¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

QMX SSB Vertical lines on VARA waterfall?

 

Would any of you happen to know what these vertical lines are on the waterfall?

I'm trying to do a Winlink P2P connection with a friend 30 miles away via NVIS and noticed these lines would sometimes occur.




QMX+ Transmitting on 10m but no receive

 

Is 10m active today? Because I get around 3w out but I hear nothing on ft8


Re: shorted PA on TX, dead SMPSU?

 

Hi Stan
?
Thanks for the pointers.
?
I got hold of a current-limiting PSU, and did the tests suggested in the wiki here: /g/QRPLabs/wiki/37128
?
on PCB#1:
step 2, I got Vcc = 4.1v (should be 0v)
step 3, I got Vcc = 4.2v (should be 0v), I stopped there
?
on PCB#2
step 1, I got Vdd = 0.67v (should be 3-3.3v). I stopped there
?
Here's the results with a 8v supply, 100mA current limit, holding down the power switch:
?
(on PCB#1)
12v goes to 5.3v?
Vcc goes 0.2v to 2.1v
pwr_on goes 7.4v to 0v
pwr_hold stays at 0v
?
(on PCB#2)
12v goes 0v to 5.2v
Vdd goes 0v to 0.1v
lin_reg_en goes 0v to 0.01v
?
when I do click the power button, current limits at 100mA every time.
?
Hope this is useful
Cheers
Dan
?
?


Re: SOTA QMX SSB

 

Roger great to hear its working! Thanks for sharing. Your picture got me curious - what antenna are you using with the tuner and Elecraft balun?

73 KD2WQI

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 1:06?PM Roger Dallimore via <mw0idx=[email protected]> wrote:
Last night I downloaded the latest firmware and threw together a rather basic microphone, and after going the the calibration tests it appeared to be working well into my main station transceiver. This afternoon I went to my local SOTA summit and was very pleased how well the QMX on SSB worked. Although I'm mostly a CW op its great to have another another mode available in such a small radio, ideal for SOTA.? ?
?
Thank you Hans for all your hard work on this project, I enjoy building and learning about your radios just as much as I do operating them.
?
73
Roger MW0IDX
?


Re: com port conflict

 

About the best option for sharing physical COMM ports is using TCP/IP.??
?? > Something like SoCAT can be used and is available on may operating systems, but that would require a lot of manual configuring.
?? > I believe FLRig is available on most operating systems, and is a good option for doing this.
????? WSJT-X has a radio option for it, and most logging programs will also connect to it.
?
There is also a hardware option - create your own 1-wire (plus ground) serial BUS. And connect to multiple physical computer ports.
?? Just mimic the Icom CI-V connections, which requires several 2N2222 (2 at each device).
?? Icom uses addresses, but the reality is that every device connected, will receive the data, and any device can send.
?? Addressing, just makes sure the right device acts on it, but in your case, it would work.
?? I won't go into any more detail here, since this really is more effort than value (in my opinion), but mentioned as an option.
?
-------
Robert Giuliano
KB8RCO


Re: Available Hand Mics for QMX SSB ?

 

Got your order, Glen. Also sent you a private message John.
?
My bubble mailers didn't show up Saturday like they were supposed to, Amazon is telling me they should show up by Tuesday, so it looks like I should start shipping these out by Wednesday.
?
Thanks for the great response guys. I have been having fun printing, putting together, and testing? microphones all weekend. I will order more parts as needed to fulfill orders, just trying to make it so as many of us as possible can enjoy this awesome mic that K6ARK designed the 3d print for.
?
My email is good in QRZ.com for anyone interested in getting one of these, send me an email and I will send you payment details.
?
Erik


Re: Simple and very tiny mic for the QMX. #qmx #ssb

 

I try to repurpose that stuff all the time. Did it have that ribbon wire in it? Thats the wire with laquered ribbon wrapped on some kind of poly thread that's? impossible to solder; found in most ear bud/mic sets.
?
If so how do you solder that stuff?
--
regards,
Bryan, N0LUF


Re: Software Development and Requirements Creep

 

Either way would have been fine.
?
Releasing SSB firmware for 80m only, no CESS, limited menu, no support for CW or digital modes,
no calibration step would have shut down the "This EER SSB Stuff Can't Possibly Work" posts.
And many here would have been happy to try out an early version of 80m SSB.
?
Pushing through and releasing it in more or less final form may be for the best, assuming Hans recovers.
It's mostly bug reports being reported, often stuff Hans wasn't aware of, not reports of needed additional functionality.
It would have taken months for Hans to find those bugs, releasing piecemeal would likely have a larger total bug count,
more documentation to write, more discussion in the forum.. All at once makes best use of his time.
?
I'm just happy it's out, and that it mostly works.
?
Jerry, KE7ER
?
?
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 02:55 AM, Chris wrote:

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 07:52 AM, Hans Summers wrote:
?
Yes, I believe you are 100% correct. Much of it could indeed have been released piecemeal as releases in their own right.?
?
?
If you had then I think there would have been a massive amount of demands for the additional features to be added NOW!? There would have been massive criticism.? The "are we there yet" posts would have? been replaced by "I want it NOW!" posts.? This would have been far more stressful and harmful to the QMX Labs reputation.
?


Re: #qmx #SSB Firmware beta 1_01_003 release #qmx #ssb

 

Hans:
?
I tried changing the 80/20 band swap advanced setting and it didn't fix the problem, but it changed the behavior a lot. It now runs longer before quitting.
?
?
In another thread, others with this problem are suggesting that the configured center frequency in the band table might have something to do with the problem. I believe that's used as the frequency to run the tests.
?
I'm thinking I may have to improve the BPF center frequencies to fix the problem.
?
M


Re: Odd 20 meter calibration

 

I found the setting in the second page of the Advanced configuration menu. It changed things (it runs longer now), but didn't fix them:
?
M


Re: Odd 20 meter calibration

 

My version 1 PCB installed an earlier band table with the band centers on the FT8 Frequencies. I'm having this sort of trouble on 80 and 40 meters.
?
I think there may be a problem if the test frequency is too far down the slope of the BPF curve resulting in low signal feedback for the tests. I've mentioned it to Hans and he told me to try changing the 80/20 band swap, but I haven't quite figured out what he meant yet. ?My BPF filters are skewed quite a bit on some bands (but the manual indicated this was nothing to worry about at the time).
?
I'll try to figure that out, but I'll also try moving the band centers and see what that changes in the calibration test.
?
?


Re: Available Hand Mics for QMX SSB ?

 

Erik,
I also would like one kit in Black.? Sent you an email also, please advise how you would like to be paid by return email.
Glen, WB4KTF, Austin, TX
wb4ktf@...
--
73s,
Glen, WB4KTF, Austin, TX


Re: FT8 in USB mode - not working right?

 

Also duplicated this exact same issue. I spent time trouble shooting but found no solution and now just switch to Digi when needed.?


Re: FT8 in USB mode - not working right?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

At first I tried clicking the "Update hamlib" button in WSJTX. This did not fix the issue. So I copied over the latest manually. WSJTX will now allow me to select the QMX.?

Tony
AD0VC


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Richard Dyer via groups.io <rdyer39@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2025 8:05 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] FT8 in USB mode - not working right?
?
Hamlib 4.6.2 or better if you want QMX support. Hamlib. 4.6.1 is BROKEN!?


Re: FT8 in USB mode - not working right?

 

Hamlib 4.6.2 or better if you want QMX support. Hamlib. 4.6.1 is BROKEN!?


Re: QMX+ Strange Audio Artifact - Help, Please...

 

Does this occur when transmitting into a dummy load?
73, Don N2VGU


Re: Software Development and Requirements Creep

 

Well said John. I agree with you.

Mike Krieger


On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 7:34?AM John Olsavicky via <kc3pby=[email protected]> wrote:
I rarely post because I believe I can learn more from listening than from sharing my limited experience.
?
I'm a customer of QRP Labs, and as such, I would like to add my opinion to this discussion about Software development. From my point of view, what Hans has offered to the amateur radio community is more than a great little radio. It's a chance for a consumer to have a glimpse behind the curtain and the opportunity to have meaningful input.?
?
The one outstanding feature that Hans produces is the engineering that goes into his products. From a consumer's view, that is what stands out. I appreciate the chance to watch something wonderful come into the world. Congratulations, Hans... and my thanks.
?
KC3PBY - John
?
?


Re: Simulation of #QMX Filters + planned 6m in QMX #qmx

 

Peter,?
Good idea! I think you have a winning idea.?

Altho the 60-15 m version is the sweet spot for me.?
--
73, Dan? NM3A


Re: FT8 in USB mode - not working right?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

The advantage of USB mode over DIGI mode is the ability to control the power level. DIGI is my preferred mode but there are times when reduced power is useful.

Tony
AD0VC


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Stan Dye via groups.io <standye@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2025 12:41 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] FT8 in USB mode - not working right?
?
I have also duplicated the problem in running FT8 in USB mode in WSJT-X.
After the first transmission of the automatic exchange, it won't transmit again.
?
My first note: FT8/FT4 will always work better in digi mode, so why are we trying this??
So a fix may be low priority, unless this also affects other WSJT-X modes that need SSB mode.
?
Anyway, I tried to diagnose it a bit, changing settings and VFOs used, etc.? I tried what I think is the least complicated settings, for radio control, i.e. setting both 'Mode' and 'Split Operation' to 'None', and setting mode manually and selecting VFO A.? But the problem persists.? I turned on the QMX CAT log, and observed the commands sent to QMX, and I see the correct commands being issued, but on the 2nd cycle when the TX command is sent, for some reason QMX immediately reverts to RX mode (per its log). This same action happens on successive cycles.? I have no idea why.
See annotated log excerpt below:

01:17:26 IF; IF00007074000 ? ? +00000000002000000 ; [This is from polling which I have set to 60sec]
01:17:26 FA; FA00007074000; ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ?? [This is from polling which I have set to 60sec]
01:17:26 MD; MD2; ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ?? [This is from polling which I have set to 60sec]
01:18:19 TX;??????????????????????????????????????? [Start of 1st TX cycle]
01:18:19 ID; ID020;???????????????????????????????? [it likes to send an ID cmd after TX]
01:18:19 TX ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??????????????? [QMX internal log msg noting change to TX?]
01:18:26 IF; IF00007074000 ? ? +00000000012000000 ; [next Poll]
01:18:26 FA; FA00007074000;???????????????????????? [ "" ]
01:18:27 MD; MD2;?????????????????????????????????? [ "" ]
01:18:33 RX;??????????????????????????????????????? [to RX -> end of 1st 13 sec TX cycle]
01:18:33 RX???????????????????????????????????????? [QMX notes change to RX?]
01:18:50 TX;??????????????????????????????????????? [Start of 2nd TX cycle]
01:18:50 ID; ID020;???????????????????????????????? [it likes to send an ID cmd after TX]
01:18:50 TX ??????????????????????????????????????? [QMX notes change to TX?]
01:18:50 RX ??????????????????????????????????????? [QMX immediately shows change to RX! Why?]
01:19:03 RX;??????????????????????????????????????? [to RX -> end of 2nd 13 sec TX cycle]
01:19:20 TX;??????????????????????????????????????? [Start of 3rd TX cycle]
01:19:20 ID; ID020;???????????????????????????????? [it likes to send an ID cmd after TX]
01:19:20 TX ??????????????????????????????????????? [QMX notes change to TX?]
01:19:20 RX ??????????????????????????????????????? [QMX immediately shows change to RX! Why?]
01:19:26 IF; IF00007074000 ? ? +00000000002000000 ; [next Poll]
01:19:26 FA; FA00007074000;???????????????????????? [ "" ]
01:19:27 MD; MD2;?????????????????????????????????? [ "" ]
01:19:33 RX; ?????????????????????????????????????? [to RX -> end of 3rd 13 sec TX cycle]
01:19:39 RX;
?


Re: wsjt-X audio level

 

On 23/03/2025 11:55, Martin DK3UW via groups.io wrote:
a good signal is only just above 20 in WSJTX. is there any place to increase that ?
Martin,

There is an Audio gain setting for each band in the Band Configuration menu.

73 Alan G4ZFQ