Re: how high would you stack them?
Hi John, Interesting question! 33 years ago my wife and I agreed to split our residential office 50/50. I gradually appropriated about 2/3rds of it. At first I had plenty of room. Then I had test
By
Dennis Tillman W7pF
·
#152123
·
|
Re: 425 Mil vertical module needed....seeking
Hi Harvey..of course take your point on the final comment you made...whether the depot has 'everything needed' to test the card to environmental spec was in my mind. I suppose in a way it's like say
By
Jack
·
#152122
·
|
Re: how high would you stack them?
Because the bottom layer is either a 7000 scope, or the equivalent in height, with one or two layers of test equipment beyond that.... by the time I get to the third layer, it really wants to be
By
Harvey White
·
#152121
·
|
Re: No contribution from David Hess since July 18th
These connectors are for CATV trunk and feeder lines. They are a special ceramic that expands while heated, and grip the outer aluminum so tight that it will break before it sucks out during a sudden
By
Michael A. Terrell
·
#152120
·
|
Re: 425 Mil vertical module needed....seeking
On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 04:16:17 +1000, you wrote: You'd be surprised that the basic difference (perhaps) in the MIL units vs. the commercial units is the ability to remove subsystems. This does not always
By
Harvey White
·
#152119
·
|
Re: No contribution from David Hess since July 18th
I think that the use of UTC + offset and communicating that offset would *avoid* these problems for all systems and persons involved and not create any. All systems and persons would include users,
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#152118
·
|
Re: 425 Mil vertical module needed....seeking
Hi again Michael...I will not go any further with the reply I sent you on TREC77 as it dawned on me (I'm a bit slow) that it is not connected to the Tektronix but happy to hear more on my own email if
By
Jack
·
#152117
·
|
Re: how high would you stack them?
If these are all about the same width you could make a rack cabinet with shelves. Open front and back with a little space above each unit for ventilation. Might be that there are shelving items at
By
Richard Knoppow
·
#152116
·
|
Re: No contribution from David Hess since July 18th
Hi Michael....can one buy "pre-shrunk" wire (which actually means before it is shrunk but going along your lines...)to fit into the pre-shrunk heat shrink?
By
Jack
·
#152115
·
|
Re: No contribution from David Hess since July 18th
I'm lost! Raymond
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#152114
·
|
CFL and LED EMI at the bench
FYI I had a huge problem with this. But adding a $3 Chinese EMI filter across the power leads in the light fixture solved it quite nicely. I now keep a bunch them on hand along with various size clamp
By
Reginald Beardsley
·
#152113
·
|
Re: how high would you stack them?
For many years I had a stack of the following sitting at one end of my bench. From bottom to top: HP 8660D signal generator HP 8556B spec an (both sections) Tektronix TM-5006A, fully loaded HP 3456A
By
Dave Daniel
·
#152112
·
|
Re: 425 Mil vertical module needed....seeking
Hi Michael....how interesting....no not the PRC, I know the sets you mean though....this was a 'pioneer' set...CW on Tx/Rx and AM on Rx only. RT654A/TRC 77. Still sought after as a great
By
Jack
·
#152111
·
|
Re: No contribution from David Hess since July 18th
I guess that you've never seen the heat shrink connectors for .500, .750 or larger hardline that have to be heated to allow you to slide the cable into? They are pre-shrunk. Michael A. Terrell
By
Michael A. Terrell
·
#152110
·
|
Send me your suggestions for a TekScopes FAQ
When new members join TekScopes this may be the very first time on a forum or mail reflector. The thought of asking a question, or replying to a question they can answer, could be compared to speaking
By
Dennis Tillman W7pF
·
#152109
·
|
Re: 425 Mil vertical module needed....seeking
Did you mean the PRC77? if so, both of its predecessors, the PRC10 and the PRC25 were module based radios that were designed to be repaired by swapping in spare, pre-tuned modules. I did
By
Michael A. Terrell
·
#152108
·
|
how high would you stack them?
I apologize for my simplicity, but I have height but not a lot of bench space. It occurred to be that there might be a limit to haw many scopes/ TM's one might stack so the question is what are you
By
John Ferguson
·
#152107
·
|
Re: Tek 465 "B" Sweep
Raymond Domp Frank 7:52am #152078 You nailed it. There are four CCFLs nearby for theseo ld eyes. Turned them off and; /g/TekScopes/photo/77251/2?p=Name,,,20,1,0,0 As a side effect I
By
Jeff Urban
·
#152106
·
|
Re: No contribution from David Hess since July 18th
Hi Raymond, Welcome to the 21st century where our members are spread around the globe and local time is a myth and UTC is the only way to avoid confusion. But that creates its own problems as was
By
Dennis Tillman W7pF
·
#152105
·
|
Re: No contribution from David Hess since July 18th
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 07:41 PM, Dennis Tillman W7PF wrote: Dennis, > > Your first message said "his last message on this forum is from July 18th." > which is the date I searched. His last post was
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#152104
·
|