Re: New CTS4466 STR Comparison Report
|
James,
Re: FTDNA Big Y 700 DNA Results. Kit No. B445590 Edward McCall
I see that there is no data on the report for my Kit. I presume that this because the warehouse does not have that data.
I attach a CVS worksheet with my FTDNA Big Y 700 results in the hope that this will fulfil the requirement.
I consent to the use of this data by the warehouse for its research and report purposes.
Regards,
Eddie McCall
-----Original Message-----
From: James Kane <jkane@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, 7 Aug 2022 14:16
Subject: [R1b-CTS4466-Plus] New CTS4466 STR Comparison Report
Hi,
The warehouse has a new report from the upcoming Studies feature in a good enough place to share here. ?You must have an account for this link to work, since 4 of the columns must be opted into sharing before it can be open to the public.
What you will find here is my take on an FTDNA style Y-DNA project STR report. ?The big difference is there are 7 additional tabs that add in Panels 6 and 7 from Big Y. ?There's also a tab for the YSEQ Extension panel that allows FTDNA customers to add missing markers to compare with their YSEQ116 panel. ?Displaying the subgrouping will be in a future release when the ancestral STR signature for the YDNA branches are ready. ?For now everyone is sorted to match up with the site's tree.
Let me know if there are questions or suggestions.
Thanks,
James Kane
PS: ?There are close to 1000 markers in this report. ?It takes a little bit to load but isn't much worse than FTDNA's version. ?I also expect there are a few typos lingering in the panel headers.
|
