Re: QMX MB - Wonky SWR Sweep
Thanks John. Mitch NK3H
By
Mitch NK3H
·
#123189
·
|
Re: FDIM 2024 LOGIC IC TRANSMITTER CHALLENGE
Hans,
Thank you and Thank you for your support at FDIM before TX challenge. I appreciate a lot.
Next year I will be present as a spectator to watch your entry! No way I can beat you if you are
By
Barb WB2CBA
·
#123188
·
|
Re: QMX MB - Wonky SWR Sweep
Thanks Ludwig. Will follow up and get back. Mitch NK3H
By
Mitch NK3H
·
#123187
·
|
Re: QMX MB - Wonky SWR Sweep
Thanks GL. Will do and get back. Mitch NK3H
By
Mitch NK3H
·
#123186
·
|
Re: CW Issues
On your 3rd issue, don't set the offset frequency outside the supported range. For example on the low side it is 600 Hz. The firmware lets you select other values and save but it doesn't take
By
Dave Koberstein
·
#123184
·
|
Re: QMX MB - Wonky SWR Sweep
Mitch,
here ( /g/QRPLabs/wiki/36874 ) is something about bad SWR values.
73, Ludwig
By
@Ludwig_DH8WN
·
#123183
·
|
Re: QMX+
Although the QMX+ is larger than the QMX, it's still a pretty portable
size. It's much smaller and lighter than a typical 100W transceiver. If you
manage to cram an internal battery and/or an ATU into
By
Shirley Dulcey KE1L
·
#123182
·
|
Re: QMX MB - Wonky SWR Sweep
Mitch,
T507 winding looks correct, assuming the secondary turns count is right.
VA3RR's advice is good. Recheck those soldered connections!
JZ
wrote:
By
John Z
·
#123181
·
|
Re: QMX MB - Wonky SWR Sweep
Mitch - I would try hitting all 6 joints with some heat as a first measure.
The sharp edges of the toroid abrading the #28 AWG wire is a secondary concern IMHO, given that mix 43 ferrite has a
By
va3rr
·
#123180
·
|
Re: Wall warts can be fatal to QMX :-(
I'm going to load test a bunch of random wall warts. It's very tempting to repurpose them, but they appear to only provide the rated voltage at close to the rated current (load). So they really need
By
Reginald Beardsley
·
#123179
·
|
Re: QRPLabs Cad System
Because of the all profit based models made for inconsistency of tools
because of pricing models and out right failure or buyout killing
the products.? ?I went KiCad over a decade ago and also
By
ajparent1/kb1gmx
·
#123178
·
|
Re: #qmx wrong inductances for LPF?
#qmx
The Hallicrafters S38C that I had as a kid, 1954, used a gimmick capacitor in the IF to affect the BFO. I thought it must have been a left over piece of wire, and learned the hard way. It took a bit
By
Dave VE3GSO
·
#123177
·
|
Re: QRPLabs Cad System
Hi Matt
To be clear, I AM on Fusion 360, Eagle is part of Fusion 360. I understand
in a couple of years it will be just named differently but the
functionality is the same.
73 Hans
By
Hans Summers
·
#123176
·
|
Re: FDIM 2024 LOGIC IC TRANSMITTER CHALLENGE
Barb, way to go!
That its a very reproducible design with margins is commendable.
--
Allison
------------------
Post online only,
direct email will go to a bit bucket.
By
ajparent1/kb1gmx
·
#123175
·
|
Re: QRPLabs Cad System
He has about two years before they have it completely end-of-life; they are
forcing everyone to Fusion 360. They won't sell or support Fusion past
June 2026 (unclear on whether you can still keep
By
Kaufman, Matt - N3AR
·
#123174
·
|
Re: QMX MB - Wonky SWR Sweep
Hi John,
Thanks for the reply. I've posted some pics of the area around T507 from 3 different angles. Apologies for the poor lighting. Please let me know your thoughts. Many thanks. Mitch NK3H
By
Mitch NK3H
·
#123173
·
|
Re: CW Issues
Steve, what AGC parameters do you use ?
73,
Steve, N2IC
By
Steve N2IC
·
#123172
·
|
Re: QMX+ USB-C Connector solder joints
Thank you Hans and everyone else that responded.
I'll add some solder to the side tabs, and leave the small center pins as-is for now.? If I run into USB problems I'll check this first.
I've also
By
Dj Merrill
·
#123171
·
|
Re: Order 84984
Thanks!
?Get BlueMail for Android ?
By
Roger Hill
·
#123170
·
|
Re: Order 84984
Hi Roger
I'll check it... So so so busy here, catching up on those 300 missed emails
while in Dayton is slow going. I've got through 150 so far...
73 Hans
By
Hans Summers
·
#123169
·
|