Re: QLG2 with QMX+ Poor Sensitivity
Hi Tony
I think that most probably a QLG2 has better sensitivity because of the LNA
in the QLG2 active antenna patch. However that also means it has a lower
IP3, so in some circumstances it may have
By
Hans Summers
·
#128131
·
|
Re: QLG2 with QMX+ Poor Sensitivity
Dan,
Hans¡¯s write up on the QLG1 indicates the large ground plane under the
patch antenna contributes to its excellent sensitivity. I think you¡¯re on
the right track with trying a ground plane
By
Tony Scaminaci
·
#128130
·
|
Re: My QMX + Sidelined by Flaky PCM1804
I agree with Dirk¡¯s assessment. Twenty years is a long time for a
semiconductor to be on the market so TI is gently pushing customers toward
newer devices. I found no reliable reports of the PCM1804
By
Tony Scaminaci
·
#128129
·
|
Re: QMX/QMX+ T507 Winding Sense
Thanks for the replies Mike, Chris and Bob. Well said Chris. Bob, in my
testing it made no difference which way they were wound. I even tried
"jumble" winding one of the windings so it had no
By
Ronald Taylor
·
#128128
·
|
Re: QMX/QMX+ T507 Winding Sense
Do you have any photos or diagrams showing what the incorrect winding scheme you had looks like.
I realise that a number of people are concerned that it isn't clear how the T507 transformers are
By
Chris, G5CTH
·
#128127
·
|
Re: Progrock2 and an old scanner
The square wave actually is better. The original crystal spec is (desired
freq)-10.7 (IF) /3 (third overtone)
Square wave means that there is usable energy at the
By
Larry Acklin
·
#128126
·
|
Re: QMX RIT Issue
Hello Raimund
Are you using the latest firmware? What is the problem here? I believe all
RIT requests were fulfilled.
73 Hans
By
Hans Summers
·
#128125
·
|
Re: QMX RIT Issue
can also confirm this : entering the RIT menu for the first time after the update I was able to do steps of 10Hz.
hope it will be fixed very(!) fast.
By
Raimund Reh
·
#128124
·
|
Re: 100 watt CW amp
That would be the really hard way to go.? Little things like the
TR switching is not adequate for 100W without modification.
When amps are combined that is done at the core amp module
level? then
By
ajparent1/kb1gmx
·
#128123
·
|
Re: #U4B #Android #OTG
#OTG
#u4b
#Android
Hi G.eorge
I believe the U4B requires 5v from the usb cable to get the terminal program to start automatically.
I would carefully check the pcb on the U4B to make sure you see 5v upstream of the
By
VE3KCL
·
#128122
·
|
100 watt CW amp
Hi,
Wondering if anyone has tinkered with idea of combining 2 of the 50watt
qcx amps using RF combiners
Thx
AA6ST
By
Sameer T
·
#128121
·
|
QMX plus, new build, problem on 6 meters?
QMX +, new build, all bands except 6 meters, receive and transmit, but not 6 meters.? Transmit on 6 puts out about 25 MW, about a 1/4 of a watt, but draws same DC amps as on other bands, about 1.2
By
Emory Haines WM3M
·
#128120
·
|
Re: #U4B #Android #OTG
#OTG
#u4b
#Android
Hi George
If you have the right cable
we got QDXs, QMXs work with no problem.
I don't see why it shouldn't work
73 DE muhsin TA1MHS
ps. Spy stuff eh?
By
Muhsin TA1MHS
·
#128119
·
|
#qmx AM Mode
#qmx
Primarily for fun it seems an AM mode would be simple to incorporate and a stepping stone to SSB.? I know this would be limited to 2W.
By
Chris KB1NLW
·
#128118
·
|
#U4B #Android #OTG
#OTG
#u4b
#Android
Greeting QRP-LABS fans!
i Am trying something i have not see of or heard elsewhere...
i Am trying to connect the U4B balloon tracker to an Andeoid device using an OTG connection and running the
By
George
·
#128117
·
|
Re: QLG2 with QMX+ Poor Sensitivity
Thanks for the input on your KLG2.
Mike Krieger
[email protected]> wrote:
By
Mike Krieger
·
#128116
·
|
New Chat: QMX Build Report
#chat-notice
A new chat has been created:
During the COVID lock downs we had down under, I built two QCX which both fired up first go without any issues other than tweaking the toroids to see if I could get a
By
Group Notification <noreply@...>
·
#128115
·
|
Re: QCX & Ant Tuning
Eric,
Beautiful build job. Especially the print on the face plate and the antenna ports on the top.
i have purchased two built ZM2 AMUs and didn¡¯t like the way they were constructed so rebuilt
By
David Wilcox K8WPE
·
#128114
·
|
Re: QCX & Ant Tuning: choice of tuners
I should have mentioned that i have also used an ATU-100 with that same EFRW + 9:1. It's nice to just push a button to tune, but I get lower VSWRs with the manual tuners.
By
Steve in Okinawa
·
#128113
·
|
Re: QLG2 with QMX+ Poor Sensitivity
Mike, Tony,
I have had very similar experience with my QLG1 (x2) and QLG2 (x2). The QLG1's patch antenna definitely seems better. However, I have not tried it with the QLG2's antenna on a
By
Daniel Walter
·
#128112
·
|