开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Date

Re: My first 24 hours on WSPR

Tony Volpe
 

Great fun Sverre.

You will find that with a decent antenna the little kit is capable of world wide communications. It is perfectly common to have spots from the UK into VK, the US and Brazil at night / early morning on 30 with 200 mw.

On the matter of drift. I have two kits and I built them slightly differently. The first I built with the crystal and most parts are soldered close down to the board. The second I wanted to experiment with and fitted a number of sockets so I could plug and unplug certain components like PA transistor, crystal and capacitors around the oscillator and low pass filter. I did this because I want to put it on different bands with different crystals. I have left the leads on the crystal and PA transistor much longer on this experimental kit so that I can plug and unplug them conveniently. This kit does not show anything like as much drift as the one with short component leads. On the short lead kit, drift is at least ?1 to 2 htz (always minus) and sometimes -3htz. On the long lead kit, the drift is usually zero.?

I think that heat from the PA transistor may be warming the crystal and making it change frequency. Obviously, when PA, crystal and frequency sensitive capacitors are close to the board, the PA warms the board and transfers heat to the frequency determining parts.


73s

Tony G0BZB


Re: My first 24 hours on WSPR

"woodiescbj"
 

Hi Sverre, you are off to a good start, 30m band seems to be dead for about 10 hours during the night but picks up again at about 05:00 utc, I run my UQRSS into a G5RV folded as a horizontal delta loop to fit in our small back yard it is about 7m off the ground my signal usually gets into the states at that time of morning and then at about 07:00 utc just inter EU contacts of up to 800 Kms, good job with finishing the kit and I hope to spot you sometime on WSPR.

Vy 73 de Colin DD5CF / G1ZOS

--- In QRPLabs@..., la3za@... wrote:


My first trials with WSPR on 30 m and the Ultimate QRSS kit have now
been concluded with reports from most of Western Europe. See my blog,

<> , for
results.

I am running both the processor/oscillator and the output amplifier from
a 5 Volt switch-mode integrated regulator and there is some frequency
pulling due to interaction as there are reports of drift of -2 to -3
(BTW, does this mean Hz over the 2 minute interval?)

I am looking forward to more experimenting and thanks for a nice kit!




Sverre

LA3ZA


My first 24 hours on WSPR

la3za@...
 

My first trials with WSPR on 30 m and the Ultimate QRSS kit have now been concluded with reports from most of Western Europe. See my blog, , for results.

I am running both the processor/oscillator and the output amplifier from a 5 Volt switch-mode integrated regulator and there is some frequency pulling due to interaction as there are reports of drift of -2 to -3 (BTW, does this mean Hz over the 2 minute interval?)

I am looking forward to more experimenting and thanks for a nice kit!?


Sverre

LA3ZA



Re: Slow running beacons....

Gordon Kennedy
 

No problems, it's not a big mistake, just a mistake- big mistakes let the smoke out (hihi).
?
73, Gord

From: Stephen Farthing
To: QRPLabs@...
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:41:43 AM
Subject: [QRPLabs] Slow running beacons....

?
Guys,

I can now confirm that I made a mistake when I loaded the code into a batch of AVRs and did not uncheck the box which tells the programmer to divide the clock speed by 8. This was entirely my fault and nothing to do with Hans! I am just waiting for a reply for him on bringing forward the release of 1.06 which will add a feature that allows users to clear the EEPROM in one go and a couple of other things.?

I'll post another message shortly about how to order a free replacement for your faulty AVR chip. I just need to work out who has the faulty chips.?

Apologies for the stupid mistake I made. But as the saying goes a man who has never made a mistake has never made anything!

73s Steve



Slow running beacons....

Stephen Farthing
 

Guys,

I can now confirm that I made a mistake when I loaded the code into a batch of AVRs and did not uncheck the box which tells the programmer to divide the clock speed by 8. This was entirely my fault and nothing to do with Hans! I am just waiting for a reply for him on bringing forward the release of 1.06 which will add a feature that allows users to clear the EEPROM in one go and a couple of other things.?

I'll post another message shortly about how to order a free replacement for your faulty AVR chip. I just need to work out who has the faulty chips.?

Apologies for the stupid mistake I made. But as the saying goes a man who has never made a mistake has never made anything!

73s Steve


Re: UQRSS running on 40 meters WSPR

"woodiescbj"
 

Nice one Philip, I am having no luck getting started on 160m band either with the U-QRSS or normal QRSS kits so I think I will change the Xtal to 80m on the N-QRSS kit and see what happens, I will only need to take a couple of turns off the BPF and I will be good to go.

73 Colin DD5CF

--- In QRPLabs@..., "Philip" <pcteee@...> wrote:

Got a 7.04 Mhz crystal from the GQRP club online shop for ?2:00
Anyhoo, with C5 removed it tunes nicely through the WSPR section
of 40 meters..

Getting a nice selection of spots this evening.

Philip G4JVF


Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

Gordon Kennedy
 

Just tried the second unit I ppurchased at the same time and same slow speed.
?
73, Gord

From: Stefan Teuscher
To: QRPLabs@...
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 5:52:21 PM
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

?
Hello Steve,
hello all,

many thanks, Steve, to detect this error that fast. Yes, this could be
the case. I didn't measure the time exactly how slow the MCU runs, but
factor 8 could match.
Another observation I've made: Sometimes the MCU forgets its time
settings, starting with 00:00 when stopping the transmission by pressing
the key S2. But sometimes the time goes on - slowly, but it goes on.

Also the effect that Tony (G4CQS) reported was exactly the same here.
There were lots of spurious signals with a distance of multpies of about
20 Hz left and right of the main signal. That's why 20 Hz is the
fundamental frequency of the PWM-signal at pin 15 of my MCU. For such a
low frequency the low pass filter (R2, C2) is much to small. So it does
not smoothing enough, modulating sidelines of +- n * 20 Hz.
I think, if the MCU runs correct, i.e. factor 8 faster, this sidelines
would be around +- n * 160 Hz, but filtered out by the low pass filter
(R2, C2).
And so these sidelines are only another effect of a much too slow
running MCU.

Tony, G0BZB: Thanks for your tries. The same thoughts that I had
yesterday. But with the scope I could see that the oscillator is really
running right and the signals are ok. And I really also checked all the
frequency band for other strong signals - but nothing found. So the
clock signal for the MCU was probably correct.

@lowemission:
I don't think that it is the callsign or the message. I also tried other
messages, nothing changed. Perhaps it works correct with a GPS.
Unfortunately I cannot test it because at the moment I have none.

So I think it is probable like Steve wrote, a little lapse when
programming the MCU.

And looking forward for a correction. But, Steve and Hans, don't hurry.
It's a hobby, but a nice one. I would like to pay the postage at least.

73s, Stefan, DL4GCS

Am 17.09.2012 21:19, schrieb Stephen Farthing:
> Guys,
>
> My theory is that I have set the clock divide by 8 fuse accidentally when I
> programmed a batch of chips. This would account for the fact that some
> versions of 1.05 work and some have this timing error. Unfortunately I have
> never found a way to get AVR studio to save the programming parameters so I
> have to set it up manually each time I program a batch of chips.
>
> So what you are seeing might be the results of such an error. I need to
> run some tests to verify this but I don't have the time to do this for a
> couple of days.
>
> If this is the case I'll replace your chips with ones that have been
> programmed correctly FOC.
>
> 73s Steve
>
>



Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

Stefan Teuscher
 

Hello Steve,
hello all,

many thanks, Steve, to detect this error that fast. Yes, this could be the case. I didn't measure the time exactly how slow the MCU runs, but factor 8 could match.
Another observation I've made: Sometimes the MCU forgets its time settings, starting with 00:00 when stopping the transmission by pressing the key S2. But sometimes the time goes on - slowly, but it goes on.

Also the effect that Tony (G4CQS) reported was exactly the same here. There were lots of spurious signals with a distance of multpies of about 20 Hz left and right of the main signal. That's why 20 Hz is the fundamental frequency of the PWM-signal at pin 15 of my MCU. For such a low frequency the low pass filter (R2, C2) is much to small. So it does not smoothing enough, modulating sidelines of +- n * 20 Hz.
I think, if the MCU runs correct, i.e. factor 8 faster, this sidelines would be around +- n * 160 Hz, but filtered out by the low pass filter (R2, C2).
And so these sidelines are only another effect of a much too slow running MCU.

Tony, G0BZB: Thanks for your tries. The same thoughts that I had yesterday. But with the scope I could see that the oscillator is really running right and the signals are ok. And I really also checked all the frequency band for other strong signals - but nothing found. So the clock signal for the MCU was probably correct.

@lowemission:
I don't think that it is the callsign or the message. I also tried other messages, nothing changed. Perhaps it works correct with a GPS. Unfortunately I cannot test it because at the moment I have none.

So I think it is probable like Steve wrote, a little lapse when programming the MCU.

And looking forward for a correction. But, Steve and Hans, don't hurry. It's a hobby, but a nice one. I would like to pay the postage at least.

73s, Stefan, DL4GCS


Am 17.09.2012 21:19, schrieb Stephen Farthing:

Guys,

My theory is that I have set the clock divide by 8 fuse accidentally when I
programmed a batch of chips. This would account for the fact that some
versions of 1.05 work and some have this timing error. Unfortunately I have
never found a way to get AVR studio to save the programming parameters so I
have to set it up manually each time I program a batch of chips.

So what you are seeing might be the results of such an error. I need to
run some tests to verify this but I don't have the time to do this for a
couple of days.

If this is the case I'll replace your chips with ones that have been
programmed correctly FOC.

73s Steve


Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

Stephen Farthing
 

Guys,

My theory is that I have set the clock divide by 8 fuse accidentally when I programmed a batch of chips. This would account for the fact that some versions of 1.05 work and some have this timing error. Unfortunately I have never found a way to get AVR studio to save the programming parameters so I have to set it up manually each time I program a batch of chips.?

So what you are ?seeing might be the results of such an error. I need to run some tests to verify this but I don't have the time to do this for a couple of days.?

If this is the case I'll replace your chips with ones that have been programmed correctly FOC.

73s Steve



On 17 September 2012 19:42, <cvest@...> wrote:
My latest order arrived today , I'll try to get it put together tonight and see how it behaves . I have 2 others to compare it to .

Charlie , W5COV


---- Stephen Farthing <squirrox@...> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have a theory but I need to test it.
>
> Steve



Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

cvest@...
 

My latest order arrived today , I'll try to get it put together tonight and see how it behaves . I have 2 others to compare it to .

Charlie , W5COV


---- Stephen Farthing <squirrox@...> wrote:

Guys,

I have a theory but I need to test it.

Steve


Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

Stephen Farthing
 

Guys,?

I have a theory but I need to test it.?

Steve


Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

"lowemmission"
 

I am running 2 UQRSS, ver 1.04 & 1.05, both have the same parameters and are configured for 30m WSPR. ver 1.05 has now been running for 4 days with no problem, both with GPS. After reading these posts I changed 1 parameter in v 1.05 of Callsign: DL4GCS to Message: 73
Frame: 02 and it ran slow. GPS disabled.

Maybe consider your message statements.

Only an observation.

lowemmission@

--- In QRPLabs@..., Gordon Kennedy <ve3gkn@...> wrote:

Just got mine last week- fired it up today and got the same situation- way too slow. Every thing physically looks good but is beaving exactly the same as yours.
?
73, Gord
VE3GKN


________________________________
From: Stefan Teuscher <stefan.teuscher@...>
To: QRPLabs@...
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2012 5:11:04 PM
Subject: [QRPLabs] UQRSS runs much too slow

Hello all,

first many thanks to Hans G0UPL for the quick delivery of the kits.
The first one I have built up yesterday, but struggling with a problem:
The MCU seems to run much too slow. This is indicated by the clock in
the display, which changes the seconds after 6 or 7 seconds (and not
every second which would be normal), and all transmissions are much too
slow. E.g. the WSPR-transmission frame lasts not nearly 2 minutes but
lasts about 12 minutes!

I have no GPS (I have just ordered one).

I have checked the oscillator, seemms to be ok (8 Vpp), also the signal
at pin 9 of the MCU: TTL-level 10.140.200 Hz (after I have changed C5
from 22 pF to 4,7 pF otherwise I could not reach 10.140.200 - but that
cannot be the reason for this behavior because it was the case just
before the change of C5).

The MCU has the version V1.05.
Because I have ordered two kits I tried both MCUs - but they behave
identical.
Thats my config:
Speed: 001
Frequency: 10,140,200
Callsign: DL4GCS
Message: 73
Frame: 02
Start: 00
CW Ident: 00
Locator: JN47
Power: 23
Use GPS: off
GPS Baud: 09600,01,1,8
AF Output: off
AF Frequ: 1300
Inv. FSK off
FSK (Hz): 4
FSK Adj: 1,300
Cursor: 4

Has anyone any idea?

73s
Stefan, DL4GCS


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links



? ?


Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

"David Barber"
 

Perhaps an obvious question but did you check the signal at the CLK pin of
the processor? (Pin 9 I believe)

***

________________________________________
From: QRPLabs@... [mailto:QRPLabs@...] On Behalf Of
Tony Volpe
Sent: 17 September 2012 09:15
To: QRPLabs@...
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

Hi Tony,

Ok - looking at the one eighth speed your kit is running at, for my
suggestion to be right the oscillator would have to be on?1.2675mhz , which
it obviously isn't. That would leave a software problem as the issue as far
as I can see, but I and other people have V1.05 that works normally. Unless
there are different versions of v1.05, I'm stuck.

tony G0bzb

On 17 September 2012 09:03, rowsbyt <[email protected]>
wrote:
?
Tony,
Tried that!
Using a 'scope & counter the xtal oscillator is definitely running at 10MHz!
Tony
G4CQS


Re: UQRSS experiments on 20 meters...

Tony Volpe
 

I've ben comparing our spots Philip on the two bands. It seems that 20 shuts down much more at night than 30 does. I had USA stations all night long more or less, but none from South America. I wonder how many south American stations are on 30. I should look at the ACTIVITY tab and see. I got noVK stations in the last 24 hours, which is a come down from recent days, but the SFI is falling steadily and has been for about five days, lessening my extreme DX gradually.

Fascinating stuff, as you say.

What do you think is happening with the spate of new kits (V1.5) that are running at one eighth speed? Could a new bug have crept in to some of the V1.05 and not others. Very strange things being reported there.

bzb


On 16 September 2012 23:28, p19547ct <pcteee@...> wrote:
?



20 meter WSPR screen grab in my photo album (G4JVF) on here...wsp20.jpg



--- In QRPLabs@..., "Philip" wrote:
>
> Had a one off crystal made by QuartSlab...Bit expensive but worth it I reckon..
>
> The crystal frequency is 14.097100 HC49U 30pF parallel..
> With C5 removed, I can tune below/through and above the WSPR portion of the 20 meter band.
>
> Running a simple one transistor (2N3866) external PA fed from the "C OUT" connector on the kit PCB.(internal PA turned off).
> This PA is running from 12 Volts and at this frequency, I get almost 500mW out (PA runs 900mW on 40 meters).
>
> Using the external PA keeps any heat away from the kit oscillator and reduces drift by a significant amount...
>
> Crystal and capacitors around the osc circuit are all plugged in on this kit so I can experiment with different values/bands without risking damage to the PCB..
> My LPF is external as well and selected to match the band I want to use...
>
> Anyhoo, first run this evening into my new 132' Windom shows a good selection of spots...
>
> Over 10 from the states, one VK, one from Uruguay, two from Brazil and goodly collection from Europe...
>
> Great fun
>
> Philip G4JVF
>



Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

Tony Volpe
 

Hi Tony,

Ok - looking at the one eighth speed your kit is running at, for my suggestion to be right the oscillator would have to be on?1.2675mhz , which it obviously isn't. That would leave a software problem as the issue as far as I can see, but I and other people have V1.05 that works normally. Unless there are different versions of v1.05, I'm stuck.

tony G0bzb


On 17 September 2012 09:03, rowsbyt <g4cqs@...> wrote:
?

Tony,
Tried that!
Using a 'scope & counter the xtal oscillator is definitely running at 10MHz!
Tony
G4CQS



--- In QRPLabs@..., Tony Volpe <tony.volpe.1951@...> wrote:
>
> That's a very strange thing to happen. I just built a new one (I had one
> already) and it is the same issue of the kit as yours, but it behaves
> perfectly.
>
> The settings look normal. I replicated Stefan's SPEED = 1, which was slower
> than either of my kits have ever been, and it made no difference.
>
> The behaviour seems to be as if you had a bad crystal that was operating
> on a lower frequency and you were tuning in on a higher harmonic of the
> 'actual' frequency it was wrongly operating on when you checked on your
> receiver. This may be impossible. I think the crystal is supposed to be a
> fundamental type, but IF that was happening, the MCU would be using a
> slower clock frequency than it ought to be on and miscalculating the time.
> I can't think of anything else, and I am sure you have both made meticulous
> checks under magnification to see that there are no bad joints or solder
> bridges on the board around the oscillator and the MCU.
>
> If my kit was doing this, I'd tune lower on a receiver and see if I could
> find a strong output at a lower frequency such as half of 10.140, or one
> third of it and so on.
>
> This may be a total red herring - if so, I am sorry, but what else but a
> slow clock frequency could make the system operate at this slow rate?
>
> Good luck anyway, and I hope my guesswork doesn't lead you up the wrong
> path.
>
> G0BZB
>
> Tony
>



Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

"rowsbyt"
 

Tony,
Tried that!
Using a 'scope & counter the xtal oscillator is definitely running at 10MHz!
Tony
G4CQS

--- In QRPLabs@..., Tony Volpe <tony.volpe.1951@...> wrote:

That's a very strange thing to happen. I just built a new one (I had one
already) and it is the same issue of the kit as yours, but it behaves
perfectly.

The settings look normal. I replicated Stefan's SPEED = 1, which was slower
than either of my kits have ever been, and it made no difference.

The behaviour seems to be as if you had a bad crystal that was operating
on a lower frequency and you were tuning in on a higher harmonic of the
'actual' frequency it was wrongly operating on when you checked on your
receiver. This may be impossible. I think the crystal is supposed to be a
fundamental type, but IF that was happening, the MCU would be using a
slower clock frequency than it ought to be on and miscalculating the time.
I can't think of anything else, and I am sure you have both made meticulous
checks under magnification to see that there are no bad joints or solder
bridges on the board around the oscillator and the MCU.

If my kit was doing this, I'd tune lower on a receiver and see if I could
find a strong output at a lower frequency such as half of 10.140, or one
third of it and so on.

This may be a total red herring - if so, I am sorry, but what else but a
slow clock frequency could make the system operate at this slow rate?

Good luck anyway, and I hope my guesswork doesn't lead you up the wrong
path.

G0BZB

Tony


Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

Tony Volpe
 

That's a very strange thing to happen. I just built a new one (I had one already) and it is the same issue of the kit as yours, but it behaves perfectly.

The settings look normal. I replicated Stefan's SPEED = 1, which was slower than either of my kits have ever been, and it made no difference.

The behaviour seems to be as if you had a bad crystal that ?was operating on a lower frequency and you were tuning in on a higher harmonic of the 'actual' frequency it was wrongly operating on when you checked on your receiver. This may be impossible. I think the crystal is supposed to be a fundamental type, but IF that was happening, the MCU would be using a slower clock frequency than it ought to be on and miscalculating the time. I can't think of anything else, and I am sure you have both made meticulous checks under magnification to see that there are no bad joints or solder bridges on the board around the oscillator and the MCU.?

If my kit was doing this, I'd tune lower on a receiver and see if I could find a strong output at a lower frequency such as half of 10.140, or one third of it and so on.

This may be a total red herring - if so, I am sorry, but what else but a slow clock frequency could make the system operate at this slow rate?

Good luck anyway, and I hope my guesswork doesn't lead you up the wrong path.

G0BZB

Tony


On 17 September 2012 07:12, Stephen Farthing <squirrox@...> wrote:
?

Hi Guys,


I'll wait for Hans to comment on this as he designed the hardware and wrote the software. I think he might be taking a short break so please be a little patient. If anyone else has a problem it would be helpful if you could quote :-

1. The version of the software - this is displayed on the LCD at start up.

2. The parameters you have entered into the kit.?

I should be able to find some time later to see if I can duplicate the problem.

Apologies,

Steve



Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

"rowsbyt"
 

Steve,

Same here!
Received my kit last week.

The clock as displayed on the LCD runs ~8 times slow.
Using QRSS with speed 5 it takes 40 seconds to send a dot.
In addition the FSK pin of the uP ((p15) has a continuous 20Hz 5v p-p square wave on it giving a rough tone - it is impossible to set up using ARGO as the (basic) bandwidth is too high! (The note is clean if I short out the LED!)

V1.05

Settings:
Mode: QRSS
Speed: 005
Frequency: 10,140,00
Callsign: G4CQS
Message: 5
Frame: 02
Start: 00
CW Ident: 00
Locator: IO82
Power: 23
Use GPS: off
GPS Baud: 090600,01,1,8
AF Output: off
AF Frequency: 0,800
Inv FSK: off
FSK (Hz): 5
FSK Adjust: 00,400
Cursor: 4

Regards,

Tony
G4CQS


Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

Stephen Farthing
 

Hi Guys,

I'll wait for Hans to comment on this as he designed the hardware and wrote the software. I think he might be taking a short break so please be a little patient. If anyone else has a problem it would be helpful if you could quote :-

1. The version of the software - this is displayed on the LCD at start up.

2. The parameters you have entered into the kit.?

I should be able to find some time later to see if I can duplicate the problem.

Apologies,

Steve


Re: UQRSS runs much too slow

Gordon Kennedy
 

Just got mine last week- fired it up today and got the same situation- way too slow. Every thing physically looks good but is beaving exactly the same as yours.
?
73, Gord
VE3GKN

From: Stefan Teuscher
To: QRPLabs@...
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2012 5:11:04 PM
Subject: [QRPLabs] UQRSS runs much too slow

Hello all,

first many thanks to Hans G0UPL for the quick delivery of the kits.
The first one I have built up yesterday, but struggling with a problem:
The MCU seems to run much too slow. This is indicated by the clock in
the display, which changes the seconds after 6 or 7 seconds (and not
every second which would be normal), and all transmissions are much too
slow. E.g. the WSPR-transmission frame lasts not nearly 2 minutes but
lasts about 12 minutes!

I have no GPS (I have just ordered one).

I have checked the oscillator, seemms to be ok (8 Vpp), also the signal
at pin 9 of the MCU: TTL-level 10.140.200 Hz (after I have changed C5
from 22 pF to 4,7 pF otherwise I could not reach 10.140.200 - but that
cannot be the reason for this behavior because it was the case just
before the change of C5).

The MCU has the version V1.05.
Because I have ordered two kits I tried both MCUs - but they behave
identical.
Thats my config:
Speed: 001
Frequency: 10,140,200
Callsign: DL4GCS
Message: 73
Frame: 02
Start: 00
CW Ident: 00
Locator: JN47
Power: 23
Use GPS: off
GPS Baud: 09600,01,1,8
AF Output: off
AF Frequ: 1300
Inv. FSK off
FSK (Hz): 4
FSK Adj: 1,300
Cursor: 4

Has anyone any idea?

73s
Stefan, DL4GCS


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
? ?

<*> Your email settings:
? ? Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
? ?
? ? (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
? ? QRPLabs-digest@...
? ? QRPLabs-fullfeatured@...

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
? ? [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
? ?