¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: -- When Will you Include SNP Testers without Big-Y?


 

Mark,

Food for thought.

Just so you're aware, you didn't "leapfrog" BigY. SNP Panels have limited use and only can identify?based on previous BIgY testers to the point where you don't share a common ancestor. They will never replace?BigY nor are they better. R-A6507 branches off over 1,300 years ago (which is well before the advent of surnames). You will never be able to come down your line on the backs of other testers..you will always need BigY or equivalent Discovery Test to actually identify?YOUR?line of SNP mutations and build new branches. Testing individual downstream SNPs is not generally useful or productive, and just?takes time and extra money. It isn't a recommended way to understand your own place on the tree. The best way is to do a BIgY, see how far down the tree you get, recruit Y STR matches?to upgrade as well, until you've got a fairly recent branch on the tree (within the last few hundred years).

Autosomal DNA is only useful overall within the last several generations, and sometimes not even then when endogamy is involved. Most Y DNA matches don't share ANY autosomal DNA so it is not in the realm of haplotree creation. They are two very different?things. Autosomal DNA use for this endeavour is biologically limited since it isn't connected to SNP data nor can you ascertain patrilines from it.

As for STRs, James doesn't?use them in isolation. The STR values (including the extended panels of STRs from BIgY testing) are examined?and applied to an already mapped of haplotree using BIgY SNPs. Panel SNPs can't really be used that well because it leaves ambiguity since you've stopped short of where you should?be and you don't have any extended?BigY STRs to add to the project/tree. STR patterns can be noticed when dealing with large numbers of men over a wide timeframe, especially?those which have a consistent pattern across multiple branches. Those STRs which are more unstable aren't easily used. BUt STRs alone are never used in modern day genetic genealogy and haplotree creation.

Hope that helps.

Lucas McCaw, BSc., BEd.

On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 1:29?PM Mark-dSF (Bio-Sullivan) via <medunham2=[email protected]> wrote:

Hi James¡ª? Great work you are doing, but some of us don't need to pay for Big-Y since we leapfrogged directly to SNP panels.? That is my case, I have a Y-Seq test that takes me down to A6507, possibly revising to A6506 as testing progresses.? Either way it traces to Castletown Beara, so I'm firmly CTS4166 and would like to show as that so others can find me.? ?

Do you have any plans to move beyond STR to SNP.? Isn't that the more precise method in any case, since STR seem to bounce around quite a bit in subclades?? ?Also, what about Autosomal, which has yielded many great results for me on Ancestry, with 4 separate populations of cousins from 4 grandparents.

In any case,? happy new year from Santa Fe, NM.? Please include my MSN address copied here in any response, as the email I use daily unlike Gmail.? ?

Regards,

Mark E. Dunham (Bio-Sullivan)
Organizer & Volunteer
505-795-0199




From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of James Kane via <jkane=[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2025 9:01 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [R1b-CTS4466-Plus] R1b-CTS4466+ BAM Tracker Updated
?


I've added a 'Tree-Premilinary-Pass' tab to this sheet and will be making some updates over the next couple days, but if you're interested in an "uncooked" version of the Joint Genotyping results you can find them there.? There are about 100 non-FGC11134 men in here that are acting as an outgroup and preventing some oddities in Big Y from clustering away from the normal WGS results.
?
If Column A does not start with R1b and Column F doesn't have a name, it's potentially a new branch unique to hs1's coordinates.

The sheet will be updated with the FTDNA kit#s and regrouped by their subclade probably this weekend unless I see a need to go back and rerun the tree inference again.? Anything that the A0-T man, HG02984, is derived for will be tossed in the end.
?
Otherwise, it looks like the age of some subclades is going to get pushed back with more equivalent SNPs.
?
Any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out.

James

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.