Re: So long...
Thanks for your interesting contributions Craig! Albert [Perhaps I can provoke you to write one more message. The message counter shows about 161,400 messages. Then your 4,600 contributions form
By
Albert Otten
·
#161407
·
|
Re: Topic title debate, was RE: [TekScopes] 7000 still hard to beat
FWIW Please don't change the subject of the thread - it remains the same thread. Instead, please start a completely new thread (i.e. don't use reply). David
By
David C. Partridge
·
#161406
·
|
Re: Topic title debate, was RE: [TekScopes] 7000 still hard to beat
Tom, Thank you! At the risk of aggravating some readers, I'll say that I think that by sharing these viewpoints and perspectives, some people (hopefully most) will alter their mindset and approach and
By
G Hopper, KB7WSD
·
#161405
·
|
Re: So long...
Many thanx for all your endless contributions in all those years Graig. And it will others giving a hard time to do the same at that level of always in detail trying to solve the problems. Have a good
By
tek_547
·
#161404
·
|
Can anyone in the Seattle area copy a 2764DC EPROM PROBLEM SOLVED
Bruce Lane will read the EPROM for me. He is nearby. Dennis Tillman W7PF
By
Dennis Tillman W7pF
·
#161403
·
|
Re: So long...
We've all appreciated your input! Cheers and happy trails! -Dave
By
Dave Seiter
·
#161402
·
|
Re: Topic title debate, was RE: [TekScopes] 7000 still hard to beat
Hi Grant- Thanks much for your thoughtful post! From reading the messages in this thread, it appears that the source of disagreement is the fact that different folks experience a very different level
By
fiftythreebuick <ae5i@...>
·
#161401
·
|
Re: So long...
Seconded. DaveD Sent from a small flat thingy
By
Dave Daniel
·
#161400
·
|
Re: So long...
OK, but come back if you miss the conversation.
By
John Griessen <john@...>
·
#161399
·
|
Re: vintageTEK scanned transformer drawings for 120-0998-01 and up ( 120-197 )
Hi Kurt : Thanks a lot for your information !!! RegardTony CheungNOV 6 2019
By
Yiu On Tony C
·
#161398
·
|
Re: Can anyone in the Seattle area copy a 2764DC EPROM
I likely have a means of reading, archiving and programming a chip. Can you give me a more complete description of the device? Manufacturer, a picture of the chip, ect.? Joe
By
J. L. Trantham
·
#161397
·
|
Re: So long...
Craig, Hate to see you go, but I also understand your reason for leaving. I have enjoyed reading your comments and learning from you. Best of luck going forward. -- Michael Lynch Dardanelle, AR
By
Mlynch001
·
#161396
·
|
Re: So long...
You will be missed. Vince.
By
Vince Vielhaber
·
#161395
·
|
So long...
Hi all I've been thinking about this for quite a while. But I think after 18 years on Tekscopes it is finally time to sign off. In part it is because I think I have said all there is that I can
By
Craig Sawyers <c.sawyers@...>
·
#161394
·
|
Re: tektronix 7S14 batteries and time base question
Hi Dennis, Thanks for that information. I guess I should have made the following disclosure: About a year ago, I acquired a 7104 with option 2. My first 7104 didn't have that. This 7104 with 2 x 7A29
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#161393
·
|
Re: vintageTEK scanned transformer drawings for 120-0998-01 and up ( 120-197 )
Here is the 120-0360-00 drawing: http://w140.com/tekwiki/images/9/97/Tek_120-0360-00.pdf
By
Kurt Rosenfeld
·
#161392
·
|
Re: New file uploaded to [email protected]
Another great piece of work, Dennis! Thanks for uploading that. Craig Sent: 05 November 2019 22:48 To: [email protected] Subject: [TekScopes] New file uploaded to [email protected] Hello, This
By
Craig Sawyers <c.sawyers@...>
·
#161391
·
|
Re: 130 LC meter
Agreed - that was my experience with the RA17. Of course I have a 130 LC meter (no surprise there!) and the only thing I had to do was replace the smoothing electrolytic, which had gone down with the
By
Craig Sawyers <c.sawyers@...>
·
#161390
·
|
Re: vintageTEK scanned transformer drawings for 120-0998-01 and up ( 120-197 )
Here is the 120-197 drawing: http://w140.com/tekwiki/images/c/cd/Tek_120-0197-00.pdf
By
Kurt Rosenfeld
·
#161389
·
|
Re: Topic title debate, was RE: [TekScopes] 7000 still hard to beat
Chuck OK - you got me fair and square. I *hope* I changed the topic line ;-) I really have no problem at all with a conversation going off in another direction, but if we do so, we really ought to
By
Craig Sawyers <c.sawyers@...>
·
#161388
·
|