Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- QRPLabs
- Messages
Search
Re: Dire need for a part!
Hi all FYI Digikey's cheapest?US shipping option is FedEx Ground (4 days) at $6.99. Mouser's cheapest shipping option is UPS Ground at $7.99.? It isn't $15...?? 73 Hans G0UPL On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:06?AM Jim Strohm <jim.strohm@...> wrote:
|
Ideas please
I built one of the early QMX rigs, S/N 338, and it's done great ever since, about 2 1/2 months, until last week. I gave it the ultimate test by transmitting without an antenna and not being observant so did it a couple of times. It took it at first, but eventually gave up and shorted one of the finals.
I replaced the finals and D106 zener diode it shorted also. It came up and did fine so put it back in the case. It worked for an hour or so then the same thing, short causing the power supply to current limit to 1 Amp. This time D106 was fine. I replaced all the finals and to be safe the driver IC503, 74ACT08D, chip. Tested and all ok so back in the case. Again it lasted about an hour with FT8 and bang. Same short. What could be causing it to repeatedly fry the finals? Actually only one of the finals shorts. The other 3 all test good. The antenna is connected with SWR of 1.0. Power out on 20M is 4.5 watts and 40M is 4 watts. Now this evening with it out of the box and just replacing the one bad BS170 it's worked for an hour and a half and still is ok. Could being in the case causes too much heat build up? I don't see anywhere where the case touches anything. Noticed today an oddity, the QMX display kind of flickers as it powers up. No flicker once it's up, but I don't remember that occurring previously. ??? It makes me think that there is something that is putting a heavy load on the voltage as it powers up so the display isn't seeing the full voltage. I don't see that indicated on the meter on the power supply. Ideas? Help! 73, Cliff, AE5ZA |
Re: Dire need for a part!
Barb, I prefer to buy from Tier 1 disti -- but with USA shipping higher than a cat's back on Halloween, and the large number of SMT parts needed to make an order that makes good economic?sense -- sometimes it's better to take a chance on buying direct from China, or from a second- or third-tier vendor like Walmart. ? As their business model, Walmart sells trash bags and Cream of Wheat, not SMT inductors. ? ?But if you buy 200 SMT inductors, at least a few of them have to be good. ? And it's cheaper to bin your own from Walmart parts than to pay $15 for $0.03 of parts from Mouser or Digikey. ? It was a sad, sad day indeed when Digikey stopped their free shipping?on prepaid orders.? I haven't tried ... if I sent them a check for $15 or $20 of hobbyist components without any shipping on the?check, would they send the parts or send back my check? ? ?Someone should try that -- alternatively, have their 12-year-old daughter?write out the order by hand, explaining her situation and the Grrrl-STEM project she needed the parts for. ? 73 Jim N6OTQ On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 5:50?PM <wb2cba@...> wrote:
|
QMX Case fit & finish
I solved an intermittent QMX audio issue and thought I would share what I discovered. I noticed the case required some effort to squeeze closed properly and for the small end screws to align. The audio problem appeared after the final assembly, but I never experienced the audio squeal when the back was off. I later found that pressing on the main board by the power supplies would recreate the problem. I then realized my case was pressing down on one of the nylon power supply mounting screws - the one closest to the middle of the board. I used my wire cutters to nip off enough of the screw to get the case to snap shut with no effort. Now the audio issue is gone and the rig is 100% complete, making dozens of great QRP QSOs on CW & some FT8 for good measure. What an amazing feat of engineering :-)?
I hope this helps someone with a similar issue. Perhaps a countersunk screw would work well here, but trimming the edge did the trick.? ? |
Re: Dire need for a part!
Sometimes when you google on the part description and include the vendor (Walmart, in this case) you will get the Walmart link in?what google returns. ? No, Walmart is NOT an electronics component vendor, but their Borg-sized computers seem to be able to find this kind of thing.? Question is, are they Radio Shack-quality (IOW, floor ?sweepings)? I've purchased a few electromechanical pieces from Walmart?-- mostly battery connectors and power plugs -- when they were cheapest AND fastest guaranteed delivery.? Somewhat surprisingly, I wasn't disappointed.? So don't rule Walmart out. 73 Jim N6OTQ On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 4:56?PM james jones <j2@...> wrote:
|
Re: Another QMX failure
Hans,
I am VERY glad to hear the QSX will not be tiny like the QMX.? I am an experienced kit builder and the QMX was really tough for me to build and I'm hoping the new SMPS boards I ordered will solve my issue of "Now it works, now it doesn't" with my QMX.? If it doesn't I'll chalk the loss up to my lack of skills. Right now if someone asks me if they should build a QMX I'm telling them if you are a well experienced kit builder with a lot of good test equipment, have great eyesight and trouble shooting skills the QMX is for you.? And being at least a BSEE would be great too.? Otherwise save yourself the $$$ and heartache and get something easier to build. Sorry Hans but that's how I feel.?? 73, Bill NZ0T |
Re: Dire need for a part!
开云体育Walmart shows they have 200 0805 47uh 10% smd parts for $13.49.?I’ve not tried ordering but they certainly are listed on their website.
YMMV
Jim w0nkn? On Sep 4, 2023, at 4:43 PM, N5SE via groups.io <bwmoore@...> wrote:
|
Re: Dire need for a part!
开云体育
David (WA5DJJ)
Can you please give me a detailed explanation how in the world you got through WalMart to get taped smd parts. I have tried everything to duplicate your feat and failed miserabley. Thanks in advance.
73, Billy (N5SE)
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of David R. Hassall WA5DJJ via groups.io <dhassall@...>
Sent: Friday, September 1, 2023 14:49 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [QRPLabs] Dire need for a part! ?
Dear members,
I found some on line and ordered them.?? They should be here soon.?? I will have extras when they get here so if anyone else needs a SMD 0805 47uH inductor please let me know.?? I am willing to share and I will have quite a few extras. -- 73 Dave WA5DJJ SUPER GRABBER WEBSITE: -- N5SE Billy Wayne Moore 7066 Shady Knoll Ln Willis, TX 77318-6324 Phone: 936-537-2975??? |
Re: FT8 for U3?
On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 08:28 PM, Jerry Moyer wrote:
True but with a circular polarity antenna on one end or the other, deep multi-path cancellations are virtually eliminated because it causes each of the wave fronts to arrive at a different and constantly rotating polarity. ?As a result only one of the arriving wave fronts at any given moment will be the same polarity as the receiving antenna and all others will arrive at that moment at a lesser signal strength. ?Assumes a space wave / direct wave only. Circular or mixed polarization is good at FM broadcast, and it's used to get around a few things in the auto world. If you use the vehicle chassis as an end fed half wave at 100Mhz then you'll see a classic dipole polar response. But a dipole is also responsive to the vertical component at the the? end of a dipole. So if you transmit circular of mixed then the end feed dipole effect of a vehicle body become almost eliminated and the dipole appear as good as omnidirectional. I've got the measurements to prove it, from my own portfolio of work 25 years ago when I had to measure this stuff ;-) But not much use at HF. Once again, the reflecting medium determines the output polarization regardless of what the incident wave is. Multipath was a pet project of mine some 25 years ago when designing diversity antennas. My old workbench below, including an HP Multipath Simulator...the rack on the left. -- - 73 de Andy - |
Re: I completed the assembly of the new QMX
GIUSEPPE
good evening everyone, finally this afternoon the Q103 and D101 spare parts for the QMX power board arrived, tomorrow I hope to be able to replace them but I hope more for a miracle for loading the firmware and starting it up.? 73 to all Giuseppe iu8eun Il Dom 20 Ago 2023, 05:23 Hans Summers <hans.summers@...> ha scritto:
|
Re: QDX - protection of BS17O PA
Hello Paul |
Re: FT8 for U3?
开云体育True but with a circular polarity antenna on one end or the other, deep multi-path cancellations are virtually eliminated because it causes each of the wave fronts to arrive at a different and constantly rotating polarity. ?As a result only one of the arriving wave fronts at any given moment will be the same polarity as the receiving antenna and all others will arrive at that moment at a lesser signal strength. ?There is a cost of about 3 dB in gain up front but that is more than offset by the reduction in multi-path fading. ?This should work regardless of whether or not it is VHF bouncing around a mountain or HF bouncing off the ionosphere. ?This method of reducing multi-path fading is most often used by FM broadcasters in the US to prevent “picket fencing” to a mobile receiver but I have also employed this same method to enable UHF FM 2-way NLOS communications inside and around buildings and even underground. ?But if the cause of the fading is actually due to Doppler shift then using a circular antenna would most likely be ineffective. ??-Jerry AC5JM? On Sep 4, 2023, at 1:02 PM, Da Amazin' man G0FTD via groups.io <punkbiscuit@...> wrote:
|
Re: QDX Rev 4 Only Shows 80M Band After Working Near T2
I seem to have a similar problem. My Rev 4 was ordered assembled and has been working fine for months.? I upgraded the firmware to 1_10 and then found the only band available is 40.? Multiple installs of different firmware and factory resets have failed to make a difference.?
n3jwj |
Re: QDX - protection of BS17O PA
I agree with Hans.? However, its more than cost or size.
From experience... Adding protections considerably complicates the transmit section and adds a large number of parts that can also fail or if kitted be damaged in assembly. It also can if "broken" cause a larger number of problems that for the inexperienced would be annoyingly difficult to repair. Add to that the best protection is prevention and that means making sure the load is? a reasonable approximation as high SWR can mean unusually low impedance, or unreasonable reactance that presents a troublesome load. From my experience in antennas the number of cases where it "works great" usually meant an untuned antenna, out of band antenna or if more than one? the wrong antenna. When corrected the usual response was "Wow" or "why? did it work before?".? What is forgotten is anything can radiate, doing it well can make a massive difference.? ? -- Allison ------------------ Post online only, please no email. |
Re: QDX - protection of BS17O PA
Dear Hans, So, I am going to put two 3 amp power diodes in the power line to drop the 12V to 10.5VDC.?? Since I ordered the 47V Zener diodes, I am going to add them to the QDX output amplifier and I am going to put the 1N4148 diode on L14.? I am only doing this to prevent the QDX from self destruction during the time that the new operator has time to learn to check the other killer things that causes failures.?? I want them to experience the same amazement of 40M contacts to the far east with a ground mounted vertical antenna with 3.5 watts when the station calls them.? Or working all over the USA on JS8CAL using this amazing little black box with no knobs.? Take care and have fun. 73 Dave WA5DJJ ? |
Re: FT8 for U3?
On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 05:43 PM, Jerry Moyer wrote:
Aren’t we really talking about multi-path cancellation? ?That commonly affects VHF and above. ?The way to deal with multi-path is to use multiple polarization or even circular polarization at one or both of the antennas. ?Am I missing something??The reflecting media is what controls the finally emitted polarization. You can send any polarization to the ionosphere, it will take it in and then spew it out at what IT determines. Same for VHF/UHF,? not ionospheric). All down to what the reflecting *media* determines based up on it's spacial geometry, angle of incidence etc. Long and complicated subjected, but one I've got quite? a bit of both amateur and professional pedigree ;-) I've also done tests, synchronized TX's on HF separated by by 10Hz or so feeding horizontal / vertical? mixed polarization. Makes no difference what polarization you send, ionosphere is the dictator,. Ionosphere takes your input and then decides upon the "output" and we are it's slaves. -- - 73 de Andy - |
Re: QDX Hiband , reduce power to 0dbm for xverter
Thanks for those ideas !?
Itnworks , yes but from 15 up it leaks like ~3db, and on ft8 3db when you are qrp is unfortunately a gamechanger.? I already did the condensator mod fromnthenbig topic what permitted me with adjusting the coils to get the higher bands up to 2w/2.5w. Thats why the idea came to me tonuse itnas transverter driver . But for digi the type of xverters i have only work properly via the 0dbm ports.? 20m could do 2m and if there is a way to generate a "HI" or "Low" signal of some sort depending on bands i could switch to 4m via 10m.?? Will have a look and try to find out how much the driver puts out.? 73 Felix , df3fx/f1veo |