Re: TNC-Pi9k6 - Teensy Socket or No Socket Preference
|
That is what I have been doing.? I just didn't know if people cared.? If they didn't I wasn't going to go to all the trouble of doing it that way.? Sounds like most folks line the socketed approach, so I will stick with?that.
Mat
I prefer sockets and I use the low profile (round pin type). It is
then easy enough to make a board that will take either the 3.2 or
3.6 Teensy boards
73,
John G8BPQ
On 17/04/2020 19:43, Mark Griffith via wrote:
Mat,
A socket would be nice, but I
think you'll gonna need to decide on the Teensy 3.2 or 3.6.?
One socket won't fit both these boards.? The 3.6 would be
better since it will support ARDOP once it is available for
Linux.
Mark
KD0QYN
My name is Mat and I am
the one who is running the WVCARC Etsy shop.? For those
who have purchased a TNC-Pi9k6 from Costal Chipworks or
from us, do you you have a preference as to if the Teensy
is in a socket or not?? The Teensy in the Costal Chipworks
version was not in a socket, which saves time assembling
the kit.? If people don't care I may go that route.? Just
looking for community feedback.
Mat
K2MJM
|
