开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Date

Argo tricks

"pgdaulton"
 

One of the tricks you can use with ARGO is multiple screens, try and set one screen centered on beacon band, another up 100hz, and another 100hz below. You can set different gains and sensitivity and see which is best, just assign a different folder for each screen. I use \desktop\30mbcn(1,2,3) then put date on next pull down. Set for capture every 15 or 30 minutes and watch band changes.

Also note Spectran, Spectrumlab, and ARGO can run simultaniously on the same sound card.

Be an experimenter!

Paul k5wms


30 METER BEACON PHOTOS AND CAPTURES

"pgdaulton"
 

I HAVE CREATED A PHOTO FILE "K5WMS" WITH PHOTOS OF MY BEACON CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION.

ALSO INCLUDED ARE CAPTURES FROM KL1X/5 IN BARTLESVILLE,OK AND W4HBK FROM PENSACOLA FL.

I AM IN CENTRAL ARKANSAS GRID SQUARE EM34WU.

I ALSO HAVE BEEN COPIED BY MIKE WE0H IN ST FRANCIS MN BUT HAVE LOST THE CAPTURE. I EDITED THE CAPTURES AND ADDED THE TEXT.

THANKS HANS AND STEVE FOR A FUN PROJECT. THREE DOWN AND 47 TO GO FOR WAS!

PAUL DAULTON K5WMS


WE0H Grabber back again!!!

Mike-WE0H
 



New server once again. Lets see how long this lasts before it locks up...

Mike
WE0H
EN35hj


Tutorial on programming AT Tiny chips

"Stephen"
 

Good morning one and all,

For those of you who are interested in learning how to program the AT Tiny chip (we use the AT Tiny 13 in the beacon kit) there is an excellent tutorial at :-



It uses the AT Tiny 45 but the example programs will run in the Tiny 13.

The code for the beacon is available on Hans's website.

72/3 de Steve...G0XAR


WE0H Grabber new address...

Mike-WE0H
 

As I figured would happen with a freebie website, they deleted my account tonight. No surprise there. So go to:

and lets see how long that Grabber survives. This is my pay per month site but it had issues with ftp service before, so who knows if it will keep working or fail.
--
Mike
WE0H
EN35hj


Re: NP0 Caps

Mike-WE0H
 

I use that Lyle K0LR style thermistor crystal heater in my freq counter. It has maintained better than 1hz stability for over a year now.

Mike
WE0H


Charlie , W5COV wrote:

...
I built my 10.140 MHz. oscillator on a very small board separate from the transmitter . I soldered a thermistor to the crystal to maintain a constant temperature . The entire board is then encapsulated in a small container and filled with thermal conductive epoxy .Only the leads for hookup to the transmitter come out of the package .
I haven't yet had time to run many tests with it . I'll post my results once I can run it for a few days under different temperature conditions .
Charlie , W5COV


Re: NP0 Caps

Matt Palmer
 

NP0 caps become much more important when going cold... not such an issue for ham electronics which will likely never see temps below 0C


Matt
W8ESE
sent from my VIC-20


On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:33 PM, hanssummers2000 <hans.summers@...> wrote:
?


Hi Steve et al

> Greetings from sunny England,

Speak for your own part of England! Here in London, the sun has disappeared behind some thick clouds.

> Those of you who have built the beacon kits will have noticed that we do not use NP0 caps. In fact I cannot remember the last time I used them. Yet these beacons are very, very stable in output frequency as are my other projects. Which makes me wonder if modern caps are much less temperature sensitive than they were in times of yore and question why people still use them.
>
> What do you guys think?

Personally I think NPO caps might be useful sometimes, but generally are over-rated. There are a lot of other temperature-sensitive parts involved in an oscillator, including of course, the crystal itself.

In past QRSS work, I have used the DB6NT crystal heater, see . I found that it completely removed any observable drift, even though I didn't trouble with NPO capacitors. So I believe that, in the case of crystal oscillators for QRSS, the main freuqency-drift-determining component is the crystal itself. The DB6NT crystal heater is very nice. It typically goes on an HC49 crystal, whereas the crystal in the QRSS Beacon kit is a 1/4 height crystal. So I'm not sure how well it would work, or maybe need adaption. Beware too, that it will cost you somewhat more than the QRSS beacon kit cost you!

73 Hans G0UPL




Re: NP0 Caps

"Charlie , W5COV"
 

开云体育

I have to agree with Hans . NP0 caps are fine in some applications , but not all . I just changed a pair of them out in a filter and replaced them with some high quality "glass" capacitors , which work much better in this application.
?
I am on the waiting list for a beacon , but while waiting and having worked with QRSS60 for many years , know the crystal and oscillator are the areas of real concern .
?
I built my 10.140 MHz.?oscillator on a very small board?separate from the transmitter . I soldered a thermistor to the crystal to maintain a constant temperature . The entire board is then encapsulated in a small container and filled with thermal conductive epoxy .Only the leads for hookup to the transmitter come out of the package .
?
I haven't yet had time to run many tests with it . I'll post my results once I can run it for a few days under different temperature conditions .
?
Charlie , W5COV
?
?
?


Re: NP0 Caps

"Paul Daulton"
 

开云体育

my experience is not all npo caps are created equal. I suspect many are mismarked as happens with nuts and bolts. Mono caps or cog as they are sometimes called exhibit better stability.
?
My beacon is mounted at the center of my dipole, temp here has been from 100 degrees F daytime to 75 or so at night. My beacon will shift about 25 to 30 hz. this fall I may have to take it down and reset it. I have a 7805 regulator down in the shack, power is fed to beacon through rg59 coax and? f? connectors. I could replace the 7805 with an LM 317 and limit the voltage to 6v and trim the freq by adjusting the voltage. also the led may shift somewhat due to temp change, I have found this the case when using varactors to tune vfo's. Those in cooler climates may want to put a heat source in the case if the beacon is to be remote mounted. a small incadesent lamp or led or resisor? and lots of insulation on? the beacon. would help.
?
Drift is a minor problem.
?
Paul k5wms

----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 11:24 AM
Subject: [QRPLabs] NP0 Caps

?

Greetings from sunny England,

Those of you who have built the beacon kits will have noticed that we do not use NP0 caps. In fact I cannot remember the last time I used them. Yet these beacons are very, very stable in output frequency as are my other projects. Which makes me wonder if modern caps are much less temperature sensitive than they were in times of yore and question why people still use them.

What do you guys think?

Regards,

Steve G0XAR


Re: NP0 Caps

"hanssummers2000"
 

Hi Steve et al

Greetings from sunny England,
Speak for your own part of England! Here in London, the sun has disappeared behind some thick clouds.

Those of you who have built the beacon kits will have noticed that we do not use NP0 caps. In fact I cannot remember the last time I used them. Yet these beacons are very, very stable in output frequency as are my other projects. Which makes me wonder if modern caps are much less temperature sensitive than they were in times of yore and question why people still use them.

What do you guys think?
Personally I think NPO caps might be useful sometimes, but generally are over-rated. There are a lot of other temperature-sensitive parts involved in an oscillator, including of course, the crystal itself.

In past QRSS work, I have used the DB6NT crystal heater, see . I found that it completely removed any observable drift, even though I didn't trouble with NPO capacitors. So I believe that, in the case of crystal oscillators for QRSS, the main freuqency-drift-determining component is the crystal itself. The DB6NT crystal heater is very nice. It typically goes on an HC49 crystal, whereas the crystal in the QRSS Beacon kit is a 1/4 height crystal. So I'm not sure how well it would work, or maybe need adaption. Beware too, that it will cost you somewhat more than the QRSS beacon kit cost you!

73 Hans G0UPL


NP0 Caps

"Stephen"
 

Greetings from sunny England,

Those of you who have built the beacon kits will have noticed that we do not use NP0 caps. In fact I cannot remember the last time I used them. Yet these beacons are very, very stable in output frequency as are my other projects. Which makes me wonder if modern caps are much less temperature sensitive than they were in times of yore and question why people still use them.

What do you guys think?

Regards,

Steve G0XAR


online lowfer grabber

"Paul Daulton"
 

开云体育

Another qrss site that may be of interest is Ralph's, W5JGV, online grabbers. Part 15 rules in the US permit unlicensed operation on 160 to 190 khz with 1 watt input to a 50 ft antenna.
?
See ?
?
This grabber is centered on the "watering hole" at 185.3 khz.
?
Daytime my beacon, WMS is often visible via ground wave( we are about 225 miles apart). At night stations up to several hundred miles apart are seen. Operation is qrss 30.
?
Best time of course is during winter months but there is propagation year round. Summer thunderstorms anywhere in the propagation area desense the ARGO but we have lots of quiet days.
?
Ralph also has a grabber on 137 khz, while not a ham band here in the us , special permission by FCC for experimental licenses has been granted to several US hams.
?
For more info on beacon activity go to ? or yahoogroups/part15.
?
Thanks for the bandwidth.
Paul k5wms


Re: beacon receiver

Mike-WE0H
 

Hi Hans,

Add me to your list for the receiver kit. Tell me when and how you would like payment and I will get it to you fast.

Many thanks,
Mike
WE0H




hanssummers2000 wrote:

Certainly the frequency of the 5068.8 rocks can be pulled easily.
One thing to bear in mind: This receiver is a very basic design utilising two SA602's. The strong signal performance, IP3 and Dynamic range, AM broadcast breakthrough etc will all be quite poor.
Steve G0XAR and I are currently working on a QRSS receiver kit to complement the QRSS beacon kit. The kit price will probably be somewhere in the range $15-$30, I can't be more precise yet. This will not be a simple, basic receiver! My design goals for this receiver are as follows:
+ Very high performance, single band receiver
+ Single signal reception (not Double-Sideband)
+ Crystal local oscillator, or option for DDS input
+ Easy to build: no complicated adjustments, no test equipment needed
+ Low cost, in the range $15-$30
+ Output direct to sound card input, will work with Argo etc
By "high performance", I mean that this receiver has a strong front end with an IP3 of around +30dBm, which will outperform the vast majority of commercial ham equipment, let alone homebuilt.
I hope to have this ready in a few weeks. So if you can wait, it might be worth waiting for ;-)
72/3 Hans G0UPL


Re: beacon receiver

"Paul Daulton"
 

开云体育

Clayton thanks for the link to Genesis. Nice offerings of kits, parts, and xtals. Mono caps ?npo? at very attractive price!
?
73 Paul k5wms

----- Original Message -----
From: Clayton G
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] Re: beacon receiver

?

I've seen this too.
My thoughts were to use the 18.138MHz crystals from Genesis radio () for the LO, and an 8 MHz IF.
?
Clayton
VK1TKA
?
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike-WE0H
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] Re: beacon receiver

?



Scroll down a bit on the page to find the lower cost partial receiver kit.

Mike
WE0H

hans wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Paul
>
> WHat is the link?
>
> 73 Hans G0UPL
>


Re: beacon receiver

"hanssummers2000"
 

Hi Mike, Paul et al

I don't know, using 5068.8kc rocks would end up with a 2.4kc center freq
in the audio output.

Hans, what do you think?
Certainly the frequency of the 5068.8 rocks can be pulled easily.

One thing to bear in mind: This receiver is a very basic design utilising two SA602's. The strong signal performance, IP3 and Dynamic range, AM broadcast breakthrough etc will all be quite poor.

Steve G0XAR and I are currently working on a QRSS receiver kit to complement the QRSS beacon kit. The kit price will probably be somewhere in the range $15-$30, I can't be more precise yet. This will not be a simple, basic receiver! My design goals for this receiver are as follows:

+ Very high performance, single band receiver
+ Single signal reception (not Double-Sideband)
+ Crystal local oscillator, or option for DDS input
+ Easy to build: no complicated adjustments, no test equipment needed
+ Low cost, in the range $15-$30
+ Output direct to sound card input, will work with Argo etc

By "high performance", I mean that this receiver has a strong front end with an IP3 of around +30dBm, which will outperform the vast majority of commercial ham equipment, let alone homebuilt.

I hope to have this ready in a few weeks. So if you can wait, it might be worth waiting for ;-)

72/3 Hans G0UPL


Re: beacon receiver

"Paul Daulton"
 

开云体育

?
Sorry in my excitement I forgot to include this.
?
I have the Norcal dds ,? which I contemplated using in a multiband Bitx. Not much has been written about 30 m with the bitx since it is mainly a phone rig but it could be adapted for 30m rec. I have 20m bitx and 80 meter bitx and an IF board with 9.0mhz xtals I was going to use in the multi band, probably should try that first.
?
Thanks for the interest Hans,
73 Paul

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 12:57 AM
Subject: [QRPLabs] Re: beacon receiver

?


Hi Paul

WHat is the link?

73 Hans G0UPL


--- In QRPLabs@..., "Paul Daulton" wrote:
>
> I found a link to n3zi's site where he has a gen coverage rx kit suitable for 30m beacon op with dds or xtal control.
>
> I will have to check microprocessor xtals for combo that will cover 10.140. 5.068if and 5.068 injection woiuld give 10.136 tweaking the xtals slightly would bring it up to 10.140 or use spectran which will go up to 5khz.
>
> comments welcome. Neat kit for $19.95.
>
> Paul k5wms
>


Re: beacon receiver

"Paul Daulton"
 

开云体育

MIke in the bfo circuit you could replace the trimmer cap with and inductor and move the bfo freq to the lower side of the "window" of the filter and rec upper side band ala? Bitx20. the first mixer xtal could be massaged to get right on freq. I built a similar rec for lowfer using 5.0 mhz injection and a 5.185 filter. It rec 185 khz usb. Stability wasnt good enough for qrss 30 but it would work ok on qrss 3. I also built a tx strip for 185 khz first mixer changed to bal mod at 5.185khz second mixer to tx mixer.
?
N3zi's dds generator would make this rec a real winner. Some where I have a box of backlit displays and ......
?
Paul

----- Original Message -----
From: Mike-WE0H
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 1:34 AM
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] beacon receiver

?

I don't know, using 5068.8kc rocks would end up with a 2.4kc center freq
in the audio output.

Hans, what do you think?

Mike
WE0H

Paul D wrote:
>
>
> I found a link to n3zi's site where he has a gen coverage rx kit
> suitable for 30m beacon op with dds or xtal control.
>
> I will have to check microprocessor xtals for combo that will cover
> 10.140. 5.068if and 5.068 injection woiuld give 10.136 tweaking the
> xtals slightly would bring it up to 10.140 or use spectran which will go
> up to 5khz.
>
> comments welcome. Neat kit for $19.95.
>
> Paul k5wms


Re: beacon receiver

"Clayton G"
 

开云体育

I've seen this too.
My thoughts were to use the 18.138MHz crystals from Genesis radio () for the LO, and an 8 MHz IF.
?
Clayton
VK1TKA
?

----- Original Message -----
From: Mike-WE0H
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] Re: beacon receiver

?



Scroll down a bit on the page to find the lower cost partial receiver kit.

Mike
WE0H

hans wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Paul
>
> WHat is the link?
>
> 73 Hans G0UPL
>


Re: beacon receiver

Mike-WE0H
 

I don't know, using 5068.8kc rocks would end up with a 2.4kc center freq in the audio output.

Hans, what do you think?

Mike
WE0H



Paul D wrote:

I found a link to n3zi's site where he has a gen coverage rx kit suitable for 30m beacon op with dds or xtal control.
I will have to check microprocessor xtals for combo that will cover 10.140. 5.068if and 5.068 injection woiuld give 10.136 tweaking the xtals slightly would bring it up to 10.140 or use spectran which will go up to 5khz.
comments welcome. Neat kit for $19.95.
Paul k5wms


Re: beacon receiver

Mike-WE0H
 



Scroll down a bit on the page to find the lower cost partial receiver kit.

Mike
WE0H



hans wrote:

Hi Paul
WHat is the link?
73 Hans G0UPL