Sticky
#qmx #Firmware release 1_02_000
68
#qmx
#firmware
Hi all SSB firmware was released into beta on 17-Mar-2025 after 9+ months of development. Many thanks to everyone who bravely helped test it and patiently provided their feedback and observations. There are now quite a few YouTube videos, forum reports and other social media mentions about on-air successes with QMX SSB. Now that it has been at least 6 weeks in beta and I believe most of the issues have been resolved, it's time to promote it to an official version. I have called this version 1_02_000 and published it on the QMX page http://qrp-labs.com/qmx where I have also published the updated operating manual, which grew from 111 pages to 134 pages. The main changes are: SSB (obviously!) including CESSB, TX Equalization, Mic AGC, VOX, Pre-distortion and and and... Addition of up to two more USB Virtual COM serial ports (up to three total). All of the hardware tests such as RF and SWR sweep, and Diagnostics, are now available on the LCD too. New CAT commands for LCD contents, S-meter, AGC-meter, Power meter, SWR meter, SSB source Complete list (relative to 1_00_027 the previous official version): SSB modes added (USB and LCB), with CESSB, TX Equalization, Mic AGC, VOX, Phase pre-distortion and more Rationalization of menus, grouped into CW, Digi and SSB submenus (now Keyer and Decoder are submenus of CW) Added up to two more USB Virtual COM serial ports (configurable) LCD versions of AF, RF, Image, LPF, Test ADC I/Q sweeps (miniature graph on LCD) New function PA mod. test to check operation of amplitude modulator Diagnostics screens are now available on the LCD interface too Now remembers previous menu location on ALL menus regardless of nesting level Add way of forcing factory reset, press Menu (left) button during power-up Change TX color in diagnostics screen from red to blue, to avoid confusion since red things are errors Added CAT LC command to retrieve LCD contents Added CAT commands SA (AGC meter), SM (S meter), PC (Power meter), SW (SWR meter) Added CAT command SS (get/set SSB input source) Bug fix: PTT P did not work properly Bug fix: Incorrect PA voltage display on the Diagnostics screen 73 Hans G0UPL http://qrp-labs.com https://www.buymeacoffee.com/g0upl
|
#qmx #ssb #mic Recommended MIC element source?
3
#qmx
#ssb
#mic
Hi all, If I order a QMX kit, will the recommended MIC element come with the kit for board mounting? Would it be usable instead in a homebrew external mini-mic build? If not supplied, is it something that can be purchased as an order "add-on" / does Hans stock any for sale :-) ( I don't see it in the add on pull down, so I think I know the answer, but thought I'd ask! ) Thanks!Wayde VA3NCA/AD2GX
|
Grabbing 5 or 3.3v off of QMX Board
2
I recently purchased a high band QMX that I'm planning on modding to do 40-10. (Hasn't come yet, delayed to June 10). I'm also adding a small audio amp board and a small 10mm speaker. The amp board takes from 2-5v, so I'm thinking of grabbing either 3.3 or 5v off of the QMX board. I looked through the schematics but I can't tell which color trace is 5, 12, or 3.3v. Can anyone point me in the right direction where I can just steal some power off the board? Also, for the audio jack, I cant tell which channels are right or left, does anyone know which one is which? Thanks!
|
QMX Receiving FT8 but No Change When Antenna Disconnected
9
Hi all, I¡¯ve completed assembly of my 60¨C15m QMX. It powers on and passes the RF and SWR sweep tests. Test ADC I/Q shows sine waves, particularly on 60m. I can hear what sounds like FT8 on 7.074 MHz in DIGI mode, and the tones appear to cycle every 15 seconds as expected. However, I¡¯ve noticed that disconnecting the antenna makes little or no audible difference ¡ª there¡¯s no significant drop in the noise floor or change in the signal. Additional observations: The BNC center pin shows ~0 ¦¸ to ground (I understand this is expected due to the SWR bridge). BNC center has continuity to one side of C510 and C526. Test ADC I/Q and scope work as expected. Reflowed L506, L508, L510, L511, L512, and L513 for better LPF continuity. I¡¯ve confirmed IC402 pin 13 is not grounded, but I don¡¯t have continuity from the BNC center to pin 13. At this point, I¡¯m hearing what I believe is live FT8, but the lack of change when removing the antenna is making me question whether the antenna signal is actually routed through the intended receive path. Would appreciate any guidance or suggestions for what else to check. Thanks! -Tanner
|
QRPLabs 10 Watt Linear with QMX+
25
Iam working on the 10 watt amp and I need a little better understanding of the power input it will need. I have a Smart Power Attenutator that will give me a 0 to 15 db reduction. I am not sure about the rquirement of the level of rf in watts (mili watts ?) for a drive level. My QMX+ shows average of 3 to 3.8 watts across the bands and I beleive this is just a little more than this little amp needs. Any help, thoughts, or other welcome, but be kind to an old gyser. Thanks all -- 73 ChuckR
|
50 Watt Power Amplifier - Low Power, High Harmonics
33
#50w
#50wpa
Hello. I'm assembling a 50 watt power amplifier for use with a QCX+ that I assembled last month, for the 80 metre band. I have very high harmonics at the output of T3 - as a result, I get only about 9.3 watts out when running at 13.8 V. Output from the LPF looks OK on the 'scope. I found the excellent videos by NA5Y which shows the output of T3 should be much closer to a sinusoid than what I get. I also found the discussion with KO1KR in August of 2020, but unfortunately I can't see his scope photos so I don't know if he had the same problem. I've since skimmed through the many discussions on this forum but haven't found the same issue exactly, though I did check out some of the suggestions given here. I found the amplifier took 67 mA with R5 fully CCW - I adjusted R5 till the amplifier drew about 70 mA with the QCX+ key-down in practice mode. Here are my scope traces: 0092 is the gate drive, yellow is Q1 gate, purple is Q2 gate - all is well here. 0090 is the drain voltage, Q1 in yellow and Q2 in purple - these look like there is oscillation ? 0091 is the voltage at the output of T3. This has a lot of third harmonic and doesn't look like the waveform NA5Y showed at this point. (QCX+ was set for 3.520 MHZ , amplifier connected to a dummy load.) I thought that perhaps my bench power supply is doing something odd when the amp is drawing power, but I probed the 12 volt line right at the barrel connector and the 'scope showed almost no disturbance of the +12 v supply. In frustration, I observed the output of T3 with the 'scope set for a long capture - it almost looks as if the distortion grows with time, for the first few tens of microsceconds the scope showed a small but sine-ish waveform, which over the span of a few hundred microseconds got wigglier and wigglier till it developed into the mess seen in my scope capture 0091. I've checked DC continuity to the windings of all the transformers and coils. I did find a bad joint on the primary of T1 but I cleaned it up and can now get power out of the amplifier. I haven't yet checked bias on all the 1N4007 diodes but the input looks quite sinusoidal at R3 closest to the input. The few watts the amplifier does produce look OK at its output. The QCX+ makes about 4.3 wats into a dummy load (43 V peak to peak) at 13.8 V DC. I'm assembling these units for a friend, and I had really hoped to have them ready for Field Day this year. The instructions are excellent and I have followed them closely. What can I look at next? Bill VE4STW
|
QMX+ need some troubleshooting assistance
4
I've had some issues with my QMX+. When I received the board the L101 inductor was damaged but appeared functional. I had the unit fully assembled and working but then IC101, 3.3v regulator fried. While removing that IC I lifted the pin1 and pin 2 traces. I was able to replace IC101 and put in jumpers to bypass the pulled traces. The 3.3v supply is now working. I decided to replace L101 and managed to lift the pad adjacent to C107. It didn't fully detach but it did break the through board connection to R113. I have replaced L101 and installed a jumper to restore the connection from VCC to R113. I added some extra solder to C107 to bridge over to L101 to help lock it to the board. Here is the issue. On the Diagnostic screen 3V3 SMPS reads 3.31 V so the 3.3v supply is working. However the 5V SMPS is reading 5.75V, and the Supply voltage is reading 13.4V. I have measured with a multimeter and VCC reads about 5.05v and the Supply voltage is 12.1v. Something is appears to be causing the Supply Voltage and 5V SMPS to read high. Any thoughts on what might be causing this?
|
Another troubleshooting question QMX+
#QMXplus
#troubleshooting
Seems I found a new issue with the QMX+ I built a few weeks ago. After fixing the power supply (thanks Ken), I found that the 40-20 meter bands were dead and exhibiting random "pops" the sound like a ball bearing in a tin can. Here is what I found: - Transmit works correctly on all bands. - The transient is not related to the signal path through the CMOS switches. Other band groups receive as advertised. - There is a large voltage transient on the output IC403 that corresponds to rather random signal on CLK1 into IC403 from the clock generator IC 204 (MS5351). On all other band groups, the CLK1 looks normal. So my current suspicion is that the I2C command being sent by the micro is simply not doing the correct thing with the clock chip. The SDA and SCL signal levels look fine and are reliably setting the clock in other bands. I've tried a factory reset a couple of times with no change in the behavior. Ideas? 73, -- Brent DeWitt, AB1LF Milford, MA
|
QMX Plus Outputting Loud Audio Noise
6
Just powered up a newly build rig. The display and control functions seem to be working. I can change bands and modes. Using a lab supply running around 11 volts and nothing unusual in current consumption. But when I power it on - get a loud blast of noise. Not hearing any signals as I operate the VFO. Nothing changes most of the time when I exercise the volume control - once I was able to gain volume control on 160m after a long battle. (I haven't installed the button battery yet - I imagine no harm in doing this (-: Where do I begin troubleshooting? It seems to be on all bands. No receiving and lots of noise. Curt
|
QMX+ with Talent battery. ATU 10 for Sale
5
#antennatuner
#ATU
A factory assembled ( Nov 2024) QMX+ with GPS and case. Talent battery YB 1201100 connecting cable with diode for Voltage reduction to 12V and ATU 10 by N7DDC complete in ufb condition. Tested for FT8 successfully. N4AN@....
|
Another QMX+ Up And Running Sort Of
10
I finally powered up my CMX+. On 60m and 30m, I get a full 5W output, but on the other bands (80m, 40m, 20m), there's barely any output. There are also some fairly loud birdies on 40m, mostly. I tried adjusting some of the toroid windings, but saw no difference in power output for 80m, 40m, or 20m. Any ideas where I should look first regarding the low power output levels? Should also mention the firmware update went smoothly no problems at all. Dave
|
QMX+ and DTR/RTS like CW keyering
9
Hello dear all and devs, Several hams on our side have equipped themselves with the QMX+. Some would like to know if it would be possible to add a few lines of code to the firmware so that when PTT is triggered¡ªeither via CAT or through DTR/RTS emulation¡ªand the QMX+ is in CW mode, it would transmit a carrier. From our tests, this already works in Digi mode, where a tone is sent through the sound card emulation. However, in CW mode, when PTT is sent via CAT, the radio does switch to transmit, but no signal is actually emitted. It might work if the software sent a tone via the sound card, but most CW software assumes that PTT alone is sufficient. This request is therefore aligned with improving compatibility with most CW-capable software (e.g., fldigi in CW mode with PTT via CAT or RTS/DTR). One of the advantages of operating in CW with the QMX+ is also the ability to reduce receive bandwidth, onboard decoding, breakin etc. We believe only a small firmware adjustment would be needed to have the carrier generated automatically, since the radio already enters transmit mode via CAT PTT. Adding RTS/DTR handling would enable a simple and widespread configuration method for this kind of operation. Otherwise, some have considered building interfaces using FT232 chips and optocouplers, but it would be unfortunate to require extra hardware when just a few lines of code might suffice. Perhaps the addition of a CW submenu to automatically enable the carrier when PTT is activated? Thank you in advance.
|
Jeff Moore repairs
4
Recently, I sent my Rev 1 QMX, which I had problems with the right encoder, and not able to load the new firmware. Mr Moore, troubleshoot the radios, and fixed the issues he found, then did a complete test of all the features, and clean any possible cold solders, or spaltters of solder. Then provided a detail report of what he did, and parts that needed to be change. All of that for just a small donation. Thank you very much Mr Moore, and looking forward to have lots of fun with my improved QMX. Ed Cortes K4BQN
|
QMX Plus in contest
31
Hi all, someone stated elsewhere, that the QMX+ was a good rig for contest. Not really I think. I just used it in the CQWPX as well as my Flex 1500. Well the waterfall is a + for the flex ( I dont want tb buy more hardware to have one for the QMX) and changing the filters directly on the Hercules console is way quicker. I have not updated to the SSB software yet. The 300 hz filter is vy wide on the high side. Strong signals can be heard widely. Nothing after 0 beat. Also strong signals seem to saturate the rx and that was a problem especially on 40 m CW clicks are not nice but that is known. 160 m when the band is used above 1.840 is not workable as all stn from below have a similar signal there again. And then I have still to figure out how to set up the AGC. The hang time on strong signals is too long and that makes life difficult. On the positive side I prefer the audio sound of the QMX+ to the flex. I dont't want to be too critical and I never had a newer state of the art rig to compare. Years back I had a TS 830 and liked that. S next up is the region 1 FD for the QMX+ -- Martin DK3UW
|
QMX+ L504 1/2 W or 1 W?
I just broke mine, also. It's too close to the edge of the board, so my PCB assembly clamp broke it :-(. I don't have an assortment of axial inductors, but when I look online, the seem to come in 1/2 W and 1 W sizes. Anyone know which size is used in the QMX+? 73, -- Dave, N8SBE, Hamshack Hotline 550-0971, HamsOverIP 101018, AmateurWire 1348
|
Low input levels in WSJT-X with no way to adjust them
2
#mac
#qmx
I am on a Mac M1. I basically have everything working except that unlike Windows and Linux, the USB soundcard in the QMX has no way of adjusting output/input levels in system settings. Everything is greyed out. The result is that audio input sits around 22 and might get up to 30 with a strong signal in the decode. Anyone found a way to use third party software to bump up input levels to the recommended 60? Or is there a way to do this on the QMX itself in digital modes? I'm running the latest firmware.
|
QDX Low Receive but Xmit fine with OSX
4
Thank you Nick. I saw that in some messages but didn¡¯t know how to get in and gain access to change it. I wanted to use the terminal program you suggested but getting there was a yeoman¡¯s feat. I first had to install a number of programs to even install PuTTY for OSX. The first one was Xcode which was almost 30GB only to find out I didn¡¯t really need to. I really only needed to download Developer Tools for Xcode, then something called Quartz and then one called Maxports. Then it was just a matter of launching the PuTTY desktop icon on the Mac, fill in the proper blanks on the GUI (Quartz provided this for PuTTY) and away it went. There is a step by step tutorial on how to install PuTTY for OSX - https://phoenixnap.com/kb/install-putty-on-mac I raised every band to 70 from 54 and although it's still near the bottom of the range (about 1/3 scale) it's much much better. I¡¯m sure folks a lot more familiar with using a Terminal program to make all kind of changes, would have breezed right through this. You pointed me in the right direction which I really appreciated. 73¡¯s. John/K7RLD
|
43 or 61 mix on 6m QDX-M?
6
I'm going to be modifying a QDX-M that was "factory" built for 10m to be used on 6m. I plan to use QMX+ values for BPF and LPF. But I believe the existing T1 transformer is a 43 mix Binoc, and I know the QMX+ and most high band QDXs now use 61 mix. Thoughts on the mix for 6m? Should I leave the 43 as installed, or will I need 61 to get decent power and /or efficiency on 6m? I know a few have built QDX-Ms for 6m, but some have left out which mix binoc they used. I also see some posts about simulations done, but the associated pictures are long gone. Any data or thoughts are appreciated -Nate N8BTR
|
Firmware suggestion for QMX/+
6
Having just had a panic attack because I thought the LPF wasn't working on my newly constructed QMX+ I have a suggestion for an improvement. Would it be possible to add warnings or even totally disable diagnostic features when they are blocked from operating correctly? For example, on the LPF sweep screen when practice mode is turned on. Just in case anyone else is like me and can't spot the blindingly obvious - The LPF diagnostics can't work if the transmitter is disabled meaning that you just get a flat trace. In my case, I'd turned on practice mode because I was messing about with a plug-in GPS then spent some time trying to work out why my LPF traces were flat on all bands but everything else seemed to work. 73 Mark 2E0OIW (Apologies if there's already a thread somewhere that I've missed)
|
SSB Calibration killed output drivers?
4
Can the SSB calibration tool kill the output drivers? My newly built QMX+ was working perfectly until I ran the SSB calibration routine. After that, as soon as the main power regulator kicks in the transceiver pulls a lot of current before quickly locking up or shutting down. It didn't take much detective work to determine that the output drivers were the culprit and at least one of them had gone practically short circuit. Luckily I'd ordered some spare output transistors so I changed them all to be on the safe side which fixed the problem but now I'm slightly worried about trying the tuning again. (Hans - any chance you could work out a way of fitting those drivers on a satellite PCB? The ground pins are a real pain to clear properly and resolder) NB my QMX+ passed all the other tests and had a dummy load attached so should have been fine. I will admit to leaving it unattended though because it was taking ages! Has anyone else experienced anything similar? Mark 2E0OIW
|