" Sweep
Hmm, I think you're right. It doesn't want to act up with the shield off. With it on t is bad almost all the time. It also was installed incorrectly, the fingers are supposed to go under a shield
By
Jeff Urban
·
#152131
·
|
Re: how high would you stack them?
<snip> I have a similar approach. The local "club" stores sell a metal shelf unit, four two piece posts 1 inch in diameter, six wire shelves (try to find the ones that are not like trays), casters,
By
Harvey White
·
#152130
·
|
Re: how high would you stack them?
Hmmm... Good ideas from you all! What works for me at the moment is a wooden bench in my garage. I made an equipment shelf for it a few years ago. Then a couple months ago I put casters (a few bucks
By
Jim Ford
·
#152129
·
|
Re: Tek 465 "B" Sweep
Hi jeff Responds to stress.....dry joint?...something never soldered?....pcb crack?...resistor cracked?...As you can tell I'm not an expert but pressure related faults seem to fall under such headings
By
Jack
·
#152128
·
|
Re: Tek 465 "B" Sweep
Has another problem. The front end of channel 1, the lower V/div. settings result in a distorted square wave, and I mean distorted. Sometimes overpeaked and sometimes underpeaked. I have determined it
By
Jeff Urban
·
#152127
·
|
Re: how high would you stack them?
I am just finishing an exercise in cramming a lot of gear into a small space (bench area 4' x 7', room 10' x 7'). I'm using shelving on the double slotted standards with 2 & 3 tab brackets. In
By
Reginald Beardsley
·
#152126
·
|
Re: how high would you stack them?
In storage I have 500 series and 7K scopes stacked 5 high.? Never had issues with bent cases.? One of my 19" racks is basically a stack of gear too.? Heavy HP scope on the bottom, gradually getting
By
Dave Seiter
·
#152125
·
|
Tek 371 test fixture
I am working on a tek 371 with a friend of mine , it has no test fixture and these things are never seen on ebay , so our idea is to make one . We are in the process of using a test fixture which will
By
oliver johnson
·
#152124
·
|
Re: how high would you stack them?
Hi John, Interesting question! 33 years ago my wife and I agreed to split our residential office 50/50. I gradually appropriated about 2/3rds of it. At first I had plenty of room. Then I had test
By
Dennis Tillman W7pF
·
#152123
·
|
Re: 425 Mil vertical module needed....seeking
Hi Harvey..of course take your point on the final comment you made...whether the depot has 'everything needed' to test the card to environmental spec was in my mind. I suppose in a way it's like say
By
Jack
·
#152122
·
|
Re: how high would you stack them?
Because the bottom layer is either a 7000 scope, or the equivalent in height, with one or two layers of test equipment beyond that.... by the time I get to the third layer, it really wants to be
By
Harvey White
·
#152121
·
|
Re: No contribution from David Hess since July 18th
These connectors are for CATV trunk and feeder lines. They are a special ceramic that expands while heated, and grip the outer aluminum so tight that it will break before it sucks out during a sudden
By
Michael A. Terrell
·
#152120
·
|
Re: 425 Mil vertical module needed....seeking
On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 04:16:17 +1000, you wrote: You'd be surprised that the basic difference (perhaps) in the MIL units vs. the commercial units is the ability to remove subsystems. This does not always
By
Harvey White
·
#152119
·
|
Re: No contribution from David Hess since July 18th
I think that the use of UTC + offset and communicating that offset would *avoid* these problems for all systems and persons involved and not create any. All systems and persons would include users,
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#152118
·
|
Re: 425 Mil vertical module needed....seeking
Hi again Michael...I will not go any further with the reply I sent you on TREC77 as it dawned on me (I'm a bit slow) that it is not connected to the Tektronix but happy to hear more on my own email if
By
Jack
·
#152117
·
|