Re: NGC 4157 image
Thanks, Geof!
Bruce
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 3:14 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [QSI-CCD] NGC 4157 image
Bruce,
That's gorgeous.
Geof
_____
From: [email protected]
By
bw
·
#28560
·
|
Re: NGC 4157 image
Bruce,
That's gorgeous.
Geof
________________________________
Sent: 13 June 2024 03:05
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [QSI-CCD] NGC 4157 image
NGC 4157 is a nearly edge-on spiral
By
Geof Lewis
·
#28559
·
|
NGC 4157 image
NGC 4157 is a nearly edge-on spiral galaxy in Ursa Major, located about 55M light-years away. ?Based on its apparent size and distance, its disk is about 125K light-years in diameter, which makes the
By
bw
·
#28558
·
|
Re: NINA and QSI cameras
Meaanwhile it works anyway, great!!Von meinem/meiner Galaxy gesendet
-------- Urspr¨¹ngliche Nachricht --------Von: Rainer <rsfoto@...> Datum: 08.06.24 20:40 (GMT+01:00) An:
By
Wolfgang Bernhardt
·
#28557
·
|
Re: NINA and QSI cameras
No idea. I did no say there is a 32bit version
By
Rainer <rsfoto@...>
·
#28556
·
|
Re: QSI and DirectShow
Moving on,
The Lycander webcam arrived today, and is actually pretty good, in fact very good for the price, a nice crisp image with good colour. The lens does unscrew, but it proved necessary to
By
Peter Vasey
·
#28555
·
|
Re: QSI and DirectShow
Hi Nicola,
Why is using the full image train crucial? I only use Metaguide for collimation, and simply replace my QSI 683 with a webcam or the Altair camera that works. Perhaps you are saying that
By
Peter Vasey
·
#28554
·
|
Re: QSI and DirectShow
As I'd like to use Metaguide for collimation, it is crucial to have the
full image train set up, therefore there can't be any webcam in the image
train. This is why I was wondering if there was any
By
Pico de Paperis
·
#28553
·
|
Re: QSI and DirectShow
Just to add to the below, obviously I don't have this next camera, but if it does have the ribbing round the lens shown in the image, the lens might unscrew so save having to take the camera
By
Peter Vasey
·
#28552
·
|
Re: QSI and DirectShow
Why do you want to use your QSI with Metaguide? It's not really intended as a video camera.
The most economical solution is a basic webcam with the lens replaced by an eyepiece adapter. Also some
By
Peter Vasey
·
#28551
·
|
QSI and DirectShow
Hello QSIers,
do you know if it is possible to use Windows DirectShow with a QSI683wsg?
Would like to use Metaguide to collimate....
Thanks!
Nicola
By
Pico de Paperis
·
#28550
·
|
Re: NGC 4618 and 4625
Thanks, Bernhard!
By
bw
·
#28549
·
|
Re: NGC 4618 and 4625
Hello Bruce,
Fascinating galaxy pair!
Excellent work
best,
Bernhard Hubl
www.ccdguide.com ( http://www.ccdguide.com )
By
Bernhard Hubl
·
#28548
·
|
Re: NGC 4618 and 4625
Thanks, Barry!
Bruce
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2024 1:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [QSI-CCD] NGC 4618 and 4625
What a wonderful composition of this target. I am always amazed with
By
bw
·
#28547
·
|
Re: NGC 4618 and 4625
What a wonderful composition of this target. I am always amazed with the level of color richness you attain in your processing.
Well done!
Barry
By
Barry Schellenberg
·
#28546
·
|
Re: NGC 4618 and 4625
Thanks Geof and Kevin, much appreciated.
Bruce W.
By
bw
·
#28545
·
|
Re: NGC 4618 and 4625
That's excellent Bruce,
I've not heard of this pair, but you've presented them superbly. I just checked them out in Stellarium and perhaps one for me to consider as they would fit nicely on my QSI583
By
Geof Lewis
·
#28544
·
|
Re: NGC 4618 and 4625
A wonderful image Bruce! Lovely detail.
Clear skies,
Kevin
To: "QSI-CCD" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 4:20:22 PM
Subject: [QSI-CCD] NGC 4618 and 4625
NGC 4618 (left) and
By
Kevin Dixon
·
#28543
·
|
NGC 4618 and 4625
NGC 4618 (left) and 4625 (right) are two single-armed Magellanic spiral galaxies, so-named because of their resemblance to the single-armed Large Magellanic Cloud. ?Their asymmetric appearance
By
bw
·
#28542
·
|
Re: NINA and QSI cameras
Yes, this is known, and where is the 32bit version?
Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Rainer
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Mai 2024 02:27
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re:
By
Wolfgang Bernhardt
·
#28541
·
|