Re: Keithley anyone?
Yeah have a number of Keithley items (a couple 181, a couple 192, a few 197, a 228A, a 196, 150, 131, 130, 128), nothing current only working older pieces in my meter collection, and still have a 2000
By
Nik Milosevic
·
#204956
·
|
Re: Tektronix 155-0065 needed! Solved!
Thanks to a member of this forum (John Griessen) I was able to get my scope up and running again! Big thanks, John!
By
Hermansson Amplification
·
#204955
·
|
Re: 7603(?) Restoration
It's better that way- then you can actually use/move/drive them without too much worry.
By
Dave Seiter
·
#204954
·
|
FS: Tektronix FG501
Selling my Tektronix FG501 function generator. Works with no
By
Benjamin Badrakh
·
#204953
·
|
Re: 7603(?) Restoration
Yes. He certainly has some nice equipment to do that work. I wish I could do the same with my pushbuttons. I've seen the other methods but that looks the best by far.
Barry - N4BUQ
By
n4buq
·
#204952
·
|
Re: 7603(?) Restoration
[email protected]> wrote:
Yeah Robin is not your average bear. He goes by "robrenz" on YouTube where
he's posted a bunch of machining related videos.
By
Sigur?ur ?sgeirsson
·
#204951
·
|
Re: Keithley anyone?
I know what I'd like: to glom onto this forum and the Tekwiki with all the Keithley stuff. A weak argument to do this would point out that:
1. Tek now owns Keithley
2. The two companies have shared
By
jspencerg
·
#204950
·
|
Re: 7603(?) Restoration
Dang! If you scroll down from the bezel treatment, he used a pantograph engraver to make button text,
filled with epoxy, then filed and polished to look like new gambling dice!
Truly fine looking,
By
John Griessen <john@...>
·
#204949
·
|
Re: [OT] Shocks in a large market. How to check ESD direction?
Google provided this: https://byjus.com/physics/gold-leaf-electroscope/
I built one in jr high school.
Very easy.
You can use aluminum leaf available at a sign maker.
Glenn
--
By
Glenn Little
·
#204948
·
|
Re: 7603(?) Restoration
I was thinking he painted the frame but now I see he sanded it down, bead-blasted it, and then applied a clear-coat (Permalac). Very clean look.
Thanks again,
Barry - N4BUQ
By
n4buq
·
#204947
·
|
Re: 7603(?) Restoration
Yes. That's it. Thanks, Sigur?ur.
Barry - N4BUQ
By
n4buq
·
#204946
·
|
Re: 7603(?) Restoration
Maybe you’re talking about Robin Renzetti:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/tek-7603-scope-w-7a18-amp-7b53a-timebase-restoration/
.
?ann sun., 5. maí 2024 kl. 21:25 skrifa?i n4buq via
By
Sigur?ur ?sgeirsson
·
#204945
·
|
FS: Need help finding a home for these 500 series scopes
Hey gang,
I know nothing about these scopes that I inherited from a retired EE professor that recently passed. He was quite fond of them and I want to see if I can find a home for them.
They
By
Berzerk
·
#204944
·
|
Photo Notifications
#photo-notice
Berzerk <crayzeemf@...> added the photo album FS: 500 series ( /g/TekScopes/album?id=294904 )
---
The following photos have been uploaded to the FS: 500 series (
By
Group Notification <noreply@...>
·
#204943
·
|
Re: 7704A - Option 9?
I remember the same sentence, just calibrated for? a higher bandwidth, which suggests less flatness, IIRC.
Harvey
By
Harvey White
·
#204942
·
|
Re: 7704A - Option 9?
I found a better explanation in the Operators Manual:
Option 9
Adjusts vertical circuit performance to extend sine-wave response to 250 MHz (upper -3 dB) when 7A19 is used; +15° C to +35° C.
So
By
n4buq
·
#204941
·
|
Re: 7704A - Option 9?
Tekwiki states:
Option 9: Extended bandwidth (250 MHz, trades pulse response)
Is that the reference you were talking about?
Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ
By
n4buq
·
#204940
·
|
Re: 7704A - Option 9?
As I recall, it was all done with a greatly relaxed transient response. Compare the overshoot specs. The hardware is the same.
By
Clark Foley
·
#204939
·
|
Re: [OT] Shocks in a large market. How to check ESD direction?
How do you make one?
<jspencerg@...> wrote:
By
cheater cheater
·
#204938
·
|
Re: 7704A - Option 9?
Hi Harvey,
That's been my belief as well. Years ago a friend and I compared our two 7704A scopes, one with opt. 9 and one without. We couldn't identify any obvious differences in circuitry. Of
By
Tom Lee
·
#204937
·
|