¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Troll

 

Since when has posting personal opinion or FACTS been a crime ?

Only in YOUR minds it seems.

Welcome to democracy, Chinese style ?


Re: Troll

 

Better yet, Hans could require full name or callsign for forum subscribers.?
--
John AE5X


Troll

 

On most forums there is a Troll that sometimes uses a ridiculous name to hide their true identity.
Their main purpose on your forum is to get attention, start a conflict , or insult someone, but not to contribute to the forum in a meaningful or friendly way.
If a Troll is outed they often return with another name, that again obscures their identity.
The best thing you can do to discourage a Troll is ignore their posts.
Dave VE3KCL?


QDX: Anyone else having a problem with image rejection? #qdx

 

I'm seeing signals from 27 KHz below 14.074 MHZ... strong Morse code signals actually (when checked on another receiver).

I understand why it's 27 KHz, and that image rejection depends on the balance between I and Q magnitudes (IC7A and IC7B outputs).

I thought I'd fixed it earlier by removing the solder bridge on IC7, the problem is better but still there.

Before I start poking around with a scope: Has anyone tweaked their image rejection?

73
Andy
WM8Q


Re: YouTuber who wants to review one but impossible to get

 

Guys. Just ignore Albert he delights in this sort of stuff. Tries to provoke a reaction!


Re: YouTuber who wants to review one but impossible to get

 

On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 07:09 PM, Chris Hoffman wrote:
ARRL
Oh yeah, a club that according to open source data only has 22% of US licence holders as members.

They can hardly claim to be an authority on anything with such an abysmal acceptance.



Re: What is on your work bench ?

Laurence Oberman
 

My fun place



On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 2:25 PM <nz0tham@...> wrote:
A Heathkit HW-101 I got from the original owner who built it in September, 1971.? It works fairly well but needs some touch up alignment along with some tweaking of an oscillator crystal or two that have changed frequency a bit over 50 years time.

MY 40 meter QCX+ works great and IMO needs no more work after I installed an audio AGC in it.

73, Bill NZ0T


Re: What is on your work bench ?

 

A Heathkit HW-101 I got from the original owner who built it in September, 1971.? It works fairly well but needs some touch up alignment along with some tweaking of an oscillator crystal or two that have changed frequency a bit over 50 years time.

MY 40 meter QCX+ works great and IMO needs no more work after I installed an audio AGC in it.

73, Bill NZ0T


Re: YouTuber who wants to review one but impossible to get

 

Have you actually watched any of Dave¡¯s videos????

He has produced a very large series of VERY informative videos. ?He is a true Elmer!!!

ARRL values him enough to give him a regular column in QST.?

So if you have nothing good to say, don¡¯t say anything. (or spin the dial)


Re: YouTuber who wants to review one but impossible to get

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Well said Randy
Phil G8PJH?




On 19 Dec 2021, at 18:50, Randy Hall <listk7age@...> wrote:

?
Dave makes a lot more than a dime!
Randy K7AGE

On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 9:26 AM Brian Moore <eaeu366@...> wrote:
Dave runs and maintains a video series on passing the licensing exams and it's by far the best one out there. I don't think he makes a dime for the thousands of hours of hard work he puts into making his licensing videos. I used them to pass my Extra-Class license. He is also a monthly columnist in ARRL's QST magazine and isn't some random U-Tuber with a shaky cellphone camera and poor audio. A lot of novice hams who watch Dave's videos might not have heard about QRP-Labs or have built their own radio gear or tried digital modes yet, so I think helping Dave out with getting a QDX would be a good thing for the whole community.


Re: YouTuber who wants to review one but impossible to get

Laurence Oberman
 

Hey?
Albert ***
I have to say something about?your comment about drivel and brain dead.
That is a pretty rough response. Maybe you are very smart but let me ask with respect, how many?videos have you done and put the hours of effort into.

Please would you share some of your?non drivel so I can review them.BTW I am an extra and an Electronics?Engineer with a masters degree so I will try not to give you a brain?dead review.

Maybe think a bit next time before responding like that.

KB1HKO
Regards
Laurence

On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 12:21 PM Albert Tatlock's Greatest Hits - Vol 1 via <andyfoad=[email protected]> wrote:

On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 05:09 PM, Wolfgang OE1MWW wrote:
In Youtube are already countless 'reviews' (???) of QDX, Look at the headlines,
most are like in the tabloid press. And some try it like in TV: part #1, part #2 in the
hope to gain more views and clicks and so on. Are they done by 'clickbaiters' ?

Yes.

or
self-promotors ?

Yes.


Does mankind need more of those videos?

No.

99.9% of these YT videos are so basic that my cat would feel insulted by them.

Low level drivel for brain dead people.

At least with the like of G0UPL or VK3YE you get decent and original content instead of baby talk.


Re: JTDX is it me for a moment (from THE WHO)

 

On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 06:19 PM, Muhsin Dogrular wrote:
strange, it might be the stars were in the wrong positions :)
Nah, they were busy riding a? Magic Bus.


Re: YouTuber who wants to review one but impossible to get

 

Dave makes a lot more than a dime!
Randy K7AGE

On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 9:26 AM Brian Moore <eaeu366@...> wrote:
Dave runs and maintains a video series on passing the licensing exams and it's by far the best one out there. I don't think he makes a dime for the thousands of hours of hard work he puts into making his licensing videos. I used them to pass my Extra-Class license. He is also a monthly columnist in ARRL's QST magazine and isn't some random U-Tuber with a shaky cellphone camera and poor audio. A lot of novice hams who watch Dave's videos might not have heard about QRP-Labs or have built their own radio gear or tried digital modes yet, so I think helping Dave out with getting a QDX would be a good thing for the whole community.


Re: JTDX is it me for a moment (from THE WHO)

 

Hi I kept the SSD,?changed?the laptop
problem solved.
strange, it might be the stars were in the wrong positions :)
Thanks anyhow
73
muhsin TA1MHS


Re: What is on your work bench ?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Send the QDX to me.... I'll build it for you just for the fun of it.? HI HI
73 Phil WA8YAN



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Dave Edwards <kd2e@...>
Date: 12/19/21 11:44 AM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] What is on your work bench ?

Up until yesterday, I would not even be able to FIT a QDX kit on my workbench!!!

Had to replace low pass filter relays on my TT Omni VI+ yesterday. That took an hour, 2 hours to clean the workbench to be able to spend that hour on the TT!!

Have an Heathkit filter board replace to do next, Swan 700cx broken coil, Drake mic jack replacement, cabinet for QRPlabs clock, about 5 Hayseed cap kits for various rigs and several other kits (in boxes).

I don't know when I'll get to the QDX!!!

All fun though!


......Dave


On 12/19/21 10:23 AM, John Kirby wrote:
?The new QDX? I hope :>))

With several unbuilt qrpLab kits on hand I passed up the QDX again
BUT ...never... pass up an opertunity to tout one of Hans' marvoules kits, the ProRock for example

Where else can you have this much fun for $18
No ATmega328 required, the Picaxe 08m2 ($2.92) will get-er done

My work bench image attached

Christmas / New Year's Eve QRSS project

P? = (5.35)^2 / 50
???? = 0.57? Watt

Snoopy vs. Red Baron *Christmas Bells*"?
>>><<<

Merry Christmas my friends

72 73 74
John
N3AAZ
FM19 DELMARVA Peninsula


Re: ATmega328 unavailability due to global semiconductor crisis

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

How about this:? Hahns could certify one of our stateside QRP Labs experts to do chip upgrades and we make the return to him and never leave the country.? I for one have 2 Atmeg328s now and a 3rd on it's way (according to USPS it has made it to the US from Turkey).? So I could even send a uP to the upgrade center in the US and he could do the upgrade on the same chip and return it to me..... no new chip required.? Or, better yet, I can just learn how to do the upgrade myself.? Just thinkin' out loud (something my XYL says I should never do.)
73 Phil WA8YAN



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: M0PWX <M0PWX@...>
Date: 12/19/21 11:01 AM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] ATmega328 unavailability due to global semiconductor crisis

Might work if Hans had an in country partner, but after seeing the fun of getting kits from turkey to UK and other countries, then sending back to Hans I doubt is a viable option

?

Peter

M0PWX

?

?

From: Andy
Or how about if you purchase a new ATmega328 with new firmware, return your existing ATmega328 for a rebate?

73
Andy Gi0VGV


Re: Batch #2 QDX Question

 

Yes
Hans posted recently it will be available in a few days.?


Batch #2 QDX Question

John N0TA
 

Is there a list of things that will be corrected in the Batch #2 QDX? Will there be an updated manual?
Thanks,
? - 73, John, N0TA


Re: YouTuber who wants to review one but impossible to get

 

Dave runs and maintains a video series on passing the licensing exams and it's by far the best one out there. I don't think he makes a dime for the thousands of hours of hard work he puts into making his licensing videos. I used them to pass my Extra-Class license. He is also a monthly columnist in ARRL's QST magazine and isn't some random U-Tuber with a shaky cellphone camera and poor audio. A lot of novice hams who watch Dave's videos might not have heard about QRP-Labs or have built their own radio gear or tried digital modes yet, so I think helping Dave out with getting a QDX would be a good thing for the whole community.


Re: YouTuber who wants to review one but impossible to get

 

On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 05:09 PM, Wolfgang OE1MWW wrote:
In Youtube are already countless 'reviews' (???) of QDX, Look at the headlines,
most are like in the tabloid press. And some try it like in TV: part #1, part #2 in the
hope to gain more views and clicks and so on. Are they done by 'clickbaiters' ?

Yes.

or
self-promotors ?

Yes.


Does mankind need more of those videos?

No.

99.9% of these YT videos are so basic that my cat would feel insulted by them.

Low level drivel for brain dead people.

At least with the like of G0UPL or VK3YE you get decent and original content instead of baby talk.