开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Re: Possible QMX TX/RX switching race condition? #qmx #receiver #smoke

 

Ok thanks for the confirmation.
?
I only suspected a microcontroller switching fault is that the failure happened after first performing the SSB calibration into a dummy load then testing SWR with the terminal tools also into the same dummy load.
?
I didn't find any other hardware faults? in the receive chain during the repair. It's working fine now so I'll have to see how it holds up over time.
?
Thanks,
Greg
N1TR?


Re: Debugging BS170-related issues

 

Hi Steve,

You can't measure many of the square waves created in this
radio with a 100MHz scope, and expect them to look at all
like a square wave.

A square wave is comprised of odd harmonics of the fundamental
frequency, at say, 30 MHz, your scope could see the fundamental,
and the 3rd harmonic, but would be pretty blind to the 5th.

Also, the usual 6 inch ground wire on the usual 100MHz probe
will be adding in a whole lot of distortion to any signal you
are measuring.

As a good rule of thumb, your scope should have at least 10x
the bandwidth of the non sinusoidal signal you wish to measure.

Your probe's ground wire should be at most 1 inch long.

-Chuck Harris, WA3UQV


On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:12:32 -0700 "Steve N2IC via groups.io"
<n2icarrl@...> wrote:
Thanks, Stan,

I'm going through all this effort before ordering parts because it
was quite a destructive event. One of the BS170's was physically
broken, and the board under it charred.

My scope is an old HP 1740A, 100 MHz. I changed probes, and now the
input side of IC502 looks like a good square wave. However, the
inputs and outputs of IC503C/D are not clean.? IC503A/B look okay.
I'm betting that IC503 was damaged.

Now I'm looking at Q507. I? have read Ludwig's postings on this. With
all the BS170's removed, the Diagnostics screen shows the transmitter
voltage at 10.9 volts. Ludwig says it should be close to 0 volts, but
maybe that is with good BS170's. The two SMPS look fine.

73,
Steve, N2IC





Re: Continuity on #RWTST - #RWTST #QMXplus

 

Stan,

I scoured my post for a personal attack, and could not find
one.

Motor wire is an exotic wire when used in a QRP radio kit.

Compact, intermittent duty, motors quite often are built to
withstand short term very hot operation... often thermally
stressing even 200C rated wire.

These kits are low temperature, low power radios, that come
provisioned with a thermal stripping wire, equivalent to
thermaleze.

A large quantity (2x the total amount required) of the desired
wire was included with each kit. Easily enough to cover the
occasional oops an inexperienced builder may encounter.

Your use of high temperature motor wire, to replace the wire
that comes with these kits, makes your choice an outlier for
the overwhelming majority of builders of these kits.

It appears to me that its principal benefit is that *you*
had it on hand.

An inexperienced builder will find it challenging to use a
knife to completely strip a #28AWG wire without damaging,
or incompletely stripping, the wire.

I find that most inexperienced craftsmen greatly over
estimate the forces required to do fine operations. They
also greatly underestimate the time required to do fine
operations properly. Either can cause disappointing results.

Sanding off wire insulation has its own difficulties. Most
high temperature motor wire insulation is also designed to
protect against abrasion... which is exactly what you are
trying to do when you sand or scrape the insulation off of
the wire. The insulation is almost always tougher than the
copper wire itself, causing the side where you first break
through to the copper to get sanded much more quickly than
the rest of the wire. By the time your are done, the wire
will be in the shape of a flat oval.

If everyone was using, or could be reasonably expected to be
using, high temperature, non-thermal stripping wire on their
kits, then your advice would be spot on.

I believe they are not, but are rather seeing the heat
sinking effect of the large continuous ground planes needed
for high quality RF work. Through the use of poor technique,
or perhaps ineffective soldering equipment, they are not
getting enough heat into the joint to melt (not burn) the
usually easy to strip thermaleze style wire.

A simple match, or a lighter, to pre-strip the wire will help
with that job, and not put the wire at much risk.

-Chuck Harris, WA3UQV


On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 09:52:57 -0700 "Stan Dye via groups.io"
<standye@...> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 09:11 PM, Chuck Harris wrote:


if you use something exotic, such as a
ceramic insulated wire, my tip about using a common lighter
won't work.

You may not know it, so I will help you: You are using an
exotic wire.
Please avoid using personal attacks, Chuck.
Some facts:
1- I can assure you again that I am not using exotic wire.
It is this:

It turns out that you can buy inexpensive wire that has has high
temperature enamel.? It is made for motor windings. It certainly is
not ideal for winding toroids for qrp.? And the enamel will NOT burn
off with a simple lighter.? Get some. Try it. Or not. But I have it,
and I have used it for winding toroids for ATU kits and transformers.
2- I do use the kit wire supplied by qrp-labs for my qrp-labs kits.
The smaller diameter wire provided will indeed burn off with
soldering or a lighter - it is of a thermaleze type. 3- For the older
kits with the .6mm wire, here is a quote from Hans' transformer
winding doc: "If using 0.60mm wire, scrape the wire enamel from this
1cm section. The enamel on the 0.60mm wire will be very difficult to
remove using heat; so it is better to scrape it or sand it." 4- I
agree with Hans.? I don't think that wire had a thermaleze type
insulation, either. 5- I, too, have recently retired from a 40+ year
career of electrical engineering design/build/test.? I'm not an
expert with RF circuits, but I do know my wire and how to use it.
Stan KC7XE





Re: Enclosure wrong size

 

Dudley,
?
From page 8 of the rev3 QMX assembly manual:
?
14)? PCBs may be supplied with a 5mm empty “rail” down one or more sides. This is an
artefact of manufacturing and should be removed. It should snap off gently with
careful application pliers or even with firm force from your fingers.?
?
Jerry, KE7ER
?
?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 07:19 AM, Jerry Gaffke wrote:

Dudley,
?
Is that "line" cut into the board?? Is there a similar score on cut into the board on the opposite side?
If so, it is a remanent of the manufacturing process, used to hold the board when going through the machine
that places and solders down all the surface mount parts.??
?
Just snap that rail off, perhaps using a pair of pliers.
?
Jerry, KE7ER
?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 07:07 AM, Dudley - N4CDH wrote:
?
Hide quoted text

?

I either got the wrong enclosure or the wrong main board for a QCX+.? The board is much wider than the enclosure.? There is a line on the board which is the size the board should have been, but nothing mentioned about cutting the board to make it fit.? Besides I don't have the tools to cut it.? Instructions say it should slide right into the enclosure.? Anyone else experienced this.? Other than one capacitor missing this is the only problem so far.


Re: Enclosure wrong size

 

Hi Dudley,
?
You just need to snap off the extra off cut. You will probably find that the? mini board where the 3.5mm sockets are mounted to has a similar extra bit. You just need to snap that off as well.
?
Mel. M0KMD


Re: Enclosure wrong size

 

Dudley,
?
Is that "line" cut into the board?? Is there a similar score on cut into the board on the opposite side?
If so, it is a remanent of the manufacturing process, used to hold the board when going through the machine
that places and solders down all the surface mount parts.??
?
Just snap that rail off, perhaps using a pair of pliers.
?
Jerry, KE7ER
?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 07:07 AM, Dudley - N4CDH wrote:

I either got the wrong enclosure or the wrong main board for a QCX+.? The board is much wider than the enclosure.? There is a line on the board which is the size the board should have been, but nothing mentioned about cutting the board to make it fit.? Besides I don't have the tools to cut it.? Instructions say it should slide right into the enclosure.? Anyone else experienced this.? Other than one capacitor missing this is the only problem so far.


Re: Enclosure wrong size

 

From the manual:
?

The PCB may be supplied with 1/4-inch / 5mm approx of blank PCB strips along one or more edges; these are part of the manufacturing process during which the PCBs are assembled on a larger panel. Simply snap the waste strip off with finger-and-thumb or pliers.


Enclosure wrong size

 

I either got the wrong enclosure or the wrong main board for a QCX+.? The board is much wider than the enclosure.? There is a line on the board which is the size the board should have been, but nothing mentioned about cutting the board to make it fit.? Besides I don't have the tools to cut it.? Instructions say it should slide right into the enclosure.? Anyone else experienced this.? Other than one capacitor missing this is the only problem so far.
++


Hans, Have a nice holiday with your family.

 

Thanks for all the SSB :)
from
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
73 DE muhsin TA1MHS
?
?


Re: SSB audio distortion #qmx #SSB Firmware beta 1_01_003 release #qmx #ssb

 

Hi
strangely I had the same problem.
I was using a uhf/vhf handhelds mike.
after I found out that there was a LED connected inside the mike case
I took it out
now it is perfect
73 DE muhsin TA1MHS


Re: Difficulty after loading ssb firmware beta 1-01-03 on QMX+

 

I've seen this before when users have deleted the previous firmware before copying over the new firmware. The procedure is to just copy or drag over the new firmware and let the radio replace the old firmware with it. Corruption seems to occur when you manually delete the old firmware first.?
--
73, Dan - W2DLC


Re: Very simple QMX software request

 

In relation to this topic, is there a shortcut to the "tune SWR" menu? It would be very convenient to access this menu with a simple key press rather than navigate the menus, particularly when using an ATU, to facilitate band changing.
?
If there isn't already one, could I suggest a long press on the "Tune" knob to take us to the Tune SWR menu? If there is one that I missed, apologies!
?
Many thanks, Hans, for your Herculean efforts with this firmware. It must have taken huge effort to create it in the first place and your responsiveness to issues has been superb! I'm loving it! I hope that you managed a break, although I've still seen responses trickling in on the forum!
?
73
?
Ellis
GM4GZW


Re: SSB audio distortion #qmx #SSB Firmware beta 1_01_003 release #qmx #ssb

 

I just found another mic capsule on an Arduino MAX9814 board. Took that off to try again.
?
Without calibrated, much better audio! Adjusted mic gain and compression. I set the noise gate to 30 and everything else as default. Still not perfect but very much improved and very usable!
?
Ran the calibration through and left every thing else as it was and the audio is very rough.
?
I'm going to factory reset it again and dial in the setting I was happy with and leave it at that, unless anyone has any suggestions to improve calibration results to improve the audio.
?
Note that there is a lot of merit in what Hans says. Not every electret mic are the same. This last one that I found on an Arduino board seems to work nicely.
?
Cheers,
?
Mel. M0KMD
?


Re: SSB audio distortion #qmx #SSB Firmware beta 1_01_003 release #qmx #ssb

 

Hi Myles,
?
Yep, I tried the dial back as well. I eventually settled on mic gain of 65 but the audio was still rough without background noise.
?
Thanks for sharing your settings.
?
Are these setting post calibration?
?
Cheers,
?
Mel. M0KMD.


Re: SSB audio distortion #qmx #SSB Firmware beta 1_01_003 release #qmx #ssb

 

Hans' suggestion of microphone can be found on the beta page: under the heading Microphone Choice.? Though I suspect this microphone is more sensitive than needed for HF radio transmission.
?
I had a similar issue with the noise you describe when not speaking.? I found it was caused by having the Mic. gain set a little to high.? The sweet spot for me was to actually transmit silence and dial the gain down until that noise disappeared.
?
My Mic. gain is set at 75, with Mic. compression set at 14, and Transmit EQ. Global gain set at -8.? Just for reference as all Mics. are different...


Re: SSB audio distortion #qmx #SSB Firmware beta 1_01_003 release #qmx #ssb

 

Hi Hans,
?
Yep, that did cross my mind..
?
In fact my first attempt was to use a PC gaming headset with mic. The audio gain was very low from the headset compared to the electret mic's I found in my junk box.
?
These electrets seemed to work quite well on my PC. I would have thought they would work equally as well on the QMX...
?
I forgot the mention, I also removed an electret mic from a Baofeng speaker mic to use on the QMX. That gave the same results as the other electret mic's.
?
Could you remind me of the mic that you used please?
?
Cheers.
?
Mel. M0KMD


Re: Very simple QMX software request

 

OR...one could switch to their trusty Yaesu FT-450D, as I do, during antenna "tuning" :0)
72,
Bill, N4QA/4/QRP Oak Island ( OKI ), North Carolina, U.S.A.


Re: SSB audio distortion #qmx #SSB Firmware beta 1_01_003 release #qmx #ssb

 

Did you leave predistortion off during calibration?
?
Let me give that a go..
?
Cheers,
?
Mel. M0KMD


Re: SSB audio distortion #qmx #SSB Firmware beta 1_01_003 release #qmx #ssb

 

Yep, done that one. I was using headphones on the IC 7300 whilst testing TX on QMX.
?
Cheers.
?
Mel, M0KMD


Re: SSB audio distortion #qmx #SSB Firmware beta 1_01_003 release #qmx #ssb

 

Hi Mel

It's possible the microphone isn't sensitive enough. Turning up the gain increases the audio but also the noise (if the mic SNR isn't enough)

73 Hans G0UPL


On Thu, Mar 27, 2025, 13:23 Mehmet Dinch via <msdinch=[email protected]> wrote:
Well, I bit the bullet and installed the 003 FW.
Update of FW went all fine, no issue there.
I wired up a electret mic I found in my junk box.
Tested the mic on pc and sounded fine.
I made an adapter using the electret mic and a foot switch for ptt.
The Mic and ppt switch works. But...
Testing SSB TX with QMX on dummy load and listening on my ICOM 7300, the audio is badly distorted before calibration and even worse post calibration. So much so that the speech is unintelligible.
The audio sounds like the QMX is only picking up the peak signals from my voice.
Most of the calibration plots look nothing like the example ones from the release notes. And only a few mildly resemble the examples.
Adjusting mic gain to about 70 seems to improve the audio. However, every time I key up,? there is now an awful lot of noise before I even start speaking. Once I start speaking the audio is ok'ish with a load of background noise.
I tried messing about with other SSB settings with no improvements.
I did find a second electret mic that gave me similar results.
I have now set it back to factory default and seeking advice.
Any suggestions?
?
Mel. M0KMD.