Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- R1b-S6881
- Messages
Search
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
Ray last posted that the following were in the S6881 Panel at YSEQ.
Chris On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:32 AM, prosperity200220815@... [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote:
|
|||||||
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
"I thought 2 looked rather low for the number of Warburtons in Wigan. I would expect similar numbers for all towns in the Mersey corridor from Liverpool to Manchester, but the highest concentrations were in Bury and Bolton." That's funny, Ray. My Cunliffe family comes from Bolton. And for anyone looking for information in Lancashire within the last couple of hundred years there are online parish and census records. I even found old pictures of Bolton in the Bolton section. The link is below. Chris On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Ray Warburton ray2warburton@... [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote:
|
|||||||
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
Cynthia, ? Is Deborah's brother in the U106 project? If not, we need to get him there so we can see his STRs. Thanks. Chris On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Ray Warburton ray2warburton@... [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote:
|
|||||||
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI thought 2 looked rather low for the number of Warburtons in Wigan. I would expect similar numbers for all towns in the Mersey corridor from Liverpool to Manchester, but the highest concentrations were in Bury and Bolton. Regards? Ray |
|||||||
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi Cynthia, Deborah's brother sounds an ideal candidate for the S6881 panel. Such a close match must indicate he is ?very likely S6881. Regards? Ray |
|||||||
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThanks, Peter! Back to Medieval Soldiers with more surname variants. So much fun. And thanks for idea about the Wigan World website. I'll definitely check it out.? Chris On Feb 14, 2017, at 5:22 PM, Peter Latham peter.latham1@... [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote:
|
|||||||
Re: New Joiner - Horrell (FTDNA 86268)
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýSounds good to me.? I wish my Liptrot had worked out.? I paid for the DNA37, and found that, although M269, we do NOT share a common ancestor within the last 40+ generations.? I¡¯m glad we missed out on the Big-Y, not getting the kit back in time.? But mis-matching 13 out of 37 STRs, can we safely say that our common ancestor is farther back than ¡°Mr. S6881,¡± and not pursue further testing?? ? Jim ? From: R1b-S6881@... [mailto:R1b-S6881@...]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 5:44 PM To: R1b-S6881@... Subject: Re: [R1b-S6881] Re: New Joiner - Horrell (FTDNA 86268) ? ? I started to write "Father's Day Sale" when I replied to Justin but then I went and checked my records. I ordered a BigY at the sale in April last year and it was for DNA Day. I think on the Father's Day sale they have more of the STR tests on sale. I guess we'll see. ? Chris ? On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:59 AM, 'Jim Liptrap' jim@... [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote: ? Generally, FamilyTreeDNA has a ¡°Fathers Day Sale¡± for their regular packages.? I haven¡¯t been looking for Big-Y sales in the past. ? ? From: R1b-S6881@... [mailto:R1b-S6881@...] ? ? Justin, ? Historically the BigY goes on sale around April and November. So basically around every 6 months. I would hold out and see if we get a good sale in April this year. There's no telling if it will happen again then but I would wait and see. ? Chris ? On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:22 AM, jdhorrell@... [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote: ? Thanks Chris. I will wait a while and see if BigY comes on sales as you suggest I think. Thanks, Justin ? ? |
|||||||
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
?????????????????????????????????????? 15 February 2017 Dear Ray, Sorry, error in my e.mail at 1.22 hrs today.? In 1881 the Wigan census for Warburtons was 23: not 2. Peter. On Wednesday, 15 February 2017, 1:22, "Peter Latham peter.latham1@... [R1b-S6881]" wrote:
?
?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? 15 February 2017 ??? ??????????????????????????????????????????????? Dear Ray, Chris, Jim and Cynthia, I have tried to find some source materials for you in my childhood part of Lancashire.? The largest local town is Wigan which boomed in the mid nineteenth century with coal mining and cotton mills sucking in people from surrounding towns and villages plus Irish immigrants.? Some Wigan sources may be of help especially to our US colleagues.? At random I have looked at the 1881 census for Wigan at Upholland is about 4 miles from Wigan.? Lathom is about 8 miles from Wigan. In the 1881 census reference you will see that Liptrot was the 8th top surname by population with 53 plus separately listed Liptrott 7, and Lipha 5.? Trap nil. Graves variants were: Graves 1; Greaves 6; Greives 6; Greeves 4. Sexton was 2. Cunliffe variants were: Cungliff 4; Cunlif 11; Cunliffe 13; Cunnif 2. Warburtons were 2. Latham was 115; Lathom 7.? Leatham or other variants nil. I guess that with an Atlas you could do a similar exercise for other Lancashire towns. The Wigan World website and magazine is a useful source for seeking out contacts.? There had been a rIft in my paternal family 2 generations ago.? Through their columns I have found lead
s to trace distant relations. In the late medieval period Wigan is estimated to have had a population of 2,500 - 3 ,000: For a general background there is quite a good Wikipedia history of Wigan which incl
udes some evidence for its medieval Scandinavian links: . I hope that this is some help. Kind regards,????????????? Peter Latham. ..........................................................................................................................
................................... On Wednesday, 15 February 2017, 0:18, "Chris Noble avalea3@... [R1b-S6881]" wrote:
?
Cynthia, ? I used the medieval soldier site that Peter provided and I do see people serving with the surnames "Grave", "Greyve" and "Greve", all earlier forms of the surname Graves. I don't know if you can exactly tie them to your line but they are there! As for Deborah, she can test her brother at YSEQ and get a better idea of where his SNP might be but then she will have to test again at FTDNA to get that SNP updated on his account?if that is something they want. They don't have to have it updated. If they find out what it is and let the U106 Admins know they will move him down to where he belongs in the U106 spreadsheet. So it is up to them how they want to go. But ultimately if the
y want to find out how they match up to the other Lathams it is going to take a BigY. The other way would be for Peter to put together a Latham panel at YSEQ but still, you are testing to his SNPs so it won't find the unique ones you have. That's the good, the bad and the ugly of the situation. Chris On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:21 PM, prosperity200220815@... [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote:
|
|||||||
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? 15 February 2017 ??? ??????????????????????????????????????????????? Dear Ray, Chris, Jim and Cynthia, I have tried to find some source materials for you in my childhood part of Lancashire.? The largest local town is Wigan which boomed in the mid nineteenth century with coal mining and cotton mills sucking in people from surrounding towns and villages plus Irish immigrants.? Some Wigan sources may be of help especially to our US colleagues.? At random I have looked at the 1881 census for Wigan at Upholland is about 4 miles from Wigan.? Lathom is about 8 miles from Wigan. In the 1881 census reference you will see that Liptrot was the 8th top surname by population with 53 plus separately listed Liptrott 7, and Lipha 5.? Trap nil. Graves variants were: Graves 1; Greaves 6; Greives 6; Greeves 4. Sexton was 2. Cunliffe variants were: Cungliff 4; Cunlif 11; Cunliffe 13; Cunnif 2. Warburtons were 2. Latham was 115; Lathom 7.? Leatham or other variants nil. I guess that with an Atlas you could do a similar exercise for other Lancashire towns. The Wigan World website and magazine is a useful source for seeking out contacts.? There had been a rIft in my paternal family 2 generations ago.? Through their columns I have found leads to trace distant relations. In the late medieval period Wigan is estimated to have had a population of 2,500 - 3 ,000: For a general background there is quite a good Wikipedia history of Wigan which includes some evidence for its medieval Scandinavian links: . I hope that this is some help. Kind regards,????????????? Peter Latham. ............................................................................................................................................................. On Wednesday, 15 February 2017, 0:18, "Chris Noble avalea3@... [R1b-S6881]" wrote:
?
Cynthia, ? I used the medieval soldier site that Peter provided and I do see people serving with the surnames "Grave", "Greyve" and "Greve", all earlier forms of the surname Graves. I don't know if you can exactly tie them to your line but they are there! As for Deborah, she can test her brother at YSEQ and get a better idea of where his SNP might be but then she will have to test again at FTDNA to get that SNP updated on his account?if that is something they want. They don't have to have it updated. If they find out what it is and let the U106 Admins know they will move him down to where he belongs in the U106 spreadsheet. So it is up to them how they want to go. But ultimately if they want to find out how they match up to the other Lathams it is going to take a BigY. The other way would be for Peter to put together a Latham panel at YSEQ but still, you are testing to his SNPs so it won't find the unique ones you have. That's the good, the bad and the ugly of the situation. Chris On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:21 PM, prosperity200220815@... [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote:
|
|||||||
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
Peter,
? I don't think either Ray or I am in touch with Dr. King so go ahead and contact her if you wish. :) Chris I would be happy to volunteer to participate in Dr Turi King's latest Viking ancestry research project.? Are Chris Noble or Ray Warburton in touch with her to relay this, or should I try to contact her direct at Leicester University ??? |
|||||||
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
Cynthia, ? I used the medieval soldier site that Peter provided and I do see people serving with the surnames "Grave", "Greyve" and "Greve", all earlier forms of the surname Graves. I don't know if you can exactly tie them to your line but they are there! As for Deborah, she can test her brother at YSEQ and get a better idea of where his SNP might be but then she will have to test again at FTDNA to get that SNP updated on his account?if that is something they want. They don't have to have it updated. If they find out what it is and let the U106 Admins know they will move him down to where he belongs in the U106 spreadsheet. So it is up to them how they want to go. But ultimately if they want to find out how they match up to the other Lathams it is going to take a BigY. The other way would be for Peter to put together a Latham panel at YSEQ but still, you are testing to his SNPs so it won't find the unique ones you have. That's the good, the bad and the ugly of the situation. Chris On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:21 PM, prosperity200220815@... [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote:
|
|||||||
Re: New Joiner - Horrell (FTDNA 86268)
I started to write "Father's Day Sale" when I replied to Justin but then I went and checked my records. I ordered a BigY at the sale in April last year and it was for DNA Day. I think on the Father's Day sale they have more of the STR tests on sale. I guess we'll see. Chris On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:59 AM, 'Jim Liptrap' jim@... [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote:
|
|||||||
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
Thanks so much, Peter! That was very interesting. I was able to find the site at http://medievalsoldier.org/. The fun part is trying to figure out how they might have spelled the name back then.?I see that I have an ancestor who served with yours under Sir John de Stanley in October 1389. Maybe they knew each other. Roger de Cundeclif, Esquire with the rank of Man-at-Arms and was Standing Force in Ireland. I also have the following that I found:?
Richard de Cundeclif, who was in France under Sir John Harleston in 1380. Roger?Cunclyf,?stationed at the Garrison of?Guines?(Calais March) under Sir Thomas Talbot in 1388. Robert de?Cuntelyff?of Lancashire, who served in Ireland under John?Stanley in 1389. Geoffrey?Cuntclyffe, an archer, in the France Expedition, who served under John Beaufort, Duke of Somerset in 1443.Thanks again. Chris |
|||||||
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
This ancestral history exploration is absolutely fascinating. You each are very generous to share all this. I am jealous of course as we Graves still need to find our ancestral footprints in Lancashire. Our SNPs confirm we were there! If any of you catch a glimpse of us please point me in that direction. It remains our mystery still. We are stuck here with the death of Thomas Graves of Lincoln Cou ty, Georgia d.1805.
Peter, we have another Latham cousin link -to a William Carey Latham whose ancestor is Cornelius James Latham Sr. My brother has a 3 GD from him at Y67, my cousin a 1 GD.?They are new to genetic testing. What is clear is that our ancestors were in Lancashire and now we are all here, amazing! Chris and Ray, might Deborah benefit by testing her brother more using the current S6881 Panel? I believe Ray included a some of our SNPs. Currently, WC is only --Predicted M269. We might be able to move them down the tree by doing so. Your thoughts.... Cynthia |
|||||||
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
Hi Ray, ? ?Thanks for your post. It's always nice to get people talking about their theories on here. I did want to answer a couple of your points.? ? ?I guess I'm remiss in clarifying that I always believe that SNPs are better than STRs for proving ancestry. I agree with everything you said in your point #1. My point in favor of testing out to 111 STRs for someone already BigY tested was to find the closest matches who could be encouraged towards SNP testing. When I look at our project's STR results I can see where someone could qualify as a match at 67 STRs and then fall away at 111. In my case, with no one with my surname in the U106 project, I have to choose the matches that I want to encourage to further testing to grow out the tree. And I can have two equal matches at 67 STRs who, when tested out to 111 STRs, only one still shows in my matches. That was my point there. And while I love that you have an S6881 panel at YSEQ and may even refine it further, we are always going to have FTDNA matches who either won't or can't test panels there. So I'm just trying to find the better matches with the tools we have at hand. ? ? ? ?My ancestors were in England before the start of surnames as the Cunliffe name is a place name from a hill outside of Rishton in Lancashire. There are records of it being used as a surname by 1273. There are a good number of people in this group who have names derived in Lancashire pointing to the fact that our ancestors were there before the start of surnames. So I do think that Mr. S6881 probably settled in the Lancashire area and over time, and before surnames, his descendants moved to different places in Lancashire. After more time some moved to surrounding areas but none seem to have gone very far until much later. My ancestor was still in Lancashire until approaching 1800 while others in the family are probably still there. ? ?As to what group S6881 descends from, that might not get solved for a long time. But I tend to think that he was in England before the start of the Viking invasions. Iain dates the SNP S6881 to around 600 AD which would make it more in line for the Anglo-Saxon invasions. But who knows? Anything could have happened. ? Thanks to both you and Peter for sharing your family histories. Those kinds of details add to our information so maybe someday we'll have a better idea of how our ancestors got to England. Chris On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Ray Warburton ray2warburton@... [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote:
|
|||||||
Re: New Joiner - Horrell (FTDNA 86268)
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýGenerally, FamilyTreeDNA has a ¡°Fathers Day Sale¡± for their regular packages.? I haven¡¯t been looking for Big-Y sales in the past. ? ? From: R1b-S6881@... [mailto:R1b-S6881@...]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 1:45 PM To: R1b-S6881@... Subject: Re: [R1b-S6881] Re: New Joiner - Horrell (FTDNA 86268) ? ? Justin, ? Historically the BigY goes on sale around April and November. So basically around every 6 months. I would hold out and see if we get a good sale in April this year. There's no telling if it will happen again then but I would wait and see. ? Chris ? On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:22 AM, jdhorrell@... [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote: ? Thanks Chris. I will wait a while and see if BigY comes on sales as you suggest I think. Thanks, Justin ? |
|||||||
Re: New Joiner - Horrell (FTDNA 86268)
Justin, ? Historically the BigY goes on sale around April and November. So basically around every 6 months. I would hold out and see if we get a good sale in April this year. There's no telling if it will happen again then but I would wait and see. Chris On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:22 AM, jdhorrell@... [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote:
|
|||||||
Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results
14 February 2017
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Dear Ray Warburton and Jim Liptrap, I agree that it is very likely that many Lancashire families named Latham (or variant spellings) took the surname as locative.? I know of several other Latham families in this part of Lancashire other than the Lathams of Upholland. The ancestry websites usually suggest that the family who obtained the estate at Lathom in Lancashire were the family descended from Sir Dunning Latham, Earl of Latham. I do not know how accurate this quotation is. The usual spelling of this family and their estate is Lathom as the modern place name.? Of course name spelling did not settle down until much later. 'Sir Dunning Latham, Earl of Latham (a Saxon lord) was living in Lancaster County about the time of the Norman Conquest. He married Lady Marigard of Avon and Essex, the daughter of Ranulph of Essex and Marion Stroud.Sir Dunning Latham sided with the Normans, thus betraying the Saxon people. His lordship was given to him by the Normans because of his choice. Sir Dunning was granted his lordship of the Chapelry of Lathom in 1067. His wife's father also sided with the Normans.Sir Dunning Latham and his wife Lady Marigard de Essex, had a son named Siward. Siward was born in 1073. Marigard died during his birth. Dunning died in 1092, of pneumonia.'Their line is traced down the websites including Sir Robert de Lathom. In the Southampton University website medievalsoldiers.org derived from the ancient muster rolls etc. there are 49 entires for Latham variant named soldiers (some clearly duplicated from different records).The first record is from 1368-69 for Robert and Edward de Lathum in the service of the Black Prince in Gascony.? In 1389 Edward de Lathoum is listed in the service of Sir John de Stanley.At the Battle of Agincourt on 25 October 1415 Thomas, William and John Latham of Cheshire were archers in the army of King Henry IV in the service of Captain John Kingsley.? In 1434 John and William Lathaum were archers in the standing force in Ireland in the service of Sir Thomas Stanley. There are 13 records of Warburtons in medievalsoldiers.com between 1378 - 1441. Hugh de Warburton was a man at arms with Henry IV's army at Agincourt on the sick list.? Recent studies have shown that Henry's Army suffered heavily from sickness before the battle. Ray Warburton mentions Wise Piers Warburton in the Wars of the Roses.?? The Ballad of Bosworth Field refers to a squire Latham in the service of Lord Strange with Lord Stanley's force at the Battleof Bosworth Field. Latham at the Battle of Bosworth Field: 22 August 1485 My cousin Charles Latham found this intriguing reference in the Ballad of Bosworth Field at verse 129 below to a squire named Latham. Lord Stanley (of Lathom House) did not attend to join King Richard III before the battle and sent Lord Strange in his place. When the king learnt that Stanley was with Henry Tudor he ordered the execution of Lord Strange. Lord Strange arranged for squire Latham to take his ring to give to his wife and requested him to take his son and heir overseas. Richard was persuaded not to execute Strange before the battle since he had more value as a hostage. Of course Richard lost and was killed, and Henry Tudor crowned himself on the battlefield. Stanley increased his influence. I do not know what became of Lord Strange and squire Latham. King Richard looked on the mountaines hye, & sayd, ¡°I see the banner of the Lord Stanley.¡± he said, ¡°ffeitch hither the Lord Strange to me, ffor doubtlesse hee shall dye this day; ¡ª125.500 ¡°Imake mine avow to Marye,that may, that all the gold this Land within shall not saue his liffe this day, in England iff I be Kinge!¡± ¡ª126.504 Then they brought Lord Strange into his sight; he said, ¡°ffor thy death make thee readye.¡± then answered that noble Knight, &said, ¡°I crye god & the world mercye! ¨C ¨C127.508 ¡°&Iesus, I draw wittnesse to thee that all the world ffrom woe did winn, since the time that I borne did bee, <>was I neuer traitor to my Kinge.¡± ¡ª128.512 a gentleman then called hee,¨C men said Latham was his name,¨C ¡°&euer thou come into my countrye, greete well my gentlemen eche one; ¡ª129.516 ¡°my yeomen Large of blood and bone, sometimes we had mirth att our meetinge; they had a Master, & now they haue none, ffor here I must be martyred with the Kinge!¡± ¡ª130.520 There he tooke a ring of his ffingar right, & to that squier raught itt hee, & said, ¡°beare this to my Lady bright, for shee may thinke itt longe or shee may see; ¡ª131.524 ¡°yett att doomes day meete shall wee,¨C I trust in Iesus that all this world shall winn¨C In the celestyall heauen vpon hye in presence of a Noble King. ¡ª132.528 ¡°& the ffeild be lost vpon our partye,¨C as I trust in god it shall not bee,¨C take my eldest sonne that is my heyre, & fflee into some ffar countrye. ¡ª133.532 ¡°yett the child a man may bee,¨C hee is comen of a Lords kinn,¨C another day to reuenge mee of Richard of England, if he be King.¡± ¡ª134.536 Theballad text of anonymous author is seventeenth century with asixteenth century prose version. It s thought that the ballad wascomposed by a Stanley supporter eye-witness of the battle of BosworthField. The whole poem can be found on the website of the Americansupporters of King Richard III. I hope that it is of some interest to detail all this. Kind regards,??? Peter Latham. ........................................................................................................................................................ On Tuesday, 14 February 2017, 17:16, "'Jim Liptrap' jim@... [R1b-S6881]" <R1b-S6881@...> wrote:
? One more thought.? The Vikings are generally in the I haplotree, rather than the R tree.? I should think that most, if not all, natives of the British Isles will have some Viking ancestry, though not necessarily in the direct-male line. Dupuytren's Contracture, also known as Viking Syndrome, does not appear to be transmitted patrilineally, Those with the condition include Ronald Reagan (Irish), Margaret [Roberts] Thatcher (Northumbrian Family), and Prince Joachim of Denmark (whose father is French). It is fascinating that the Lathom estates in Lancashire began with a Viking Family supporting William the Conqueror.? But you say the estate fell to the Stanley Family when Isabel Lathom, last of the Viking family, died in 1414.? Most of our S6881 group appear to descend from the Saxon stock in the area who did not assume surnames until the fourteenth or fifteenth centuries, when they became necessary to identify the ¡°common folk¡± on the estates for taxation purposes.? So our surnames are more likely to have been acquired from the places they lived, their occupations, or physical attributes.? Best wishes always,Jim Liptrap ?From: R1b-S6881@... [mailto:R1b-S6881@...] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 10:30 AM To: R1b-S6881@... Subject: [R1b-S6881] Re: Ancestral Surnames and BigY results ?? Just a few thoughts on your postings, in no particular order. 1. On the STR vs SNP discussion, I also am no expert, but my view is that SNP results are definitive, whilst STR results are only indicative. STR mutations are relatively frequent, and bi-directional. Two opposite mutations can cancel out. Also I believe you can have a double jump e.g from 11 to 13 at a particular marker. The upshot is that matches might be random, resulting from many cancelling mutations. I was always told that you need other reasons, such as shared surname or other known link, to verify an STR match. On the other hand we can be pretty sure a SNP match means we have two descendants of the person who originated that SNP. So once you have found the most recent SNPs (shared and singletons) I don¡¯t see the advantage of further STR testing of those individuals. For people yet to test I would use an STR test to identify if they are likely to be S6881, and then use the S6881 panel. In time we should also have panels for the various S6881 subclades. These should give a better indication of the relationships between the various documented family trees, though whether they will help to identify missing links will depend if the relevant genealogical records are in existence. Im my Warburton One-Nmae study I have developed many family trees including about 7 in the Lancashire Group, and it is my hope that DNA may help me produce a tree of trees showing roughly when the trees converge. 2. In Peter¡¯s Latham's history you mention both the Viking term Lathe, and Lathom as a place name. Is it possible that the place name came from the Viking word, and the surname, which would have originated much later, derives from the place? Warburton is a locative name from the village Warburton, but the village was named after a Saxon Saint, Werbergh. 3. I too think Mr S6881 was born in England, and until an S6881 branch is found on the continent this is the best working assumption. It is also clear that some of his descendants were in the village of Warburton. As the village was founded (possibly by Queen Ethelflaeda of Mercia) to guard a ford of the river Mersey I assume it would be populated by loyal Saxon subjects. This is my reason for thinking Mr S6881 was a Mercian. Also the dates of Mercia¡¯s existence 515AD - 918AD encompass Iain¡¯s dates for S6881. When Warburton was founded the Mersey was the northern boarder of Mercia, and subject to Viking incursions (I believe these were Norwegian Vikings rather than Danes). However I¡¯m not sure where the earlier boundary with Northumbria was. I suspect it was variable. So it is unclear whether the S6881s settled in Lancashire before England became a single entity in the 10th century of afterwards. In any event it was probably long before surnames were established. If Latham and Warburton are locative names it implies both places were home to Mr S6881s descendants at the time they were established. 4. Cynthia mentioned the Warburton - Graves link was ancient. There is a curious phenomenon that the S6881 tree indicates a Warburton - Warburton and a Graves - Graves link which are also ancient, clearly predating the adoption of surnames. In the Warburton case I presume that two descendants of an early Warburton villager independently adopted their old village name and finished up in the same area of Lancashire. Incidentally the earliest known presence of a Saxon Warburton in Lancashire (ignoring sons of the Norman Warburtons of Arley Hall) was a Thomas in Tottington (probably Stubbins Halll, Edenfield) who I calculated from Manorial records must have been born around 1490. 5. Peter¡¯s mention of the Stanleys, Earls of Derby is interesting as Wise Piers Warburton, who founded Arley Hall, was a big supporter of the Stanleys in the Wars of the Roses. Following the Stanleys role in the defeat of Richard III at Bosworth, and the ascension of Henry VII, Piers¡¯s son John became a Knight of the Kings Body. My own ancestors subsequently appeared on land that was formerly part of Stanley lands in Hale and I theorise that this may have been granted for services rendered at that time DNA evidence suggests my line (and the Cheshire group of Warburtons) are related to the Warburtons of Arley, ad thus descended from a Norman knight. Regards Ray Ray Warburton Warburton Website: #yiv9222202960 -- #yiv9222202960ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-mkp #yiv9222202960hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-mkp #yiv9222202960ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-mkp .yiv9222202960ad {padding:0 0;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-mkp .yiv9222202960ad p {margin:0;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-mkp .yiv9222202960ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-sponsor #yiv9222202960ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-sponsor #yiv9222202960ygrp-lc #yiv9222202960hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-sponsor #yiv9222202960ygrp-lc .yiv9222202960ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960activity span .yiv9222202960underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9222202960 .yiv9222202960attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#yiv9222202960 .yiv9222202960attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9222202960 .yiv9222202960attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv9222202960 .yiv9222202960attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv9222202960 .yiv9222202960attach label a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9222202960 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;}#yiv9222202960 .yiv9222202960bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv9222202960 .yiv9222202960bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9222202960 dd.yiv9222202960last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv9222202960 dd.yiv9222202960last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv9222202960 dd.yiv9222202960last p span.yiv9222202960yshortcuts {margin-right:0;}#yiv9222202960 div.yiv9222202960attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9222202960 div.yiv9222202960attach-table {width:400px;}#yiv9222202960 div.yiv9222202960file-title a, #yiv9222202960 div.yiv9222202960file-title a:active, #yiv9222202960 div.yiv9222202960file-title a:hover, #yiv9222202960 div.yiv9222202960file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9222202960 div.yiv9222202960photo-title a, #yiv9222202960 div.yiv9222202960photo-title a:active, #yiv9222202960 div.yiv9222202960photo-title a:hover, #yiv9222202960 div.yiv9222202960photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9222202960 div#yiv9222202960ygrp-mlmsg #yiv9222202960ygrp-msg p a span.yiv9222202960yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv9222202960 .yiv9222202960green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv9222202960 .yiv9222202960MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv9222202960 o {font-size:0;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv9222202960 .yiv9222202960replbq {margin:4px;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv9222202960 input, #yiv9222202960 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv9222202960 code {font:115% monospace;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-mlmsg #yiv9222202960logo {padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-msg p#yiv9222202960attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-reco #yiv9222202960reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-sponsor #yiv9222202960ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-sponsor #yiv9222202960ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-sponsor #yiv9222202960ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;}#yiv9222202960 #yiv9222202960ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none !important;}#yiv9222202960 |