Re: Wich PCB Rev. Do I Have?
But carefully read the instructions because Rev 4 boards say Rev 3 in one place. "QMX Rev 4 PCBs don't need the PTT mod; note that there is a silkscreen error, there's a "Rev 3" printed under the
By
pgramsey, N9LFF
·
#122262
·
|
Re: QMX+
Looks to be about the same size as my Flex-1500 QRP radio.? I wonder how it would perform if I sent the I and Q signals to some nice SDR software?? Same band configuration, same power output, for a
By
Mark Griffith
·
#122261
·
|
Re: #qmx+ Announcing new QMX+ 160-6m multimode transceiver kit
Hi Nate I'm in Dayton Hamvention and it's hard to do everything remotely on my phone. The software version for 1_00_019 is written and ready. I will try to upload it to the website soon. The manual
By
Hans Summers
·
#122260
·
|
Re: #qmx+ Announcing new QMX+ 160-6m multimode transceiver kit
Hello Scott No, QMX+ is not intended to replace QSX. However the gap between QMX+ and QSX is not as wide as I'd like so probably QSK will have an increased specification. 73 Hans G0UPL
By
Hans Summers
·
#122259
·
|
Re: #qmx+ Announcing new QMX+ 160-6m multimode transceiver kit
Great news! I noted the assembly instruction PDF is there, but the firmware/operating instruction link doesn't work. I'm curious to see some sample RF sweeps on this new offering! :-) -Nate N8BTR
By
Nate Reik N8BTR
·
#122258
·
|
QSX Replacement??
Hans, is the new QMX+ going to replace the long awaited QSX?? Or is the QSX still in development?? Thanks, Jim G.
By
Jim G
·
#122257
·
|
Re: #qmx+ Announcing new QMX+ 160-6m multimode transceiver kit
Not to bring up a sore point, but I am wondering if the QMX+ is intended to replace the QSX. 73, Scott AK5SD
By
Scott Dupuie
·
#122256
·
|
Re: QMX - Curious observation
Sounds like something with the BPF selection maybe? Or LPF? I wonder if you need to look at the diode and through-hole inductor solder joints? -Nate N8BTR
By
Nate Reik N8BTR
·
#122255
·
|
Re: QMX+
I hope so, I want a high band! -- 73 Michael N6QP Up in Thin R
By
Michael N6QP
·
#122254
·
|
QMX - Curious observation
Hi, For a few days, using the QMX for reception only, it seemed very deaf.? Normally strong signals were barely detectable. Today I was monitoring 14MHz FT8 sub band and there were only a handful of
By
algarveastronomy
·
#122253
·
|
Re: #qmx+ Announcing new QMX+ 160-6m multimode transceiver kit
Congrats Hans, this is going to be a big hit.
By
Ron Carr
·
#122252
·
|
Re: #qmx+ Announcing new QMX+ 160-6m multimode transceiver kit
Thank You Hans!? Ordered mine yesterday!!
By
Eric Fox
·
#122251
·
|
Re: QMX+
I got one after a long wait in line at FDIM. Also got the GPS and dev board. A priority for me would be an onboard tuner. -- 73 KD8CGH
By
Bob Benedict, KD8CGH
·
#122250
·
|
Re: QLG1 battery
How much time are you looking to hold the data?? Maybe they're better now but early ones had poor leakage current and would self-discharge in a week or less.? Also I don't know what's in the module
By
Jeffrey Ludlow
·
#122249
·
|
Re: Old Timer Soldering Question
As the others have said, don¡¯t cheap out on the solder, use a decent iron and don¡¯t be afraid to use some additional flux. ?I typically use 0.5 - 0.7mm diameter as it¡¯s a bit more controllable
By
Clive - G4KCM
·
#122248
·
|
Re: QMX+
I just ordered a midband QMX and I'm not disappointed because I will have the QMX unbuilt, I'm disapointed that I'll have to pay shipment a 2nd time. I will build both. I know that the QMX+ is
By
roebi@...
·
#122247
·
|
Re: Old Timer Soldering Question
Like in the old days, soldering is all about the flux! Many inexpensive 60-40 solders and the newer (and not nearly as easy to use) lead free solders don¡¯t have enough flux in them. This is why the
By
Dave VE3GSO
·
#122246
·
|
Re: W1NC QMX Repair
#qmx
Hello, I did also sent a QMX for repair and alignment to Jeffrey. He did a wonderful job and the QMX is now up to specs. Bought the QMX used and was very unhappy with the performance. Now the QMX is a
By
Harry
·
#122245
·
|
Re: SWR disagreement and 50-watt amplifier
For anyone wondering what the suggestion re revised bias was about, schematic given above. I? have used a known good schematic? and marked it up.? so there are no doubts it has been proven , at
By
Timothy Fidler
·
#122244
·
|
Re: QMX+
I would suspect that there are quite a few people disappointed after just having bought a QMX. I wonder how many unbuilt QMX kits will appear on Ebay? -- Phill EA5JHA
By
Phill
·
#122243
·
|