开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: NGC 4157 image

 

开云体育

Thanks, Geof!

?

Bruce

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Geof Lewis
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 3:14 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [QSI-CCD] NGC 4157 image

?

Bruce,

That's gorgeous.

?

Geof


From:?[email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of bw <bw_msg01@...>
Sent:?13 June 2024 03:05
To:?[email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject:?[QSI-CCD] NGC 4157 image

?

NGC 4157 is a nearly edge-on spiral galaxy in Ursa Major, located about 55M light-years away. ?Based on its apparent size and distance, its disk is about 125K light-years in diameter, which makes the galaxy somewhat larger than our Milky Way galaxy. Although NGC 4157 is quite photogenic, it seems to get little attention from amateur imagers or, for that matter, professional astronomers. ?The surrounding background in the image has many distant galaxies including some galaxy clusters at distances of 3-5B light-years.

The image was captured during 6 nights in May 2024 from SkyPi Remote Observatory using a 12.5" PlaneWave scope and a QSI-640ws camera at f/8 for a final LRGB integration of 18.3 hours.



Thanks for looking,
Bruce W.


Re: NGC 4157 image

 

开云体育

Bruce,
That's gorgeous.

Geof


From:[email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of bw <bw_msg01@...>
Sent:?13 June 2024 03:05
To:[email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject:?[QSI-CCD] NGC 4157 image
?
NGC 4157 is a nearly edge-on spiral galaxy in Ursa Major, located about 55M light-years away. ?Based on its apparent size and distance, its disk is about 125K light-years in diameter, which makes the galaxy somewhat larger than our Milky Way galaxy. Although NGC 4157 is quite photogenic, it seems to get little attention from amateur imagers or, for that matter, professional astronomers. ?The surrounding background in the image has many distant galaxies including some galaxy clusters at distances of 3-5B light-years.

The image was captured during 6 nights in May 2024 from SkyPi Remote Observatory using a 12.5" PlaneWave scope and a QSI-640ws camera at f/8 for a final LRGB integration of 18.3 hours.



Thanks for looking,
Bruce W.


NGC 4157 image

 

NGC 4157 is a nearly edge-on spiral galaxy in Ursa Major, located about 55M light-years away. ?Based on its apparent size and distance, its disk is about 125K light-years in diameter, which makes the galaxy somewhat larger than our Milky Way galaxy. Although NGC 4157 is quite photogenic, it seems to get little attention from amateur imagers or, for that matter, professional astronomers. ?The surrounding background in the image has many distant galaxies including some galaxy clusters at distances of 3-5B light-years.

The image was captured during 6 nights in May 2024 from SkyPi Remote Observatory using a 12.5" PlaneWave scope and a QSI-640ws camera at f/8 for a final LRGB integration of 18.3 hours.



Thanks for looking,
Bruce W.


Re: NINA and QSI cameras

 

开云体育

Meaanwhile it works anyway, great!!



Von meinem/meiner Galaxy gesendet


-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Rainer <rsfoto@...>
Datum: 08.06.24 20:40 (GMT+01:00)
Betreff: Re: [QSI-CCD] NINA and QSI cameras

No idea. I did no say there is a 32bit version


Re: NINA and QSI cameras

Rainer
 

No idea. I did no say there is a 32bit version


Re: QSI and DirectShow

 

开云体育

Moving on,

The Lycander webcam arrived today, and is actually pretty good, in fact very good for the price, a nice crisp image with good colour. The lens does unscrew, but it proved necessary to dismantle the camera to fully remove it. Just two little screws as you can see. That exposed the screw thread which is 12 mm, so my adapter fitted ok. Unfortunately the lens holder is too far back for my adapter, but I've scaled the Amazon one from a screenshot and you can see the approximate sizes. Photo attached below

The distance from the front cover of the camera to the threaded lens holder is 8.3 mm, so the Amazon adapter will easily fit with the front cover in place. The clip arrangement can also be easily removed by prising up the little cover on the hinge to expose a small screw.

It self installed under both Windows7 and Windows XP, and works fine with Metaguide (although monochrome) and Sharpcap. This version of course is 720p so 1280 x 720. But there is also a 1080p version shown on Amazon (1920 x 1080) for ?25. ? IF that has a larger chip as the pixel count suggests, it might make a pretty good Lunar camera.? Perhaps I will give mine a go anyway, even though it wouldn't have the front cover on.

Here are the links again:

Camera?

Adapter ?

Cheers,

Peter.


Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W  (Northumberland, UK)


On 06/06/2024 10:56, Peter Vasey via groups.io wrote:

Hi Nicola,

Why is using the full image train crucial?? I only use Metaguide for collimation, and simply replace my QSI 683 with a webcam or the Altair camera that works.? Perhaps you are saying that other items in your image train effect the collimation, so you are trying to compensate for that?

But that could create its own problems, surely it's better to have the main instrument properly collimated, then make sure the downstream items are in line and at right angles to the telescope axis, perhaps by using screwed adapters.

Incidentally I've ordered the Lycander 720P webcam for a bit of fun - hardly breaking the Bank at ?14.26 ;-)? It will arrive tomorrow, and I'll see what it's like for modifying - I already have a 12mm thread eyepiece adapter on my venerable Toucam, but of course that camera doesn't work with Windows7 upwards (I use XP in my Observatory), and I'd need to reflash it and use a different driver - can't be bothered to go through all that and maybe ruin it completely!

Cheers,

Peter.


Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)

On 06/06/2024 10:18, Pico de Paperis via groups.io wrote:
As I'd like to use Metaguide for collimation, it is crucial to have the full image train set up, therefore there can't be any webcam in the image train. This is why I was wondering if there was any chance to use it straight?away with my QSI.

Cheers
Nicola

Il giorno gio 6 giu 2024 alle ore 02:42 Peter Vasey via groups.io <petevasey@... <mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto:

??? Just to add to the below, obviously I don't have this next camera, but
??? if it does have the ribbing round the lens shown in the image, the lens
??? might unscrew so save having to take the camera apart:

???

??? And it's cheaper!

??? Peter

???
??? Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)

??? On 06/06/2024 00:47, Peter Vasey via groups.io wrote:
???? > Why do you want to use your QSI with Metaguide?? It's not really
???? > intended as a video camera.
???? >
???? > The most economical solution is a basic webcam with the lens
??? replaced by
???? > an eyepiece adapter.? Also some (but not all) guide/imaging
??? cameras will
???? > work with Metaguide.? My Altair GPCAM2 224C is ok, but not my
??? GPCAM3 178M.
???? >
???? > This video might help, showing how to convert a Logitech C270 webcam:
???? >
???? >
???
???? >
???? > Camera:
???? >
???
???? >
???? > Adapter:
???? >
???
???? >
???? > I expect even cheaper webcams could be converted with a bit of
???? > ingenuity!? Might even have a 12mm thread.
???? >
???? > Cheers,
???? >
???? > Peter
???? >
???? >
???? > Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)
???? >
???? > On 05/06/2024 11:23, Pico de Paperis via groups.io
??? wrote:
???? >> Hello QSIers,
???? >>
???? >> do you know if it is possible to use Windows DirectShow with a
??? QSI683wsg?
???? >> Would like to use Metaguide to collimate....
???? >>
???? >> Thanks!
???? >> Nicola
???? >>
???? >
???? >
???? >
???? >
???? >







--?
Nicola
Sky Monsters -









Re: QSI and DirectShow

 

Hi Nicola,

Why is using the full image train crucial? I only use Metaguide for collimation, and simply replace my QSI 683 with a webcam or the Altair camera that works. Perhaps you are saying that other items in your image train effect the collimation, so you are trying to compensate for that?

But that could create its own problems, surely it's better to have the main instrument properly collimated, then make sure the downstream items are in line and at right angles to the telescope axis, perhaps by using screwed adapters.

Incidentally I've ordered the Lycander 720P webcam for a bit of fun - hardly breaking the Bank at ?14.26 ;-) It will arrive tomorrow, and I'll see what it's like for modifying - I already have a 12mm thread eyepiece adapter on my venerable Toucam, but of course that camera doesn't work with Windows7 upwards (I use XP in my Observatory), and I'd need to reflash it and use a different driver - can't be bothered to go through all that and maybe ruin it completely!

Cheers,

Peter.


Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W (Northumberland, UK)

On 06/06/2024 10:18, Pico de Paperis via groups.io wrote:
As I'd like to use Metaguide for collimation, it is crucial to have the full image train set up, therefore there can't be any webcam in the image train. This is why I was wondering if there was any chance to use it straight?away with my QSI.
Cheers
Nicola
Il giorno gio 6 giu 2024 alle ore 02:42 Peter Vasey via groups.io <> <petevasey@... <mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto:
Just to add to the below, obviously I don't have this next camera, but
if it does have the ribbing round the lens shown in the image, the lens
might unscrew so save having to take the camera apart:
<>
And it's cheaper!
Peter
<>
Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)
On 06/06/2024 00:47, Peter Vasey via groups.io <> wrote:
> Why do you want to use your QSI with Metaguide?? It's not really
> intended as a video camera.
>
> The most economical solution is a basic webcam with the lens
replaced by
> an eyepiece adapter.? Also some (but not all) guide/imaging
cameras will
> work with Metaguide.? My Altair GPCAM2 224C is ok, but not my
GPCAM3 178M.
>
> This video might help, showing how to convert a Logitech C270 webcam:
>
>
<>
>
> Camera:
>
<>
>
> Adapter:
>
<>
>
> I expect even cheaper webcams could be converted with a bit of
> ingenuity!? Might even have a 12mm thread.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
> <>
> Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)
>
> On 05/06/2024 11:23, Pico de Paperis via groups.io
<> wrote:
>> Hello QSIers,
>>
>> do you know if it is possible to use Windows DirectShow with a
QSI683wsg?
>> Would like to use Metaguide to collimate....
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Nicola
>>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Nicola
Sky Monsters - <>


Re: QSI and DirectShow

 

As I'd like to use Metaguide for collimation, it is crucial to have the full image train set up, therefore there can't be any webcam in the image train. This is why I was wondering if there was any chance to use it straight?away with my QSI.

Cheers
Nicola


Il giorno gio 6 giu 2024 alle ore 02:42 Peter Vasey via <petevasey=[email protected]> ha scritto:
Just to add to the below, obviously I don't have this next camera, but
if it does have the ribbing round the lens shown in the image, the lens
might unscrew so save having to take the camera apart:



And it's cheaper!

Peter


Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)

On 06/06/2024 00:47, Peter Vasey via wrote:
> Why do you want to use your QSI with Metaguide?? It's not really
> intended as a video camera.
>
> The most economical solution is a basic webcam with the lens replaced by
> an eyepiece adapter.? Also some (but not all) guide/imaging cameras will
> work with Metaguide.? My Altair GPCAM2 224C is ok, but not my GPCAM3 178M.
>
> This video might help, showing how to convert a Logitech C270 webcam:
>
>
>
> Camera:
>
>
> Adapter:
>
>
> I expect even cheaper webcams could be converted with a bit of
> ingenuity!? Might even have a 12mm thread.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
>
> Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)
>
> On 05/06/2024 11:23, Pico de Paperis via wrote:
>> Hello QSIers,
>>
>> do you know if it is possible to use Windows DirectShow with a QSI683wsg?
>> Would like to use Metaguide to collimate....
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Nicola
>>
>
>
>
>
>







--
Nicola
Sky Monsters -


Re: QSI and DirectShow

 

Just to add to the below, obviously I don't have this next camera, but if it does have the ribbing round the lens shown in the image, the lens might unscrew so save having to take the camera apart:



And it's cheaper!

Peter


Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W (Northumberland, UK)

On 06/06/2024 00:47, Peter Vasey via groups.io wrote:
Why do you want to use your QSI with Metaguide?? It's not really intended as a video camera.
The most economical solution is a basic webcam with the lens replaced by an eyepiece adapter.? Also some (but not all) guide/imaging cameras will work with Metaguide.? My Altair GPCAM2 224C is ok, but not my GPCAM3 178M.
This video might help, showing how to convert a Logitech C270 webcam:

Camera:

Adapter:

I expect even cheaper webcams could be converted with a bit of ingenuity!? Might even have a 12mm thread.
Cheers,
Peter

Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)
On 05/06/2024 11:23, Pico de Paperis via groups.io wrote:
Hello QSIers,

do you know if it is possible to use Windows DirectShow with a QSI683wsg?
Would like to use Metaguide to collimate....

Thanks!
Nicola


Re: QSI and DirectShow

 

Why do you want to use your QSI with Metaguide? It's not really intended as a video camera.

The most economical solution is a basic webcam with the lens replaced by an eyepiece adapter. Also some (but not all) guide/imaging cameras will work with Metaguide. My Altair GPCAM2 224C is ok, but not my GPCAM3 178M.

This video might help, showing how to convert a Logitech C270 webcam:



Camera:


Adapter:


I expect even cheaper webcams could be converted with a bit of ingenuity! Might even have a 12mm thread.

Cheers,

Peter


Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W (Northumberland, UK)

On 05/06/2024 11:23, Pico de Paperis via groups.io wrote:
Hello QSIers,
do you know if it is possible to use Windows DirectShow with a QSI683wsg?
Would like to use Metaguide to collimate....
Thanks!
Nicola


QSI and DirectShow

 

Hello QSIers,

do you know if it is possible to use Windows DirectShow with a QSI683wsg?
Would like to use Metaguide to collimate....

Thanks!
Nicola


Re: NGC 4618 and 4625

 

Thanks, Bernhard!


Re: NGC 4618 and 4625

 

Hello Bruce,

Fascinating galaxy pair!
Excellent work

best,
Bernhard Hubl


Re: NGC 4618 and 4625

 

开云体育

Thanks, Barry!

?

Bruce

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Barry Schellenberg
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2024 1:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [QSI-CCD] NGC 4618 and 4625

?

What a wonderful composition of this target. I am always amazed with the level of color richness you attain in your processing.?

Well done!

Barry


Re: NGC 4618 and 4625

 

What a wonderful composition of this target. I am always amazed with the level of color richness you attain in your processing.?

Well done!

Barry


Re: NGC 4618 and 4625

 

Thanks Geof and Kevin, much appreciated.

Bruce W.


Re: NGC 4618 and 4625

 

开云体育

That's excellent Bruce,
I've not heard of this pair, but you've presented them superbly. I just checked them out in Stellarium and perhaps one for me to consider as they would fit nicely on my QSI583 sensor through the C14 with Optec x0.7 tele-compressor.

Geof


From:[email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of bw <bw_msg01@...>
Sent:?23 May 2024 21:20
To:[email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject:?[QSI-CCD] NGC 4618 and 4625
?
NGC 4618 (left) and 4625 (right) are two single-armed Magellanic spiral galaxies, so-named because of their resemblance to the single-armed Large Magellanic Cloud. ?Their asymmetric appearance suggests a strong gravitational interaction between the two. ?But professional observations indicate the level of interaction has been modest, suggesting instead that the single-armed structures are created by processes intrinsic to each galaxy.

The image was captured during 4 nights in April 2024 from SkyPi Remote Observatory using a 12.5" PlaneWave scope and a QSI-640ws camera at f/8 for a final LRGB integration of 17.3 hours.



Thanks for looking,
Bruce W.


Re: NGC 4618 and 4625

 

A wonderful image Bruce!? Lovely detail.

Clear skies,
Kevin


From: "bw msg01" <bw_msg01@...>
To: "QSI-CCD" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 4:20:22 PM
Subject: [QSI-CCD] NGC 4618 and 4625

NGC 4618 (left) and 4625 (right) are two single-armed Magellanic spiral galaxies, so-named because of their resemblance to the single-armed Large Magellanic Cloud. ?Their asymmetric appearance suggests a strong gravitational interaction between the two. ?But professional observations indicate the level of interaction has been modest, suggesting instead that the single-armed structures are created by processes intrinsic to each galaxy.

The image was captured during 4 nights in April 2024 from SkyPi Remote Observatory using a 12.5" PlaneWave scope and a QSI-640ws camera at f/8 for a final LRGB integration of 17.3 hours.



Thanks for looking,
Bruce W.


NGC 4618 and 4625

 

NGC 4618 (left) and 4625 (right) are two single-armed Magellanic spiral galaxies, so-named because of their resemblance to the single-armed Large Magellanic Cloud. ?Their asymmetric appearance suggests a strong gravitational interaction between the two. ?But professional observations indicate the level of interaction has been modest, suggesting instead that the single-armed structures are created by processes intrinsic to each galaxy.

The image was captured during 4 nights in April 2024 from SkyPi Remote Observatory using a 12.5" PlaneWave scope and a QSI-640ws camera at f/8 for a final LRGB integration of 17.3 hours.



Thanks for looking,
Bruce W.


Re: NINA and QSI cameras

 

开云体育

Yes, this is known, and where is the 32bit version?

?

Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Rainer
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Mai 2024 02:27
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [QSI-CCD] NINA and QSI cameras

?

Here is the LInk to NINA Download