¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: CW Filters

 

Hello Hans,

I would like to respond to your concerns one at a time

On Fri, 2025-04-11 at 18:00:46 +0300, Hans Summers via groups.io wrote:
I don't think your proposal would work well, though I find myself
lacking a deep enough understanding to explain why clearly. Perhaps
someone else could contribute here also. But I'll try. ... Weaver
demodulation is used in some SDRs. A disadvantage is that there is a
hole in the response at the sub-carrier frequency (the CW sidetone
frequency, in your nomenclature). In the analog world it is hard to
make the hole small but in DSP it could be made a lot smaller, such
that it is unobtrusive on an SSB receiver. However for CW, I wonder
how that would work... the "hole" would be exactly at the center of
the passband, and the CW transmission could well have energy either
side of it, and given that the actual bandwidth of a CW transmission
could be only 10 or 20 Hz, even a small "hole" would have a marked
effect.
There is no "hole" in the Weaver modulation if we make it digital. All
the information of the received signal is present in the I and Q
channels.

Suppose we want to listen to a CW signal transmitted at 7020 kHz. We set
the VFO to 7020-12 = 7008 kHz. The mixed signals contain the sum and
difference of these frequencies: 14028 and 12 kHz. Only the 12 kHz
components pass through the lowpass filters in front of the ADC, and
appear digitally as cosine and sine of a 12 kHz signal.

We are now in the digital world. We mix the 12 kHz IQ signals with the
-12 kHz IF frequency. The mixer outputs two DC components, which are the
cosine and sine of the phase difference between the mixed signals.

These DC components pass almost unaffectected through the lowpass
filters, say ¡À50 Hz. The outputs are then mixed with the sidetone
frequency (700 Hz) before being fed to the speaker's DAC. We will here a
700 Hz sine tone.

Suppose we want to move the passband 20 Hz up. Then we adjust the IF
mixer to 12020 Hz and the sidetone frequency to 720 Hz. The received
signal will now appear as -20 Hz signals in the LP filter (the frequency
needs a sign in the IQ domain). We will still hear a 700 Hz tone in the
speaker, while the passband will be from -20 to +80 Hz around 7020 kHz.
We shouldn't adjust the VFO because that would change the USB output.

An additional problem is that you lose the advantage of doing the SDR
at a 12 kHz IF. The 12 kHz IF gives immunity to hum and noise which
can often be found on a direct conversion receiver near to (or within
a few kHz of) 0 Hz. Operating at a 12 kHz IF produces significant
advantages. The conversion to 12 kHz IF is quite trivial digitally and
computationally inexpensive because the sampling is at 4x this (48
ksps).
I still use the 12 kHz IF, as described above. The bias, low-frequency
noise, and hum are avoided.

Finally another problem. To obtain a 50 Hz bandwidth CW filter, you
would need to have a 25 Hz LPF. To do such a low pass filter in DSP
will require a very long (large number of taps) DSP filter. To avoid
this, it will be necessary to decimate down to a much lower sample
rate. Which is fine. But you cannot avoid the fact that there will be
a large delay through the filter. Intuitively and/or approximately
speaking the filter must be 40 ms long for a 25 Hz LPF.
There is essentially no (extra) delay caused by the implementation of
the filters. They run as a series of first or second order filters, not
as finite-impulse filters. The realizations of the filters are on
so-called balanced form, which makes them numerically robust. It is
possible to run them using 16-bit arithmetics. (I have been running it
on a 48MHz SAMD21 M0+ at 16-kHz.). The response of the filter will have
a delay, but this is determined by the bandwidth and type of filter.

The proposed filter works both for CW and SSB (Rx and Tx), without using
Hilbert transforms.


Best regards

Anders


Re: QMX issues

 

Lundi = French for Monday??

Jack, W8TEE

On Sunday, April 20, 2025 at 09:59:45 AM EDT, Jerry Lunday <hpceng@...> wrote:


Intersting name. I don't see many "day's".
?
73.
Jerry/k5sop


QCX Classic Case WANTED

 

I post a message like this every 6months or so in hope...

I'm looking for someone who has an original QCX Classic case they no longer want. This is the BaMa Tech case that was sold by QRP Labs for sometime. The case is not available new any more.

If you have such a case or maybe a cased QCX Classic that is fried and dead and you want to sell, please contact me andy.mm0fmf AT gmail.com.

I'm in the UK and Brexit etc. has made shipping to and from the UK much more "fun and challenging" now. But if you are in the EU or in the US I have friends/relatives in either that will handle shipping to me making it simple for you :-)

Here's hoping.

Thanks
Andy, MM0FMF


Power out on 60 mtr QCX+

 

Hi
I recently built a QCX+ for 60 mtrs. Everything works ok except that I only get about 1.5watts out into a dummy. load.? Just wondering whether any one has built a QCX+ for 60mtrs and what power? out? that is expected for this band .
look forward to any replies.
Keith G4TJE
?


CW Practice / Rag Chew Session

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý


On 4/12/25 I had a CW practice / rag chew session on 30 meters. I worked one station on 30 then switched to 17 and worked one station there:

Conditions started out OK on 30 but after an hour it went dead. I switched to 17 which seemed better but still not much action. SSN = 114, SFI = 157, A = 20, K = 2.

My next CW practice session will be April 21 at 09:00 EDT / 13:00 UTC on 20 meters. Anyone and everyone is welcome. This practice is intended for operators who are new to CW or they need some practice. IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW POOR YOUR CW IS. Mistakes are OK. Poor fists are OK. Slow speed is OK. Really slow speed is OK. This practice is meant for you to improve your CW. I will do my best to adjust to your skill level. Operate at any power level. If several stations show up, I will operate as a round-table control station. I will do it as a round-table so everyone gets a chance to transmit. Please listen to my directions.


Details:

Date - April 20 2025

Time - 09:00 EDT? 13:00 UTC

Band - 20 Meters

How to find me - I will find a clear frequency and call CQ. Go to the Reverse Beacon Network and search for my call sign AB8DF.

That will tell you what frequency I am on. Tune your station to that frequency and if you hear me give me a call. If there is a QSO in progress, please wait for a break in the action. Then send your callsign. If I hear you, I will invite you to join the QSO and start a round-table QSO.


Reply to this email if you have questions.


IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW POOR CW IS


Ed

AB8DF


Re: QMX with POTA Yesterday

 

Nice description Jason.
?
Can you detail or link the diode fix please?
?
Thanks


Re: QMX+ with WA3TFS amplifier

 

Allison, thank you, I will do that.? I had removing C17 on my list to test, but didn't try it.? I mistakenly thought that once PTT triggered the relay, it was a non-issue.? I see now that leaving C17 is a problem.
?
Early on I tested +5V to R6 without RF in and the current was stable at 1mA.? With RF in, the current was much larger and unstable, I guess due to the rectified RF!?
--
73,
Jim - AE5JE


Re: QMX issues

 

Intersting name. I don't see many "day's".
?
73.
Jerry/k5sop


Re: What do I check when QMX transmit stops working?

 

Have you Enabled TX PTT in PuTTy? If not here are the steps to do so.
?
  1. Navigate to the QMX Menu:?Access the QMX putty menu using the appropriate method for your QMX device (e.g., using the on-board keys or a connected computer).
  2. Locate the "Transmit" Setting:?Within the menu, find the setting labeled "Transmit".
  3. Enable Transmit:?Press the "E" key to enable transmission for the selected band.?This allows you to transmit on the chosen band.
  4. Locate the "TX PTT +5V" Setting:?In the same menu, find the option labeled "TX PTT +5V".
  5. Enable PTT +5V:?Press the "E" key to enable the +5V signal on the PTT connector during transmission.?This provides the necessary signal to activate the transmitter.
  6. Verify Settings:?Double-check that both "Transmit" and "TX PTT +5V" are enabled for your desired band to ensure proper operation.?.


Re: QMX only hearing static

 

Kai, please don't apologise. No duty for a fast reaction, it's our hobby.
?
Your result points more to a broken PCM1804. It's the highest probability. But to exclude something more you may test this:
  1. Check voltage at IC403 pin 2 and pin 14 to GND. Both should show around 1.6V (pulses with 3.3V high and 50% duty cycle.) But take care not to connect these pins to others. You may destroy IC204. And it's hard to have access to IC403. If you don't want to check these voltages, no problem. If the TX is working there is a high probability the two signals are ok.
  2. Check voltages at IC405 and IC406 pins 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 to GND. For all you should see something around 2.5V.
If you don't want to replace the PCM1804 by yourselves you may contact Jeff Moore (please check th forum for his name).
?
I wish you success. 73 Ludwig


Newly assembled QMX, SWR=1.5 with dummy load

 

Hey,
?
I just assembled this a few days ago, made a couple of contacts with an end-fed. What I found odd is that when I attached a 50 ohm dummy load to the output and measured SWR, it was around 1.5 on 20m and <2 on other bands. Surely it shouldn't be that? What may have I done wrong? Should I worry?
?
73 de HF2J


Re: QMX issues

 

On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 01:47 PM, N4REE - Bob wrote:
Probably because the op fiddled long enough to draw the voltage down to an acceptable value.
12V and a bit more is no problem for a 9V QMX except the PA. So if you operate from 11.xV without transmitting there will be no problem. And there will be nothing like written in the first post.
?
No sidetone could be a result from protection because of a (short) high SWR. Factory reset will reset the protection status but every time and not only after some resets.
?
But what should cause "No audio out"? The audio is switched off in some parts of the menu. But you should see this if watching the display. And I don't know why it should be off in normal RX status and "repaired" by a factory reset. (Ok, if you lower the volume to zero it will be at default after a Factory reset, but default after the first Factory reset.)
?
All this looks to me more like a wiggly contact. After pressing buttons sometimes it's ok and sometimes not.
?
73 Ludwig
?


Re: QMX+ Front Panel Soldering - Alternate Method

 

I followed the instructions explicitly since it was my first build. And I felt like this was indeed one of the tough points to accomplish.
Being new to soldering added to my anxiety of course.
I kinda felt like I was building a ship in a bottle.
But thankfully, even without the ¡®tricks¡¯ of the experience builders above.. I was still able to prevail.. and without issue.
?
My new QMX+ is ¡®on the air¡¯!!!
Happy Easter everyone!
Mike
KK7MMN
?


Re: Thank you Hans

 

Me too. I've often posted how satisfied I am with a self-built, QMX high band. Over a thousand POTA hunting QSOs with it now, and reach as far as Alaska and mid-Germany from central Florida (with simple antennae).? Just finished building the QMX+ last week and have put about 100 QSOs on it. BOTH are fabulous radios! Thanks Hans!
--
72 de N4REE, Bob Easton - QRP CW forever


Re: QMX #12v

 

The Assembly manual clearly states that the PCB board is the heatsink, not the washer.
I've been using a self-built high band, 12v, QMX, in our Florida heat, for many months and have never felt it hot, or even warm to touch. NOT a problem!
?
OTOH, I don't do .
--
72 de N4REE, Bob Easton - QRP CW forever


Re: QMX+ not measuring SWR

 

Sorry for this jumbled stream,? I will make a proper post with screenshots later today. Thank you so much for the help.


On Sat, Apr 19, 2025, 7:54?PM Nico Smith via <nicosmith873=[email protected]> wrote:

What parts should I check for rx? Also now for some reason it says swr is 1.7 on every band when it is not


On Sat, Apr 19, 2025, 1:34?PM DH8WN via <DH8WN=[email protected]> wrote:
Nico,
?
to transmit you use the TX path and for receive the RX path. If one is ok it doesn't mean the other must be ok also.
?
73 Ludwig


Re: QMX+ Front Panel Soldering - Alternate Method

 

I used this method as well, assemble the display, connecting pins and front panel using the top two screws with nut spacers. Solder just the front pins to the display.? Then disassemble and follow the instructions, except that the front pins with the poor access are done.


Re: QMX issues

 

On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 08:27 PM, Stan Dye wrote:
I'm not sure why a bunch of Factory Resets fixed it.
Probably because the op fiddled long enough to draw the voltage down to an acceptable value.
?
Y-O-Y did Han's waste so much time putting multiple LARGE PRINT, red font, voltage warnings in the manuals?? ;)
--
72 de N4REE, Bob Easton - QRP CW forever


Re: #qmx #SSB Firmware beta 1_01_003 release #qmx #ssb

 

For information, with the Windows volume all 100% as well as the Vara sound card (change has no effect) my 20m VarAC output is 2.5W.? That is 1/2 of WSJTX output.


Re: QMX+ Front Panel Soldering - Alternate Method

 

My approach was to use the method described in Hans' instructions for the 2 corner pins. That was enough to establish position. Then, I loosened the screws just enough to allow the assembly to tilt back about 1/4 inch. That gave enough room to make the rest easier ... and without letting the spacers escape.
--
72 de N4REE, Bob Easton - QRP CW forever