开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent

Piero Sinclair
 

Fortunately I live on the top of a cliff.


On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, 13:25 Dan D., <dan_draggon@...> wrote:

Dan D.


Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent

 

开云体育

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/mega-tsunami-stone-age-britain-b2483031.html

Dan D.


Re: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06865-0

 

Hi Rob,

BAM files of these aDNA are available in the European Nucleotide Archives (ENA) database:


Among these aDNAs, NEO752 was yet analyzed by FTDNA (Mades? 752): R-Z18 (3 positive reads for U106, then for R-Z18: 1 positive read for Z16, Z370, 2 for Z371, 3 for Z369).

I don't know (but I assume that was the case) if the other R1b aDNAs in this study were analyzed by FTDNA (we can no longer see the R-P310 aDNAs in the corresponding public Discover tree...).

However, several forums address this paper:

(see page 4)

An article from this same scientific project deals more specifically with Danish aDNAs:


Cheers,

Ewenn


https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06865-0

 

Wondering if anyone has tried to look more closely at the 6 R-P310 in Neolithic Denmark in this study? I don't if they Have Bam files. Would be interesting to know what their downstream haplogroups were,if any.


Re: BigY - is it worth it?

 

There'd 5 of us now upgraded to the 111 level a few only at 67.? At 37 level many matches we don't recognise as belonging to our surname.

Will look at the next sale was 200 dollar.

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024, 10:34 Iain via , <gubbins=[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Jason,


Being the first person in your Y-STR match set to upgrade can be very useful in terms of deeper ancestry, as it puts your group in a wider geographical context. For the people in your wider haplogroup, this also establishes the existence of a new branch, which can be very instructive when we start to look at origins.


To clarify the point on Y-STR matches, your matches themselves are not upgraded. So if a person has only taken a Y-37 test, then you will still only see them on your Y-37 matches page. However, if you have only tested Y-37 (as Damir has) but your matches have tested to Y-67, Y-111 or BigY themselves, then upgrading to BigY will let you see these matches at the level to which they've tested.


Deceased persons' DNA is an increasing problem in genetic genealogy. The average age of new testers seems to be about 65, perhaps because something about retirement triggers a genealogical interest! However, this means that (in the US) the average tester will only live around 15-20 years, so anyone you see with a four-digit kit number is already more likely to be dead than alive. Unfortunately, there's very little that can be done, as the testing companies are generally very hesitant to use someone's DNA without clear instruction from that person or their official respresentative. This is why it is very important that testers today name a beneficiary to their account. This can be as simple as making sure the account login is passed onto your descendants, or it can (preferably also) be set up in your account:


Cheers,


Iain.


Re: BigY - is it worth it?

 

开云体育

Hi Jason,


Being the first person in your Y-STR match set to upgrade can be very useful in terms of deeper ancestry, as it puts your group in a wider geographical context. For the people in your wider haplogroup, this also establishes the existence of a new branch, which can be very instructive when we start to look at origins.


To clarify the point on Y-STR matches, your matches themselves are not upgraded. So if a person has only taken a Y-37 test, then you will still only see them on your Y-37 matches page. However, if you have only tested Y-37 (as Damir has) but your matches have tested to Y-67, Y-111 or BigY themselves, then upgrading to BigY will let you see these matches at the level to which they've tested.


Deceased persons' DNA is an increasing problem in genetic genealogy. The average age of new testers seems to be about 65, perhaps because something about retirement triggers a genealogical interest! However, this means that (in the US) the average tester will only live around 15-20 years, so anyone you see with a four-digit kit number is already more likely to be dead than alive. Unfortunately, there's very little that can be done, as the testing companies are generally very hesitant to use someone's DNA without clear instruction from that person or their official respresentative. This is why it is very important that testers today name a beneficiary to their account. This can be as simple as making sure the account login is passed onto your descendants, or it can (preferably also) be set up in your account:

https://help.familytreedna.com/hc/en-us/articles/360004731636-Beneficiary-Information-Tab


Cheers,


Iain.


Re: BigY - is it worth it?

 

@iain? can I just clarify what you said above.

If I upgrade to the big y I will be the first within my group to do so.? I have been thinking about this for a while and probably will next sale.

But you mentioned y37 matches being upgraded to the y111 level.

This would be amazing as a tester at the level is now deceased.

Jason

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024, 09:14 Dado, <dstanic@...> wrote:

Thanks for the answers. Ian as always professional and comprehensive, inspiring. Yes I am Croatian and It would be nice if I can contribute a little to the understanding of the history of that branch. All things considered, there is no choice but to make BigY. It is decided!?

Best regards,?
Damir


Re: BigY - is it worth it?

 

Thanks for the answers. Ian as always professional and comprehensive, inspiring. Yes I am Croatian and It would be nice if I can contribute a little to the understanding of the history of that branch. All things considered, there is no choice but to make BigY. It is decided!?

Best regards,?
Damir


Re: BigY - is it worth it?

 

Thanks for the answers. I will upgrade to Big Y, looking forward to results!


Re: BigY - is it worth it?

 

开云体育

Well,

Speaking of the devil (ahem, vampire), ha-ha, my own BigY test result is slowly paying off. I used to get a match before with someone from Slovenia, but now I have a newer match, one branch below the former, therefore in early medieval times, with someone from the Czech Republic.?

As we can see, “the dead travel fast”, as Bram Stoker would have put it elegantly back in 1897 (when my paternal grandfather was actually born in Romania - so I can say he was born two centuries ago).

Leaving all jokes aside, it is nice to test and then lay back and wait for miracles to happen (novel matches).

A retired (“Bohemian”-Transylvanian) vampire,

Dan D.


On Jan 16, 2024, at 4:52?PM, Wayne via groups.io <dna_wayne@...> wrote:

?
Another item to add to Iain's comment about southern and east European U106 individuals getting BigY results is that via the haplogroup branching one may be able to link back to a more northern or western European point of origin.? Would your line be a potential descendant of say a Christian crusader?? ?As we get more test results available this type of hypothesis can be investigated.? ?

We would also be looking for new lineages which might take the potential "vampire" association away from one of the group admins. He just has not lived up to Vlad the Impaler's legacy. It has been awhile since we have had to address potential U106 lineages which needed to be buried in strange ways - well outside of the royal lines which require excessive amounts of elaborate formality.

-Wayne K



On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 03:11:35 PM EST, Iain via groups.io <gubbins@...> wrote:


Hi Damir,


Martin correctly describes your situation. I'll just add a few points.


You may want to see this alternative visualisation from Family Tree DNA of what the family tree of R-BY5715 looks like:

https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/R-BY5715/tree

If you look in the scientific details, you will see that your R-BY5715 family is about 2000 years old, and if you look in the variants tab, you will see that BY5719 is one of the SNPs that defines the R-BY5715 haplogroup.


YSeq's R-U106 super-panel is a good way for people to cheaply test down to a recent haplogroup. We recommend this test for people who aren't planning to take a BigY test but are interested in the deep history of their families. The benefits of this are that we have a fairly clear idea of the origins of the high-level haplogroups, so we can roughly tell where your ancestors were thousands of years ago (I think I've explained that background to you already). However, as we approach the present, we paradoxically have less information to work with, because we have fewer testers on which to base our judgements.


However, your YSeq tests are simply a static, yes/no test for a set of haplogroups. The BigY test is a discovery test. The test will scan approximately a quarter of your Y chromosome and look for new SNP mutations that you hold. With this, new haplogroups can be formed. You will find your place within R-BY5715, whether that is in a pre-existing haplogroup, or a new haplogroup. Immediately, we can say that you may find relatives closer to the present than 2000 years ago, which is where you are currently stuck.


But also, your SNPs will then be on record when new people come along, allowing new haplogroups to be formed in the future, which we don't know about yet. In future, as more people test, this will let you find new relatives closer to the present. So BigY is partly an investment in the future as well. You will find out more as the years pass.


You will also get a lot of STR results. If you have any Y-37 matches, these will get refined to Y-111, and you can use the leverage of the additional 600-700 STR markers you will get as part of the BigY to see how close you are to any matches who have also tested to these levels. Some of these matches may turn out to be irrelevant, but you may also gain matches if people have tested who are closely related to you, but have many mutations in the first 37 markers.


How useful you'll find that information really depends on what you're interested in, and exactly what the results are (which are unpredictable). Probably we will at least find something interesting for you about where your family was 1000-2000 years ago, perhaps more recently, but there is no guarantee. It can be a bit of a gamble.


Ultimately, there is also a point to kick-starting research in your area. If you have a BigY test, then it gives more reason to the people around you to test as well, since they can then immediately see how they are related to you. After all, the YSeq test you have just taken gets its SNPs from BigY tests: if you want your family's SNPs on the YSeq test, you may want to upgrade to BigY!


I'm also guessing from your name that you are of Croatian heritage. We desparately need people from southern and eastern Europe to upgrade to BigY to address the gross biases we have against testing in these regions. You would be very much doing our statistics a favour by upgrading, and with better statistics we can be clearer about how R-U106 has branched and spread over the last 5000 years. You will also help improve the estimates of how old all of the haplogroups within R-BY5715 are and, with these improved TMRCAs, we may be able to tell more about where R-BY5715 came from and how it spread.


So there are a lot of benefits to upgrading to BigY: a younger branch in the family tree, a better idea of how you are related to other tests, improved measurements of how old your recent chain of haplogroups are, and better statistics for us all. Whether those benefits are worth the cost is up to you!


Best wishes,


Iain.


Re: BigY - is it worth it?

 

Another item to add to Iain's comment about southern and east European U106 individuals getting BigY results is that via the haplogroup branching one may be able to link back to a more northern or western European point of origin.? Would your line be a potential descendant of say a Christian crusader?? ?As we get more test results available this type of hypothesis can be investigated.? ?

We would also be looking for new lineages which might take the potential "vampire" association away from one of the group admins. He just has not lived up to Vlad the Impaler's legacy. It has been awhile since we have had to address potential U106 lineages which needed to be buried in strange ways - well outside of the royal lines which require excessive amounts of elaborate formality.

-Wayne K



On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 03:11:35 PM EST, Iain via groups.io <gubbins@...> wrote:


Hi Damir,


Martin correctly describes your situation. I'll just add a few points.


You may want to see this alternative visualisation from Family Tree DNA of what the family tree of R-BY5715 looks like:

https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/R-BY5715/tree

If you look in the scientific details, you will see that your R-BY5715 family is about 2000 years old, and if you look in the variants tab, you will see that BY5719 is one of the SNPs that defines the R-BY5715 haplogroup.


YSeq's R-U106 super-panel is a good way for people to cheaply test down to a recent haplogroup. We recommend this test for people who aren't planning to take a BigY test but are interested in the deep history of their families. The benefits of this are that we have a fairly clear idea of the origins of the high-level haplogroups, so we can roughly tell where your ancestors were thousands of years ago (I think I've explained that background to you already). However, as we approach the present, we paradoxically have less information to work with, because we have fewer testers on which to base our judgements.


However, your YSeq tests are simply a static, yes/no test for a set of haplogroups. The BigY test is a discovery test. The test will scan approximately a quarter of your Y chromosome and look for new SNP mutations that you hold. With this, new haplogroups can be formed. You will find your place within R-BY5715, whether that is in a pre-existing haplogroup, or a new haplogroup. Immediately, we can say that you may find relatives closer to the present than 2000 years ago, which is where you are currently stuck.


But also, your SNPs will then be on record when new people come along, allowing new haplogroups to be formed in the future, which we don't know about yet. In future, as more people test, this will let you find new relatives closer to the present. So BigY is partly an investment in the future as well. You will find out more as the years pass.


You will also get a lot of STR results. If you have any Y-37 matches, these will get refined to Y-111, and you can use the leverage of the additional 600-700 STR markers you will get as part of the BigY to see how close you are to any matches who have also tested to these levels. Some of these matches may turn out to be irrelevant, but you may also gain matches if people have tested who are closely related to you, but have many mutations in the first 37 markers.


How useful you'll find that information really depends on what you're interested in, and exactly what the results are (which are unpredictable). Probably we will at least find something interesting for you about where your family was 1000-2000 years ago, perhaps more recently, but there is no guarantee. It can be a bit of a gamble.


Ultimately, there is also a point to kick-starting research in your area. If you have a BigY test, then it gives more reason to the people around you to test as well, since they can then immediately see how they are related to you. After all, the YSeq test you have just taken gets its SNPs from BigY tests: if you want your family's SNPs on the YSeq test, you may want to upgrade to BigY!


I'm also guessing from your name that you are of Croatian heritage. We desparately need people from southern and eastern Europe to upgrade to BigY to address the gross biases we have against testing in these regions. You would be very much doing our statistics a favour by upgrading, and with better statistics we can be clearer about how R-U106 has branched and spread over the last 5000 years. You will also help improve the estimates of how old all of the haplogroups within R-BY5715 are and, with these improved TMRCAs, we may be able to tell more about where R-BY5715 came from and how it spread.


So there are a lot of benefits to upgrading to BigY: a younger branch in the family tree, a better idea of how you are related to other tests, improved measurements of how old your recent chain of haplogroups are, and better statistics for us all. Whether those benefits are worth the cost is up to you!


Best wishes,


Iain.


Re: BigY - is it worth it?

 

开云体育

Hi Damir,


Martin correctly describes your situation. I'll just add a few points.


You may want to see this alternative visualisation from Family Tree DNA of what the family tree of R-BY5715 looks like:

https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/R-BY5715/tree

If you look in the scientific details, you will see that your R-BY5715 family is about 2000 years old, and if you look in the variants tab, you will see that BY5719 is one of the SNPs that defines the R-BY5715 haplogroup.


YSeq's R-U106 super-panel is a good way for people to cheaply test down to a recent haplogroup. We recommend this test for people who aren't planning to take a BigY test but are interested in the deep history of their families. The benefits of this are that we have a fairly clear idea of the origins of the high-level haplogroups, so we can roughly tell where your ancestors were thousands of years ago (I think I've explained that background to you already). However, as we approach the present, we paradoxically have less information to work with, because we have fewer testers on which to base our judgements.


However, your YSeq tests are simply a static, yes/no test for a set of haplogroups. The BigY test is a discovery test. The test will scan approximately a quarter of your Y chromosome and look for new SNP mutations that you hold. With this, new haplogroups can be formed. You will find your place within R-BY5715, whether that is in a pre-existing haplogroup, or a new haplogroup. Immediately, we can say that you may find relatives closer to the present than 2000 years ago, which is where you are currently stuck.


But also, your SNPs will then be on record when new people come along, allowing new haplogroups to be formed in the future, which we don't know about yet. In future, as more people test, this will let you find new relatives closer to the present. So BigY is partly an investment in the future as well. You will find out more as the years pass.


You will also get a lot of STR results. If you have any Y-37 matches, these will get refined to Y-111, and you can use the leverage of the additional 600-700 STR markers you will get as part of the BigY to see how close you are to any matches who have also tested to these levels. Some of these matches may turn out to be irrelevant, but you may also gain matches if people have tested who are closely related to you, but have many mutations in the first 37 markers.


How useful you'll find that information really depends on what you're interested in, and exactly what the results are (which are unpredictable). Probably we will at least find something interesting for you about where your family was 1000-2000 years ago, perhaps more recently, but there is no guarantee. It can be a bit of a gamble.


Ultimately, there is also a point to kick-starting research in your area. If you have a BigY test, then it gives more reason to the people around you to test as well, since they can then immediately see how they are related to you. After all, the YSeq test you have just taken gets its SNPs from BigY tests: if you want your family's SNPs on the YSeq test, you may want to upgrade to BigY!


I'm also guessing from your name that you are of Croatian heritage. We desparately need people from southern and eastern Europe to upgrade to BigY to address the gross biases we have against testing in these regions. You would be very much doing our statistics a favour by upgrading, and with better statistics we can be clearer about how R-U106 has branched and spread over the last 5000 years. You will also help improve the estimates of how old all of the haplogroups within R-BY5715 are and, with these improved TMRCAs, we may be able to tell more about where R-BY5715 came from and how it spread.


So there are a lot of benefits to upgrading to BigY: a younger branch in the family tree, a better idea of how you are related to other tests, improved measurements of how old your recent chain of haplogroups are, and better statistics for us all. Whether those benefits are worth the cost is up to you!


Best wishes,


Iain.


Re: BigY - is it worth it?

 

Your YSeq results are quite impressive.? You now fall into a "so close, but so far" scenario.

FTDNA prefers BY5715.? ?There are nine people.? There are two subclades of BY5715 and you could go 3 to 4 levels deeper.? ?The following link is pre-set to BY5715


You get the names of your BigY matches and your non-Matching Variants.? This should include some or all of the nine plus others on nearby branches.? You can visualize these matches and SNPs on the Block Y tree.??

Your Y37 list will get refined to a Y111 match list.? That could be helpful as well.??

I think you have plenty to gain from a BigY, but that's just my opinion.? ??

FTDNA will likely have sales centered around Roots Tech at the end of February.? Or maybe sooner.? ?



BigY - is it worth it?

 

Cheers,

I need advice. Some time ago I did a Yseq test (R1b-U106 Superclade Panel) and got the final haplogroup FGC18842-S21728-BY5719 which I see, is the same as BY5716. I also did a Y-37 Ftdna test earlier and am now considering whether to upgrade to BigY-700.

However, I'm not entirely sure what exactly you'd get with the BigY-700 test, given that my haplogroup has already been determined. Okay, so it's an older mutation, so I guess you'd get younger branches? I would be grateful for advice, or whether it is worth doing BigY in my case?

Best regards,

?

Damir


Re: Information Regarding FT209276

OrcadianDundonianBorn
 

Thank you, Iain! Very much appreciated and very?helpful!

My family are the Sinclairs from Orkney, related to the Rosslyn Chapel and the Balfours.


Re: Information Regarding FT209276

 

开云体育

There are two places you can find out information about what Family Tree DNA holds about a haplogroup. These are the public haplotree and their Discover project:

https://www.familytreedna.com/public/y-dna-haplotree/R;name=R-FT209276

https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/R-FT209276/


I mention Family Tree DNA specifically, because they hold well over 90% of all the deep Y-DNA tests in the commercial markets, and many of the early academic samples too. For shallower tests, which don't go down to the same depth, there will be more at other companies like 23andMe, Ancestry, LivingDNA, etc.


L45 is one of the SNP mutations contained in most of these shallow tests and R-L45, the haplogroup it represents, is a family of people stretching back to a common ancestor living 2500 years ago. It is very likely that a deeper Y-DNA test than the one supplied by 23andMe would place you in a smaller branch of this family - i.e., a more recent haplogroup.


Looking at Family Tree DNA's public haplotree for R-L45, we can see a total of 308 testers, of whom 134 have stated origins, of whom 101 are from Europe and 90 are from the British Isles in particular. The remaining 11 are from Germany, Denmark and Sweden. There will be many more in other testing platforms.


Family Tree DNA knows about 96 different haplogroups within R-L45. Looking at a smaller haplogroup like R-FT209276, we have seven testers, of whom three have stated origins in Scotland (1) or Ireland (2). R-FT209276 is about 2000 years old, which is still fairly old compared to most haplogroups in R-L45. It's unlikely that there are other people in R-FT209276 on other testing platforms, since only Family Tree DNA and a few other specialised companies offering Whole Genome Sequencing tests will offer tests that cover these smaller haplogroups (and can find new ones).


This shows the difference between the shallow, chip-based tests like 23andMe, and the deep sequencing from tests like Family Tree DNA's BigY test.


In terms of working out our origins, these deep tests are vital. Knowing you are R-L45 says something about where your male-line ancestors were 2500 years ago. That says nothing about where they have travelled in the last 2500 years, so it is not very useful at picking out modern origins - like any of the cultures we think have influenced Scotland or Orkney in particular. We generally don't see R-U106 in Pictish populations: R-U106 tends to be representative of later incomers to the British Isles, and the Picts appear to be mostly from the R-DF13 haplogroup, so it is unlikely that your ancestors were Pictish, but that's about as far as we can tell.


A deeper haplogroup can tell you more about your recent ancestry (though often we are still trying to work this out, and answers are rarely clear-cut). For example, my family are from Aberdeenshire. We know that they were part of the Unetice Culture 4000 years ago, but we think that they lived in France until medieval times.


When we see R-U106 in Orkney, it is more normally associated with Viking ancestry, but there are clear instances of people coming there from medieval Ireland, and the notable Orcadian family Sinclair (unproven but likely Norman French) is part of R-U106 too. So it is not a clear-cut case to say that, because your family is from Orkney, they must either be Picts or Vikings. Other possibilities remain too, and your haplogroup of R-L45 makes these more likely. R-L45 is clearly a Germanic haplogroup, but different parts of it will have gone and become the Vikings, Anglo-Saxons, Normans and other groups that populated different parts of the British Isles.


Cheers,


Iain.


Re: Information Regarding FT209276

OrcadianDundonianBorn
 

I am paternal (Y) R-L45.

I was born and currently live IN SCOTLAND of both mainland Scottish men and ORCADIAN (i.e. PICTS + VIking/Norwegian) men from Westray, Orkney.? Our family is still there and we all know each other.?

So, you're saying that only one person who has tested is actually from the UK?

Strange. There are about 80 of us who tested in our family on 23 and Me who all came back R-L45, all related to our dad and grandfather.?

Has that number changed on this group??


BBC NEWS: Scientists crack mystery of how MS gene spread

 

开云体育

Scientists crack mystery of how MS gene spread

The DNA of ancient cattle herders has revealed how diseases evolved in Europe over thousands of years.

Read in BBC News:


Dan D.


Re: FamilyTreeDNA provides Y-DNA haplogroups from Family Finder autosomal tests

 

Hi Ray, all,

The question of the reliability of SNP test results is certainly a crucial point, especially since these tests constitute more than half of R-U106+ tests in the FTDNA's database.

FTDNA confirmed to me that they have in very rare cases found SNPs that had previously only been observed in a single tester in their database. This led to the creation of new haplogroups. In my small downstream branch of R-U106 (25 bigY), there are at least two testers with private (but named) mutations covered by FTDNA autosomal chips (but no new branch formed so far).

Best wishes for the festive season to all.

Ewenn


Le ven. 22 déc. 2023, 19:06, Raymond Wing <wing.genealogist@...> a écrit?:
The chip-based testing all autosomal tests rely upon is not perfect. False positives and false negatives are known to occur within these tests.? I don't remember off-hand how high this error rate is, but I do believe it is important to keep in mind. The SNP pack tests offered by FTDNA had similar issues,as it relied upon similar chip-based technology.?

On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 5:33?PM Ewenn <gwenng008@...> wrote:
According to the same principle as the example above, we could even imagine the hypothesis where an FF test would match one of a tester's PVs, provided that the position of this PV is covered by the chip (identical mutation or different from that sought initally by the chip).

Ewenn


Re: FamilyTreeDNA provides Y-DNA haplogroups from Family Finder autosomal tests

 

I would like to second what Raymond said. When I imported my Genographic 2.0 results into FTDNA (in 2016), my Y-SNP tree was littered with false positives outside of my branch.

I also suspect that FTDNA is using similar technology for single SNP tests. I tested for Z301 at FTDNA, and it was reported as negative, Sanger sequencing at YSEQ yielded a positive result.
?

On Friday, December 22, 2023 at 10:06:25 AM PST, Raymond Wing <wing.genealogist@...> wrote:


The chip-based testing all autosomal tests rely upon is not perfect. False positives and false negatives are known to occur within these tests.? I don't remember off-hand how high this error rate is, but I do believe it is important to keep in mind. The SNP pack tests offered by FTDNA had similar issues,as it relied upon similar chip-based technology.?


On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 5:33?PM Ewenn <gwenng008@...> wrote:
According to the same principle as the example above, we could even imagine the hypothesis where an FF test would match one of a tester's PVs, provided that the position of this PV is covered by the chip (identical mutation or different from that sought initally by the chip).

Ewenn