Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Over the moon !
Nice one Chris! Congrats...? For my curiosity - which filter did you use for the QSO (passband and center)? 73 Hans G0UPL On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 9:56?AM M0awn via <trident.t150v=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Beautiful Thanks Chris, very nice to hear some feedback on the new filters in action out in the wild! 73 Hans G0UPL On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 10:28?AM M0awn via <trident.t150v=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Nice result. QRP RIG?with a dipole for G to VK CW QSO.
Between the 50 Hz and the 300 Hz filter BW there is almost 8 dB difference in dynamic range. This is in the range of a beam antenna gain compared to a dipole. Although the antenna gain works in both directions.
I will have to try to listen the CW signal using the 50 Hz BW filter.
--
73 Bojan S53DZ |
On my QMX(s), I currently have 100 Hz @ 625 as the lowest BW -- partially to limit to a sensible number of options to rotate through -- and largely because I didn't personally observe improvement at 50 Hz (as to my sense I was getting more 'purity' w.r.t. the tone). ?On the QMX's narrowest setting, I could perhaps characterize it as feeling as if I wasn't entirely "locked in" (to the tone itself over the duration of a QSO). ?That being said, it'd be worthwhile for me to do this comparison in different RF environments. ?
?
I also like having the "Auto-offset" setting turned to Yes/on (since the tone freq. graduates higher as you narrow down), but do find there is a bit of additional RIT tweaking to do.
?
Conversely, I go down to 50 Hz all the time on the Yaesu ftDx10, and I definitely notice the SNR improvement as I narrow all the way down.
?
Purely just my own perceptions! |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss