Re: Help .. QLG1 no power
Figured it out, first time kit builder excitement ... triple checked part placements and had L1 in L3 ... bingo .... working now? Thanks
By
Brian - KQ4MM
·
#26283
·
|
Re: QSX radio + 630m :)
Hi Allison, If you just want to run a beacon then a U3S will be fine and there is no need for a SSB transceiver. But if you want to make two way QSOs the situation is different. Digital modes allow
By
N1BUG
·
#26282
·
|
Re: QSX's ARM-Based Microcontroller
Dear Hans, let me know if you will need more help with QSX development. ;) 73 - Petr, OK1RP ¡ª STMicroelectronics
By
Petr Ourednik
·
#26281
·
|
Re: QSX radio + 630m :)
ajparent1/KB1GMX wrote: _______________________________ Quoting you: Let us see if we can help you.? FT8 requires SSB capability.? The new radio is an SSB radio. Do you see the connection?
By
John AE5X
·
#26280
·
|
Re: QSX - 6 and 4 meters expansion?
Please do not confuse this with other designs with serious limitations. Those have problems with delivering enough drive to the IRF510 at HF never mind higher. From testing 6M is easy, no changes.?
By
ajparent1/kb1gmx
·
#26279
·
|
Re: QSX radio + 630m :)
I Did old school (literally in jr high) back in the late 60s? 1750M band. USA Part 15, 160-190khz 1W max input and 15M antenna ad feed line max Ran 1w Am input at the base of the 15M pole with a huge
By
ajparent1/kb1gmx
·
#26278
·
|
Re: Computer controlled Oscilloscope - What do you suggest
#tool
That was my understanding as well (such as it is). I certainly hope so, as I think my my warranty just recently expired.
By
TrueBlue
·
#26277
·
|
Help .. QLG1 no power
Hello, First time kit builder here and need help troubleshooting a QLG1 that will not power on. Having recently built a QCX 40M kit successfully I decided to give the GS kit a try so I could do some
By
Brian - KQ4MM
·
#26276
·
|
Re: Winding QCX T1
#qcx
#t1
I just completed my QCX40 and simpathize with others who were/are challenged by The T1. In my case I had to unwind one turn of the large coil and strip back the end insulation.? I must have nicked
By
[email protected]
·
#26275
·
|
Re: QSX radio feature requests
Hi Ken, As you took the time out to write directly and spend time so nicely formatting it.... It's only correct I should take the time out to see if you ever posted anything on the forum. I did
By
Alan de G1FXB
·
#26274
·
|
Re: QSX radio feature requests
I'll second that. Paul DJ0CU
By
Paul Harrison
·
#26273
·
|
Re: QSX radio feature requests
Hans: FOCUS. Finish what you started, in the manner you intended. All the other stuff can come later. And, walk out of the corporate headquarters at 5 pm and spend time with your wife and children!
By
Fred Piering WD9HNU
·
#26272
·
|
Re: QSX radio feature requests
Amen! +1 Ethernet please.... ;-) Alan
By
Alan de G1FXB
·
#26271
·
|
Re: QSX radio feature requests
Amen! Roy WA0YMH
By
Roy Appleton
·
#26270
·
|
Re: QSX radio feature requests
Hi Alan, all I am enjoying the discussion on LF, VHF proposals. All nice ideas and perhaps in time, some can be made reality. It is useful to remind ourselves that designing and producing a 10-band
By
Hans Summers
·
#26269
·
|
Re: ocxo
Finally got the oscillator running. Not only was Q4 dud but so was the 27mhz crystal.? I had to remove 3 of the transistors to remove the crystal because they sit on top of the crystal lip. Board
By
M0RON
·
#26268
·
|
Constantly sending dashes-Problem solved.
After many hours troubleshooting with a DVM, I changed out the IC. All problems fixed, the problem was with the IC not the board. Thanks everyone for your suggestions. 73 Tom??? KS5X --- This email
By
Tom Gundlach <ks5x@...>
·
#26267
·
|
Re: QCX constantly transmitting dashes
OK Think I'll post a separate posting listing what I found.
By
Tom Gundlach <ks5x@...>
·
#26266
·
|
Re: QSX - 6 and 4 meters expansion?
Curt, Tnx for your reply. I Surely understand that some modifications might be necessary ¨C among those the PA and filters, but also that the price will go up. It was just a thought for making it
By
Allan Nelsson <allan@...>
·
#26264
·
|
Re: QSX radio + 630m :)
Exactly! I've used several methods of rx-only, tx-only and transceive on 630m and they all include compromises that I believe would be alleviated in a stand-alone xcvr - a cousin to the QSX? I believe
By
John AE5X
·
#26263
·
|