¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: So long...
Thanks for your interesting contributions Craig! Albert [Perhaps I can provoke you to write one more message. The message counter shows about 161,400 messages. Then your 4,600 contributions form
By Albert Otten · #161407 ·
Re: Topic title debate, was RE: [TekScopes] 7000 still hard to beat
FWIW Please don't change the subject of the thread - it remains the same thread. Instead, please start a completely new thread (i.e. don't use reply). David
By David C. Partridge · #161406 ·
Re: Topic title debate, was RE: [TekScopes] 7000 still hard to beat
Tom, Thank you! At the risk of aggravating some readers, I'll say that I think that by sharing these viewpoints and perspectives, some people (hopefully most) will alter their mindset and approach and
By G Hopper, KB7WSD · #161405 ·
Re: So long...
Many thanx for all your endless contributions in all those years Graig. And it will others giving a hard time to do the same at that level of always in detail trying to solve the problems. Have a good
By tek_547 · #161404 ·
Can anyone in the Seattle area copy a 2764DC EPROM PROBLEM SOLVED
Bruce Lane will read the EPROM for me. He is nearby. Dennis Tillman W7PF
By Dennis Tillman W7pF · #161403 ·
Re: So long...
We've all appreciated your input! Cheers and happy trails! -Dave
By Dave Seiter · #161402 ·
Re: Topic title debate, was RE: [TekScopes] 7000 still hard to beat
Hi Grant- Thanks much for your thoughtful post! From reading the messages in this thread, it appears that the source of disagreement is the fact that different folks experience a very different level
By fiftythreebuick <ae5i@...> · #161401 ·
Re: So long...
Seconded. DaveD Sent from a small flat thingy
By Dave Daniel · #161400 ·
Re: So long...
OK, but come back if you miss the conversation.
By John Griessen <john@...> · #161399 ·
Re: vintageTEK scanned transformer drawings for 120-0998-01 and up ( 120-197 )
Hi Kurt : Thanks a lot for your information !!! RegardTony CheungNOV 6 2019
By Yiu On Tony C · #161398 ·
Re: Can anyone in the Seattle area copy a 2764DC EPROM
I likely have a means of reading, archiving and programming a chip. Can you give me a more complete description of the device? Manufacturer, a picture of the chip, ect.? Joe
By J. L. Trantham · #161397 ·
Re: So long...
Craig, Hate to see you go, but I also understand your reason for leaving. I have enjoyed reading your comments and learning from you. Best of luck going forward. -- Michael Lynch Dardanelle, AR
By Mlynch001 · #161396 ·
Re: So long...
You will be missed. Vince.
By Vince Vielhaber · #161395 ·
So long...
Hi all I've been thinking about this for quite a while. But I think after 18 years on Tekscopes it is finally time to sign off. In part it is because I think I have said all there is that I can
By Craig Sawyers <c.sawyers@...> · #161394 ·
Re: tektronix 7S14 batteries and time base question
Hi Dennis, Thanks for that information. I guess I should have made the following disclosure: About a year ago, I acquired a 7104 with option 2. My first 7104 didn't have that. This 7104 with 2 x 7A29
By Raymond Domp Frank · #161393 ·
Re: vintageTEK scanned transformer drawings for 120-0998-01 and up ( 120-197 )
Here is the 120-0360-00 drawing: http://w140.com/tekwiki/images/9/97/Tek_120-0360-00.pdf
By Kurt Rosenfeld · #161392 ·
Re: New file uploaded to [email protected]
Another great piece of work, Dennis! Thanks for uploading that. Craig Sent: 05 November 2019 22:48 To: [email protected] Subject: [TekScopes] New file uploaded to [email protected] Hello, This
By Craig Sawyers <c.sawyers@...> · #161391 ·
Re: 130 LC meter
Agreed - that was my experience with the RA17. Of course I have a 130 LC meter (no surprise there!) and the only thing I had to do was replace the smoothing electrolytic, which had gone down with the
By Craig Sawyers <c.sawyers@...> · #161390 ·
Re: vintageTEK scanned transformer drawings for 120-0998-01 and up ( 120-197 )
Here is the 120-197 drawing: http://w140.com/tekwiki/images/c/cd/Tek_120-0197-00.pdf
By Kurt Rosenfeld · #161389 ·
Re: Topic title debate, was RE: [TekScopes] 7000 still hard to beat
Chuck OK - you got me fair and square. I *hope* I changed the topic line ;-) I really have no problem at all with a conversation going off in another direction, but if we do so, we really ought to
By Craig Sawyers <c.sawyers@...> · #161388 ·