Is it possible, easily (?), to express the number of R-U106 positive results from ancient burial places, as a percentage of all the DNA results from each burial place for various time periods in the past?
Could this be an indicator of the percentage of ancient populations positive for R-U106 at various time periods in the past?
Perhaps the total number of ancient dna sample results is way too sporadic and small to be meaningful in any way.
--
Kevin Terry
Kevin Terry