It's not going to come out perfectly even, no matter what you do!
Don't try to cram -exactly- 96" of modules on a 96" table!
--Paul E Musselman
.
On 2/24/24 2:37 PM, Terrence Moore
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Aka my
¡°Junction Length Straights¡± (597 mm) for use in a loop
opposite ¡°Jackson Junctions:.
?
A loop would
need 2 on each side of the loop (total 4)? ?( 4 singles + 2
¡°junction length straights¡± = 95.8¡± on a 96¡± table which
will be close depending on module construction leg
placement, table edge roll and table edge taper) or other
options . . .
?
???????????????????????????????
T
?
?
???????????????????????????????
?
?
Another
possible solution is to build two straight modules the
length of Jackson Junctions and place them opposite each
other. That will give you enough "shortening" to account
for the difference between 8' and 8x modules.