¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: BCI Filter Kits K9DP vs N4ELS : Summary


 

Oh, I agree entirely Chuck, and I thank you. As a 13-year-old, I nearly froze to death attaching my xtal radio set that I got for Christmas to my grandfather's 1/4 mile long electric fence wire and listening to the strong local stations in the headphones with the 3 others in the background that you could hear much fainter, but that fixed the DX bug in me to the point I was bringing wires into the house to hook around the ferrite antennas. Then I started winding random small coils across the tuning capacitor of grandma's Zenith tube-type AM radio to discover Radio Canada International upon which I listened so much that I often forgot about doing my chores or my homework. Eventually, a friend loaned me his Hallicrafters SW radio where I learned the code as I was a 10M addict since it was close in frequency to my other grandfather's CB that his neighborhood used to tp citizen patrols for wayward teens through their REACT club. Grandpa was a retired colonel so discipline he vowed to teach me besides calculus. It seems like I learn the best by doing things the hard way and never like anyone else thinks I should. Anyway, it has been a lot of fun playing with these BCI filters and learning the ins and outs of them.

Davey - KU9L

On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 04:45:17 AM EDT, Chuck Carpenter <w5usj@...> wrote:


Davey,


On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:59 PM, David Knapp wrote:
That said, depending on the strength of the local AM radio stations the strength of the filter needed may vary greatly. I
Of course, that's true but:
The QRPme filter has from 1000 to 10000 times more attenuation from 1.6MHz to 0.5MHz, the AM Radio broadcast band.
Just on general principals you'd pick the one with the most attenuation. For a specific station/channel use a tuned notch.

The K9DP filter has slightly less transmission loss from 3.5MHz to at least 50MHz..

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.