¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: hp/agilent group from yahoo
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/hp_agilent_equipment/conversations/messages Still up here. Hope it moves soon. Regards
By Tom Miller · #146389 ·
Re: Free parts
Hi Terry, A pity that I live in Melbourne, Australia ...... postage is probably prohibitive ..... :( I have a 7L13 in a 7603 .... working well at the moment. I found the 670-3114-00 board in the Artek
By tinkera123 · #146388 ·
hp/agilent group from yahoo
Where did the HP/Agilent Yahoo group go?? Is it here on groups.io?? Karin
By karin_k3uu · #146387 ·
Re: Replacing 453 rectifier tubes.
Thanks for the help :) serial number is 28495. Im actually using the other 453 it was too pretty to part out. The other one is a pre 20,000 serial so it has nuvistors.
By Brendan · #146386 ·
Re: Replacing 453 rectifier tubes.
OK ...I assume from earlier question about supply voltages that the high voltage is ok as well? So at this point I am guessing after 40+ years the CRT itself is just tired?. You said you had a parts
By Dave / NR1DX · #146385 ·
Re: Replacing 453 rectifier tubes.
Yes I did the grid bias adjustment. I get no dot in single sweep at all.
By Brendan · #146384 ·
Re: Replacing 453 rectifier tubes.
Yes a usable trace. I have been using it this way for years. After all the work it has done it deserves to be fixed.
By Brendan · #146383 ·
Re: Replacing 453 rectifier tubes.
And you did CRT grid bias adjustment on page 6-10? -- Dave Manuals@... www.ArtekManuals.com
By Dave / NR1DX · #146382 ·
Re: Replacing 453 rectifier tubes.
And you get usable trace at full intensity but not exactly a "bloom" or overly bright? -- Dave Manuals@... www.ArtekManuals.com
By Dave / NR1DX · #146381 ·
Re: Replacing 453 rectifier tubes.
Supply voltages are amazingly close to perfect after all these years. I have swapped intensity pots with another 453 and the issue remained. I dont start to see a trace until about 55V at TP 1047.
By Brendan · #146380 ·
Re: Replacing 453 rectifier tubes.
1)All supply voltages are ok? 2) Next "easy check" is to check and be sure the intensity control itself is not open at either end or at the wiper -- Dave Manuals@... www.ArtekManuals.com
By Dave / NR1DX · #146379 ·
Re: Replacing 453 rectifier tubes.
Ok tubes replaced. Still did not fix my intensity issues :( back to the drawing board.
By Brendan · #146378 ·
WTB: standard Tek cabinet for 602 or 17xx series; also 602 knob
Hi, Having acquired a couple of panel-less X-Y scopes, I'd like to obtain the one-piece metal cabinet which appears to be a standard size across the Tek range. About 5" x 8 1/4" x 16 3/4", I believe
By toby@... · #146377 ·
Re: Replacing 453 rectifier tubes.
Ok never mind. figured it out
By Brendan · #146376 ·
Re: 2213A Calibration Problems
Short scan intermittently becoming full scan is often the plate connections on the tube. Look at the 2 flying leads under the tube, the furthest one away is often not connected. Magic? or lousy
By chipbee40 · #146375 ·
Re: Replacing 453 rectifier tubes.
Ok. Next question. How do I discharge this CRT. Only type I have had to discharge had the plugin where I can discharge it to the frame.
By Brendan · #146374 ·
Re: Replacing 453 rectifier tubes.
Regardless ...ALWAYS a good idea to discharge the CRT.. unless you just like doing back flips off your stool -DC manuals@... -- Dave Manuals@... www.ArtekManuals.com
By Dave / NR1DX · #146373 ·
Replacing 453 rectifier tubes.
Do I need to discharge the CRT to replace those tubes? Opened it up,looked dangerous arrived to the conclusion that I had better ask.
By Brendan · #146372 ·
Re: DC508 display board PCB replacement
Dennis, It cost me about $50.00 for the parts. But I did order more than I needed. All of them came from Digikey. The bill of materials is in the Files section with the Digikey part numbers. I have
By Steve Murphree · #146371 ·
Re: 422 AC/DC Version
Hi Jeff, Why do you say there's 6.2 megohms limiting the cathode current? I only see about 1.83Meg (R810, R839, R829, the - guessed - dynamic impedance of GVS4, R838 and R837), and still, that already
By Fabio Trevisan · #146370 ·